DP wrote-
Quote:I'm not even sure why you are arguing with the guy smorgs. If you wanna be a Nana, who gives a shite if he prefers a Granny?
There you go boys! That's an argument eh?
I give a shite and so do a lot of other people. The French even give a gender to words officially. There is a feminising effect of "Nana" and "Nan-nan" which came in during the 70s under PC regulations.
There's something more robust about Grandma and Granny. Like there is with "ruck", "maul" and "scrum".
It is my contention that terms like "Nana" and "Nan-nan", in continual use all through the formative years is feminising. Bringing up sissies.
Explain why the change took place. Granny and Grandma had been in use for donkey's years. The onus is on the revisionists to explain why they adopted these new-fangled terms. Pretending it's natural is pathetic. It is a part of that whole bag of tricks designed to downplay the idea of a male as head of the household.
Very few of those who have adopted them like masculine sports.
DP will have you in frocks lads if you don't watch out.
With one sweet, easy and cheap jibe. Surround yourself with self-complacent babyish words and you will have babyish ideas and, what is much worse, expect everybody else to have.