25
   

FOLLOWING THE EUROPEAN UNION

 
 
australia
 
  1  
Mon 20 Dec, 2004 03:57 pm
I will agree with whatever you guys say. I can't be bothered to argue.
0 Replies
 
australia
 
  1  
Mon 20 Dec, 2004 03:58 pm
I will agree with whatever you guys say. I can't be bothered to argue.
0 Replies
 
Walter Hinteler
 
  1  
Tue 21 Dec, 2004 01:40 am
Something "between the USA and Germany/Europe":

Quote:
20.12.2004

Targeting Santa

http://www.dw-world.com/dw/image/0,1587,1431294_6,00.jpg

Groups in Germany and Austria have launched campaigns protesting the commercialization of Christmas. The target of their ire is Santa, an American import who they say doesn't represent what the holiday is all about.

Bettina Schade says she doesn't have anything personal against Santa Claus. In fact, she likes a lot of things about today's celebrations of Christmas -- the lighted trees, the gold ornaments, the silver stars.

But all the material things, the hectic rush to buy gifts, and the ubiquity of the bearded man in the red suit are taking away from the core meaning of Christmas. She'd like to see things changed, or at least toned down a little.

"The Christian origins of Christmas, like the birth of Jesus, have receded into the background," she said. "It's becoming more and more a festival that is reduced to simply worldly gifts and to commerce."

She is part of a campaign called the Frankfurter Nicholas Initiative, founded by a Roman Catholic priest in Frankfurt, Eckhard Bieger. Alarmed by the growing commercialization of Christmas in Germany, he launched the initiative that's aimed at putting St. Nicholas, a fourth-century monk, back in the Christmas spotlight where he used to be.

It's an uphill battle, however, since St. Nicholas' successor, the American-inspired jolly old St. Nick, or Santa Claus, has been edging the miter-wearing historical figure out of the German Christmas landscape of late. German kids do set out their shoes on Dec. 6 for St. Nicholas to fill them with sweets, but that holiday now pales in comparison with Santa's sleigh-ride night.

http://www.dw-world.com/dw/image/0,1587,1431281_7,00.jpg
[size=8]Chocolate Santa dressed up at St. Nicholas[/size]

To counter this trend, the Frankfurt Initiative along with another Catholic organization, the Bonifatiuswerk, has launched pro-Nicholas campaign. They show kids how to turn chocolate Santas into chocolate Nicholas figures and have been handing out stickers in stores and at Christmas markets featuring a bar cutting across an image of Kriss Kringle. It proclaims the area a "Santa-Free Zone."

"Santa Claus is a creation of the advertising industry and Coca-Cola to further commercial interests," Bieger told Reuters.


Santa's origins

The image of Santa most known today -- fat, white bearded and in a red suit -- is indeed a creation of the Coca-Cola company, which was looking for a new figure to use in its advertising campaigns in the 1930s and 1940s.

http://www.dw-world.com/dw/image/0,1587,347675_7,00.jpg
Santa Claus, inspired by Coke

A Swedish-American artist, Haddon Sundblom, created the jolly, benevolent character for Coke based on a previous figure created for Harper's Weekly in the 19th century by Thomas Nast, a German immigrant to the United States.

For the small but vocal anti-Santa movement, which has also gained momentum in Austria, Santa Claus is a poor reflection of the original St. Nicholas, who is believed to have been a fourth-century bishop in Myra, in present-day Turkey. He had a reputation for generosity and kindness, which gave rise to legends of miracles that he performed for the poor and unhappy.

"St. Nicholas was a man who helped the poor, saved people who were unjustly condemned, freed prisoners," Schade said. "You could say he was a forerunner of Amnesty International. Santa is much less than that -- just about giving gifts."


True meaning

The church-affiliated groups believe focusing on St. Nicholas can remind people about the core values of Christmas, such as family, sharing and doing good for others. They feel the time of the year that should encourage people to be thoughtful and contemplative is being drowned out by Jingle Bells and ho ho ho.

http://www.dw-world.com/dw/image/0,1587,1431577_6,00.jpg

"What is the meaning of Christmas? The meaning of Christmas is, in the first place, not shopping," said Reverend Volker Faigle, a Lutheran pastor and representative of the Protestant church to the German government and the EU.

