Endymion
 
  -1  
Reply Sun 1 Jul, 2007 07:38 pm
http://staging.michaelmoore.com/sicko_opening_day/Sacramento_Tower_Theatre/IMG_7035_5002.jpg

http://www.michaelmoore.com/

Anyone out there seen it yet?
I'll always remember the first time i went to see F 9/11
I was sitting close to this guy in a wheelchair who had no legs
and when the film finished he started crying and couldn't stop.

Someone said, "we need a Mike Moore here in Britain."

He's a modern day Robin Hood, alright
0 Replies
 
edgarblythe
 
  0  
Reply Sun 1 Jul, 2007 08:16 pm
I will see it on DVD.
0 Replies
 
Endymion
 
  -1  
Reply Tue 3 Jul, 2007 01:39 am
hey, Edgar
I'd like to hear your views on it

oh yeah

Surprise! Surprise!
Bush spares Libby from jail term

http://msnbcmedia1.msn.com/j/msnbc/Components/Photos/070702/070702_libby_hmed_3p.h2.jpg
0 Replies
 
Endymion
 
  -1  
Reply Tue 3 Jul, 2007 09:38 pm
http://english.aljazeera.net/mritems/images/2007/7/3/1_223537_1_5.jpg


Eight students from Islamabad's Red mosque, or Lal Majid, three policemen and a TV cameraman have been killed after students from the mosque clashed with Pakistani security forces.

http://english.aljazeera.net/NR/exeres/54E2F140-E474-42A1-9CD2-84C41C7A9883.htm

Naima - please let us know you're okay
0 Replies
 
lostnsearching
 
  0  
Reply Wed 4 Jul, 2007 02:44 am
Hi Endy

I'm perfectly okay, thanks.

21 deaths...10 confirmed...about 94 injured... they're starting to surrender!(above 500 now)... about 2000-5000 people in there... Curfew in Islamabad since last night!

things are getting better....i think....

thanks Endy Smile
0 Replies
 
lostnsearching
 
  0  
Reply Wed 4 Jul, 2007 09:44 am
here's an update you might like...

Maulana Abdul Aziz(the f*ckin idiot behind all the chaos) arrested …trying to escape amongst the women surrendering… wearing a burqa (the black viel thing those women are wearing )

Laughing Laughing Laughing

I know I shouldn't be laughing… but the report I just saw was Hillarious…(or maybe I'm just too happy)

Good day, Endy
0 Replies
 
Endymion
 
  -1  
Reply Wed 4 Jul, 2007 06:30 pm
Glad it's over - look after yourself.

Okay?
0 Replies
 
Endymion
 
  -1  
Reply Wed 4 Jul, 2007 06:49 pm
I know I'm a day late - but tonight I got out this album (yeah, vinyl),

http://www.xs4all.nl/~maroen/engels/album/bornusa.jpg

And I opened a bottle of Californian wine. And I drunk a toast to independence.



BORN IN THE U.S.A. ~ Bruce Springsteen


Born down in a dead man's town
The first kick I took was when I hit the ground
You end up like a dog that's been beat too much
Till you spend half your life just covering up

Born in the U.S.A.
I was born in the U.S.A.
I was born in the U.S.A.
Born in the U.S.A.

Got in a little hometown jam
So they put a rifle in my hand
Sent me off to a foreign land
To go and kill the yellow man

Born in the U.S.A.
I was born in the U.S.A.
I was born in the U.S.A.
I was born in the U.S.A.
Born in the U.S.A.

Come back home to the refinery
Hiring man says "Son if it was up to me"
Went down to see my V.A. man
He said "Son, don't you understand"

I had a brother at Khe Sanh fighting off the Viet Cong
They're still there, he's all gone

He had a woman he loved in Saigon
I got a picture of him in her arms now

Down in the shadow of the penitentiary
Out by the gas fires of the refinery
I'm ten years burning down the road
Nowhere to run ain't got nowhere to go

Born in the U.S.A.
I was born in the U.S.A.
Born in the U.S.A.
I'm a long gone Daddy in the U.S.A.
Born in the U.S.A.
Born in the U.S.A.
Born in the U.S.A.
I'm a cool rocking Daddy in the U.S.A.





Transcript


SPECIAL COMMENT
By Keith Olbermann
Anchor, 'Countdown'
Updated: 5:13 p.m. PT July 3, 2007

"I didn't vote for him," an American once said, "But he's my president, and I hope he does a good job."

