blatham
 
  1  
Thu 21 Feb, 2008 10:56 am
blatham wrote:
MM

I think so too.


Here's Karl Rove this morning in the WSJ. The theme is...Barack is a creature of the far left. But of course, that's always true of any dem candidate. It's a rightwing election-slogan given.
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB120355939956381797.html?mod=opinion_main_commentaries


Variations on a theme...
Quote:
Before the Iowa caucuses, an antitax group, the Club for Growth, attacked Howard Dean in a television commercial that described his campaign as a ''latte-drinking, sushi-eating, Volvo-driving, New York Times-reading, body-piercing'' freak show.
http://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpage.html?res=9504E7DE163AF93BA35751C0A9629C8B63&sec=&spon=&pagewanted=all

The sun rises. The sun goes down.
0 Replies
 
blatham
 
  1  
Thu 21 Feb, 2008 11:08 am
Bi-Polar Bear wrote:
I too painfully agree that Obama will probably get the nomination. It is really a reflection on americas obsession with the candidate as rock star and a mistake. That's my opinion and it would take something REALLY huge to get me to change it.

I won't and don't hate the guy and I'll give him the benefit of the doubt once he's in but I won't vote for him and I'm totally pessimistic about him.

He'll be a better president than bush, but that's the meaningless award of the century.


hi bear

Not meaning to challenge your right to hold any wrong opinion, but... :wink:

You earlier suggested that the present attraction to Obama has a precedent in the attraction some felt for George W Bush. I think that's a very innaccurate comparison.

We knew Bush wasn't very intelligent. That was evident to all and it was a serious point of discussion before he gained the nomination. The kudos gained for picking Cheney as vice after he'd won the nomination related to how this added 'gravitas' or 'experience' or 'sober and thoughtful adult' to the ticket.

We know, on the other hand, that Obama is very intelligent indeed. It's a characteristic noted by all, including rightwing folks like Brooks.

We knew Bush wasn't curious. His lack of knowledge about history and about the world demonstrated not only how ill-prepared he was for this post but also that he'd apparently gone through his adult life without ever opening a book.

Something quite opposite is true of Obama (as it was of Bill Clinton). Not only has he bothered to get himself extremely well educated, but he's even written a couple of books. Can we imagine George writing a book?

And, he loves music and may need a DJ of the sublimest taste.
0 Replies
 
nappyheadedhohoho
 
  1  
Thu 21 Feb, 2008 11:55 am
Butrflynet wrote:
nappyheadedhohoho wrote:
Butrflynet wrote:
Part of the problem is that the people who are fanning this are leaving out one very important word in the quote from Michelle's speech. Another part of the word is that when you are reading the text of that speech you don't hear the inflection that was in her voice when she said that word they omitted. When the word and inflection are included, the quote takes on a different meaning.


What's the word that is being omitted?

"For the first time in my adult life, I am really proud of my country. Not just because Barack is doing well, but I think people are hungry for change."




Isn't youtube great???? :wink:



Depends on who is doing the editing of the video uploaded to youtube.


Spin this.

http://embeds.blogs.foxnews.com/2008/02/19/michelle-obama-is-proud-of-her-country/
0 Replies
 
Cycloptichorn
 
  1  
Thu 21 Feb, 2008 11:58 am
nappyheadedhohoho wrote:
Butrflynet wrote:
nappyheadedhohoho wrote:
Butrflynet wrote:
Part of the problem is that the people who are fanning this are leaving out one very important word in the quote from Michelle's speech. Another part of the word is that when you are reading the text of that speech you don't hear the inflection that was in her voice when she said that word they omitted. When the word and inflection are included, the quote takes on a different meaning.


What's the word that is being omitted?

"For the first time in my adult life, I am really proud of my country. Not just because Barack is doing well, but I think people are hungry for change."




Isn't youtube great???? :wink:



Depends on who is doing the editing of the video uploaded to youtube.


Spin this.

http://embeds.blogs.foxnews.com/2008/02/19/michelle-obama-is-proud-of-her-country/


You see, there's no need to. B/c it's a pointless thing. It is immaterial to whether or not one should vote for Obama or McCain this fall. All it is is an attempt by losers on the right wing - such as yourself - to grasp on to a little scandal, in hopes that it will sway people's opinions. Nobody is even going to remember this in two weeks let alone six months. So I have no idea why you waste your time with crap like this.