He said the Protestant church also did not hold any particular grudge against Santa, or the gift-giving he represents. It is just a matter of keeping what many see as the excesses of the Christmas season in check.

"Our shopping centers want to make money and they have a right to make money, we have no problem with that," he said. "But if you already start the season in September, people think Christmas is just about shopping, shopping, shopping. Then we think Christmas is misused."

The Protestant Church has started a program called "Christmas in December," selling things such as Advent calendars without the chocolates and cartoon figures. Church representatives even approached German retailers and marketers asking them to keep the Christmas overkill in check.


Crucial for sales

But according to the German retailing association, Christmas is a critical time for retailers: What some see as Santa surfeit, shop owners see as a lifeline.

From the looks of shops in Berlin, retailers have not held back when it comes to promoting Santa and gift-giving. That is perhaps understandable, since according to the HDE retailers' association, about 20 percent of annual sales are made in the last two months of the year.

http://www.dw-world.com/dw/image/0,1587,1428866_6,00.jpg
Christmas shoppers

"We didn't have a good year in 2004, but in December the mood has picked up," said Hubertus Pellengahr, HDE's spokesman. "Presents are being bought, people have finally found a little joy in buying again."

But talking to shoppers in front of one of Berlin's premier department stores, KaDeWe, it appears some holiday fatigue might be setting in.

"There are many good things that comes over from America, but this kitsch Christmas style is getting the upper hand," said Hella Wichman, 55, who was visiting Berlin from Hamburg and doing a little window shopping.

"There's too much of everything, too many lights, too much money spent, too much Santa," she said. "There is nothing thoughtful about Christmas anymore."

But jolly old Santa himself, talking to children amid glittering ornaments on KaDeWe's fifth floor, finds the groups who would like to lower his profile somewhat alarmist. He said there's room for both him and his predecessor St. Nicholas during the Yuletide season.


"Santa brings joy, and children grow up so fast anyway," he said. "Why not let them enjoy his magic for as long as they can?"
Source
0 Replies
 
australia
 
  1  
Tue 21 Dec, 2004 01:47 am
Walter, 5 hours and i am on my way. Are you still okay to pick me up at munich airport?
0 Replies
 
cicerone imposter
 
  1  
Wed 5 Jan, 2005 11:41 pm
Cautious EU greets Cuba gesture

Many EU nations believe dialogue is the best approach to Cuba
A European Union commission spokeswoman has called Cuba's move to re-establish contacts with eight EU countries "a step in the right direction".
Monday's move signalled a thaw in the "cocktail wars" which have stymied Cuba-EU ties since June 2003.

The dispute boiled over when eight European embassies began inviting Cuban dissidents to parties in protest at Cuba's human rights record.

A prominent dissident said the European gesture had served its purpose.

Piecemeal peacemaking

The spokeswoman for the commission - the EU's executive arm - said Cuba's decision to re-establish contacts with eight European capitals was a "positive development".

Changes in Cuba depend on us, on the people of Cuba

Oswaldo Paya
Leading Cuban dissident
But Francoise Le Bail said the commission wanted a full resumption of ties, reported the AFP news agency.

The Czech Republic, the Netherlands, Poland and Slovakia remain out of Cuba's favour. Diplomats say those nations have opposed a softening of ties with Havana.

The dispute began over Cuba's imprisonment of 75 dissidents - which Havana says are mercenaries in the pay of Washington - and its execution of three men who attempted to hijack a ferry.

The European Union announced it would limit high-level government contacts in response. It also began inviting Cuban dissidents to national-day celebrations at embassies.

Havana was so enraged by the move that it cut contacts with all European embassies except Belgium, which did not invite dissidents to events.

European rethink

But Spain has spearheaded a new approach calling for increased European dialogue with Cuba.

And last month Brussels proposed a compromise: not to ask any Cubans to future receptions, whether they are government ministers or dissidents.


Paul Rivero is one of the 14 of 75 dissidents Cuba has released
In Havana, Oswaldo Paya, one of the leaders of the dissident Varela democracy project, played down the apparently conciliatory air.

"The EU had made the decision to invite us as an expression of solidarity with the people of Cuba, as a gesture of displeasure with the detention of our 75 brothers," Mr Paya told the Associated Press news agency.

