1
   

Conversion from Islam = Death penalty?

 
 
RexRed
 
  1  
Reply Wed 22 Mar, 2006 06:07 pm
Steve (as 41oo) wrote:
So are you a Christian Rex? Or do you just define Christianity to be what RedRex believes in?


I am a Biblical "re"searcher.
0 Replies
 
Steve 41oo
 
  1  
Reply Wed 22 Mar, 2006 06:11 pm
what for?
0 Replies
 
RexRed
 
  1  
Reply Wed 22 Mar, 2006 06:13 pm
Steve (as 41oo) wrote:
what for?


Truth, practical spirituality.
0 Replies
 
Doktor S
 
  1  
Reply Wed 22 Mar, 2006 06:28 pm
'truth'
'spirituality'
Rolling Eyes
Meaningless.
0 Replies
 
Instigate
 
  1  
Reply Wed 22 Mar, 2006 07:24 pm
This answer your question.
0 Replies
 
Instigate
 
  1  
Reply Wed 22 Mar, 2006 07:25 pm
Here is a more indepth answer to your query.
0 Replies
 
RexRed
 
  1  
Reply Wed 22 Mar, 2006 07:33 pm
Doktor S wrote:
'truth'
'spirituality'
Rolling Eyes
Meaningless.


Meaningless without a guide...
0 Replies
 
neologist
 
  1  
Reply Wed 22 Mar, 2006 08:10 pm
You are right about one thing, Rex. The trinity is a pagan doctrine.
0 Replies
 
RexRed
 
  1  
Reply Wed 22 Mar, 2006 08:31 pm
neologist wrote:
You are right about one thing, Rex. The trinity is a pagan doctrine.


Yes thanks Neo...

I tend to have grown very fond of Jesus as a man and not as my God... I cannot amalgamate the two at all. I see Jesus as the creation and God as the creator (I have biblical reasons for this.). Jesus was the man that brought me to God. And I love the prophets (PBUT) and teachers (PBUT) that have helped me to understand and know Jesus.

I think I will start a thread about the "trinity and idolatry" and we can discuss this issue further if need be.
0 Replies
 
cjhsa
 
  1  
Reply Wed 22 Mar, 2006 08:35 pm
I was always afraid of the holy ghost. I thought he lived under my pew.
0 Replies
 
RexRed
 
  1  
Reply Wed 22 Mar, 2006 08:56 pm
Funny... Smile

The holy "ghost" is a poor translation for holy spirit or holy "energy"... the holy spirit is an "it" not a person...

It is the gift from the giver, God.

This energy is "created" within us... so it is individual... but equal. This energy goes on to become us in the afterlife..
0 Replies
 
Raul-7
 
  1  
Reply Thu 23 Mar, 2006 02:10 am
Islam was still rather new and at the time they were constantly in jihad (it means resistance, not holy war) againt the oppressors, pagans, people of the book, etc. Thus it was forbidden to convert in fear that the converts would reveal the Muslims' weaknesses, battle plans, etc. to the enemies of Islam. That was the main reason behind forbidding and killing converts; it was an issue of treason and safety.

Hopefully I did not distort the orignal reason.
0 Replies
 
Steve 41oo
 
  1  
Reply Thu 23 Mar, 2006 04:21 am
RexRed wrote:

This energy is "created" within us. This energy goes on to become us in the afterlife..
What type of energy? And whats afterlife? Its meaningless. Whats afterafterlife? more after?

You just make up these wacky superstitious ideas as you go along. If you were honest you would have to say you have no idea about that which is unknowable. But you dont...you and thousands others insist on on dreaming up these ever more bizarre self serving fantasies, and sell them to the gullible. Smile
0 Replies
 
Steve 41oo
 
  1  
Reply Thu 23 Mar, 2006 04:40 am
Raul-7 wrote:
Islam was still rather new and at the time they were constantly in jihad ....That was the main reason behind forbidding and killing converts; it was an issue of treason and safety. Hopefully I did not distort the orignal reason.
Smile

I see. So resisting oppressors and the people of the book was responsible for Islam spreading from Arabia tribe to Spain and India in little more than 100 years? The establishment of the caliphate and the islamic empire happened through spreading the Good News eh? You must know this is rubbish. Islam spread through a desire for conquest and the material benefits it afforded.