That?-on this eve of the 4th of July?-is the essence of this democracy, in 17 words. And that is what President Bush threw away yesterday in commuting the sentence of Lewis "Scooter" Libby.

The man who said those 17 words?-improbably enough?-was the actor John Wayne. And Wayne, an ultra-conservative, said them, when he learned of the hair's-breadth election of John F. Kennedy instead of his personal favorite, Richard Nixon in 1960.

"I didn't vote for him but he's my president, and I hope he does a good job."

The sentiment was doubtlessly expressed earlier, but there is something especially appropriate about hearing it, now, in Wayne's voice: The crisp matter-of-fact acknowledgement that we have survived, even though for nearly two centuries now, our Commander-in-Chief has also served, simultaneously, as the head of one political party and often the scourge of all others.

We as citizens must, at some point, ignore a president's partisanship. Not that we may prosper as a nation, not that we may achieve, not that we may lead the world?-but merely that we may function.

But just as essential to the seventeen words of John Wayne, is an implicit trust?-a sacred trust: That the president for whom so many did not vote, can in turn suspend his political self long enough, and for matters imperative enough, to conduct himself solely for the benefit of the entire Republic.

Our generation's willingness to state "we didn't vote for him, but he's our president, and we hope he does a good job," was tested in the crucible of history, and earlier than most.

And in circumstances more tragic and threatening. And we did that with which history tasked us.

We enveloped our President in 2001.And those who did not believe he should have been elected?-indeed those who did not believe he had been elected?-willingly lowered their voices and assented to the sacred oath of non-partisanship.

And George W. Bush took our assent, and re-configured it, and honed it, and shaped it to a razor-sharp point and stabbed this nation in the back with it.

Were there any remaining lingering doubt otherwise, or any remaining lingering hope, it ended yesterday when Mr. Bush commuted the prison sentence of one of his own staffers.

Did so even before the appeals process was complete; did so without as much as a courtesy consultation with the Department of Justice; did so despite what James Madison?-at the Constitutional Convention?-said about impeaching any president who pardoned or sheltered those who had committed crimes "advised by" that president; did so without the slightest concern that even the most detached of citizens must look at the chain of events and wonder: To what degree was Mr. Libby told: break the law however you wish?-the President will keep you out of prison?

In that moment, Mr. Bush, you broke that fundamental com-pact between yourself and the majority of this nation's citizens?-the ones who did not cast votes for you. In that moment, Mr. Bush, you ceased to be the President of the United States. In that moment, Mr. Bush, you became merely the President of a rabid and irresponsible corner of the Republican Party. And this is too important a time, Sir, to have a commander-in-chief who puts party over nation.

This has been, of course, the gathering legacy of this Administration. Few of its decisions have escaped the stain of politics. The extraordinary Karl Rove has spoken of "a permanent Republican majority," as if such a thing?-or a permanent Democratic majority?-is not antithetical to that upon which rests: our country, our history, our revolution, our freedoms.

Yet our Democracy has survived shrewder men than Karl Rove. And it has survived the frequent stain of politics upon the fabric of government. But this administration, with ever-increasing insistence and almost theocratic zealotry, has turned that stain into a massive oil spill.

The protection of the environment is turned over to those of one political party, who will financially benefit from the rape of the environment. The protections of the Constitution are turned over to those of one political party, who believe those protections unnecessary and extravagant and quaint.

The enforcement of the laws is turned over to those of one political party, who will swear beforehand that they will not enforce those laws. The choice between war and peace is turned over to those of one political party, who stand to gain vast wealth by ensuring that there is never peace, but only war.

And now, when just one cooked book gets corrected by an honest auditor, when just one trampling of the inherent and inviolable fairness of government is rejected by an impartial judge, when just one wild-eyed partisan is stopped by the figure of blind justice, this President decides that he, and not the law, must prevail.

I accuse you, Mr. Bush, of lying this country into war.

I accuse you of fabricating in the minds of your own people, a false implied link between Saddam Hussein and 9/11.

I accuse you of firing the generals who told you that the plans for Iraq were disastrously insufficient.

I accuse you of causing in Iraq the needless deaths of 3,586 of our brothers and sons, and sisters and daughters, and friends and neighbors.

I accuse you of subverting the Constitution, not in some misguided but sincerely-motivated struggle to combat terrorists, but to stifle dissent.

