25
   

FOLLOWING THE EUROPEAN UNION

 
 
nimh
 
  1  
Mon 7 Aug, 2006 03:02 pm
More good news, if against the backdrop of bad start-out conditions:

Quote:
Bulgarian Court condemns political hate speech

4 August 2006
Bulgarian Helsinki Committee

[My] summary:

Quote:
The Sofia trial court has delivered a judgment against Volen Siderov, MP and leader of the Attack party. It ruled that Siderov's public hate speech against Roma, Jews, Turks, homosexuals, and all "non-Bulgarians" constitute harassment and incitement to discrimination. A coalition of 68 public interest groups and further prominent individuals brought a case against Sidorov, which judges have divided into eight separate sets of proceedings. This case was the first of them.

And:


[My] summary:

Quote:
The Czech police are planning to recruit more ethnic Romanies, Vietnamese and Ukrainians next year, said an Interior Ministry spokeswoman. The ministry will launch an information campaign this autumn in five cities. The ministry has earmarked 70,000 crowns for the campaign and the same sum for the recruitment of new officers.
0 Replies
 
nimh
 
  1  
Sun 13 Aug, 2006 03:32 pm
Quote:
Prague richest city in post-communist zone

Prague is the richest city in the former Eastern Bloc, says the Swiss bank UBS in its annual index of the richest cities in the world.

For the second year in a row, the Czech capital has an edge over Ljubljana, the Slovenian capital, which ranks 43rd on the index, while Prague is 41st [..], just behind Singapore.

[T]he UBS index indicates that there is still a significant difference in the living standards between Prague and nearby Vienna, which ranks 21st on the index [..].
0 Replies
 
Mapleleaf
 
  1  
Sun 13 Aug, 2006 07:22 pm
Fascinating...thanks nimh Smile
0 Replies
 
Walter Hinteler
 
  1  
Mon 21 Aug, 2006 12:15 am
http://i8.tinypic.com/256xky8.jpg

source: The Guardian, 21.08.2006, page 6
0 Replies
 
Francis
 
  1  
Mon 21 Aug, 2006 12:31 am
From the sketch, can I reach the conclusion that the more you smoke, the less you are happy, Walter? :wink:
0 Replies
 
Walter Hinteler
 
  1  
Mon 21 Aug, 2006 12:40 am
I'm at 7.6 with only a smoke now and then.
When I look at your smokeless 7.3, however, ...
0 Replies
 
Francis
 
  1  
Mon 21 Aug, 2006 12:44 am
Personnaly, I'm not on that scale, Walter. You know I'm atypical...
0 Replies
 
Walter Hinteler
 
  1  
Mon 21 Aug, 2006 12:48 am
I noticed that, Francis. And they clearly pictured only full faced EU-citizens. :wink:
0 Replies
 
Francis
 
  1  
Mon 21 Aug, 2006 12:54 am
Yes because if they portrayed hemi-sized faces, I clearly would be far above in the scale...
0 Replies
 
Walter Hinteler
 
  1  
Mon 21 Aug, 2006 01:07 am
:wink:

Back to the seamy sides of European life:

Quote:
Romanians and Bulgarians face immigration curbs

· EU entry will not mean open door, minister says
· Restrictions on workers opposed by Foreign Office

Will Woodward, chief political correspondent
Monday August 21, 2006
The Guardian


Restrictions will be placed on the rights of immigrants from Romania and Bulgaria to work in Britain when those countries join the EU next year, despite objections from the Foreign Office and Labour backbenchers, senior ministers signalled yesterday.
The government does not want to see a repeat of the freedoms allowed to workers from Poland when it joined the EU in 2004. John Reid, the home secretary, believes a hardening of public opinion on immigration, combined with a new push by the Conservatives on immigration, is reinforcing the case for restrictions. Officially the Home Office held the line yesterday that a decision would be taken later this year.

But the first sign of a firmer stance came when trade and industry secretary Alistair Darling was asked if the accession of Romania and Bulgaria to the EU would mean an "open door" to their workers. He told BBC News Sunday: "No. No one who deals with immigration fails to realise you've got to have a system that is properly managed, properly controlled.
"We will need to consider, along with other countries, along with other institutions in this country, what our requirements are, so this is done in a managed way, in a way that is reasonable, in a way that is balanced. Immigration has to be carefully managed and our policy is the policy of a managed system."

