0
   

Why are you religious? Please give your reasons.

 
 
Phoenix32890
 
  1  
Reply Sat 18 Mar, 2006 07:44 am
Quote:
re·li·gious (rĭ-lĭj'əs)
adj.
Having or showing belief in and reverence for God or a deity


Hep- I think that you have your terms confused. Being religious means believing in a deity. There are many people who do not subscribe to a particular religious tradition, but believe in a god, nonetheless.
0 Replies
 
Treya
 
  1  
Reply Sat 18 Mar, 2006 07:59 am
Hehehe... that's why I said by my definition...

Which I'm pleading the 5th on... :wink:
0 Replies
 
Doktor S
 
  1  
Reply Sat 18 Mar, 2006 12:43 pm
Phoenix32890 wrote:
Quote:
re·li·gious (rĭ-lĭj'əs)
adj.
Having or showing belief in and reverence for God or a deity


Hep- I think that you have your terms confused. Being religious means believing in a deity. There are many people who do not subscribe to a particular religious tradition, but believe in a god, nonetheless.

Then there are those of us that take the opposite path.
0 Replies
 
Treya
 
  1  
Reply Sat 18 Mar, 2006 12:59 pm
So does that make you the opposite of religious then dok?

Hmmm... What would be the opposite of religious?
0 Replies
 
kevnmoon
 
  1  
Reply Sat 18 Mar, 2006 02:06 pm
Everybody free.. In İslam.. One of you may say I don't believe and live free.. Don't confuse with human doctrins.. God Royality is freedom Royality for world.. Only say you ve to be carefull about second world.. Also everybody talk about for this world.. No problem no problem.. If there is no second world.. oooo believer don't loss anything..

But If there is a God ..
Hi.. Why did God give freewill and ego to humanbeing ?

Ants are animal.. Flowers are plant.. They are in so so in discipline .. But human .. What is the orginalities of human ?? Nature killer.. Human killer.. Technology murder.. There r many hungry people in the world.. Whereis the human being ? What is human being.. Only story...

Humanbeing pray everything .. money.. ego.. benefits.. But God??? ooo problem.. He prevents our freewill.. He didn't bind anybodies hands.. Says you r free.

If you share all stars , everyone will ve 100 billion stars.. God Royality.. Don't need anyone .. He shows only ant's way , flower's way .. Quite quite..
0 Replies
 
xingu
 
  1  
Reply Sat 18 Mar, 2006 05:09 pm
Quote:
He didn't bind anybodies hands.. Says you r free.


Is that so? Then why don't you Muslims practice what your God preaches? Why do you persecute so many people?

Here's something I picked up today.

Quote:
Iraqi cleric wants gays killed in "most severe way"
03.16.2006 12:00 AM EST

In the midst of sectarian violence that threatens to drag Iraq into civil war, the country's influential Shiite cleric Grand Ayatollah Ali al-Sistani has issued a violent death order against gays and lesbians on his Web site, according to London-based LGBT human rights groups OutRage.
Written in Arabic, the fatwa comes from a press conference with the powerful religious cleric, where he was asked about the judgment on sodomy and lesbianism. "Forbidden," Sistani answered, according to OutRage, "Punished, in fact, killed. The people involved should be killed in the worst, most severe way of killing."

Considering Sistani's stature and influence within the Iraqi Shiite majority, OutRage member Ali Hili declared the cleric's statements extremely dangerous.

"Sistani's murderous homophobic incitement has given a green light to Shia Muslims to hunt and kill lesbians and gay men," said Hili. "We hold Sistani personally responsible for the murder of lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender Iraqis. He gives the killers theological sanction and encouragement."

Sistani is a leading member and voice of the Shiite sect, which in Iraq has approximately twice as many followers as the Sunni sect. (The Advocate)

http://www.logoonline.com/news/story.jhtml?id=1526230&disableFeatureRedirect=true&contentTypeID=1087

http://petertatchell.net/international/sistani.htm

Persecute and kill. It's in your Koran and everyday life.

It's bad enough to kill for oil and wealth. But you people kill for your God. You use your religion to justify murder.
0 Replies
 
neologist
 
  1  
Reply Sat 18 Mar, 2006 05:36 pm
Doktor S wrote:
Yes, choice.
The experience of choice.
That you can and wil ultimately only choose one way does not preclude the experience itself Smile
Was it a choice freely made?
0 Replies
 
Doktor S
 
  1  
Reply Sat 18 Mar, 2006 07:08 pm
neologist wrote:
Doktor S wrote:
Yes, choice.
The experience of choice.
That you can and wil ultimately only choose one way does not preclude the experience itself Smile
Was it a choice freely made?

Freedom too is an illusion from where I sit. Yet perhaps the most important illusion we have.
0 Replies
 
Doktor S
 
  1  
Reply Sat 18 Mar, 2006 07:16 pm
hephzibah wrote:
So does that make you the opposite of religious then dok?

Hmmm... What would be the opposite of religious?


In a way I suppose. It all hinges on how one defines religious.
The popular conception of the word is rather myopic as it tends to focus on the judeo-christian interpretation. God is always taken to mean something 'out there' with a certain set of properties.
If you interpret 'religious' as 'someone that believes in god' then I qualify, however my autotheistic interpretation of what 'god' is shares little in common with the popular conception.
If you define 'religious' as someone that follows a certain set of tenets and dogma, then I qualify as I do tend to live my life by the Satanic creed.