I accuse you of fomenting fear among your own people, of creating the very terror you claim to have fought.

I accuse you of exploiting that unreasoning fear, the natural fear of your own people who just want to live their lives in peace, as a political tool to slander your critics and libel your opponents.

I accuse you of handing part of this Republic over to a Vice President who is without conscience, and letting him run roughshod over it.

And I accuse you now, Mr. Bush, of giving, through that Vice President, carte blanche to Mr. Libby, to help defame Ambassador Joseph Wilson by any means necessary, to lie to Grand Juries and Special Counsel and before a court, in order to protect the mechanisms and particulars of that defamation, with your guarantee that Libby would never see prison, and, in so doing, as Ambassador Wilson himself phrased it here last night, of becoming an accessory to the obstruction of justice.

When President Nixon ordered the firing of the Watergate special prosecutor Archibald Cox during the infamous "Saturday Night Massacre" on October 20th, 1973, Cox initially responded tersely, and ominously.

"Whether ours shall be a government of laws and not of men, is now for Congress, and ultimately, the American people."

President Nixon did not understand how he had crystallized the issue of Watergate for the American people.


It had been about the obscure meaning behind an attempt to break in to a rival party's headquarters; and the labyrinthine effort to cover-up that break-in and the related crimes.

And in one night, Nixon transformed it.

Watergate?-instantaneously?-became a simpler issue: a President overruling the inexorable march of the law of insisting?-in a way that resonated viscerally with millions who had not previously understood - that he was the law.

Not the Constitution. Not the Congress. Not the Courts. Just him.

Just - Mr. Bush - as you did, yesterday.

The twists and turns of Plame-Gate, of your precise and intricate lies that sent us into this bottomless pit of Iraq; your lies upon the lies to discredit Joe Wilson; your lies upon the lies upon the lies to throw the sand at the "referee" of Prosecutor Fitzgerald's analogy. These are complex and often painful to follow, and too much, perhaps, for the average citizen.

But when other citizens render a verdict against your man, Mr. Bush?-and then you spit in the faces of those jurors and that judge and the judges who were yet to hear the appeal?-the average citizen understands that, Sir.

It's the fixed ballgame and the rigged casino and the pre-arranged lottery all rolled into one?-and it stinks. And they know it.


Nixon's mistake, the last and most fatal of them, the firing of Archibald Cox, was enough to cost him the presidency. And in the end, even Richard Nixon could say he could not put this nation through an impeachment.

It was far too late for it to matter then, but as the decades unfold, that single final gesture of non-partisanship, of acknowledged responsibility not to self, not to party, not to "base," but to country, echoes loudly into history. Even Richard Nixon knew it was time to resign

Would that you could say that, Mr. Bush. And that you could say it for Mr. Cheney. You both crossed the Rubicon yesterday. Which one of you chose the route, no longer matters. Which is the ventriloquist, and which the dummy, is irrelevant.

But that you have twisted the machinery of government into nothing more than a tawdry machine of politics, is the only fact that remains relevant.

It is nearly July 4th, Mr. Bush, the commemoration of the moment we Americans decided that rather than live under a King who made up the laws, or erased them, or ignored them?-or commuted the sentences of those rightly convicted under them?-we would force our independence, and regain our sacred freedoms.

We of this time?-and our leaders in Congress, of both parties?-must now live up to those standards which echo through our history: Pressure, negotiate, impeach?-get you, Mr. Bush, and Mr. Cheney, two men who are now perilous to our Democracy, away from its helm.

For you, Mr. Bush, and for Mr. Cheney, there is a lesser task. You need merely achieve a very low threshold indeed. Display just that iota of patriotism which Richard Nixon showed, on August 9th, 1974.

Resign.

And give us someone?-anyone?-about whom all of us might yet be able to quote John Wayne, and say, "I didn't vote for him, but he's my president, and I hope he does a good job."

http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article17960.htm



0 Replies
 
Endymion
 
  -1  
Reply Wed 4 Jul, 2007 07:31 pm
Why do we hate them?

By Gilad Atzmon

07/04/07 "ICH" -- --- When I came over to Britain some thirteen years ago, I found a very tolerant place. I was amazed to see so many people of so many colours, not just living together in peace, but living in full harmony. At Essex University, the institute where I was doing my postgraduate studies, everyone was enthusiastic about post-colonialism. The Brits, so it seemed to me at the time, were repenting over their embarrassing colonial past. I was mildly impressed but not totally overwhelmed. At the end of the day, it isn't that difficult to denounce your grandfather's crimes.

