25
   

FOLLOWING THE EUROPEAN UNION

 
 
Walter Hinteler
 
  1  
Mon 19 Mar, 2007 01:17 am
This quote from report in today's Independent sums up the latest nicely, I think:

Quote:
The unpredictable French presidential race may be about to confound the pundits yet again. The Socialist candidate, Ségoléne Royal, written off by some commentators and struggling to hold together her campaign, regained ground in a batch of opinion polls over the weekend.

The centrist candidate, François Bayrou, surging since early February, and neck and neck with Mme Royal last week, has begun to lose momentum and even fall back.

Whether this represents another chance in the mood of a volatile, even perverse, electorate is unclear.
0 Replies
 
Walter Hinteler
 
  1  
Mon 19 Mar, 2007 01:31 am
Quote:
The governing Center Party won Finland's parliamentary election by a razor-thin margin yesterday but the main opposition Conservatives made strong gains to claim a possible spot in the next ruling coalition.

The left-leaning Social Democrats, currently the Center Party's main coalition partner, were the big losers and could end up in opposition for the first time since 1995.

However, any government change was not expected to yield major changes in the country of 5.3 million, one of Europe's most homogenous societies.
Source
0 Replies
 
georgeob1
 
  1  
Mon 19 Mar, 2007 02:25 pm
So contemporary European politics are (at least today) dominated by "increasingly conservative" Finns and "volatile, even perverse" Frenchmen.

I would never have guessed... Smile
0 Replies
 
nimh
 
  1  
Mon 19 Mar, 2007 05:40 pm
georgeob1 wrote:
Extensive government social problems generally involve high taxation and subtle losses of freedom.

Freudian slip of the tongue there I think - I'm sure you meant to write "social programs" :wink:

I think your description has too much of a facile superimposition of a general ideological view onto the individualities of the situation, which may or may not fit the template.

Eg, despite your rendering of the choice as being between a high-tax social programs system and a lean small-government alternative, we see the Gyurcsany government slashing the social system and raising taxes - drastically.

georgeob1 wrote:
Nimh, What you have described are indeed problems. however, are the competing political alternatives any better? Artificially sustaining uneconomic industries theough government taxation and subsidy merely promotes misallocation of resources and less output for all.

Note - we are not talking about "artificially sustaining uneconomic industries" - at least I haven't mentioned any such. I think most of that has been stopped a long time ago.

Though I dare point out that the US provides ample subsidies and protectionist trade barriers for various sections of its economy. Ethanol comes to mind, as do some farming sectors that would be hard hit if they'd have to face true free market competition from their colleagues in countries like Brazil. Its a choice that can be made, and is made, even within the most capitalist countries.

What I did mention, by ways of concrete example, was the apparent slashing into a government-provided social service (the presence of psychological counsellors in schools) that would, when maintained, most probably pay itself off in the long term (fewer school drop-outs ending up on government benefits later in life, fewer people with psychological problems as adults, which must help prevent incapacity, crime etc).

What I also mentioned as concrete example was the doubling of heating prices in one blow. You might cheer this on as it means "real market prices" will now be charged, but with low-income renters now facing heating prices higher than their income, the social costs are predictable and, in the mid-term, expensive as well (homelessness, social dislocation, people with spiralling debts, etc).

Whereas not every protection against market prices need necessarily spell some automatic doom of economic stagnation. It is perfectly possible to integrate elements of social protection without sticking a spanner in the economic wheels. For example, the Netherlands has rent controls in place both for public and private rental housing, and not just has it not spelled doom for its economy, housing shortages in Dutch cities are not more severe than in comparable cities in England.

Basically, I dont agree with the notion that portrays the kind of "reforms" undertaken by, for example, the Gyurcsany government now, as some sort of preordained, unavoidable natural law. I think thats an ideological construct. I think that it also shows a doctrinary, ideological world view to portray every economic policy decision as some sort of binary choice between opposite models; as if Western Europe doesn't offer a rich variety of differing ways to use the market economy model in principle, yet mitigate and compensate it in various different ways.

Even if I would buy into this notion, however, that still is no excuse for the rampant euphemisation of these "reform" policies in the media. If you do think that slashing budget cuts and surging basic costs of living are an unavoidable phase in a country's adaptation to the 'natural' laws of economic development, fine, but then at least describe it in honest terms rather than cloaking it in this ever so benevolent-sounding jargon of "reform", "modernisation" and "restructuring".