However, I am still an atheist, as far as the popular conception of god, or in fact any non-autotheistic interpretation.
0 Replies
 
Chumly
 
  1  
Reply Sat 18 Mar, 2006 07:17 pm
Re: Why are you religious? Please give your reasons.
Chumly wrote:
Why are you religious? Please give your reasons.
Howz bout 'er Neo?
0 Replies
 
JLNobody
 
  1  
Reply Sat 18 Mar, 2006 07:40 pm
When Chumly asks why one is religious and to give his reasons, the implication is that the individual chooses to be religious. I think that very few people have explictly chosen to adopt a faith as an internal posture (for reasons, say, like that of Pascal's Wager). Some have, I'm confident, chosen a religion as an external posture, to be good with one's community, for example. But instead of asking the question in terms of a goal or purpose, one may ask the psycho-sociological question of what CAUSED an individual to feel faith. That's much more difficult to answer, don't you think?
0 Replies
 
gustavratzenhofer
 
  1  
Reply Sat 18 Mar, 2006 07:42 pm
I chose to leave faith. Would that be applicable?
0 Replies
 
flushd
 
  1  
Reply Sat 18 Mar, 2006 07:46 pm
Oh yeah JLNobody, and it would be very interesting to hear responses to that question.

I am not religious, and I have not chosen any one religion. I do have a lot of respect, and lot yet to learn, though, from Buddhism. Perhaps other religions as well; though they are less appealing to me.

I left the faith of Christianity that I grew up in.
0 Replies
 
JLNobody
 
  1  
Reply Sat 18 Mar, 2006 07:47 pm
Raul-7's is not as applicable as yours Gus. He said that he is religious because he is grateful to his Creator, and because of his fear of eternal punishment for not following "the path".

All he has said is that he is religious because he is religious.

Perhaps your answer, Gus, could be reversed? Could you just change the variables, and say, you entered religion for the opposite of the reasons that you left it? That is, of course, if you could say why you chose to leave religion.
0 Replies
 
djjd62
 
  1  
Reply Sat 18 Mar, 2006 07:53 pm
i find religion fascinating, but i have yet to find a god or any particular religion i'd be willing to put my faith in
0 Replies
 
JLNobody
 
  1  
Reply Sat 18 Mar, 2006 08:01 pm
Correction, Raul-7's response is not valid as an explanation for why he became religious, but it is valid as an explanation of why he persists in his religion. Is that right, Raul?

Flushd, I am a shoddy practicioner of (zen) Buddhism which is to my mind an atheistic form of spiritual hygiene.
0 Replies
 
Chumly
 
  1  
Reply Sat 18 Mar, 2006 08:08 pm
JLNobody wrote:
When Chumly asks why one is religious and to give his reasons, the implication is that the individual chooses to be religious. I think that very few people have explictly chosen to adopt a faith as an internal posture (for reasons, say, like that of Pascal's Wager). Some have, I'm confident, chosen a religion as an external posture, to be good with one's community, for example. But instead of asking the question in terms of a goal or purpose, one may ask the psycho-sociological question of what CAUSED an individual to feel faith. That's much more difficult to answer, don't you think?
I did ask two for simple things:
1) No long scriptural quotes
2) Not to say it's the Bible, Koran, Torah etc. that tells one to be religious

But I did not imply choice or lack of choice in my question. I left all that completely up to the individual. So pretty much anything goes.
0 Replies
 
gustavratzenhofer
 
  1  
Reply Sat 18 Mar, 2006 08:16 pm
JL, I entered religion because it was forced down my throat almost from the day of my conception. I could swear as I was being formed in the womb I could hear the rustling of rosary beads.

I spent my early childhood going to church seven days a week. I was an altar boy. I looked out the church windows on beautiful summer days and could see some of the atheist boys from around town playing baseball and laughing among themselves.

I looked around the church -- old people, people with dementia in their eyes -- and I asked myself why I was in this situation. What did I do wrong to suffer at such a young age?

Fear of my parents' reaction kept me from fleeing the church on that beautiful summer day, but years later I walked away from that cold, heartless edifice.

And I have never returned.
0 Replies
 
JLNobody
 
  1  
Reply Sat 18 Mar, 2006 08:21 pm
O.K., but asking for "reasons" does suggest to me a request for the basis for a choice.
To me "choice" suggests a reason regarding a goal that PULLS one from the anticipated future--if I do this I will gain this or avoid that.
A "cause", by contrast, implies a PUSH from the past--an antecedent condition or force that impels a present condition, e.g., religious belief or membership.
0 Replies
 
Lash
 
  1  
Reply Sat 18 Mar, 2006 08:23 pm
Not religious. Used to be quite spiritual--not so much now.

My daughter and her fiance have found a funky church --in an auditorium--where people are free to interpret the message with dance, song or art. They raise money to refurbish an old building to give this area our first art gallery. <smiles>

They meet at 4pm on Sundays, and are welcoming and casual.

I'm going to go Sunday.
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

700 Inconsistencies in the Bible - Discussion by onevoice
Why do we deliberately fool ourselves? - Discussion by coincidence
Spirituality - Question by Miller
Oneness vs. Trinity - Discussion by Arella Mae
give you chills - Discussion by Bartikus
Evidence for Evolution! - Discussion by Bartikus
Evidence of God! - Discussion by Bartikus
One World Order?! - Discussion by Bartikus
God loves us all....!? - Discussion by Bartikus
The Preambles to Our States - Discussion by Charli
 
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.03 seconds on 05/13/2024 at 11:06:54