Sure is entertaining to watch, though Laughing

Cycloptichorn
0 Replies
 
Bi-Polar Bear
 
  1  
Thu 21 Feb, 2008 11:59 am
blatham wrote:
Bi-Polar Bear wrote:
I too painfully agree that Obama will probably get the nomination. It is really a reflection on americas obsession with the candidate as rock star and a mistake. That's my opinion and it would take something REALLY huge to get me to change it.

I won't and don't hate the guy and I'll give him the benefit of the doubt once he's in but I won't vote for him and I'm totally pessimistic about him.

He'll be a better president than bush, but that's the meaningless award of the century.


hi bear

Not meaning to challenge your right to hold any wrong opinion, but... :wink:

You earlier suggested that the present attraction to Obama has a precedent in the attraction some felt for George W Bush. I think that's a very innaccurate comparison.

We knew Bush wasn't very intelligent. That was evident to all and it was a serious point of discussion before he gained the nomination. The kudos gained for picking Cheney as vice after he'd won the nomination related to how this added 'gravitas' or 'experience' or 'sober and thoughtful adult' to the ticket.

We know, on the other hand, that Obama is very intelligent indeed. It's a characteristic noted by all, including rightwing folks like Brooks.

We knew Bush wasn't curious. His lack of knowledge about history and about the world demonstrated not only how ill-prepared he was for this post but also that he'd apparently gone through his adult life without ever opening a book.

Something quite opposite is true of Obama (as it was of Bill Clinton). Not only has he bothered to get himself extremely well educated, but he's even written a couple of books. Can we imagine George writing a book?

And, he loves music and may need a DJ of the sublimest taste.


no one is questioning Obama's intelligence or remotely suggesting that anyone with an iq higher than room temperature isn't smarter than bush.

I am head and shoulders smarter than bush as are you. Does that qualify us to run for president? Maybe we could still get on the ballot somewhere.
0 Replies
 
nappyheadedhohoho
 
  1  
Thu 21 Feb, 2008 12:06 pm
Cycloptichorn wrote:
nappyheadedhohoho wrote:
Butrflynet wrote:
nappyheadedhohoho wrote:
Butrflynet wrote:
Part of the problem is that the people who are fanning this are leaving out one very important word in the quote from Michelle's speech. Another part of the word is that when you are reading the text of that speech you don't hear the inflection that was in her voice when she said that word they omitted. When the word and inflection are included, the quote takes on a different meaning.


What's the word that is being omitted?

"For the first time in my adult life, I am really proud of my country. Not just because Barack is doing well, but I think people are hungry for change."




Isn't youtube great???? :wink:



Depends on who is doing the editing of the video uploaded to youtube.


Spin this.

http://embeds.blogs.foxnews.com/2008/02/19/michelle-obama-is-proud-of-her-country/


You see, there's no need to. B/c it's a pointless thing. It is immaterial to whether or not one should vote for Obama or McCain this fall. All it is is an attempt by losers on the right wing - such as yourself - to grasp on to a little scandal, in hopes that it will sway people's opinions. Nobody is even going to remember this in two weeks let alone six months. So I have no idea why you waste your time with crap like this.

Sure is entertaining to watch, though Laughing

Cycloptichorn


No one is going to remember this in two weeks let alone six months?

You are beyond naive.
0 Replies
 
Cycloptichorn
 
  1  
Thu 21 Feb, 2008 12:08 pm
nappyheadedhohoho wrote:
Cycloptichorn wrote:
nappyheadedhohoho wrote:
Butrflynet wrote:
nappyheadedhohoho wrote:
Butrflynet wrote:
Part of the problem is that the people who are fanning this are leaving out one very important word in the quote from Michelle's speech. Another part of the word is that when you are reading the text of that speech you don't hear the inflection that was in her voice when she said that word they omitted. When the word and inflection are included, the quote takes on a different meaning.


What's the word that is being omitted?

"For the first time in my adult life, I am really proud of my country. Not just because Barack is doing well, but I think people are hungry for change."