Because that just reminds me of the communists of erstwhile, who were also such masters in branding sweeping dismantlings of the lives people lived with gloriously abstract, benign-sounding labels. I guess it comes with the territory of any "we know what's best for you" ideological world view. Purist market economy ideologues, purist state economy ideologues, ideologues are ideologues.

Realistically, I can of course well imagine why politicians are none too eager to be honest about what they propose. But what gets to me is that whole chunks of the mainstream media have adopted this newspeak euphemisation as well. That is I think one of the ignored scandals of the last two decades or so.
0 Replies
 
nimh
 
  1  
Mon 19 Mar, 2007 05:50 pm
georgeob1 wrote:
Royal's rather strident socialist rhetoric has made it easy for a strong centrist argument (and candidate) to emerge.

<raises eyebrow>

Are we talking the same Segolene Royal?

The, what was the euphemism used generally, "modernist", "reform-oriented" politician who is widely seen to be rather on the centre-right of her party?

The politician who is distrusted by many rank-and-file members of the Parti Socialiste because of her "liberal" (eg, market-friendly) and relatively Atlanticist leanings? The woman who people hoped/feared would take the main leftwing party in France in a rather Blairite direction?

I know she's reconciled with the "born-again" leftist Laurent Fabius in time for the election campaign, but...

I think Royal's decline in prospective voter favour has a lot to do with a sense of drift in her campaign, a string of blunders abroad that reinforced doubts about her competency on foreign affairs, a sense that she's a figurehead of a divided party thats not really behind her, and perhaps an unreadiness to perceive of a woman as a possible strong leader, but "strident socialist rhetoric", no.

If only, then at least she'd have that going for her. Mr. Green
0 Replies
 
Walter Hinteler
 
  1  
Tue 20 Mar, 2007 12:05 am
Meanwhile in Britain, the "new green" conservatives
got a 10-point lead ...

http://i10.tinypic.com/3zqyejm.jpg
0 Replies
 
Walter Hinteler
 
  1  
Tue 20 Mar, 2007 12:40 am
From today's Guardian:
Quote:
The Polish government is to ban discussions on homosexuality in schools and educational institutions across the country, with teachers facing the sack, fines or imprisonment.
Poland's education minister, Roman Giertych, has said he hopes to introduce a similar ban across the entire EU.
0 Replies
 
Walter Hinteler
 
  1  
Tue 20 Mar, 2007 12:47 am
And in the same paper, the German ambassador to the UK attacks the USA:

Quote:
A European moment

With the US crippled by a crisis of international credibility and legitimacy, the EU must take the lead

Wolfgang Ischinger
Tuesday March 20, 2007
The Guardian


In 1990, Charles Krauthammer published his famous essay on the "unipolar moment", about America's future power to shape the world at will: "The true geopolitical structure of the post-cold-war world ... is a single pole of world power that consists of the United States at the apex of the industrial west."

In 2007, most will agree that the unipolar moment, if it ever existed, has passed. That is only underlined by the failure of the "unipolar experiment" - aka the invasion and occupation of Iraq - and the damage it inflicted on Washington's international legitimacy and credibility. For traditional European Atlanticists, it does not make for pleasant viewing to see US leadership damaged and questioned. But expectations are low today regarding its ability to lead the international community. In the face of a US credibility crisis, some look to Europe to take the initiative and fill the vacuum. Can 2007 be a "European moment"?

Critics will contend that the EU is in no shape to lead, as it continues to grapple with its constitutional crisis, its inability to provide clear foreign policy guidance and its lack of military power. But on three critical global issues - nuclear non-proliferation, Middle East peace and climate change - it is better placed than anyone.

Opening nuclear negotiations with Tehran was a European idea in 2004, initially given a lukewarm reception by Washington. More recently, as the EU3 (Britain, France and Germany) approach began to be seen as the only game in town, Washington has offered more active support, but so far always stopping short of speaking to Tehran directly on the nuclear issue. Bringing Russia and China on board was, again, a European initiative. If a solution emerges, it is likely to be European-brokered. There is much greater cohesion among Europeans on Iran than there was on Iraq five years ago: on Iran, the EU will not be split.

