1
   

God; puzzle solved.

 
 
Jason Proudmoore
 
  1  
Reply Fri 13 Oct, 2006 04:01 pm
RexRed wrote:
Can God create a computer that can think outside of himself?


Of course not...only humans can do that.
0 Replies
 
RexRed
 
  1  
Reply Fri 13 Oct, 2006 05:36 pm
Jason Proudmoore wrote:
RexRed wrote:
Can God create a computer that can think outside of himself?


Of course not...only humans can do that.


Can't a human be defined as a computer?
0 Replies
 
Jason Proudmoore
 
  1  
Reply Fri 13 Oct, 2006 06:36 pm
RexRed wrote:
Jason Proudmoore wrote:
RexRed wrote:
Can God create a computer that can think outside of himself?


Of course not...only humans can do that.


Can't a human be defined as a computer?


A "Bio" computer...
0 Replies
 
RexRed
 
  1  
Reply Fri 13 Oct, 2006 06:50 pm
Jason Proudmoore wrote:
RexRed wrote:
Jason Proudmoore wrote:
RexRed wrote:
Can God create a computer that can think outside of himself?


Of course not...only humans can do that.


Can't a human be defined as a computer?


A "Bio" computer...


Does God compile?
0 Replies
 
Jason Proudmoore
 
  1  
Reply Fri 13 Oct, 2006 06:55 pm
RexRed wrote:
Jason Proudmoore wrote:
RexRed wrote:
Jason Proudmoore wrote:
RexRed wrote:
Can God create a computer that can think outside of himself?


Of course not...only humans can do that.


Can't a human be defined as a computer?


A "Bio" computer...


Does God compile?


What the hell are you talking about?
0 Replies
 
RexRed
 
  1  
Reply Fri 13 Oct, 2006 09:12 pm
Jason Proudmoore wrote:
RexRed wrote:
Jason Proudmoore wrote:
RexRed wrote:
Jason Proudmoore wrote:
RexRed wrote:
Can God create a computer that can think outside of himself?


Of course not...only humans can do that.


Can't a human be defined as a computer?


A "Bio" computer...


Does God compile?


What the hell are you talking about?

Are you computer illiterate?
0 Replies
 
Jason Proudmoore
 
  1  
Reply Sat 14 Oct, 2006 05:18 am
RexRed wrote:
Jason Proudmoore wrote:
RexRed wrote:
Jason Proudmoore wrote:
RexRed wrote:
Jason Proudmoore wrote:
RexRed wrote:
Can God create a computer that can think outside of himself?


Of course not...only humans can do that.


Can't a human be defined as a computer?


A "Bio" computer...


Does God compile?


What the hell are you talking about?

Are you computer illiterate?


Are you insane?
0 Replies
 
RexRed
 
  1  
Reply Sat 14 Oct, 2006 06:18 am
Jason Proudmoore wrote:
RexRed wrote:
Jason Proudmoore wrote:
RexRed wrote:
Jason Proudmoore wrote:
RexRed wrote:
Jason Proudmoore wrote:
RexRed wrote:
Can God create a computer that can think outside of himself?


Of course not...only humans can do that.


Can't a human be defined as a computer?


A "Bio" computer...


Does God compile?


What the hell are you talking about?

Are you computer illiterate?


Are you insane?


See how you are?

You take a conversation and turn it into an insult?

I am not insane, are you?

2Ti 1:7
For God hath not given us the spirit of fear; but of power, and of love, and of a sound mind.
0 Replies
 
Jason Proudmoore
 
  1  
Reply Sat 14 Oct, 2006 07:36 am
RexRed wrote:


See how you are?

You take a conversation and turn it into an insult?


You asked me, without any elaboration, if God computes…and I asked you "what the hell are you talking about?" and then you asked me if I am a computer illiterate…

So, who's insulting who?


RexRed wrote:


I am not insane, are you?


I'm a very sane individual… but you on the other hand…

RexRed wrote:

2Ti 1:7
For God hath not given us the spirit of fear; but of power, and of love, and of a sound mind.


…see what I mean?
0 Replies
 
RexRed
 
  1  
Reply Sat 14 Oct, 2006 08:57 am
Jason Proudmoore wrote:
RexRed wrote:


See how you are?

You take a conversation and turn it into an insult?


