Diest TKO
 
  1  
Thu 19 Jun, 2008 11:06 am
H2O_MAN wrote:
http://i116.photobucket.com/albums/o18/kaspershyboy1/011.jpg

yeah... just think about how irrational the notion of an Antichrist is...

T
K
O
0 Replies
 
kickycan
 
  1  
Thu 19 Jun, 2008 11:10 am
H2O_MAN wrote:
http://i116.photobucket.com/albums/o18/kaspershyboy1/011.jpg


Wow. Do you actually believe this is a possibility? Please tell me you are just trying to stir up some **** here.
0 Replies
 
ebrown p
 
  1  
Thu 19 Jun, 2008 11:12 am
The UPC on the back of his hand is a nice touch-- but doesn't this crazy fear of UPC's date back to when disco was still cool? (for those of us old enough to remember that far back)
0 Replies
 
H2O MAN
 
  1  
Thu 19 Jun, 2008 11:15 am
springhill wrote:
http://i26.tinypic.com/2qklahs.jpg


WAR HERO.
0 Replies
 
H2O MAN
 
  1  
Thu 19 Jun, 2008 11:18 am
kickycan wrote:


Wow. Do you actually believe this is a possibility? Please tell me you are just trying to stir up some **** here.


I think Marilyn Manson wrote a song about it ...
0 Replies
 
kickycan
 
  1  
Thu 19 Jun, 2008 11:19 am
I don't know what you mean. Got lyrics?
0 Replies
 
H2O MAN
 
  1  
Thu 19 Jun, 2008 11:41 am
kickycan wrote:
I don't know what you mean. Got lyrics?


Not handy. Got Google?

I found this on another forum:

"Obama is no Antichrist, he is just a super liberal democrat who will try to enact very liberal policies.
This includes putting up to four liberal supreme court judges on the bench for life."

Antichrist or not, Obama is bad news.
0 Replies
 
kickycan
 
  1  
Thu 19 Jun, 2008 12:04 pm
Okay, so I assume you don't literally believe that he could actually be the antichrist, and are just stirring up **** with that poster thing. Correct?
0 Replies
 
Bi-Polar Bear
 
  1  
Thu 19 Jun, 2008 12:30 pm
I'd call that a damn good guess kickster :wink:

On a related issue, I believe there have been many prototype Anti-Christ figures in our history. bush fit many of the biblical criteria. Do I believe Obama to be an (or the) anti christ? No I do not.... but I've seen a lot and am hard to surprise, so I'll let you know.
0 Replies
 
cicerone imposter
 
  1  
Thu 19 Jun, 2008 12:42 pm
BPB wrote: bush fit many of the biblical criteria.

Ain't that the truth! LOL
0 Replies
 
kickycan
 
  1  
Thu 19 Jun, 2008 03:09 pm
I wish Obama would just show everyone how he can walk on water. Or cure a leper or something. Just once! That would shut these non-believers up for good!
0 Replies
 
cicerone imposter
 
  1  
Thu 19 Jun, 2008 03:25 pm
kickycan wrote:
I wish Obama would just show everyone how he can walk on water. Or cure a leper or something. Just once! That would shut these non-believers up for good!


But that wouldn't be "antichrist" would it? LOL
0 Replies
 
ebrown p
 
  1  
Thu 19 Jun, 2008 03:49 pm
Maybe he can cause leprosy (or walk under water)...

((actually causing leprosy might be a fun talent to have))
0 Replies
 
teenyboone
 
  1  
Thu 19 Jun, 2008 04:43 pm
cicerone imposter wrote:
Where they stand on taxes:


OBAMA: Up to $1,000 in tax cuts per middle-class famly. Eliminate income taxes for people over 65 earning less than $50,000.


MC CAIN: Double the personal exemption for dependents to $7,000. Offer taxpayers choice of a simpler set of tax rules.