When it comes to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, barely any progress has been made over the past six years. The adoption of the "road map" and the creation of the quartet (EU, Russia, UN, US) were born of European ideas. They were formally endorsed by Washington, but never seriously pursued and later quasi-abandoned. This year, a major effort by the current EU presidency has led to the quartet's revival, and more diplomatic activity. Many in the region doubt, however, whether Washington will have the determination necessary for a breakthrough in the peace process without even more active input from Europe. The European willingness to take more responsibility in the region, and to play a role in ending the Lebanon war in 2006, including the deployment of military forces to the country, was an eye-opener for many - in the region and beyond.

On climate change, the critical question is who can - and will - lead the international debate about a post-Kyoto regime. If a deal can be hammered out in 2007, and if it has any chance of endorsement in the US, China and India, it will most likely be the result of the EU's ongoing efforts to move ahead with ambitious goals on CO2 emissions and energy saving.

But would a European moment in 2007 not be interpreted as a challenge to the global leadership role of the US?

Let's not get carried away: without active American support, political and military, none of these major challenges can be resolved. Europeans should beware the hubris of challenging the US. But the European moment could actually enhance the transatlantic relationship by offering, at a crucial juncture, elements that America currently lacks: legitimacy and credibility. That is why our American friends should encourage European initiatives, embrace a European willingness to lead, and welcome the European moment.

· Wolfgang Ischinger is the German ambassador to Britain and served as ambassador to the US from 2001 to 2006

[email protected]
0 Replies
 
nimh
 
  1  
Tue 20 Mar, 2007 09:05 am
French presidential elections

The deadline has passed, the list is in; it is now known which candidates have supplied enough signatures to qualify for the presidential elections.

Elysée : douze candidats sur la ligne de départ

These are the twelve candidates that will stand. I'll add a political label for each and the equivalent 2002 (first round) result - in red if they stood themselves in 2002 or in orange if another politician from the same party stood.

  • François Bayrou (UDF) - liberal, 2002: 6,8%
  • Olivier Besancenot (Ligue Communiste Révolutionnaire) - trotskyite, 2002: 4,3%
  • José Bové (Altermondialiste) - antiglobalist, 2002: --
  • Marie-George Buffet (PCF) - communist, 2002: 3,4%
  • Arlette Laguiller (Lutte Ouvrière) - trotskyite, 2002: 5,8%
  • Jean-Marie Le Pen (Front national) - far right, 2002: 16,9%
  • Frédéric Nihous (Chasse, pêche nature, traditions) - countryside, 2002: 4,2%
  • Ségolène Royal (PS) - socialist, 2002: 16,2%
  • Nicolas Sarkozy (UMP) - conservative, 2002: 19,9%
  • Gérard Schivardi ("candidat des maires", soutenu par le Parti des Travailleurs) - trotskyite/leftist, 2002: 0,5%
  • Philippe de Villiers (Mouvement pour la France) - national-conservative, 2002: --
  • Dominique Voynet (Verts) - green, 2002: 5,3%
0 Replies
 
georgeob1
 
  1  
Tue 20 Mar, 2007 01:59 pm
Walter,

I applaud the remarks of Ambassador Ischinger. They were balanced and reasonable. No one has exclusive access to right understanding, and a healthy competition between Europe and America can be good for all.

Nimh,

I will concede I know far less about the details of the local 'reform' issues to which you refer than do you. Moreover, I generally agree with you that narrow doctrinal approaches to most social, economic and political issues, is very often unwise and conducive to bad outcomes. One of their great contributions to political thought is the British concept of "muddling through" - a pragmatic focus on the acceptable resolution of concrete issues, in a process that will inevitably involve continuing change and adaptation.

However, I also believe in the inexhaustible ability of government to extend and preserve its activities - whatever they are - long after any need for them has passed. That is a factor too often neglected in evaluating the trade offs on issues ranging from rent control even to to health and heating oil subsidies. The U.S. subsidies to growers of cane sugar are a case in point. The subsidies have themselves created a well-funded and organized political influence group that has been able to sustain these subsidies long past the point at which they make any economic sense at all. The ethanol subsidy is a good example of an interest group getting a free ride on a hot political issue. The real focus of government in this area ought to be on conversion of more ubiquitous crops than corn; coal gasification; biogas; and nuclear power. The most productive government activity is generally to get out of the way of innovation and to reduce counterproductive regulation.
0 Replies
 
Walter Hinteler
 
  1  
Wed 21 Mar, 2007 01:35 am
http://i12.tinypic.com/4hsajy9.jpg

Quote:
50 reasons to love the European Union

As the EU celebrates its anniversary, The Independent looks at 50 benefits it has brought, and asks: "What has Europe done for us?"
Published: 21 March 2007
1 The end of war between European nations