He said change in Cuba depended "on us, on the people of Cuba".

He said that within the EU there was "the goodwill to contribute" to such change.
0 Replies
 
Walter Hinteler
 
  1  
Thu 6 Jan, 2005 03:26 am
Quote:
Tsunami aid likely to be given EU budget flexibility

06.01.2005 - 09:57 CET | By Honor Mahony The European Commission has indicated that it is not likely to punish EU countries that breach the rules governing the euro as a result of giving aid to victims of the tsunami disaster in south east Asia.

Spokesperson for monetary affairs Amelia Torres on Wednesday (6 January) said that the Commission was expected to treat the aid as an exception.

"All expenses must be counted during the assessment of the size of the budget deficit," she said, according to Reuters. "But the tsunami aid may be treated as an exceptional circumstance."

The European Commission is in charge of making sure that member states adhere to the euro rules - known as the stability pact. These say that countries may not run budget deficits of more than 3 per cent of gross domestic product (GDP).

Ms Torres' comments came as Germany on Wednesday pledged 500m euro for the tsunami victims.

A country may escape being punished for breaching the stability pact if its deficit is caused by a natural disaster or severe economic recession.

Berlin has breached the stability pact three times in a row and is pushing for a more flexible interpretation of the rules to allow for the exclusion of certain types of spending, such as for reseach, from deficit calculations.

Court case?
Germany's repeated breaking of the pact rules is having repercussions elsewhere in the EU.

Liberal members of the European Parliament want to take the European Commission to court for letting Germany and the other serial pact breacher, France, off the hook last month.

In December, monetary affairs commission Joaquin Almunia announced that the Commission would not be pursuing excessive deficit procedures against Paris and Berlin although the countries may break the 3 per cent ceiling in 2005, as well.

The liberal group, the third biggest in the European Parliament, is using a paper by Cologne-based Professor Bernhard Kempen to back up their calls.

Professor Kempen concluded that the liberals would have a case for going to court.

Silvana Koch-Merin, leader of the German FDP faction in the Liberal group, said "Almunia buckled under pressure from the German and French governments. That is a scandal. The Commission is supposed to be the guardian of the [EU] treaties" .

The Liberals will now try and rally support from other groups in the European Parliament.
Source
0 Replies
 
Walter Hinteler
 
  1  
Tue 11 Jan, 2005 12:40 pm
Quote:
A Franco-German Anti-Turkey Pact


The head of the Christian Social Union (CSU), Edmund Stoiber and new Chairman of the ruling French Conservatives, Nicolas Sarkozy have made a mutual display of their opposition to Turkey joining the European Union

http://www.dw-world.de/dw/image/0,1587,403220_6,00.jpg
Edmund Stoiber remains firm in his opposition to Turkey joining the EU

Joining Stoiber at a CSU meeting in the Alpine location of Wildbad Kreuth, the French politician made no bones about his support for the German conservatives' controversial opposition to Turkey being granted accession to the European Union.

Speaking after the meeting, Stoiber said that neither he nor his French colleague would entertain the idea of forging a political union with countries of what he termed "a different structure."

He said the European Union could not support membership from countries such as Turkey, Ukraine or Belarus, and added that the only way to work with such unlikely candidates would be to create privileged partnerships.

Stoiber and his CSU are opposed to having Turkey join the European party on the grounds that the new constitution would give Turkey, as a densely-populated country, too much say in the overall scheme of things.

Expanding informal understanding

Stoiber said that his party would be willing to give the green light to the European constitution only if it granted the German parliament, the Bundestag a more influential voice on the European stage. But in the absence of such a clause, some 18 CSU members of parliament have threatened to vote against ratifying the constitution treaty.

http://www.dw-world.de/dw/image/0,1587,1411151_6,00.jpg
Nicolas Sarkozy
The two men made a joint stand for an expansion of the existing Franco-German axis. Stoiber said it was time for some of the larger countries, such as Britain, Italy, Spain and Poland, to reach informal agreement among themselves. But Sarkozy (photo, above) said any such expansion should not be of an exclusive nature.
Source
0 Replies
 
HofT
 
  1  
Tue 11 Jan, 2005 12:47 pm
Walter - thanks. Contrary to popular belief the US is ultimately aligned with the Russian position which consists of forever blocking any Asian (including territories in the Caucasus mountains not previously annexed by the Czars) nations from joining the EU.

