0
   

Religion versus human dignity.

 
 
timberlandko
 
  1  
Reply Mon 25 Sep, 2006 09:24 am
Baph wrote:
... I was wondering how to access personal messages on this site, and start new threads ...


Re PMs (Personal Messages), see This

To start a new topic, navigate to the appropriate FORUM,

click the http://www.able2know.com/forums/templates/Able2Know/images/lang_english/post.gif button at the top left of the page,

then compose and submit your topic-starting post.
0 Replies
 
JLNobody
 
  1  
Reply Mon 25 Sep, 2006 12:26 pm
And, of course, we can always harvest the limbs of death row convicts. That way we eat without killing, if that is one's concern.
These proposals are becoming not so modest, I fear.
0 Replies
 
JLNobody
 
  1  
Reply Mon 25 Sep, 2006 12:26 pm
And, of course, we can always harvest the limbs of death row convicts. That way we eat without killing, if that is one's concern.
These proposals are becoming not so modest, I fear.
0 Replies
 
neologist
 
  1  
Reply Mon 25 Sep, 2006 12:35 pm
Perhaps only the rump, one hump at a time, as Candide was advised:

"Cut off only one of the buttocks of
each of those ladies,' said he, 'and you will
fare extremely well; if you are under the
necessity of having recourse to the same
expedient again, you will find the like supply
a few days hence. Heaven will approve of
so charitable an action. . ."

Chapter 19
0 Replies
 
echi
 
  1  
Reply Mon 25 Sep, 2006 12:43 pm
You guys are sick. SICK!!
0 Replies
 
neologist
 
  1  
Reply Mon 25 Sep, 2006 01:13 pm
May I invite you over to my friend Joe Sixpack's place?

Barbecued ribs, (heh heh) tater salad and chips with a keg of Mac and Jacks. Pepsi fer the kids. And ice cream. Coffee too.

Everyone welcome this Saturday. Call for details.
0 Replies
 
echi
 
  1  
Reply Mon 25 Sep, 2006 02:03 pm
Thanks, but I only eat rabbit food.
0 Replies
 
neologist
 
  1  
Reply Mon 25 Sep, 2006 02:06 pm
Well, there is a veggie plate for the faint of heart
0 Replies
 
timberlandko
 
  1  
Reply Mon 25 Sep, 2006 02:11 pm
Vegetables are what food ate.
0 Replies
 
neologist
 
  1  
Reply Mon 25 Sep, 2006 02:16 pm
Yeah, but don't worry echi; you'll be safe around us fellers.
0 Replies
 
echi
 
  1  
Reply Mon 25 Sep, 2006 02:28 pm
neologist wrote:
Well, there is a veggie plate for the faint of heart


"FAINT OF HEART??"


Evil or Very Mad Grrrrrrr...
0 Replies
 
JLNobody
 
  1  
Reply Mon 25 Sep, 2006 03:56 pm
Yes, having recently fed, we are safe, for the time being. Twisted Evil
0 Replies
 
JLNobody
 
  1  
Reply Mon 25 Sep, 2006 03:56 pm
Yes, having recently fed, we are safe, for the time being. Twisted Evil
0 Replies
 
Setanta
 
  1  
Reply Mon 25 Sep, 2006 03:58 pm
The time has come
The Walrus said
To speak of many things
Of ships and shoes
And sealing wax
Of cabbages and Kings . . .
0 Replies
 
Eorl
 
  1  
Reply Mon 25 Sep, 2006 05:27 pm
neologist wrote:
May I invite you over to my friend Joe Sixpack's place?

Barbecued ribs, (heh heh) tater salad and chips with a keg of Mac and Jacks. Pepsi fer the kids. And ice cream. Coffee too.

Everyone welcome this Saturday. Call for details.


Save me the Parson's nose.....?
0 Replies
 
real life
 
  1  
Reply Tue 26 Sep, 2006 11:42 pm
rosborne979 wrote:
real life wrote:
........there are these who cannot bring themselves to say that ANYTHING is evil.


The discussion here isn't over whether you call something evil or not, it's over whether something is inherently 'evil'.

We all know that you can call something evil. And I for one think that terrorism and cannibalism are pretty awful things. I just don't call them evil because evil to me implies some type of supernatural inherent quality to things, while it's perfectly obvious that 'evil' is subjective, not inherent.

real life wrote:
Their entire worldview depends on denying evil.


Only the concept of inherent evil. Whereas your entire world view seems to revolve around the assumption of inherent evil.


True, I believe there are absolutes-- right and wrong.

Is believing in absolutes wrong?

When would flying passenger airplanes into buildings ever be right?

If it's always wrong, isn't that the same as stating an absolute?
0 Replies
 
JLNobody
 
  1  
Reply Tue 26 Sep, 2006 11:46 pm
Real Life asks: "When would flying passenger airplanes into buildings ever be right?"
To me it will always be wrong. To Islamists it will always be right."
0 Replies
 
Eorl
 
  1  
Reply Tue 26 Sep, 2006 11:53 pm
Such Islamists would agree with real life that objective good and evil exist, and they would point him as an example of the evil that the good martyrs were trying to eliminate.
0 Replies
 
fresco
 
  1  
Reply Wed 27 Sep, 2006 12:39 am
It seems we are getting fall out from the "moral objectivity" thread.

IMO there is no such thing as "objectivity" moral or otherwise.
I think in matters of religion we can only talk about lack of consenus. In other words if the "rationality" of any particular religion conflicts with the interests and views of the majority then it is potentially "evil".
The argument by religionists that the majority is "misguided" and that their"true" interests lie in "the afterlife" is the clear source of such "evil".
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

700 Inconsistencies in the Bible - Discussion by onevoice
Why do we deliberately fool ourselves? - Discussion by coincidence
Spirituality - Question by Miller
Oneness vs. Trinity - Discussion by Arella Mae
give you chills - Discussion by Bartikus
Evidence for Evolution! - Discussion by Bartikus
Evidence of God! - Discussion by Bartikus
One World Order?! - Discussion by Bartikus
God loves us all....!? - Discussion by Bartikus
The Preambles to Our States - Discussion by Charli
 
Copyright © 2025 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.04 seconds on 01/15/2025 at 02:45:04