heeheeheeheeheeheeheehee . . .
ah, comic relief . . .
okseeyahbye
The issue at hand at the moment is whether or not this law was passed by relying on deliberately faulty information, or accidentally faulty information. The underlying premise is understood to be false.
Correction: The underlying premise has not been proven to be true, as no Weapons of Mass Destruction have yet been found.
Since the underlying premise was dire threat what might yet be found is highly unlikely to support such a premise.
Well, those three two-line posts sum the discussion up as well as anything ... ;-)