2 Democracy is now flourishing in 27 countries

3 Once-poor countries, such as Ireland, Greece and Portugal, are prospering

4 The creation of the world's largest internal trading market

5 Unparalleled rights for European consumers

6 Co-operation on continent-wide immigration policy

7 Co-operation on crime, through Europol

8 Laws that make it easier for British people to buy property in Europe

9 Cleaner beaches and rivers throughout Europe

10 Four weeks statutory paid holiday a year for workers in Europe

11 No death penalty (it is incompatible with EU membership)

12 Competition from privatised companies means cheaper phone calls

13 Small EU bureaucracy (24,000 employees, fewer than the BBC)

14 Making the French eat British beef again

15 Minority languages, such as Irish, Welsh and Catalan recognised and protected

16 Europe is helping to save the planet with regulatory cuts in CO2

17 One currency from Bantry to Berlin (but not Britain)

18 Europe-wide travel bans on tyrants such as Zimbabwe's Robert Mugabe

19 The EU gives twice as much aid to developing countries as the United States

20 Strict safety standards for cars, buses and aircraft

21 Free medical help for tourists

22 EU peacekeepers operate in trouble spots throughout the world

23 Europe's single market has brought cheap flights to the masses, and new prosperity for forgotten cities

24 Introduction of pet passports

25 It now takes only 2 hrs 35 mins from London to Paris by Eurostar

26 Prospect of EU membership has forced modernisation on Turkey

27 Shopping without frontiers gives consumers more power to shape markets

28 Cheap travel and study programmes means greater mobility for Europe's youth

29 Food labelling is much clearer

30 No tiresome border checks (apart from in the UK)

31 Compensation for passengers suffering air delays

32 Strict ban on animal testing for the cosmetic industry

33 Greater protection for Europe's wildlife

34 Regional development fund has aided the deprived parts of Britain

35 European driving licences recognised across the EU

36 Britons now feel a lot less insular

37 Europe's bananas remain bent, despite sceptics' fears

38 Strong economic growth - greater than the United States last year

39 Single market has brought the best continental footballers to Britain

40 Human rights legislation has protected the rights of the individual

41 European Parliament provides democratic checks on all EU laws

42 EU gives more, not less, sovereignty to nation states

43 Maturing EU is a proper counterweight to the power of US and China

44 European immigration has boosted the British economy

45 Europeans are increasingly multilingual - except Britons, who are less so

46 Europe has set Britain an example how properly to fund a national health service

47 British restaurants now much more cosmopolitan

48 Total mobility for career professionals in Europe

49 Europe has revolutionised British attitudes to food and cooking

50 Lists like this drive the Eurosceptics mad
0 Replies
 
Walter Hinteler
 
  1  
Wed 21 Mar, 2007 01:50 am
Quote:
So, what has Europe ever done for us? Apart from...

Published: 21 March 2007

1. The end of war between European nations

While rows between England, France and Germany have been a feature of EU summits, war between Europe's major powers is now unthinkable. The fact that the two world wars that shaped the last century now seem so remote is, in itself, tribute to a visionary project that has permanently changed the landscape. As the EU celebrates the 50th anniversary of the signing of the Treaty of Rome it is clear that while the detailed topography will always be difficult to agree, it is an extraordinary achievement that we are standing on common ground.

2. Democracy is flourishing in 27 countries

Spain, Portugal, Greece, and the EU's 10 ex-Communist countries are parliamentary democracies. None of these nations were truly free in the decades following the Second World War. Each is now a democracy anchored within the EU and is unlikely to change course.

3. Once poor countries like Ireland, Greece and Portugal prospering

EU subsidies well spent have been crucial to the lift-off of the Irish economy. Once firmly in Britain's economic shadow, the Celtic tiger has emerged. Gross domestic product per capita in Ireland in 2005 was 137.1 per cent of the EU average, compared to 116.8 per cent in the UK.

4. The creation of the world's largest internal trading market

The 27-nation EU now around 500m people making it the world's largest economic trading bloc. By comparison the US has a population of around 300m. The old EU 25 had 19.2 per cent of the World's exports as compared with 14.4 per cent from the US. This gap is set to grow following the last enlargement in January to 27 member states.