I was amazed to see Turks and Cypriots running grocery shops side by side in Green Lane. My first roommate was a Palestinian M.A. student from Beit Sahour, it all felt natural. It didn't take long before I fell in love with the town and decided to make it into my permanent home.

At the time, Britain was very different from the place I came from. In my homeland the human landscape was officially reduced into two types. In a manner of crude binary opposition there was always a clear division between the ?'Good' and the ?'Bad', the ?'us' and the ?'them', the ?'West' and the ?'East' or just the ?'Jews' and the ?'Arabs'. In the place I came from, peace couldn't even be seen on the horizon. But in the London of the 1990s, there was no such dichotomy. Painfully enough, this has changed. On a daily basis our media outlets repeat the idiotic question: "Why do they hate us so much?" By now it is rather clear, the binary opposition between ?'us' and ?'them' has made it into an integral part of the British discourse as well.

When I moved over in the early 1990s, British politics was very boring. John Major was in power. But then, not before long, a young, dynamic, visionary politician removed him from office. This politician is a man who has managed in just ten years to demolish one of the most harmonious societies in the West. Tony Blair, the great new Labour promise, had been running the country for a decade; he managed to drag this country into every possible conflict, and to escalate minor conflict to crisis levels. He has managed to lie repeatedly to his people, his parliament and his cabinet, he has launched an illegal war that cost over 700,000 innocent civilian lives. He obviously failed to see the impact those wars may have on his multi-ethnic society at home.

Blair has just left the PM office, thank God for that, however, this country is now on the brink of moral collapse. Its civil rights system is under severe threat. Politicians of all parties are calling for tougher detention laws. The possibility of mass deportation of new immigrants doesn't look like a remote nightmare. Yet, most worrying is the role of the ?'free' media in this country. The leading papers and TV are succumbing quite willingly to the official Government line of thinking. It's something that reminds me too much of the recruited media in my doomed homeland, the place I left thirteen years ago.

I find myself wondering, how dare the media ask ?'why do they hate us?' Don't they know the answer? Don't we know the answer? Weren't we the ones who demolished Iraq? Wasn't it our PM, Tony Blair, who gave a green light to the Israelis to flatten Lebanon? Wasn't it Tony Blair's government who dismissed the democratically elected Hamas in Palestine? Wasn't it Blair who allowed the Israelis to starve Gaza?

For those who still fail to realise, to kill is rather simple, to turn towns into piles of rubble isn't that complicated either. Yet, to raise a child may take a few years, to build a city takes hundreds of years and to establish harmony between human beings takes thousand of years. We should stop lying to others and to ourselves. We know perfectly well why they hate us, they have some good reasons, as things stand momentarily, we are the ones who are killing them en mass. It is us who demolish their towns and kill their kids.

Thus, rather than raising the pathetic question, ?'why do they hate us?' we'd better evade our self-righteous mode, and ask ourselves, ?'why do we hate them so much?' or even, ?'why do we hate so much?' in general.

To bring peace to London, Glasgow, Britain and the West is to look in the mirror, to look into our severe and devastating wrongdoings, to repair the damage made by Blair, Bush and company, to revise the dream of ecumenical Western society. It is possible. It is within our capacity. We have been just there not that long ago. I remember it very well, it was only thirteen years ago, I felt it when I landed in Britain.

Gilad Atzmon was born in Israel in 1963 and had his musical training at the Rubin Academy of Music, Jerusalem (Composition and Jazz) A multi-instrumentalist he plays Soprano, Alto, Tenor and Baritone Saxes, Clarinet, Sol, Zurna and Flutes. Also a prolific and often controversial writer, Atzmon's essays are widely published his novel 'Guide to the perplexed' and 'My One And Only Love' have been translated into 24 languages all together. Visit his website http://www.gilad.co.uk/

0 Replies
 
Endymion
 
  -1  
Reply Thu 5 Jul, 2007 06:00 am
http://english.aljazeera.net/mritems/images/2007/7/4/1_223597_1_3.jpg


banana

some 'ave it better than de other
some 'ave a life of luxuries
some 'ave it all
an' some 'ave none attal
an' some must pick the fruits from da trees

some live free of war and worry
some grow fat on all da cream
while some crawl on deah knees
in da poorer countries
and talk about their big banana dreams


Endymion 2007
0 Replies
 
Endymion
 
  -1  
Reply Fri 6 Jul, 2007 12:20 am
http://english.aljazeera.net/mritems/images/2007/7/5/1_223705_1_3.jpg


Israel raids kill 11 Palestinians

Nine fighters from the al-Qassam Brigades, the military wing of Hamas, have been killed during an Israeli incursion into al-Barij and al-Maghazi refugee camps in central Gaza.