The argument has divided ministers, with Mr Reid and John Hutton, the work and pensions secretary, arguing in private for the UK to use its right, alongside new EU countries, to restrict the labour market to new accession countries for up to seven years.

But the Foreign Office has been resisting and last week the former Europe minister, Denis MacShane, said it would send "a whole set of wrong signals" to restrict Romanian and Bulgarian workers.

Britain was one of only three countries to allow unfettered access to the labour market from Poland and nine other countries who joined the EU in 2004. Romania and Bulgaria are due to join the EU on January 1 2007, but the date has not been finalised.

A Home Office spokeswoman said yesterday: "A decision on Bulgarian and Romanian nationals' access to the UK labour market will be made later this year once a firm date of accession is determined. Any decision will be based on various factors including an evaluation of the UK's labour market needs, the impact of previous enlargement in 2004, and the position of other member states."

Earlier this month Mr Reid announced he was setting up a committee of "non-partisan" experts to set an "optimum level of immigration". According to a Mori poll for the Sunday Times published yesterday, 77% of people want strict annual limits on immigration and 75% want immigration rules to be made tougher. Mr Reid believes he can position the government in the mainstream of the argument and is relaxed about the Conservatives returning to this territory.

The home secretary adapted a line from the Conservatives' 2005 election campaign last month when he dismissed the "daft, so-called politically correct notion that anybody who talks about immigration is somehow a racist".

The Tories made what under new leader David Cameron is a rare foray into the immigration debate by calling for restrictions on Romanian and Bulgarian workers. Damian Green, the shadow immigration spokesman, called for an early decision to impose similar conditions to those introduced by other EU countries on the 10 new members in 2004.
Source
0 Replies
 
Walter Hinteler
 
  1  
Mon 21 Aug, 2006 01:09 am
Related comment in The Guardian (not online) from page 20 of today's edition:

Quote:
EU enlargement
Fears from the east
0 Replies
 
nimh
 
  1  
Fri 25 Aug, 2006 08:58 pm
More on the same theme..

Quote:
UK receives more than 400,000 migrants

Tuesday August 22, 2006
Guardian Unlimited

[My] summary:

Quote:
At least 427,000 east European migrants have come to work in the UK in the past two years, the government admitted - a figure likely to be used by those who wish to stop Romanian and Bulgarian workers coming to Britain next year.

The government's original estimate was that the annual intake of workers from the new member states would be 5,000-13,000.

Home office minister McNulty said the government had "yet to take a decision" on Bulgaria and Romania.

"At least 427,000" came in when the official estimate was "5,000-13,000". Is there an award for the most prepostorous statistical gaffe of the year?
0 Replies
 
Walter Hinteler
 
  1  
Sun 27 Aug, 2006 06:53 am
Quote:
Spain swings hammer at glass ceiling

Socialist leader is trying to make mark as `feminist,' but some foes say policies treat women `like statistics'


By Tom Hundley
Tribune foreign correspondent

August 27, 2006

MADRID -- Vogue magazine is not known to be high on the reading list of most European socialists.

But the Spanish edition of the fashion magazine has featured a flattering photo spread of eight female members of Socialist Prime Minister Jose Luis Rodriguez Zapatero's Cabinet.

http://i4.tinypic.com/25r1gmg.jpg

Not long after his surprise election two years ago, the Spanish leader declared his determination to make his mark as Spain's "feminist" prime minister. He demonstrated his seriousness by naming women to eight of his government's 16 senior Cabinet positions, including the post of deputy prime minister.

Within days of taking office, Zapatero tackled what he called Spain's "worst shame," domestic violence against women. During the right-wing dictatorship of Gen. Francisco Franco, it was legal for husbands to "discipline" their wives by beating them. Three decades after Franco's death, the problem lingers.

But under "zero tolerance" laws that went into effect last year, police are required to act swiftly after a complaint, and abusive men face imprisonment. Spanish judges also are experimenting with electronic tagging to keep abusers away from their victims.