5. Shopping without frontiers has given consumers more power

European consumers can buy goods for their own use in whichever EU country they choose - in person, on the internet, over the telephone, or by mail order - without paying additional taxes. This competition is driving down prices and increasing quality

6. Co-operation on continent-wide immigration policy

Though EU countries set immigration levels the EU is increasingly active in the fight against illegal migration and in trying to match the labour needs of European countries to the supply of migrants. On the downside, the EU is increasingly an impregnable fortress and many lose their lives trying to get here by boat from Africa

7. Crime-busting co-operation, through Europol

This provides a clearing house for EU police forces. The police in EU member states can now use an EU arrest warrant to get suspects moved from one country to another where they will face serious charges without lengthy extradition procedures.

8. Laws which make it easier for British people to buy property in Europe

It may not be good for the environment but access to second homes a short-haul flight away has fulfilled the dreams of millions of Britons. Retirement or regular holidays from the south of Spain to the east of Bulgaria has become a reality for many and a legally safeguarded one at that.

9. Cleaner beaches and rivers throughout Europe

EU law and peer pressure - including annual reports - have forced the UK to clean up its act, for example bringing the once-dirty waters off Blackpool beach up to standard. The first EU legislation was passed in 1976 with two more pieces in 2002 and 2006. Now you can monitor the quality of bathing water by checking on a website.
0 Replies
 
Walter Hinteler
 
  1  
Wed 21 Mar, 2007 01:51 am
Quote:
10. Four weeks statutory paid holiday a year for workers in Europe

The EU Working Time Directive ensures that all Europeans get at least four weeks of paid holiday per year. In the US many workers get a fortnight. The same directive provides for 11 hours rest in every 24 and one day of rest per week plus a rest break if the working day is longer than six hours. Minimum standards are set for paid maternity and paternity leave.

11. No death penalty (incompatible with EU membership)

No EU member state has the death penalty and reintroduction of capital punishment would not be compatible with EU membership. Even countries outside the EU are having to review their policies if they want to be considered for membership of the club, most notably Turkey.

12. Competition means cheaper phone calls

Since the liberalisation of telecommunications in the 1980s loosened the grip of the monopolies, prices have plummeted. The European Commission says the cost of international calls in the EU has fallen by 80 per cent since 1984.

13. Small EU bureaucracy (24,000 employees, fewer than the BBC)

Despite the eurosceptic claims, the number of EU officials is surprisingly small. After the scandal of 1999 when the Brussels based European Commission resigned, strict new rules were imposed on spending.

14. Making the French eat British beef again

When the BSE crisis subsided and British meat was judged safe, the European Court of Justice ordered France to resume imports. France contested the ruling but had no alternative in the end. By contrast, the US retains an embargo.

15. Minority languages, like Irish, Welsh and Catalan recognised and protected

Minority languages are gaining recognition. Be it Irish, Welsh or Catalan, minority languages are getting a greater role thanks to the EU which even has a Commissioner for Multilingualism. Irish became an official language of the EU this year. Catalans have lesser language rights because their tongue is official only in one part of Spain, their member states. The EU - with 23 official languages - is doing more to keep lesser tongues alive than some individual member states.

16. Europe is helping to save the planet with regulatory cuts in CO2

The EU has announced the most ambitious targets for curbing carbon emissions, promising a cut of at least one-fifth on 1990 levels by 2020. Other parts of the world are being challenged to follow suit. The EU also has blazed a trail with its carbon emissions trading system which, despite teething troubles, is still a model for other parts of the world.

17. One currency from Bantry to Berlin (but not Britain)

The Euro is now the only real alternative to the dollar on the international stage. You can travel throughout 13 countries and use one currency. Slovenia became the 13th and latest nation to join the single currency this year. Several more nations have yet to meet the necessary criteria.

18. Europe wide bans on tyrants like Robert Mugabe

Smart sanctions on the Zimbabwean President and his cronies have been negotiated through the EU and prevent those on a list from visiting all 27 nations. Though countries differ in the way they believe the EU should treat the government in Harare, they all agreed to renew the sanctions for another year.

19. The EU gives twice as much aid to developing countries as the US

The European Union and its member states paid out more than €43bn in 2005 in public aid to developing countries. This is the equivalent of 0.34 per cent of GNP of the 25 member states, and is higher than the per capita aid levels of the United States at around 0.2 per cent. More than €7bn is channelled through the EU.
0 Replies
 
Walter Hinteler
 
  1  
Wed 21 Mar, 2007 01:52 am
Quote:
20. Strict safety standards for aircraft

Airlines deemed to be unsafe are now banned from travelling into any EU country. Recently some of Pakistan's national carrier were barred because of safety fears.

