If there is a God, then where the hell is he?

NickFun wrote:

... He made woman from a rib. Cheaper cut".

Didn't he have a union card?

0 Replies

RexRed wrote:

The image of God is spirit ...

How does a spirit reflect light, when it doesn't have a physical presence? To form an image, an object must be able to reflect light in a manner physiologically detectable.

0 Replies

RexRed wrote:

The physical world is an extension of the spiritual world not the other way around.

Has this observation been published in a peer-reviewed Journal?

0 Replies

RexRed wrote:

The form of God is invisible.

This is scriptually incorrect

Romans 1:19 Because that which may be known of God is manifest in them; for God hath shewed [it] unto them.

Romans 1:20 For the invisible things of him from the creation of the world are clearly seen, being understood by the things that are made, [even] his eternal power and Godhead; so that they are without excuse:

0 Replies

mesquite wrote:

Of course he was a he. Ever seen a she with a long white beard?

GOD

He is wearing pink tho.

0 Replies

What would happen if there wasnt a God(in any form)?

0 Replies

Mindonfire wrote:

RexRed wrote:

The form of God is invisible.

This is scriptually incorrect

Romans 1:19 Because that which may be known of God is manifest in them; for God hath shewed [it] unto them.

Romans 1:20 For the invisible things of him from the creation of the world are clearly seen, being understood by the things that are made, [even] his eternal power and Godhead; so that they are without excuse:

Unfortunately, you do not have any idea of what the bible says. You can only pick and choose verses that you think backup what you say. You should first learn what the verses mean before you do so.

0 Replies

Translation: My goofy exegesis is right, and yours is wrong.

0 Replies

snood wrote:

Setanta wrote:
Well, now that Rex is here, puking up his hippie-mystical drivel, this thread is trashed.

...as opposed to you simply puking on everybody, huh?
You take the damn cake. You're insulting and condescending to the guy who posted the thread, you use up two pages of the thread battling about whether c_logic used your name in vain, and you still try to come off like the arbiter of what is, and isn't a useful post. ...

That's a good point snood.

Setanta wrote:

You're the one who is not very bright. When you use the quote funtion, my name appears. But as soon as you break up the quote, you are obliged to type in the quote code to continue to quote after you have used the quote code to close the first portion of the quote. Therefore, in any subsequent quote, you had to have typed in my name, even though you were not quoting me.

From which i conclude that you're not very bright.

Fine, think whatever you want to think - let's just lay this thing to rest.

0 Replies

Setanta wrote:

Translation: My goofy exegesis is right, and yours is wrong.

Are you following me again? Have fun.

I have to laugh at the fact you are goading somebody about using the quote function. You totally screwed it up on a reply to me making it make like I wrote your silly dribble. Rolling Eyes

Would you agree that the not very bright opinion that you wrote to c_logic would, therefore, also apply to you? Question

0 Replies

The word is drivel.

C_logic attributed someone else's post to me. Even if i did screw up the quote function, i did not attribute to you what anyone else wrote. Otherwise, you'd not have been able to make your pathetic attempt at ridicule.

0 Replies

Setanta wrote:

The word is drivel.

C_logic attributed someone else's post to me. Even if i did screw up the quote function, i did not attribute to you what anyone else wrote. Otherwise, you'd not have been able to make your pathetic attempt at ridicule.

No the word is dribble. It is my word and I know what I typed and know what I meant. There you go again, playing the king of the threads. Although, I take it that you consider what you write as drivel. Very astute of you.

I picture you dribbling down your chin as you chase thread after thread so you can ridicule those who do not agree with you.

You sure like that word, pathetic. Don't you. Does it come up a lot in conversation?

0 Replies

http://web4.ehost-services.com/el2ton1/gun2.gif

0 Replies

Do you think God realises he causes so much unhappiness and arguments?

0 Replies

Do you think God causes unhappiness and arguments?

0 Replies

Intrepid wrote:

No the word is dribble. It is my word and I know what I typed and know what I meant.

It is typical of your idiocy that you think anyone can type by dribbling on a key board. That might work if you'd been sucking on ball bearings, but it wouldn't be reasonable to assume that you'd produce anything legible.

Quote:

There you go again, playing the king of the threads.

No, i just enjoy pointing out your stupidity.

Quote:

Although, I take it that you consider what you write as drivel. Very astute of you.

No, just because you attempt to say something, doesn't make it so. As far as being astute, it doesn't take a genius to see that what you typically post is idiotic.

Quote:

I picture you dribbling down your chin as you chase thread after thread so you can ridicule those who do not agree with you.

That's rich, considering how much time you and your buddy Snit have devoted to chasing me from thread to thread. I just drop into threads out of interest, and especially those in which i have already posted. As i posted here before you did (and before Snit did), the reasonable assumption is that you are chasing me. Not that i mind, you do entertain.

Quote:

You sure like that word, pathetic. Don't you. Does it come up a lot in conversation?

You should be glad that your drivel evokes pathos, which is peferrable to hostility and violence. No, it doesn't much come up in conversation with me in real life--but then, i don't discuss religion and other such drivel in real life.

0 Replies

neologist wrote:

Do you think God causes unhappiness and arguments?

No, that comes from people who insist upon the existence of their imaginary friend without substantiation, and who attempt to shove their religious beliefs down the throats of others.

One of the reasons you and i get along is (at least from my angle) the fact that i've never known you to insist that you are absolutely right and that i am absolutely wrong.

We could work up a good bitch fight if we tried, though.

0 Replies

Setanta wrote:

No, i just enjoy pointing out your stupidity.

Are you testing the TOS?

Is this your way of saying that you don't agree with me and I am absolutely wrong?

0 Replies

I generally don't agree with stupidity. It would only be a violation of the terms of service if i said you are stupid. I simply have pointed out that many of the things you post here are stupid. That is a substantive difference, which i have noticed the thin skinned religionist can't seem to distinguish. Your buddy Snit is a prime example. He goes off at anyone for any criticism of organized religion, and continues to assert that religion should be immune from all criticism. When it comes to violating the terms of service, you should talk to him. He may be the site record holder.

0 Replies

Setanta wrote:

neologist wrote:
Do you think God causes unhappiness and arguments?

No, that comes from people who insist upon the existence of their imaginary friend without substantiation, and who attempt to shove their religious beliefs down the throats of others.

One of the reasons you and i get along is (at least from my angle) the fact that i've never known you to insist that you are absolutely right and that i am absolutely wrong.

We could work up a good bitch fight if we tried, though.

Shoved beliefs cause religious indigestion, the symptoms of which include contemptuous bile. I wouldn't want that.

0 Replies

If there is a God, then where the hell is he?

Related Topics

Quick Links

My Account

able2know