lol well.. i'd like to say interesting but your umm how to put this.. your saying alot with out saying anything.. thats good.. ya
That's an easy way to dismiss careful and precise carping of your logic. <shrugs>
see you say things like 'incorrect' but offer nothing to well say HOW im incorrect your like the bully in high school and i find it boorish..
You seem to like characterizations about me a lot. "Bully" and "immature" and such. I hope you do not mind if i fail to reciprocate.
If you would like me to expound on how you were incorrect to assert not having made things up I would be more than happy to do so for you.
just saying im 'dropping names' is so very immature...
Here we go with the characterizations again. Well, let's just say I prefer to characterize it as "accurate". You dropped a few names, and did not do anything to strengthen your argument.
"I read so and so and so and so."
"So? This does not make the argument any less absurd."
you have not responded with anything what so ever yet so I find no reason to try to counter anything youv'e said..
Actually I have adroitly pointed out the deficiencies in your logic. But I understand your reluctance to attempt to counter it.
because as I said there has been no substance to what you have said..
You repeat this a lot. I think you protest a wee bit much. Mayhap this is being posited as a substitute for countering my arguments? I can understand your reluctance to do so, but mist say that the "you said nothing" tactics are very transparent.
I am going to ask something directly to what you failed to include in your last post. Since you evidently feel that God is in our dimension.. give me theoretical arguments to say that God is...
Happy to oblige. Here's just one
Your god exists within your head, which despite appearances does in fact exist within this dimension.
after you have done that.. dont reply with your 'bully tactics' anymore your wasting space on this forum.
I'm not the one trying to bully anyone into cessation. That seems to be your role visavis. ;-)
It seems you are using "bully" as an operative term for constructing arguments that irritate you and that you are unable to refute, reducing you to claims that no argument has been made.
"See, I don't have to have the intellectual capacity to refute anything you said. Why? Um... because you have said nothing! Yes, that's the ticket! "
oh and if you find your 'cynical mindset' comfortable i suggest you take your own advice and rise above your current ignorance.. cynicism is not good.. according to the common philosophical view.
visavis, I fear you are demonstrating inadequate reading comprehension skills. I said nothing of being comfortable with cynicism. i said I was comfortable with the dimension in which I live, and joked about your penchant for using such appellations.
I can't be faulted for lapses in your reading visavis.