The new Ukrainian position on their Iraq troops serves as a reminder that all is not as it seems on that front <G>
0 Replies
 
georgeob1
 
  1  
Tue 11 Jan, 2005 12:54 pm
The interplay of these issues and the occasionally evident EU desire to form an entity that could seriously challenge what some regard as an undesirable U.S. domination of world affairs, will likely shape the future alignments of nations that may well dominate the 21st century, just as did WWI shape the 20th. Turkey may emerge in alliance with the U.S. and Russia.
0 Replies
 
cicerone imposter
 
  1  
Tue 11 Jan, 2005 12:59 pm
Interesting bed-fellows indeed! Wink
0 Replies
 
Walter Hinteler
 
  1  
Wed 26 Jan, 2005 01:23 pm
British Foreign Minister Jack Straw today unveiled the question voters will be asked in an upcoming referendum on the EU Constitution:" Should the United Kingdom approve the treaty establishing a Constitution for the European Union?" Presenting the referendum text to Parliament, Straw said:
The choice before the British people, when the referendum comes, will be fundamental to our national interests. If we reject this treaty, Britain will be isolated and weak in Europe - going cap in hand to our partners, and maybe forced, in time, to accept some kind of second-class status in Europe as others go ahead without us.

But if we endorse the new treaty, we fix the framework for our kind of Europe, one in which Britain is more prosperous and more powerful.

That is the patriotic case - for a Britain which takes its opportunities, builds on what we have achieved in Europe, and uses our alliances to make us more powerful and more influential in the world.

For too long, those who seek to isolate Britain from the rest of Europe have laid claim to all the best patriotic tunes. But the consequences of what they advocate should be every patriot's nightmare: a weaker and isolated Britain whose future prosperity and security is put at risk. Pro-Europeans should reclaim the flag and put the patriotic case for the Constitutional Treaty. British power depends on it.



The Conservative Party opposes the Constitution and warns that it will lead to a European superstate. Other parties in favor of the Constitution echo Straw's sentiments that rejecting the EU Constitution will isolate Britain and could lead to the UK being forced to leave the EU.

An exact date for the referendum has not yet been set. In an interview with the Financial Times today, Prime Minister Tony Blair said the referendum would be held "some time in 2006 but when, I don't know."


Quote:
UK government fires starting gun for referendum campaign

26.01.2005 - 17:44 CET | By Richard Carter

EUOBSERVER / BRUSSELS - The UK Government has published the question voters will be asked in the forthcoming UK referendum on the EU Constitution, kicking off what promises to be a long and bitter battle.

The question on the ballot sheet will be as follows: "Should the United Kingdom approve the treaty establishing a Constitution for the European Union?"

Presenting the question today (26 January) in the UK parliament, Foreign Minister Jack Straw said that the UK would be "isolated and weak" if the Constitution were rejected.

Starting gun
And the publication of the question provoked a flurry of statements from both those in favour of the Constitution and those against, effectively starting the campaign.

The opposition Conservative Party, which opposes the Constitution, said that the question appears straightforward but has warned that the Constitution will lead to a European superstate.

They have said that if they win the election next Spring, a vote will be held by October.

Britain in Europe, a pro-Constitution campaign group, also welcomed the simplicity of the question and said it hoped that voters could now concentrate on the "important issues facing Britain and its relationship with its closest partners in Europe".

Their Director, Lucy Powell, said in a statement, "There will be a stark choice facing voters: to continue with our present course of active engagement in Europe or take a step into the unknown by rejecting the Treaty".

"The first course has served us well for over 30 years, ensuring British prosperity and higher living standards. The second course of action is fraught with uncertainty and would be a leap into the unknown".

Vote No's Neil O Brien said, "Tony Blair promised a great campaign in which 'battle would be joined'. Now the Government is reduced to trying to sneak out the EU Constitution bill without even a press conference".

"The reality is that the Government doesn't want to discuss the EU Constitution ahead of the election because they know it is extremely unpopular with voters and with business".

Early 2006
An exact date for the poll has not yet been set, but insiders believe that the vote will be held in early 2006.

