@Izzie,
Hi, Izzie.
All Roberta's photos can be clicked on and the url found for where she got the photo, that's a kind of attribution. For example, on Roberta's first post on this thread:
http://www.hummingbirds.net/images/oomen1.jpg - you know that's from
www.hummingbirds.net.
Your images when clicked on show your photobucket site as the url.
I don't know if Robert's photo was from his own flicker site or someone else's, but I'm thinking it is like Roberta's and most of our photo urls, the site where he saw the photo.
I don't say that no such attribution is "wrong", and I certainly wasn't meaning for folks to stop posting photos.
I would, though, be pissed if I had my own photographs online that could be found, say, at google images, and saw them in some online forum as from someone else's photobucket site, without reference to my image website.
It isn't hard to say "photo from
www.hummingbirds.net".
I'm sure I'm not all so perfect in this - I'm just saying it can matter to some photographers to have the website attributed, if not their own name.