Hours later, witnesses said a member of the smaller fighter group, Islamic Jihad, was killed by an Israeli rocket fired at civilians trying to rescue a wounded person.

Medics said an eleventh person killed was a civilian.

More than 25 Palestinians were injured in Thursday's attacks, including an Al-Aqsa TV journalist, shot as he tried to cover the story. One of the men, Muhamad Siam, was identified as a local Hamas leader.

http://english.aljazeera.net/mritems/images/2007/7/5/1_223706_1_5.jpg
A man tries to move an Al-Aqsa TV cameraman after he was shot by Israeli troops [AFP]

Emad Ghanem, a journalist working for Hamas' satellite channel Al-Aqsa TV, was filming near the al-Barij refugee camp in the east when he was hit by Israeli gunfire.

(As a result, both his legs have been amputated)
0 Replies
 
Endymion
 
  -1  
Reply Fri 6 Jul, 2007 12:41 am


The dangerous patriot...is a defender of militarism and its ideals of war and glory.

- Colonel James A. Donovan, Marine Corps


The World Turned
Upside-Down

Bizarro Bush thinks he's George Washington, but he's really George III[/color]
http://www.antiwar.com/justin/?articleid=11246



All forms of violence, especially war, are totally unacceptable as means to settle disputes between and among nations, groups and persons.

- Dalai Lama
0 Replies
 
Endymion
 
  -1  
Reply Fri 6 Jul, 2007 08:11 am
http://english.aljazeera.net/mritems/images/2007/7/6/1_223754_1_2.jpg

Palestinians mourn Gaza raid dead

Thousands of Palestinians have marched in Gaza at the funerals of 11 people, including nine Hamas fighters, who were killed in an Israeli raid into the central Gaza Strip a day earlier.

The Israeli military on Friday said it had concluded an incursion into Gaza near al-Barij and al-Maghazi refugee camps and had pulled its forces out overnight.

Troops, backed by tanks, entered Gaza early on Thursday and killed nine fighters from the al-Qassam Brigades, Hamas' military wing, as well as a member of the smaller armed group, Islamic Jihad, and a man medical staff said was a civilian.

More than 25 Palestinians were injured in Thursday's attacks, including an Al-Aqsa TV journalist, shot as he was covering the story.

Call for revenge
Thousands of people marched in the streets of al-Barij refugee camp on Friday and armed men fired rifles into the air, vowing revenge.

In a statement, al-Qassam Brigades said: "This blood will only increase our determination to chase the enemy and to strike it and resist by all our might until the last drop of our blood."

A spokesman for Fatah joined Ismail Haniya of Hamas, the deposed Palestinian prime minister, in condemning what Haniya called Israel's "military escalation" and "criminal massacre" and said Palestinian fighters had the right to respond.

Emad Ghanem, a journalist working for Hamas' satellite channel Al-Aqsa TV, was filming near the al-Barij refugee camp in the east during Thursday's raid when he was hit by Israeli gunfire.

As he lay on the ground, video footage showed him being hit by several more shots before fellow journalists came to his aid.

He was eventually carried off and both his legs were amputated in hospital.

An Israeli military spokeswoman said journalists were at risk if they entered a combat zone but soldiers did not deliberately target them.

A military source added that Israel did not consider a cameraman working for Hamas to be a journalist.

In a separate incident around the same incursion, Israeli soldiers fired on a rooftop where several journalists, including a Reuters camera crew, were filming. No one was injured.

'Human shields'

Also during Thursday's raid, Azmi Abu Dalal, a Palestinian ambulance worker, said Israeli forces seized him and several colleagues when they tried to evacuate a wounded Palestinian man from a security post Hamas fighters had been using.
Abu Dalal said soldiers used them as "human shields" to exit the area.

Israeli law bans soldiers from using civilians for protection but the county has been repeatedly accused of breaching the rule.

The deaths bring to 5,776 the number of people killed since the outbreak of the second Palestinian uprising in September 2000, most of them Palestinians, according to a tally by the AFP news agency.

