1
   

Do People Delight in the Failures of Others?

 
 
patiodog
 
  1  
Reply Thu 15 May, 2003 09:04 am
mmmm. Perhaps long, long ago, when someone got up themselves (as the antipodal pasty people put it) of line we'd just bash them on the head with a stick. Very satisfying, it must have been. Now we wait for fate to deliver the blow...
0 Replies
 
Phoenix32890
 
  1  
Reply Thu 15 May, 2003 09:09 am
Soz- Got to disagree with your "take" on selfishness. A person who has a well developed self will not need to raise his self esteem by lowering other people. It is people who are selfLESS who derive enjoyment from the misery of others. It is like a see-saw for the selfless. The more that they can lower someone else, the higher (better ) they feel about themselves!
0 Replies
 
New Haven
 
  1  
Reply Thu 15 May, 2003 09:14 am
What does "selfless" mean?
0 Replies
 
Heeven
 
  1  
Reply Thu 15 May, 2003 09:24 am
But Phoenix, we laugh at their misery when it is caused by their own stupidity. You don't see people jumping for joy when a celebrity is killed in a genuine accident - like the plane crash that took Alliyahs life.

It is more so situations where they get into trouble for their excesses - like picking up a hooker (Eddie Murphy), abusing drugs (Robert Downey Jr), getting obscene face-lifts (Michael Jackson), shop-lifting (Winona Ryder), drugs (Whitney Houston), assaulting a cop (Zsa Zsa Gabor), public lewdness (Pee Wee Herman), domestic abuse, nakedness, statutory rape, DUI's, etc.
0 Replies
 
sozobe
 
  1  
Reply Thu 15 May, 2003 09:24 am
Phoenix, that's what I was saying. A selfish person wants the big fancy house et al and wishes the owner of the house harm. Shoots him scathing glances, won't help him in a pinch -- whatever. I'm positing that the whole schadenfreude thing is a self-correcting mechanism for society, so that the (selfish) owner of the big fancy house decides to build a neighborhood rec center so that people like him more.

This isn't selflessness, it's just various permutations of selfishness.
0 Replies
 
patiodog
 
  1  
Reply Thu 15 May, 2003 09:26 am
"If you can't love yourself, you can't love others." Isn't that the way the saying goes?

It's the way out of the existential dilemma, if I may digress ever so slightly. If we are only a sum of our actions, what motivation do we have to treat other people with kindness and compassion? Well, if we really are just a sum of our actions, then the only thing we should value is ourselves. However, if we are able to recognize that other people are like us -- that is, if we are capable of empathy -- we can follow the Golden Rule, as 'twere: treat others as you yourself would like to be treated. Accepting this, there are only two reasons to treat others poorly: we have no empathy (we do not see them as being like us), or we do have empathy but we do not value ourselves. To deny the self -- to be "selfless" -- is also to deny others.

One of the trappings of celebrity is to make them not like us, and to remove, to some extent, our capacity for empathy towards them. (But since this doesn't explain why we'd delight in our neighbor's lawn dying because she inexplicably threw a dead squirrel in our yard -- not that this has happened to me or anything -- my model must be inherently flawed.)

(Talking out me bum this morning...)
0 Replies
 
patiodog
 
  1  
Reply Thu 15 May, 2003 09:29 am
Yeah, what they said...
0 Replies
 
Phoenix32890
 
  1  
Reply Thu 15 May, 2003 09:31 am
patiodog- Thanks! I have been wracking my brain to come up with an cogent answer for New Haven, and you have done it for me.

The quote that I know is:



Quote:
To say, "I love you", one most know first how to say the "I"~ Ayn Rand
0 Replies
 
patiodog
 
  1  
Reply Thu 15 May, 2003 09:34 am
(If that's cogency, I'd hate to see a ramble!)
0 Replies
 
Phoenix32890
 
  1  
Reply Thu 15 May, 2003 09:36 am
Patiodog- Made perfect sense to me!
0 Replies
 
Phoenix32890
 
  1  
Reply Thu 15 May, 2003 09:47 am
Soz-

Quote:
the (selfish) owner of the big fancy house decides to build a neighborhood rec center so that people like him more.