21. Free medical help for tourists

Any citizen of a European country is entitled to free medical treatment if he or she is taken ill or suffers an accident in another member state. So long as you carry the correct form from your national health service, no questions will be asked.

22. EU peace-keepers operate throughout the world

The EU is building its crisis intervention force and has taken over operations in Bosnia from Nato. EU forces have also been in action in Africa helping avert humanitarian crises. In addition the EU has a big policing project.

23. easyJet and Ryanair can fly anywhere without national rules protecting high cost flag carriers due to liberalisation of air travel

easyJet and Ryanair can fly anywhere without the national rules protecting high-cost flag carriers due to liberalisation of air travel. Any airlines granted a licence in an EU country - meeting safety standards and other conditions - can operate services anywhere within the EU. Between 1992 and 2000 prices at the cheaper end of the market fell by 40 per cent.

24. Introduction of pet passports

Since 2004 travelling across borders with pets has been easier. In addition to pet passports with a vaccination certificate pets require permanent identification which can be either a tattooed code on the skin or a microchip which can be read by a special machine. In the future the microchip is likely to be obligatory.

25. It will soon take only two hours from London to Paris by Eurostar

The Channel Tunnel, and high-speed lines in France and now Britain are not, properly speaking, EU projects. However, the tunnel was built partly as a means of reducing the mental barriers between Britain and the Continent. With the opening of the final section of Britain's fast line to St Pancras this year, trains will travel to Paris in two hours.

26. Prospect of EU membership has forced modernisation on Turkey

The presence of an affluent and stable bloc to its west has given the modernisers in Turkey the ally they needed to create a democratic constituency for change. That change has been pushed through with the promise of a European future.

27. Unparalleled rights for European consumers

Any consumer can send back a product if it breaks down within two years of purchase. Manufacturers often claim that they offer only a 12 month guarantee, but EU law states otherwise and consumers are demanding their rights.

28. Study programmes and cheap travel means greater mobility for Europe's youth

Through the Erasmus programme, in the 2003-4 academic year, 7,500 UK students spent between three and 12 months at a university in one of the other member states.

29. Food labelling is much clearer

All ingredients used in food products must be listed. Any GM ingredients must be mentioned as must colouring, preservatives and other chemical additives.
0 Replies
 
Walter Hinteler
 
  1  
Wed 21 Mar, 2007 01:53 am
Quote:
30. End of the road for border crossings (apart from in the UK)

Frontier posts have been abandoned between the 15 countries that have implemented the Schengen accords. This agreement means that EU nationals crossing most borders in continental western Europe do not need to show passports. The newer nations plan to join in soon.

31. Compensation for air delays

Passengers must get immediate help if their flight is delayed by more than a few hours, cancelled without notice or if they are denied boarding because the plane is overbooked. The carrier must make alternative travel arrangements unless the passenger asks for their money back instead. Depending on the length of the delay they must provide food and refreshments and accommodation if necessary.

32. Strict ban on animal testing for the cosmetic industry

Since November 2004 the EU has banned animal testing on finished cosmetic products entirely. Remaining safety testing on animals of ingredients for cosmetics will be ended.

33. Greater protection for Europe's wildlife

Tough European laws protect birds, flora and fauna, although the EU bird directive is widely flouted in southern Europe, particularly in Malta where 2m migratory birds are shot each year, including 80 protected species which are shot or trapped by hunters.

34. Regional development fund has aided the deprived parts of Britain

Some of the UK's poorest regions have benefited from massive handouts from the EU which has been used to regenerate some of the country's most run-down areas. Scotland's Highland and Islands have benefited enormously as have the Welsh mining valleys, Cornwall and deprived inner cities like Liverpool.

35. European driving licences recognised

Driving licences issued in one EU country are valid in any other, providing they are modern, EU-standard, ones with a photo identity. This means that the old days of having to gain translations for a UK permit to drive in Italy are over.

36. Britons now feel a lot less insular

A famous newspaper headline (perhaps apocryphal) once read "Fog in Channel; Continent Cut Off". Remember the 1960s, when Ostend seemed like an exotic destination? EU membership has not dried up the English Channel but is has helped to remove the psychological barriers between Britain and the continent.

37. Europe's bananas remain bent, despite sceptics' fears

The suggestion that the EU wanted to impose straight bananas, or blue bananas, or ban all but Caribbean bananas, is one of the oldest of Euro-myths. Obsessive euro-harmonisation of rules is a thing of the past.