Israel withdrew from Gaza in 2005 after 38 years of occupation, but continues to carry out armed incursions and air strikes in the territory from where Palestinian fighters fire rockets into Israeli territory.

http://english.aljazeera.net/NR/exeres/BF45F79E-8C1F-418F-B7CF-BBF85862CC19.htm
http://english.aljazeera.net/mritems/images/2007/7/6/1_223738_1_5.jpg
0 Replies
 
Endymion
 
  -1  
Reply Sat 7 Jul, 2007 12:46 am
OIL EMPIRE.US

http://www.oilempire.us/oilempire.html
0 Replies
 
Endymion
 
  -1  
Reply Sat 7 Jul, 2007 12:57 am
UK

Letters: Political protest
T-shirt was too political for the parliamentary police

Published: 07 July 2007

Sir: On Wednesday, I accompanied my sixth-form students on a tour of the Houses of Parliament. As we entered to meet the tour guides, I was taken aside by a police officer for wearing a T-shirt with the slogan "1967-2007 - End Israeli Occupation" on the back. I was not given a reason, but told that unless I wore my coat to cover it up, I would not be allowed in. I complied. Nevertheless, I was later approached by another police officer for my name, address and details.

Once through the security gates, another police officer warned me, on pain of being made to leave, to keep my coat buttoned up, because the small Palestinian Solidarity logo on the front could just about be seen.

One of the first things the tour guide announced was: "This is the people's Parliament." A student queried: "Why then can you not show the T-shirt?"

The incident provoked much interest and discussion among the students. I was able to draw attention to the debate which took place the previous day in the House of Lords, headed, "Palestine: Occupied Territories", which was published in Hansard and given to us by our guide.

Launching the debate, Lord Dykes, "as an enthusiastic friend of Israel", unambiguously stated that Israeli occupation of the West Bank was illegal and criticised the international community for failing to make Israel comply with international law. Baroness Tonge stated: "The injustice which is Palestine is one of the major causes of the rise of terrorism in this world. Ever since 1948, Palestine has been used as a propaganda weapon for Islamists worldwide."

It is difficult to understand why one is stopped by the police for carrying a message on a T-shirt which is the same as that expressed by members of the House of Lords. After the question-time session we had with our MP, John Pugh, I asked what rules stated that I should not show the PSC logo. He replied with amusement that there probably were not any, but if the police say something, the best thing is to obey.

Are we now a police state? Do we have arbitrary policing?

PETER REILLY

SOUTHPORT, MERSEYSIDE


http://comment.independent.co.uk/letters/article2742797.ece
0 Replies
 
Endymion
 
  -1  
Reply Sun 8 Jul, 2007 12:38 am
Iraq - A Nightmare




http://english.aljazeera.net/mritems/images/2007/7/7/1_223867_1_3.jpg

More than 150' dead in Iraq blast

More than 150 people have been killed by a lorry bomb in a crowded market in the northern Iraqi village of Amirli, an Iraqi military commander told Al Jazeera.
Many homes in the small community were destroyed when a suicide bomber detonated a powerful bomb on a lorry loaded with bricks, security and administration officials said on Saturday.
Hamad Rasheed, a local civilian administrator, said: "Some 40 homes, 20 shops and 10 vehicles were destroyed.

"The corpses were under the debris of the collapsed buildings. Some were burnt and others were torn apart.

"This is a big disaster for the town, all of the casualties were civilians," he added.

Corpses

Ambulances and private cars ferried dozens of corpses and wounded civilians to nearby clinics and hospitals in where relatives waited for news of the missing.
Dr Wissam Abdullah, the director of a local hospital said the dead and wounded had been taken to an emergency room at his hospital in Tuz Khurmatu, to two hospitals in Kirkuk and two more as far away as the Kurdish city of Sulaimaniyah.

Lieutenant colonel Saman Hamid, security forces commander in nearby Tuz Khurmatu, told the AFP news agency, "there are more than 250 wounded."

"I heard the cries of my child, then I heard nothing else until I woke in hospital," Sukaina Abdul Razak, whose clay brick home collapsed when the bomb went off, said.
"I don't know the fate of my husband and my family. They were all in the kitchen, but I was in my room."

'Smoke and dust'

Shrapnel from the explosion killed shoppers hundreds of metres from ther bomb, Hussein Abu Al-Hussein Akbar Aziz said.