In an interview in today's Financial Times, UK Prime Minister Blair said that the referendum would be held "some time in 2006 but when, I don't know".

The UK is due to hold an election early this spring - probably in May - and it will take over the Presidency of the EU on 1 July this year, so the vote is almost certain to be after these two events.

The timing may prove to be crucial.

The UK is arguably the country most likely to vote against the Constitution, which needs to be ratified by all 25 member states to come into force.

"Yes" campaigners are hoping that the UK will vote last on the issue, with the text already ratified by all 24 other member states. This would increase the pressure on the UK to vote "yes" and strengthen the argument that the UK would be isolated in the event of a "no" vote.

But it looks as if Denmark, Poland and the Czech Republic may vote after the UK, nullifying this effect.

Strong feelings against the Constitution
Whenever the poll is held, the Government is set for a tough task in persuading a sceptical British public of the merits of the Constitution.

Current opinion polls show that roughly two-thirds are against the Treaty. However, people close to the debate say privately that the gap will narrow after the election (which Mr Blair is widely expected to win), when the Government steps up its campaign.

Big battle ahead
Those arguing in favour of the Constitution include most Labour MPs, the Liberal Democrats (third party) and the Britain in Europe campaign.

They argue that Britain will be isolated if it fails to ratify the Treaty and that the UK may be forced to leave the EU.

Those arguing against include the Conservative Party, the UK Independence Party (UKIP), the Green Party, the Scottish National Party and the No campaign.

They say that signing the Constitution would give too many powers away to Brussels.
Source
0 Replies
 
Lash
 
  1  
Thu 27 Jan, 2005 06:39 pm
It would be interesting to hear opinions of Europeans, British and otherwise. Should England sign on? Do British members feel they are losing sovereignty to the EU....(read France.)...No! I don'tknow who wrote that. I mean the EU.








....(France).
0 Replies
 
georgeob1
 
  1  
Thu 27 Jan, 2005 09:15 pm
I find the relative absence of dissention among Europeans concerning the growing Power and assertiveness of the organs of EU government. Commission, Parliament, and Bureaucracies, quite remarkable. Overall they have gone much farther with a confederation-type government ("shared sovereignty" and all that) than I had thought possible. Even the accession of ten new member states, all generally at a lower state of economic development than the "Old Europe' average, has gone so far without truly serious discord.

At some point it seems to me that they will have to face the inherent instability of a Confederation of independent or quasi-sovereign states, and either break up or move on to at least a Federal structure of government. At some point, shared use of the British & French vetoes in the Security Council and shared oversight of British & French nuclear weapons, will become issues. Will the French view of a Europe led by them and their junior partner, Germany continue and prevail? So far the principal national governments are actively pro EU - as Walter's posts above demonstrate. Will the public opinion in these countries enable that to continue or will Euro skeptical political parties come to power?

Will the British finally let go of their traditional wariness of irrevocable commitment to the continent? Or will they try to continue life on the razor's edge?

All of these countries (and the U.S. as well) face serious demographic stresses on their presently unsustainable social welfare programs. The degree and immediacy of these problems are different in Britain, Germany, France and the new member states, but the basic problems are common. How might these so far unrelated national political struggles be affected by new advances in common EU social programs?

I certainly don't know the answers to any of these questions, and I would welcome the perceptions and analysis of our European friends here.
0 Replies
 
Walter Hinteler
 
  1  
Fri 28 Jan, 2005 02:44 am
Quote:
A House Divided
The Orange Revolution is carving new fault lines between Old and New Europe that have nothing to do with war in Iraq.
Source
0 Replies
 
Walter Hinteler
 
  1  
Mon 31 Jan, 2005 02:55 pm
Quote:
EU lifts Cuba diplomatic freeze

The EU has decided to temporarily lift a diplomatic freeze imposed on Cuba shortly after a crackdown which saw 75 dissidents jailed in March 2003.


The suspension, which is due to be reviewed by July, follows the recent release of several dissidents.

But the union has called for the "urgent" and "unconditional" release of all dissidents detained in Cuba.

EU foreign ministers have also pledged to boost relations with critics of Cuban President Fidel Castro.

The decision was announced by Jean Asselborn, foreign minister of Luxembourg, which currently holds the EU's rotating presidency.