Next, Zapatero took on that most patriarchal of all Spanish institutions, the Roman Catholic Church. He upset the Spanish bishops and the Vatican by liberalizing the laws on divorce and abortion. He also gave the go-ahead for same-sex marriages and stem cell research.

Pope snubbed

When Pope Benedict XVI visited Spain last month, he offered pointed criticism of the government's social policies, but Zapatero took the opportunity to further distance himself from the church by skipping the papal mass.

Zapatero's latest goal is new legislation requiring that neither sex make up more than 60 percent of any party's election candidates. The bill also calls for Spanish companies that do business with the government to appoint women to 40 percent of the positions on their corporate boards.

Opponents of the proposed legislation acknowledge that Spain has some catching up to do on gender issues, but they argue the new laws wouldn't help.

Ana Pastor of the opposition Popular Party and health minister in the previous government described Zapatero's proposals as "laws of the elite" that "treat women like statistics."

"Instead of laws that address real problems, it deals with electoral lists and corporate boards," she said. "They [the Socialist Party] think that by obliging women to be in government, they are allowing them to govern."

Spanish business leaders also have come out against the proposed legislation, saying quotas for corporate boards will make the companies less competitive.

But Soledad Murillo, in charge of gender policies at the Ministry of Labor, rejects the criticism.

`Not talking about quotas'

"I think it's a good law," she said. "We are not talking about quotas; we are talking about proportionality.

"The companies are criticizing. They say: `We can't put someone on the board just because of her sex.' But we are saying `Consider competence and experience first--and then gender.'"

Murillo argued that in Spain, with its still-developing corporate culture, the government's top-down approach to gender equality was the quickest way to achieve the desired results.

In trying to increase the presence of women in the highest business echelons, Spain is following the example of Norway, which earlier this year became the first European country to mandate that 40 percent of the board members of the country's large corporations be women.

But unlike Spain's proposal, which sets a target of eight years to comply and would punish non-compliance with the loss of government contracts, Norway's law, which went into effect in January, gives companies two years to comply and punishes non-compliance with disbandment of the company.

While European companies tend to lag their American counterparts in promoting women to top executive positions, European women do much better in the political sphere.

The fact that Germany is led by a woman scarcely turns a head. One of the two front-runners to succeed French President Jacques Chirac is a woman.

In Spain, women not only make up half the Cabinet, they occupy 36 percent of the seats in the lower house of parliament.

In Britain, however, the party of former Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher is struggling to increase the number of women on its electoral lists. At present, women occupy only 9 percent of the Conservative Party's seats in Parliament.

Tory leader David Cameron last week announced reforms that would require local associations to place more women on the short lists of candidates for targeted seats, a move that provoked an angry backlash among male and female Tories.


Source; photo from print edition, page 7
0 Replies
 
nimh
 
  1  
Sun 27 Aug, 2006 04:53 pm
The HRW report described below is available at http://www.hrw.org/campaigns/aids/2006/romania/, as are press release and report summary & recommendations.

nimh wrote:
Quote:

[My] summary:

Quote:
Romania is consigning a generation of HIV-infected teenagers to a life of persecution on the margins of society, a Human Rights Watch study shows. It details the problems of more than 7,200 Romanians aged 15 to 19 infected with HIV between 1986 and 1991 in the course of an ill-conceived government programme, which resulted in over 10,000 children at hospitals and orphanages being exposed to contaminated needles.

Forty per cent of the survivors now have no access to education; more than 700 are in orphanages or foster care. Many doctors refuse to treat them and prospective employers turn them away when told they are HIV-positive. Romanian law prescribes mandatory HIV-testing for anyone wanting to become a hairdresser, a beautician, a child carer, a health professional, a cleaner, or work in the food and several other industries.
0 Replies
 
nimh
 
  1  
Sun 3 Sep, 2006 02:36 pm
Tensions rising in Slovakia, and between Slovakia and Hungary:


[My] summary:

Quote:
Hungary has summoned the Slovak Ambassador to Budapest to explain new signs of anti-Hungarian sentiment in Slovakia.

On Friday, an ethnic-Hungarian woman was robbed and beaten up; her attackers wrote "Hungarians, return to behind the Danube" on her T-shirt. The next day, police arrested three men bringing an 11-metre long banner saying "death to the Hungarians!" to a soccer game.