38. Strong economic growth - greater than the US last year

The EU's ambition to overtake America economically by 2010 has been ridiculed. The German economy has picked up with the UK and Nordic nations are performing strongly. Even Italy, thought to be in dire straits last year, is clocking up reasonable growth. The European Commission said it expects the economy of the 27-nation European Union to grow 2.7 per cent this year, ahead of the US's estimated 2.5 per cent

39. Single market has brought the best continental footballers to Britain

The Bosman ruling, based on European law, and other decisions, have freed up football transfers. From Eric Cantona to Thierry Henry and Cristiano Ronaldo, British fans have been enjoying watching Europe's finest talent for the past 15 years.
0 Replies
 
Walter Hinteler
 
  1  
Wed 21 Mar, 2007 01:53 am
Quote:
40. Human rights legislation has protected the rights of the individual

The introduction of the Human Rights Acts has provided a legal framework to prevent abuses of power.

41. European parliament provides democratic checks on all EU laws

The European Parliament, directly elected since 1979, has been given increased powers over the years. The parliament has made a significant impact in areas ranging from the environment to animal rights.

42. EU gives more, not less, sovereignty to nation states

Switzerland and Norway, two independent countries have little or no negotiating leverage when they deal with the EU. In fact they have less sovereignty than member states who decide the policy. Britons are more able to control their own destiny - in areas from international trade, to environmental protection, to consumer rights - because they are part of a 27 nation, democratic bloc. Real sovereignty, rather than theoretical sovereignty, is enhanced by EU membership.

43. Maturing EU is a proper counterweight to the power of US and China

As it develops common foreign and defence policies, the EU is finding its voice. Europe's interests and those of America and the emerging powers, such as China and India, will sometimes coincide, sometimes conflict. Could Britain's interests be protected if we stood alone or if we became a junior partner of the US?

44. European immigration has boosted the British economy

Hundreds of thousands of Poles commute between Poland and Britain. More surprisingly the economies of both countries are booming. The UK economy has benefited from a surge of well-qualified, highly motivated workers.

45. EU common research programme

Job opportunities and Europe-wide access to education mean there really are Europeans now who see the need to speak at least three modern languages.

46. Europe has set Britain an example how properly to fund a national health service

Some continental countries have health funding problems but several, the Dutch in particular, provide quality care while keeping down costs. It took the EU to rule that British patients had a right to seek care abroad.

47. British restaurants now much more cosmopolitan because of European influences

Britain has become - let us admit it - a more continental country in the last 34 years. We now care about what we eat. Nowhere has this been more marked than in the quality and variety of food being offered in our restaurants.

48. Mobility for career professionals throughout Europe

Professionals from doctors to architects now have a right to have their national qualifications recognised across the EU. Language and cultural barriers will always remain a problem for professionals but there are can no longer be purely protectionist obstacles to a career in another EU country.

49. Europe has revolutionised British attitudes to food and cooking

Despite major drawbacks, the bloated Common Agricultural Policy has enabled small family farmers to flourish in Europe. Its support has led to the birth of the Slow Food movement and arrival in British towns of farmers markets, growing with quality organics produce. Bon appetit!

50. Lists like this drive Eurosceptics mad

In the Daily Mail-Sun universe, the EU can never do any good. Brussels is an insane bureaucracy, which secretly plots to have all donkeys painted blue (with yellow stars). The 50th birthday of the European project is a time to celebrate the many positive things which the EU has brought us.


Source for above
0 Replies
 
georgeob1
 
  1  
Wed 21 Mar, 2007 11:22 am
Walter Hinteler wrote:
[42. EU gives more, not less, sovereignty to nation states

Switzerland and Norway, two independent countries have little or no negotiating leverage when they deal with the EU. In fact they have less sovereignty than member states who decide the policy. Britons are more able to control their own destiny - in areas from international trade, to environmental protection, to consumer rights - because they are part of a 27 nation, democratic bloc. Real sovereignty, rather than theoretical sovereignty, is enhanced by EU membership.


I believe Europe has much to be proud of with respect to the achievements of the EU. However a few of the bragging points listed appear a bit strained and tortured to me -- this one is a good example.

