More on those cartoons of the Prophet Muhammed in that Danish newspaper, and all the ado thats followed (pretty much the only story from Denmark that seems to reach the international news pages):
Cartoons ignite cultural combat in Denmark
2006/01/01 · International Herald Tribune
(My) summary:
Quote:When the Danish newspaper Jyllands-Posten published cartoons of the Prophet Muhammad - including one in which he wears a turban shaped as a bomb - it expected a strong reaction. But it was unprepared for the global furor that spurred demonstrations in Kashmir and condemnation from 11 Muslim countries. The cartoons spawned a national debate over whether Denmark's famously liberal freedom of speech laws have gone too far, as many in the Muslim community say they reflect an intensifying anti-immigrant climate that is radicalizing young Muslims. Police in October arrested seven Muslim men aged 20 or under in connection with an alleged terrorism plot.
The (otherwise run-of-the-mill) article shows that stupidity is an equal opportunity gift. Commenting on the cartoons, an imam grotesquely laments that "We are being mentally tortured." A retired priest and now far-right politician intones, "Muslim immigration is a way for Muslims to conquer us, just as they have done for the past 1,400 years" - don't tell me you don't remember those 1400 years in which Muslims have tried to conquer Denmark.
Still, a real enough dilemma is sketched out when the report goes into the activities of Hizb-ut-Tahrir (known here from Steve's posts), which is banned in Germany but free to operate in Denmark and the UK:
Quote:Terrorism experts say the group has played a major role in the radicalization of disaffected Muslim youth. But because its main weapon is ideology rather than explosives, Danish officials say, it is allowed to operate under the same permissive rules that allowed the publication of the cartoons.
Under Danish law, inciting someone to commit an act of terror is illegal, but spouting vitriol against the West or satirizing Muhammad is not. The State Prosecutor's Office investigated the group in the spring of 2004 and decided not to ban it since it was not breaking the law.