Prime minister Ferenc Gyurcsany condemned what he called "atrocities and increasing hatred against foreigners" and demanded his Slovak counterpart, Robert Fico, do the same. He added that there is "a direct link between the nationalists being part of the Slovak coalition and rising extremism."

Fico denounced "all acts of extremism," but added, "I will not allow anybody, including prime minister Gyurcsany, to dictate the pace of the Slovak government". He also rejected a proposal from the opposition Hungarian Coalition Party (SMK) to adopt a joint parliamentary declaration to address the issue. He instead accused ethnic-Hungarian politicians of fostering nationalistic feelings and trying to capitalize on recent incidents.

The tension started to mount after Fico's social democrats in July formed a government with the far-right National Party (SNS).

More here:

Quote:
Row harms Slovak-Hungarian ties

<snipped>

'Intimidation'

The row erupted after a young ethnic Hungarian woman was beaten up in the Slovak town of Nitra last Friday, apparently after being heard speaking Hungarian on her mobile phone.

A day later, an ethnic Hungarian teenager was attacked in the town of Sladkovicovo, allegedly for speaking Hungarian.

The party representing Slovakia's Hungarians, the SMK, said that in recent weeks gangs of young Slovaks had been entering bars and intimidating Hungarian speakers.

In Hungary, the Slovak embassy has been daubed with graffiti, and anti-Slovak banners have been unfurled at football matches.

Mr Gyurcsany described the attacks as "atrocities" during a televised debate with Slovak Prime Minister Robert Fico on Tuesday.

Mr Fico promised to take action, but has so far failed to condemn the attacks.

Slovakia accused Hungary of an overreaction to the incidents, which was creating an "atmosphere of tension" between the two countries.

Uneasy relationship

Tensions have been rising since the vehemently anti-Hungarian Slovak National Party (SNS) joined the government in Bratislava in June, the BBC's European affairs analyst Jan Repa says.

The SNS leader, Jan Slota, has referred to Hungarians as a "cancer" and expressed regret that they had not been expelled after World War II.

<snip>
0 Replies
 
Walter Hinteler
 
  1  
Mon 4 Sep, 2006 12:18 am
French right crowns Sarkozy as candidate for presidency

Not unexpected. As well, as the 'differences' on the left/center to find strong candidates (= one strong) are no surprise.

(It's been very interesting to follow discussions about this 'live' on French tv over last week!)
0 Replies
 
Mapleleaf
 
  1  
Tue 5 Sep, 2006 07:55 pm
Walter, in how many languages are you fluent? How about you nimh? Is this a requirement for functioning in the EU society?
0 Replies
 
Walter Hinteler
 
  1  
Tue 5 Sep, 2006 10:42 pm
Fluent? In English - nearly - only.

Basic active knowledge in French, but my passive knowledge (= understanding) is much better (so I never take a dictionary with me).

Understand Dutch pretty well, speak it only like someone who just started learning it.

Since I've learnt Latin at school, too, I can guess a bit of Italian and Spanish ...

I don't think it's only a requirement for the function of the EU-cociety but without knwing at least one foreign language you are quite lost in the modern world.
0 Replies
 
Steve 41oo
 
  1  
Wed 6 Sep, 2006 04:14 am
Walter Hinteler wrote:
Fluent? In English - nearly - only.
I can vouch for the fact that Walter is superfluent in German
0 Replies
 
Walter Hinteler
 
  1  
Fri 8 Sep, 2006 12:40 am
Just a quick reminder that the French will elct a new president as well (from today's 'Le Figaro'):

http://i6.tinypic.com/48f50k2.jpg
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

THE BRITISH THREAD II - Discussion by jespah
The United Kingdom's bye bye to Europe - Discussion by Walter Hinteler
Sinti and Roma: History repeating - Discussion by Walter Hinteler
[B]THE RED ROSE COUNTY[/B] - Discussion by Mathos
Leaving today for Europe - Discussion by cicerone imposter
So you think you know Europe? - Discussion by nimh
 
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.09 seconds on 11/16/2024 at 11:45:10