"We have never seen an attack like that in Amirli. The whole village was shrouded in smoke and dust," he said. "I was serving a woman and her child in my shop. They were both killed."

Earlier reports had put the death toll at about 20 people.

It was the second attack on a village in the north of the country in the last 24 hours.

Late on Friday a suicide car bomber killed 22 people and wounded 17 others when he drove his vehicle into a group of Shia Kurds near Iraq's border with Iran.

The victims were returning from a funeral, a local official said.

In another attack, six people were killed, including five Iraqi soldiers, when a car bomb was driven into a military checkpoint in east Baghdad, an army spokesman said. The attack also wounded 24 people, including 18 soldiers.

US soldiers killed

Meanwhile, the US military announced the deaths of six troops in the past three days, mostly victims of roadside bombs in Baghdad.
Three soldiers were killed by the devices in Baghdad on Friday and another on Saturday. Two Marines were killed in combat in Anbar province, the US military said.
So far this month 20 soldiers have been killed, half of them in Baghdad.

Overnight, a mortar killed seven members of a family in Baghdad as they slept on their roof, police said.
Constant power outages often force Iraqis to sleep on the roof of their homes to try and escape sweltering summer temperatures inside.

Police said the mortar bomb that killed seven family members in the mostly Sunni neighbourhood of Fadhil in central Baghdad also wounded two neighbours.

http://english.aljazeera.net/mritems/images/2007/7/7/1_223848_1_5.jpg
0 Replies
 
Endymion
 
  -1  
Reply Sun 8 Jul, 2007 12:43 am
http://www.independent.co.uk/multimedia/archive/00251/cartoon070707_251758b.jpg

Meanwhile here in Britain - (The Independent)

Letters: Brown's Cabinet
Published: 29 June 2007

Does the Brown Cabinet really represent a fresh start?

Sir: A brief moment of optimism engendered by Gordon Brown emphasising the word "change" evaporated as soon as I checked out the voting patterns of the new members of his Cabinet (www.theyworkforyou.com). All showed up as "very strongly for" all the key policies of Tony Blair's government, including the war with Iraq, identity cards, foundation hospitals, top-up fees and Trident. So what will change?

JUDITH STRONG

TWICKENHAM, MIDDLESEX
0 Replies
 
Endymion
 
  -1  
Reply Sun 8 Jul, 2007 12:57 am
http://www.alternet.org/images/managed/topstories_main.jpg

Disappeared: Five Years in Guantanamo

In 2001, 19-year-old Murat Kurnaz (German - turkish born) was an innocent man caught in the wrong place at the wrong time. Accused of being a terrorist, he spent five years in Guantanamo before being released -- now he's telling his story.

http://www.alternet.org/rights/55993/

All the best to you, Murat - hope that somehow, through speaking out about your ordeal, you will eventually learn to come to terms with being treated like an animal for 5 long years

Keep talking... maybe, who knows... just maybe the conscience of the American people will be stirred to respond to your story of bravery and courage.
0 Replies
 
Endymion
 
  -1  
Reply Sun 8 Jul, 2007 01:24 am
Prisoner 345: What Happened to al-Jazeera's Sami al-Haj

by Rachel Morris http://www.cjr.org/cover_story/prisoner_345.php
0 Replies
 
Endymion
 
  -1  
Reply Sun 8 Jul, 2007 03:24 am
You know me - I don't belive in a 'God' as such, but I found this quote written by Mother Teresa over in daily quotes, and it really had a powerful effect on me. Here it is:

People are often unreasonable, illogical, and self-centered;
Forgive them anyway.
If you are kind, people may accuse you of selfish, ulterior motives;
Be kind anyway.
If you are successful you will win some false friends and true enemies;
Succeed anyway.
If you are honest and frank, people may cheat you;
Be honest and frank anyway.
What you spend years building, someone could destroy overnight;
Build anyway.
If you find serenity and happiness, they may be jealous;
Be happy anyway.
The good you do today, people will often forget tomorrow;
Do good anyway.
Give the world the best you have, and it may never be enough;
Give the world the best you've got anyway.

You see, in the final analysis, it is between you and God;
It was never between you and them anyway.

--Mother Teresa

http://www.able2know.com/forums/about4003-0-asc-0.html
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

 
  1. Forums
  2. » Revolution
  3. » Page 30
Copyright © 2026 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 3.64 seconds on 02/26/2026 at 06:19:30