Submerging and combining your autonomy with that of a larger group may well increase your leverage on matters in which your interests are identical. However it is undeniable that one's autonomy has been significantly reduced by the combination. Both Switzerland and Norway are taken seriously by the rest of the world, and I don't see that they have suffered a loss of sovereignty -- or even leverage in dealing with the new EU of 28 states. This is particularly true if you compare it to the leverage exercised by any one of those member states -- to what extent does the EU policy on any matter exactly reflect their own individual interests?

I believe the EU has been a great success, but that it is neither necessary or beneficial to attempt to inflate it with such distortions of basic ideas as this.

The evolution of the EU will necessarily continue. The parallel processes of enhanced EU power relative to that of the member states and increased democratization of the EU governing institutions, will eventually diminish the individual identities and political powers of the individual states --- if these processes continue to operate with the success that has characterized the last two decades. The game so far for most of Europe has been very positive-sum, however, in the long run other factors such as these will come into play.
0 Replies
 
Walter Hinteler
 
  1  
Wed 21 Mar, 2007 11:45 am
georgeob1 wrote:
However a few of the bragging points listed appear a bit strained and tortured to me


The Independent wrote:
50. Lists like this drive Eurosceptics mad
:wink:

Thanks for your nice comment, though, George!

Perhaps the relation of your example Switzerland and Norway towards the EU is worth to be looked at.

georgeob1 wrote:
Both Switzerland and Norway are taken seriously by the rest of the world, and I don't see that they have suffered a loss of sovereignty -- or even leverage in dealing with the new EU of 28 states.


Switzerland and the EU:
Quote:
Switzerland applied for membership of the EU in 1992, but as a result of two negative referenda (on the EEA in 1992, and on the start of accession negotiations in 2001) the issue is on ice for the foreseeable future. Nevertheless, in 2004 the Swiss Parliament decided to maintain the application for membership.

Nine further bilateral agreements have been negotiated in recent years. These cover the following sectors: taxation of savings, participation in Schengen and Dublin cooperation, judicial and administrative cooperation in the fight against fraud, trade in processed agricultural products, participation in the European Environment Agency, statistical cooperation, participation in the Media programme, preparations for participation in future programmes in the fields of education, youth and training, and avoidance of double taxation of retired EU officials.
Source


Norway and the EU:
Quote:
Norway's relations with the EU are mainly governed by the Agreement on the European Economic Area (EEA). The EEA Agreement is in force since 1.1.1994 and extends the Single Market legislation, with the exception of Agriculture and Fisheries, from the EU Member States to Norway, Iceland and Liechtenstein. Through the EEA Agreement, Norway also participates, albeit with no voting rights, in a number of EU Agencies and programmes, covering i.a. enterprise, environment, education and research programmes.
[...]Many EU policy areas that fall beyond the scope of the EEA Agreement have developed dramatically over the past decade, not least the EU common foreign, security and defence policy, where Norway frequently joins EU positions. Norway has been actively seeking a way to be associated with the process of CFSP/ESDP policy formulation and is today associated to the ESDP through NATO and the Berlin + arrangements. Norway participates in EU joint actions such as the EU police mission in Bosnia. In addition, Norway has pledged personnel and equipment to the ESDP Rapid Reaction Force and to the EU Nordic battle group so long as the EU actions are undertaken under a UN mandate.
Source
0 Replies
 
Walter Hinteler
 
  1  
Thu 22 Mar, 2007 01:18 am
Walter Hinteler wrote:


And yesterday:

Belgians brave rainstorm for anti-racism weddings

Quote:
Braving rain and hail, hundreds of Belgians took part in a symbolic ceremony yesterday in a town where three couples refused to be married by a black official.

In an impressive show of solidarity against those who have given the term "white wedding" a bad name, the couples exchanged or renewed their marriage vows in the Flemish town of St-Niklaas.
0 Replies
 
Walter Hinteler
 
  1  
Thu 22 Mar, 2007 01:21 am
http://i12.tinypic.com/40lqb9c.jpg

http://i13.tinypic.com/2encao2.jpg

http://i3.tinypic.com/2ufgia8.jpg
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

THE BRITISH THREAD II - Discussion by jespah
The United Kingdom's bye bye to Europe - Discussion by Walter Hinteler
Sinti and Roma: History repeating - Discussion by Walter Hinteler
[B]THE RED ROSE COUNTY[/B] - Discussion by Mathos
Leaving today for Europe - Discussion by cicerone imposter
So you think you know Europe? - Discussion by nimh
 
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.14 seconds on 11/15/2024 at 11:46:49