snood wrote:It's a little ironic to me to be saying that classes on "white studies" (which, by the way, are in my estimation not a treatment generally on "racism" as much as they are a tutorial about white privilege in the US)
How does one seperate "white priviledge" from "racism"? They seem, to me at least, to be terms for opposite sides of the same coin.
Quote:...should strive to be inclusive of the entirety of the spectrum of events and perspectives encompassing the race issue, when their very existence is an attempt to address omissions and inaccuracies in all of American education, since before blacks were whipped for trying to read, until now.
Shouldn't the coverage be complete? If Jefferson's views on race are going to be brought up shouldn't there be a discussion of how he came to hold those views? Jefferson was a great writer and orator but he had few original thoughts.
Earlier in this thread I mention Dr. William Petty and Charles Linnaeus. These are the two people who wrote the theological and scientific works that created the concept of race we have today. Linnaeus was the one who first wrote of the 4 races in the world ("White" Europeans, "Red" Americans, "Yellow" Asians and "Black" Africans..) in his 1740 publishing of
"General System of Nature". The works of Petty and Linnaeus were a few of many that were published during the European Enlightenment which were read by many, inculding Jefferson. How can they cover Jefferson's thoughts and writings in these classes without covering how he came to his ideas? If they don't, another incomplete history full of ommissions and inaccuracies is being taught.