Quote:
"Mohammed's God endorsed a policy of conquest, instructing his believers to fight against unbelievers wherever they might be found. In short Mohammed had to conquer, his followers liked to conquer, and his diety told him to conquer"
0 Replies
 
RexRed
 
  1  
Reply Thu 23 Mar, 2006 01:13 pm
Steve (as 41oo) wrote:
Raul-7 wrote:
Islam was still rather new and at the time they were constantly in jihad ....That was the main reason behind forbidding and killing converts; it was an issue of treason and safety. Hopefully I did not distort the orignal reason.
Smile

I see. So resisting oppressors and the people of the book was responsible for Islam spreading from Arabia tribe to Spain and India in little more than 100 years? The establishment of the caliphate and the islamic empire happened through spreading the Good News eh? You must know this is rubbish. Islam spread through a desire for conquest and the material benefits it afforded.

Quote:
"Mohammed's God endorsed a policy of conquest, instructing his believers to fight against unbelievers wherever they might be found. In short Mohammed had to conquer, his followers liked to conquer, and his diety told him to conquer"


Maybe Islam spread on it's own and the conquering part was outside forces trying to topple the regime and Islam simply defending itself? Did you ever think of that?

Christianity and Judaism has spread in much the same ways through wars... Christians once ruled Jerusalem remember?

What were one generation removed pagan Europeans doing in the holy lands? $
0 Replies
 
Steve 41oo
 
  1  
Reply Thu 23 Mar, 2006 01:33 pm
RexRed wrote:
Maybe Islam spread on it's own and the conquering part was outside forces trying to topple the regime and Islam simply defending itself? Did you ever think of that?


no. But I'm pretty sure thats not how it happened either.

RexRed wrote:
Christianity and Judaism has spread in much the same ways through wars... Christians once ruled Jerusalem remember?


I dont think there ever was a "christian empire" as such. Setanta is the man for an answer here. The Jews never had an empire. I accept they are trying to build one now starting with Israel and help from the USA but I think its just plain wrong to suggest Judaism in the past spread through conquest, the reverse if anything.

RexRed wrote:
What were one generation removed pagan Europeans doing in the holy lands? $
They were Christian knights on holiday doing a bit of saracen bashing. Football supporters are similar today.
0 Replies
 
RexRed
 
  1  
Reply Thu 23 Mar, 2006 02:37 pm
Steve (as 41oo) wrote:
RexRed wrote:
Maybe Islam spread on it's own and the conquering part was outside forces trying to topple the regime and Islam simply defending itself? Did you ever think of that?


no. But I'm pretty sure thats not how it happened either.

RexRed wrote:
Christianity and Judaism has spread in much the same ways through wars... Christians once ruled Jerusalem remember?


I dont think there ever was a "christian empire" as such. Setanta is the man for an answer here. The Jews never had an empire. I accept they are trying to build one now starting with Israel and help from the USA but I think its just plain wrong to suggest Judaism in the past spread through conquest, the reverse if anything.

RexRed wrote:
What were one generation removed pagan Europeans doing in the holy lands? $
They were Christian knights on holiday doing a bit of saracen bashing. Football supporters are similar today.


Alright I accept the humor but you are making light of some pretty serious things here.

Just to set you straight, the Christian "church" of England had a "king" too and it was an "empire" (during the crusades)...

Maybe theologically the Europeans were on the wrong side of the Bible with their pagan trinity?

Is that really a laughing matter? Isn't truth the real pursuit?
0 Replies
 
Eorl
 
  1  
Reply Thu 23 Mar, 2006 11:55 pm
Re: Conversion from Islam = Death penalty?
peterW wrote:
Is this true? If someone decides to stop being a Muslim and follow another faith, then does the Koran (and therefore the social laws that are derived from it) require, or even hint at, a death penalty?


Did anyone attempt to answer this, or did it just turn into a bragging session about who has the bigger god ?
0 Replies
 
Steve 41oo
 
  1  
Reply Fri 24 Mar, 2006 06:12 am
RexRed wrote:
...Just to set you straight, the Christian "church" of England had a "king" too and it was an "empire" (during the crusades)...

Maybe theologically the Europeans were on the wrong side of the Bible with their pagan trinity?

Is that really a laughing matter? ...
No its hilarious.
0 Replies
 
RexRed
 
  1  
Reply Sun 26 Mar, 2006 09:49 pm
http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,189131,00.html
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

700 Inconsistencies in the Bible - Discussion by onevoice
Why do we deliberately fool ourselves? - Discussion by coincidence
Spirituality - Question by Miller
Oneness vs. Trinity - Discussion by Arella Mae
give you chills - Discussion by Bartikus
Evidence for Evolution! - Discussion by Bartikus
Evidence of God! - Discussion by Bartikus
One World Order?! - Discussion by Bartikus
God loves us all....!? - Discussion by Bartikus
The Preambles to Our States - Discussion by Charli
 
Copyright © 2025 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.04 seconds on 01/18/2025 at 05:58:10