"We highlighted the need to support a process leading to democratic pluralism, respect for human rights and basic freedoms," Mr Asselborn said.

'Cocktail war'

A statement approved by EU foreign ministers said the union was willing to resume "a constructive dialogue with the Cuban authorities aiming at tangible results in the political, economic, human rights and co-operation sphere".

But it underlined it would develop "more intense relations with the peaceful political opposition and broader layers of civil society in Cuba".

The sanctions were imposed on the Caribbean island after a crackdown that led to 75 dissidents being handed long prison sentences, and the summary execution of three Cubans found guilty of hijacking a ferry.

The EU banned high-level governmental visits and participations in cultural events in Cuba and started inviting dissidents to embassy parties, leading to further retaliations by Cuban authorities.

But after releasing several dissidents over the past few months, Cuba announced earlier this month that it had restored diplomatic ties with EU diplomats on the island.

Spain' s Socialist government led by Prime Minister Jose Luis Rodriguez Zapatero has played a crucial role in promoting a review of EU policy towards Cuba.
Source
0 Replies
 
georgeob1
 
  1  
Mon 31 Jan, 2005 03:07 pm
Doesn't appear to me that the EU is being given any important issues in foreign relations if this is an indication. We are all just waiting for the old tyrant to die. Then we will have to wait until a generation enervated by a lifetime of socialism itself dies. Poor Cuba.
0 Replies
 
fbaezer
 
  1  
Mon 31 Jan, 2005 06:16 pm
Lash wrote:
Do British members feel they are losing sovereignty to the EU....(read France.)?


Oh, dear Lash, this francophobia is tiresome.
It should read: Do British members feel they are losing sovereignty to the EU....(read Germany?). Wink


georgeob1 wrote:
We are all just waiting for the old tyrant to die. Then we will have to wait until a generation enervated by a lifetime of socialism itself dies. Poor Cuba.


I'm more optimistic than you on that one, goergeob1. The bulk of the generation enervated by a lifetime of socialism is quite fed up with socialism, IMHO.
0 Replies
 
georgeob1
 
  1  
Mon 31 Jan, 2005 06:33 pm
fbaezer wrote:

I'm more optimistic than you on that one, goergeob1. The bulk of the generation enervated by a lifetime of socialism is quite fed up with socialism, IMHO.


I sincerely hope you are correct, Fbaezer. When I consider the difficulties Germany experienced with the Ossies, I become pessimistic (if 40 years of socialism could do that to Germans, consider what it might do....). On the other hand that might be because the Germans take everything seriously. Perhaps the Cubans are relatively immune --- but I am skeptical.

So nice to read today that those wise EU Foreign Ministers have agreed to restore relations with Fidel. How wise and thoughtful of them.
0 Replies
 
nimh
 
  1  
Tue 1 Feb, 2005 04:52 am
Quote:
A House Divided
The Orange Revolution is carving new fault lines between Old and New Europe that have nothing to do with war in Iraq.

Interesting article, Walter. I didnt know. I've heard or read nothing about an anti-Polish/Lithuanian backlash over the Ukraine issue here. Zilch. Surprised to read how it plays a role in France, Spain, whereever.

In any case, I'm on the Poles' and Lithuanians' side, here, obviously. Mystery to me why we should head for a Turkish accession, but fend off the Ukrainians who, for Gods sake, want to "knock down our doors" to get in! <shakes head>
0 Replies
 
blatham
 
  1  
Tue 1 Feb, 2005 05:12 am
Not sure how many of you have seen this brilliant piece by Judt. Quite aside from the analysis of the evolving relationship between America and the EU, there is a lot of very good discussion on the EU itself, its problems and promises.

Quote:
Europe vs. America
http://www.nybooks.com/articles/17726
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

THE BRITISH THREAD II - Discussion by jespah
The United Kingdom's bye bye to Europe - Discussion by Walter Hinteler
Sinti and Roma: History repeating - Discussion by Walter Hinteler
[B]THE RED ROSE COUNTY[/B] - Discussion by Mathos
Leaving today for Europe - Discussion by cicerone imposter
So you think you know Europe? - Discussion by nimh
 
Copyright © 2025 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.06 seconds on 07/15/2025 at 02:44:29