I think the following is rather revealing. After we have listened to the mantra of "change change change," one wonders what these Democrats are talking about. Here is what one foreign leader concludes, and I can't say he doesn't have reason to conclude what he did. After all, why talk about nothing but change if you don't believe what you currently have is a failure. I guess that is the logical conclusion here:
http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,335993,00.html
Libyan strongman Col. Muammar al-Qaddafi weighed in on America's presidential campaign, specifically commenting on both Democratic rivals' repeated calls for "change."
"I've seen that in America, a candidate who wants people to vote for him keeps talking about change," Qaddafi said earlier this week in a televised address on Libyan TV, an obvious reference to Barack Obama.
"They all keep saying 'change, change,' " he continued, adding Hillary Clinton to his reference. "They want to change America and its current political system. They want to make a change in their lives. They say their system is a failure, that their government is a failure, and that their elections are a failure."
Qaddafi offered up Libya as a model for "change," predicting that "the whole world will return to the model of the republic of the masses, to communes, to popular security, to popular defense, to popular capitalism, and to popular socialism.
"The whole world will return to the Libyan model," he said.
So I add my question to Qaddafi's observation, just what does Obama and Clinton want to change to? Is it the Libyan model or some other kind of model of government.
Personally, I am sick of this change talk. I think we should quit being a bunch of whiners and complainers and go back to what made this country successful in the first place, and it certainly isn't what Clinton or Obama have in mind.