You asked me, without any elaboration, if God computes…and I asked you "what the hell are you talking about?" and then you asked me if I am a computer illiterate…

So, who's insulting who?


RexRed wrote:


I am not insane, are you?


I'm a very sane individual… but you on the other hand…

RexRed wrote:

2Ti 1:7
For God hath not given us the spirit of fear; but of power, and of love, and of a sound mind.


…see what I mean?


No I don't see what you mean and I find your implications and insult to be a sign of a lack of decorum...

When you don't like the message you attack the messenger rather than reason with the logic of the message...

Does that sound sane to you?

You can learn from insane people too. Truth does not discriminate as you are attempting to do.

My question to you was actually not meant in jest.

I am still wondering if you are computer illiterate...

Does God compile was the question not does God compute...?

Your response was,
What the hell are you talking about?

My response to that was, are you computer illiterate?

A simple yes or no would have sufficed.

Maybe it is the word "illiterate", the word savvy would have been a bit more of what I meant.

Sorry if the question seemed insensitive.

Term terms terms Smile

Also, you will not find me apologizing for loving God and his word... If you find that to be insanity then I would say, a lack of God is insanity and throw it back on you.
0 Replies
 
Jason Proudmoore
 
  1  
Reply Sat 14 Oct, 2006 10:31 am
RexRed wrote:


No I don't see what you mean


No? Let me translate this difficult language that we call "English" into something that you would understand better:

According to your religious cult, this passage suggests that demented people do not exist in the world.

"2Ti 1:7
For God hath not given us the spirit of fear; but of power, and of love, and of a SOUND MIND"

Can you see my point better…can you see your twisted logic…your lack of understanding of the English language…your insanity?


RexRed wrote:

and I find your implications and insult to be a sign of a lack of decorum...


Assuming that I'm a computer illiterate (without expressing the sense in which you used the word "compile") is not an insulting statement? Come on! Get with the program.

RexRed wrote:


When you don't like the message you attack the messenger rather than reason with the logic of the message...


What logic of the message? Show me logic...

That's where you're wrong, my demented friend…I liked the message; it was great evidence to point out that you're not just insane but lacked also logic in your sentences.

RexRed wrote:


Does that sound sane to you?


Your lack of understanding and logic? Just that you need a couple of lessons in sentence structure and clarity. It doesn't constitute as dementia, but the ideas you support are what makes you a maddy.

RexRed wrote:


You can learn from insane people too.


I am learning from you, aren't I?


RexRed wrote:

Truth does not discriminate as you are attempting to do.


What truth? The truth as you see it?


RexRed wrote:


My question to you was actually not meant in jest.


But my questions were intended as comedy as well as serious matter.


RexRed wrote:


I am still wondering if you are computer illiterate...


And I still don't know what the hell you meant, if God compiles or not. What the hell is the relevancy of the argument? (And I'm still wondering if you are able to write a sentence that makes sense to the reader)

RexRed wrote:


Does God compile was the question not does God compute...?


Exactly! Any elaboration?


RexRed wrote:


Your response was,
What the hell are you talking about?


Bingo!

RexRed wrote:


My response to that was, are you computer illiterate?

At least you can read.

RexRed wrote:


A simple yes or no would have sufficed.

No…but are you insane?


RexRed wrote:


Maybe it is the word "illiterate", the word savvy would have been a bit more of what I meant.


Maybe it's your dementia that prevents you from being understood.

RexRed wrote:


Sorry if the question seemed insensitive.

Term terms terms Smile

I'm sorry I called you "insane."Twisted Evil


RexRed wrote:


Also, you will not find me apologizing for loving God and his word...


Of course not!! We all must fear the lord, right?

RexRed wrote:


If you find that to be insanity then I would say, a lack of God is insanity and throw it back on you.


Insanity (n)
extreme folly; senselessness; foolhardiness.
0 Replies
 
RexRed
 
  1  
Reply Sun 15 Oct, 2006 01:45 am
Jason, I really don't know how to respond to you other than I am not learning anything currently from you other than you like to call people insane.

Empty insult.

If you are going to insult someone at least have a good reason for it.

I quoted the Bible and you go all ballistic... It is not me that has demonstrated instability.

You break up my post nearly into little tiny syllables until it no longer even has continuity. And then you ramble on something about how I should believe like you...

Why? I am perfectly happy believing just the way I do.