It is only a SELFLESS person who would build the recreation center to have people like him. A person with a strong sense of self does not need the approval of others to feel good about himself. A truly SELFISH person does it out of magnanimity for his fellow human beings, and for the pleasure it brings to him.

I think that the reason that my words may not be clear to you, I do not perceive the words selfish and selfless as many people do. I think that the word selfish has gotten a bad rap. There is a concept that many people hold, that one person's gain necessitates the loss to another person. I do not hold those views. Looking out for yourself does not necessitate stepping on another.
0 Replies
 
patiodog
 
  1  
Reply Thu 15 May, 2003 09:51 am
I thinks Phoenix is working on a philosophy of magnanimous hedonism, I does.
0 Replies
 
Phoenix32890
 
  1  
Reply Thu 15 May, 2003 09:54 am
patiodog- Magnanimous- yes

Hedonism- Nah- Been there, done that. didn't even get the T-Shirt! :wink:
0 Replies
 
patiodog
 
  1  
Reply Thu 15 May, 2003 09:56 am
(surely you had the t-shirt but lost it somewhere...)
0 Replies
 
Phoenix32890
 
  1  
Reply Thu 15 May, 2003 09:59 am
Patiodog- It's not nice to cast aspersions on an old broad! Laughing
0 Replies
 
patiodog
 
  1  
Reply Thu 15 May, 2003 10:06 am
Well, I tried tossing dispersions on a young narrow, but I couldn't find my mark.
0 Replies
 
eoe
 
  1  
Reply Thu 15 May, 2003 02:42 pm
I think those miserable people who have pissed away their own lives take great pleasuire in the failures of others. It's that "crabs in a barrel" mentality. They didn't have what it takes to achieve their own dreams and don't want to see anyone else do it either.
As far as selfish vs. selfless, I can appreciate what Miss Phoenix says about looking out for oneself. Without stepping on others or allowing others to step on you. Sometimes you have to say no to people and it may appear as if you're being selfish but what you're really doing is not allowing them to take advantage of you. We all know takers. That's all they do is take. And it's up to us to protect ourselves, which means saying no, sometimes hell no.
But Miss Phoenix, I don't get the tie between selfish, selfless and delighting in the failure of others. Did I miss something?
0 Replies
 
cavfancier
 
  1  
Reply Thu 15 May, 2003 02:45 pm
He-don-ism: The act of men adoptings philosophies, or perhaps a way of life.
0 Replies
 
patiodog
 
  1  
Reply Thu 15 May, 2003 04:01 pm
ooooh, that's a good one, cav. took me a minute...
0 Replies
 
BoGoWo
 
  1  
Reply Sat 17 May, 2003 10:48 am
Being a lazy son of a b.....(actually, come to think of it I don't like that term; it foists one's shortcomings off on one's mother, and slanders her at the same time.... retracted) jerk, I haven't read all the posts, but wish to comment anyway;

Once again I hark back to our humble beginnings as hairy apes in a precarious existence. We lived in a heirarchical system of "top down" management because that seemed to work best for the gene pool which, after all is all that matters in a jungle environment - survival.
Therefore we all had to "cowtow" to those higher on the totempole of importance than ourselves, bowing and scraping (licking and grooming) to keep from invoking "society's" censure, which we would probably not survive. So whenever the mighty screwed up and provided a little entertainment, we would throw the first, second, etc...... stones as hard as we could, without fear of reprisal; and it seems to have stuck for those who still give credance to the sanctity of "betterness".
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

How can we be sure? - Discussion by Raishu-tensho
Proof of nonexistence of free will - Discussion by litewave
Destroy My Belief System, Please! - Discussion by Thomas
Star Wars in Philosophy. - Discussion by Logicus
Existence of Everything. - Discussion by Logicus
Is it better to be feared or loved? - Discussion by Black King
Paradigm shifts - Question by Cyracuz
 
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.03 seconds on 04/27/2024 at 01:39:00