stuh505
 
Reply Tue 27 Feb, 2007 09:50 pm
Sketch I did today of a friend...it was done as a warmup for a "good" digital painting. This is attempt #3, I imagine I'll do a few more before starting on the real thing, but I rather like this one too.

Note: it actually looks best if you stand about 10 ft back but I understand if your seat is planted Razz

http://img261.imageshack.us/img261/8408/t1mod2wh1.jpg
  • Topic Stats
  • Top Replies
  • Link to this Topic
Type: Discussion • Score: 1 • Views: 3,997 • Replies: 34
No top replies

 
littlek
 
  1  
Reply Tue 27 Feb, 2007 09:51 pm
Gorgeous!
0 Replies
 
stuh505
 
  1  
Reply Tue 27 Feb, 2007 09:52 pm
Wow that was fast, thank you!
0 Replies
 
littlek
 
  1  
Reply Tue 27 Feb, 2007 09:53 pm
Did you erase her upper lip? Or is that a shadow?
0 Replies
 
stuh505
 
  1  
Reply Tue 27 Feb, 2007 10:06 pm
No, it's washed out on purpose but that's a good point, it lacks depth. How's this..

http://img186.imageshack.us/img186/1751/t1mod2yc5.jpg
0 Replies
 
littlek
 
  1  
Reply Tue 27 Feb, 2007 10:11 pm
I meant the line above her upper lip - sorry. There is shading up there, but also something that almost looks like a pencil thin mustache.
0 Replies
 
stuh505
 
  1  
Reply Tue 27 Feb, 2007 10:24 pm
Yeah. That line is to suggest the upper boundary of the lip. It would not really appear as an intensity edge but it is necessary because I did not go into detail on the texture of the lips. It doesn't bother me this way, but I do appreciate your comments because I like this version better.

That's the kind of thing I would change in the real painting where I go into intimate details of skin texture
0 Replies
 
Tico
 
  1  
Reply Wed 28 Feb, 2007 07:46 am
I like it, too.

When I first looked at it, I thought that line that littlek's talking about was wrong too. Then I realized that it's the upper edge of the upper lip -- I was reading the teeth as the upper lip (closed mouth instead of open). So defiinitely do some correction there. If the light is bright enough to wash out the lip detail, then the teeth shouldn't be so delineated. Or, conversely, deepen the tone of the underside of the upper lip.
0 Replies
 
Chai
 
  1  
Reply Wed 28 Feb, 2007 08:16 am
Wow, you're really talented.
0 Replies
 
stuh505
 
  1  
Reply Wed 28 Feb, 2007 09:19 am
Thanks guys. Stay tuned for the painting.
0 Replies
 
sozobe
 
  1  
Reply Wed 28 Feb, 2007 01:05 pm
The shading on her right cheek (left side of image) is very nicely done.
0 Replies
 
tomasso
 
  1  
Reply Wed 28 Feb, 2007 01:17 pm
uhhhhh...... could i have her phone #?

:wink:
0 Replies
 
Letty
 
  1  
Reply Wed 28 Feb, 2007 01:22 pm
Stuh, I see you haven't lost your touch. I rolled my chair back and it is as wonderful up close as ten feet away. I particularly like the sepia tones.
0 Replies
 
stuh505
 
  1  
Reply Wed 28 Feb, 2007 01:54 pm
Thank you Letty. Ok guys here is an update...I like how it is coming out. I don't think it is done yet though.

http://img129.imageshack.us/img129/2905/v4qd5.jpg
0 Replies
 
stuh505
 
  1  
Reply Wed 28 Feb, 2007 02:02 pm
Here's my todo list:

-redo the nose it is too big
-fix sizes of the teeth
-add eyelashes to left eye
-create more detail in iris (possibly)
-increase definition in eyebrow hairs
0 Replies
 
littlek
 
  1  
Reply Wed 28 Feb, 2007 06:34 pm
Tico wrote:
I like it, too.

When I first looked at it, I thought that line that littlek's talking about was wrong too. Then I realized that it's the upper edge of the upper lip -- I was reading the teeth as the upper lip (closed mouth instead of open). So defiinitely do some correction there. If the light is bright enough to wash out the lip detail, then the teeth shouldn't be so delineated. Or, conversely, deepen the tone of the underside of the upper lip.


OH! Those are teeth!
0 Replies
 
Tico
 
  1  
Reply Wed 28 Feb, 2007 06:45 pm
I'm kinda partial to the more abstract version. But if you're going for realism, I think the nose appears to be pushed a little too far to the left.

Still, very good.
0 Replies
 
sozobe
 
  1  
Reply Wed 28 Feb, 2007 06:47 pm
Same here. The sketchier version was more forgiving of inconsistencies. There's some twistiness that isn't right -- eyes/ nose, nose/ mouth, mouth/ neck, etc.
0 Replies
 
sozobe
 
  1  
Reply Wed 28 Feb, 2007 06:52 pm
This section especially doesn't work right now:

http://i34.photobucket.com/albums/d130/sozobe/a2kgirlsection.jpg

In the sketch it was just kind of shadow, your eye could get the proportions right, but in this more articulated version the edge of her neck is much too far to the right and her neck seems way too skinny.
0 Replies
 
stuh505
 
  1  
Reply Wed 28 Feb, 2007 07:09 pm
Yeah I'm noticing a lot of stuff like that when I flip the canvas, so I'll get around to it. Thanks for comments
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

My grandfathers cameras - Discussion by shewolfnm
Quetzecoatal Returns to Mexico - Discussion by Asherman
Riding the Line - Discussion by Asherman
Monument - Discussion by Asherman
Coming of the Kachina - Discussion by Asherman
Shan An (Mountain Peace) - Discussion by Asherman
Corn Maiden - Discussion by Asherman
Canyons - Discussion by Asherman
Snake River - Discussion by Asherman
Godess - Discussion by Asherman
Asherman Art - Discussion by Asherman
 
  1. Forums
  2. » Sketch
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.03 seconds on 04/27/2024 at 06:56:50