You assume you know what I believe and you make judgments. I have not made judgments toward you other than you like hurl superlatives.

That just tells me the that the fruit of your belief system has left you inhospitable and unfeeling.
0 Replies
 
Jason Proudmoore
 
  1  
Reply Sun 15 Oct, 2006 07:10 am
RexRed wrote:
Jason, I really don't know how to respond to you other than I am not learning anything currently from you other than you like to call people insane.



I call people insane ONLY if they display some trait of insanity. Your lack of understanding and learning does not lie on my ability to teach.

RexRed wrote:
Empty insult.



Are you kidding me?


RexRed wrote:

If you are going to insult someone at least have a good reason for it.


Wasn't that good enough reason?
RexRed wrote:


I quoted the Bible and you go all ballistic... It is not me that has demonstrated instability.


You probably have gone completely sinile before your time, Redrex. Let me hightlight something for you:

Below you asked me if I was insane from an early statement made by me.
RexRed wrote:


I am not insane, are you?


And here I told you that I wasn't insane…see?
Jason Proudmoore wrote:

I'm a very sane individual… but you on the other hand…


RexRed wrote:

2Ti 1:7
For God hath not given us the spirit of fear; but of power, and of love, and of a sound mind.

But since you quoted a verse in the Bible that clearly states that God ONLY creates powerful, loving, and sound individual, I had to take this as evidence and present it to you as lack of understanding, that this world not just contains sick individuals, but also unpowerful, hateful, and insane individuals. See how this quote from your Bible serves as a bandaid to cover the reality of the world? Open your eyes.

Jason Proudmoore wrote:

…see what I mean?

See what I mean was a statement I used to pointout your inability to perceive and analize obvious information used in everyday human reasoning.


RexRed wrote:

You break up my post nearly into little tiny syllables until it no longer even has continuity.


Was that wrong? Should've I not done that? Did I alter anything?

RexRed wrote:

And then you ramble on something about how I should believe like you...


When have I ever suggested to you that you should think like me? Can't you see your reasoning here? and then you get all upset when I call you insane.


RexRed wrote:

Why? I am perfectly happy believing just the way I do.

I know you're not in agony…but please…when you ask a question don't just try to keep it simple, and don't just utter everything that comes out of your head…elaborate…for the sake of the argument.

RexRed wrote:

You assume you know what I believe and you make judgments.
RexRed wrote:


I have not made judgments toward you other than you like hurl superlatives.


I haven't made judgement toward you other than calling you "insane."
If you don't like it, just write something that makes sense…it ain't much. Believe me.

RexRed wrote:

That just tells me the that the fruit of your belief system has left you inhospitable and unfeeling.


I am not a superstition person, Rex. But I do follow a system of reasoning. I react to senseless ideas the way I do because I care for people…I care for you, believe it or not. I want people to know what they are in order for them to take positive action on themselves. More, way more than half of the people at A2K don't totally express their feelings because they want to project themselves as individuals they're not. I do this as a wakeup call for you…get some help by learning how to express yourself lucidly…and probably we would get somewhere else.
0 Replies
 
RexRed
 
  1  
Reply Sun 15 Oct, 2006 10:50 am
Jason,

You obviously have a problem..

You have hijacked this thread to call names...

You are insecure...
0 Replies
 
Jason Proudmoore
 
  1  
Reply Sun 15 Oct, 2006 12:03 pm
RexRed wrote:
Jason,

You obviously have a problem..


And that problem is…?

RexRed wrote:

You have hijacked this thread to call names...


Hijacked? Is it drama I'm getting from you?
And No…I have called you "insane"…just one name.

RexRed wrote:

You are insecure...

You're the one who can't express a logical idea and resort to mindless gibes and superfluous critism… and I'm the one who's insecure. Go get a clue…or a shrink.
0 Replies
 
RexRed
 
  1  
Reply Sun 15 Oct, 2006 12:18 pm
Rex wrote in red

Jason Proudmoore wrote:
RexRed wrote:
Jason,

You obviously have a problem..


And that problem is…?

Your problem.
RexRed wrote:

You have hijacked this thread to call names...


Hijacked? Is it drama I'm getting from you?
And No…I have called you "insane"…just one name.

Several times...
RexRed wrote:

You are insecure...

You're the one who can't express a logical idea and resort to mindless gibes and superfluous critism… and I'm the one who's insecure. Go get a clue…or a shrink.