CI:
We're both retired. Not rich but comfortable, for now. We pay income taxes on an annuity, but have to file tax returns tr recoup any of it! What do we do? Live in the street? We're retired military and Uncle Sam, doesn't give us a thing! It's ALL earned!
Cool
0 Replies
 
cicerone imposter
 
  1  
Thu 19 Jun, 2008 05:07 pm
teenyboone, I'm not sure there's an easy answer on the general income tax question. One thing for sure is that the tax codes with over 40,000 pages is too complicated and needs to be simplified. No president has been willing to solve this big problem.

Our social security is taxed even though both my wife and I are retired; it's really a stupid way for government to give us retirement benefits then take it away. Our government's incompetence has created a monster called the IRS tax code that nobody is able to interpret - even the workers at the IRS or tax experts.

Our country needs to revert 100 percent to a sales tax scheme where poor people can get rebates by filing a simple rebate form once a year.

Interest rates on savings should be rewarded, not taxed. Most people pay more on credit card interest than they can earn by saving money. Doesn't make any sense. Rewards and penalties are ass backwards.
0 Replies
 
spendius
 
  1  
Thu 19 Jun, 2008 05:38 pm
c.i. wrote-

Quote:
Our country needs to revert 100 percent to a sales tax scheme where poor people can get rebates by filing a simple rebate form once a year.


That's you all over c.i.

"Simple" eh? Don't be so ridiculous. They don't generate non-economic (i.e. high status) jobs by keeping it simple.

What a silly moo you are.
0 Replies
 
teenyboone
 
  1  
Thu 19 Jun, 2008 05:39 pm
cicerone imposter wrote:
teenyboone, I'm not sure there's an easy answer on the general income tax question. One thing for sure is that the tax codes with over 40,000 pages is too complicated and needs to be simplified. No president has been willing to solve this big problem.

Our social security is taxed even though both my wife and I are retired; it's really a stupid way for government to give us retirement benefits then take it away. Our government's incompetence has created a monster called the IRS tax code that nobody is able to interpret - even the workers at the IRS or tax experts.

Our country needs to revert 100 percent to a sales tax scheme where poor people can get rebates by filing a simple rebate form once a year.

Interest rates on savings should be rewarded, not taxed. Most people pay more on credit card interest than they can earn by saving money. Doesn't make any sense. Rewards and penalties are ass backwards.


Your answer seems to be the most beneficial, but it makes too much sense, huh? Can't have that! No simplification for us, unh-unh! :wink:
0 Replies
 
Thomas
 
  1  
Fri 20 Jun, 2008 12:35 pm
Today's New York Times reflects on Obama's decision to forego public financing, on how this decision threatens the survival of the public financing system, and on how it will increase the dependance of the political process on special interest money.

The New York Times wrote:


Full Article.

Barack Obama, who won against Clinton on a platform of being less cynical than her, of putting hope and principle over the old partisan ways of Washington, and of restoring the integrity of the political process, has broken his word the day it became expedient. But what's more, he has done his nation a grave disservice.
0 Replies
 
georgeob1
 
  1  
Fri 20 Jun, 2008 12:40 pm
Thomas wrote:

Barack Obama, who won against Clinton on a platform of being less cynical than her, of putting hope and principle over the old partisan ways of Washington, and of restoring the integrity of the political process, has broken his word the day it became expedient. But what's more, he has done his nation a grave disservice.


But it's OK because he is the Chosen One; the Expected One; the Messiah.
0 Replies
 
cicerone imposter
 
  1  
Fri 20 Jun, 2008 12:41 pm
I think the negatives are already building up against Obama. "Change" doesn't seem so important when he personally benefits vs general benefit of future elections.
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

So....Will Biden Be VP? - Question by blueveinedthrobber
My view on Obama - Discussion by McGentrix
Obama/ Love Him or Hate Him, We've Got Him - Discussion by Phoenix32890
Obama fumbles at Faith Forum - Discussion by slkshock7
Expert: Obama is not the antichrist - Discussion by joefromchicago
Obama's State of the Union - Discussion by maxdancona
Obama 2012? - Discussion by snood
 
  1. Forums
  2. » Obama '08?
  3. » Page 935
Copyright © 2025 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.23 seconds on 07/11/2025 at 08:14:14