Where is all of the "content" you have had to contribute to this forum?

You have little more than hot air. Go blow up somewhere else.
0 Replies
 
Jason Proudmoore
 
  1  
Reply Sun 15 Oct, 2006 12:42 pm
Jason Proudmoore wrote:

And that problem is…?


RexRed wrote:


Your problem.

Does this "problem" have a name? Or is it just the delusion taking over again?


RexRed wrote:

You have hijacked this thread to call names...


Jason Proudmoore wrote:

Hijacked? Is it drama I'm getting from you?
And No…I have called you "insane"…just one name.


RexRed wrote:

Several times...


Just one name, several times…not called you NAMES…know the difference?

RexRed wrote:


You are insecure...


Jason Proudmoore wrote:

You're the one who can't express a logical idea and resort to mindless gibes and superfluous critism… and I'm the one who's insecure. Go get a clue…or a shrink.


RexRed wrote:


Where is all of the "content" you have had to contribute to this forum?

Are you also blind? Haven't you read that I suggested to you that you should get professional help? Isn't that contribution enough?

RexRed wrote:

You have little more than hot air. Go blow up somewhere else.


Seriously, Rex, get some help.
0 Replies
 
RexRed
 
  1  
Reply Tue 17 Oct, 2006 12:00 am
Jason Proudmoore wrote:
Jason Proudmoore wrote:

And that problem is…?


RexRed wrote:


Your problem.

Does this "problem" have a name? Or is it just the delusion taking over again?


RexRed wrote:

You have hijacked this thread to call names...


Jason Proudmoore wrote:

Hijacked? Is it drama I'm getting from you?
And No…I have called you "insane"…just one name.


RexRed wrote:

Several times...


Just one name, several times…not called you NAMES…know the difference?

RexRed wrote:


You are insecure...


Jason Proudmoore wrote:

You're the one who can't express a logical idea and resort to mindless gibes and superfluous critism… and I'm the one who's insecure. Go get a clue…or a shrink.


RexRed wrote:


Where is all of the "content" you have had to contribute to this forum?

Are you also blind? Haven't you read that I suggested to you that you should get professional help? Isn't that contribution enough?

RexRed wrote:

You have little more than hot air. Go blow up somewhere else.


Seriously, Rex, get some help.


Ro 1:21
Because that, when they knew God, they glorified him not as God, neither were thankful; but became vain in their imaginations, and their foolish heart was darkened.
0 Replies
 
Cyracuz
 
  1  
Reply Tue 17 Oct, 2006 03:08 am
... Never mind. I'll start a new thread.
0 Replies
 
RexRed
 
  1  
Reply Tue 17 Oct, 2006 10:43 am
Cyracuz wrote:
... Never mind. I'll start a new thread.


It is pretty hard for me to respond to the subject when I have to defend my every word from someone constantly criticizing my mentality and not the gist of my words...

Does that sound like I am dealing with a someone who is balanced?

I would rather have talked about the God puzzle you have in mind.

When I don't have to defend my own reasoning facilities maybe I will feel unfettered to speak freely here.

It seems that insults are rooted in an insecure mind they stifle the flow of ideas and they steal the communion and fellowship of the forum.

If you look back I was the one attacked by Jason.

So if you were really a good moderator for you own threads you would have told Jason to stop insulting the people interested in your thread. Namely me at this point...

But instead you just sat by and watched.

If you look back when this sort of thing has happened in my threads I have taken charge and seen that things were settled with some decorum

It is often a thankless job.

I expect no less when I am visiting in someone else's threads.

But since no one seems to think that rank insults are out of line here then I guess it is a free for all.

It is up to you to Cyraz to keep you own threads civilized and to stick up for people who are here to legitimately comment on your ideas..
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

700 Inconsistencies in the Bible - Discussion by onevoice
Why do we deliberately fool ourselves? - Discussion by coincidence
Spirituality - Question by Miller
Oneness vs. Trinity - Discussion by Arella Mae
give you chills - Discussion by Bartikus
Evidence for Evolution! - Discussion by Bartikus
Evidence of God! - Discussion by Bartikus
One World Order?! - Discussion by Bartikus
God loves us all....!? - Discussion by Bartikus
The Preambles to Our States - Discussion by Charli
 
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.05 seconds on 05/18/2024 at 04:51:14