Isn't youtube great???? :wink:



Depends on who is doing the editing of the video uploaded to youtube.


Spin this.

http://embeds.blogs.foxnews.com/2008/02/19/michelle-obama-is-proud-of-her-country/


You see, there's no need to. B/c it's a pointless thing. It is immaterial to whether or not one should vote for Obama or McCain this fall. All it is is an attempt by losers on the right wing - such as yourself - to grasp on to a little scandal, in hopes that it will sway people's opinions. Nobody is even going to remember this in two weeks let alone six months. So I have no idea why you waste your time with crap like this.

Sure is entertaining to watch, though Laughing

Cycloptichorn


No one is going to remember this in two weeks let alone six months?

You are beyond naive.


No, you are merely grasping for straws.

Cycloptichorn
0 Replies
 
nappyheadedhohoho
 
  1  
Thu 21 Feb, 2008 12:12 pm
Cycloptichorn wrote:
nappyheadedhohoho wrote:
Cycloptichorn wrote:
nappyheadedhohoho wrote:
Butrflynet wrote:
nappyheadedhohoho wrote:
Butrflynet wrote:
Part of the problem is that the people who are fanning this are leaving out one very important word in the quote from Michelle's speech. Another part of the word is that when you are reading the text of that speech you don't hear the inflection that was in her voice when she said that word they omitted. When the word and inflection are included, the quote takes on a different meaning.


What's the word that is being omitted?

"For the first time in my adult life, I am really proud of my country. Not just because Barack is doing well, but I think people are hungry for change."




Isn't youtube great???? :wink:



Depends on who is doing the editing of the video uploaded to youtube.


Spin this.

http://embeds.blogs.foxnews.com/2008/02/19/michelle-obama-is-proud-of-her-country/


You see, there's no need to. B/c it's a pointless thing. It is immaterial to whether or not one should vote for Obama or McCain this fall. All it is is an attempt by losers on the right wing - such as yourself - to grasp on to a little scandal, in hopes that it will sway people's opinions. Nobody is even going to remember this in two weeks let alone six months. So I have no idea why you waste your time with crap like this.

Sure is entertaining to watch, though Laughing

Cycloptichorn


No one is going to remember this in two weeks let alone six months?

You are beyond naive.


No, you are merely grasping for straws.

Cycloptichorn


You find it entertaining for now. We'll see how long that lasts.
0 Replies
 
Cycloptichorn
 
  1  
Thu 21 Feb, 2008 12:16 pm
My guess is that it will last for years. Years. B/c McCain is going to be smashed by Obama this fall. The money gap is startling and McCain has plenty of problems of his own outside of the race.

There's still time for you to get on board the winning bus, if you like. Nobody will hold your past errors against you.

Cycloptichorn
0 Replies
 
Finn dAbuzz
 
  1  
Thu 21 Feb, 2008 12:17 pm
Here is a very interesting article that offers the possibility that an Obama presidency may be in the interest of conservatism, and not in the way you might suspect.

I'm not sure I can agree with O'Sullivan's interesting premise, but it will help me feel a little better if Obama wins in November, and the article is certainly worth reading for its intelligent consideration of the issue of party vs principle.

The Conservative Interest
0 Replies
 
Cycloptichorn
 
  1  
Thu 21 Feb, 2008 12:22 pm
Nice article, Finn.

For those who don't like to click through, the ending:

Quote:


Cycloptichorn
0 Replies
 
cicerone imposter
 
  1  
Thu 21 Feb, 2008 12:26 pm
I like Obama's message of inclusion over divisiveness; that alone is the CHANGE message he brings to our country.
0 Replies
 
Bi-Polar Bear
 
  1  
Thu 21 Feb, 2008 12:35 pm
that was bush's message exactly. Uniter, not a divider. Oh how we forget.
0 Replies
 
spendius
 
  1  
Thu 21 Feb, 2008 12:35 pm
He's only talking about it c.i.

He can't possibly have the slightest intention of fostering inclusiveness and eradicating diversity surely?

Why do you continually equate talking about something with the thing itself?
0 Replies
 
Bi-Polar Bear
 
  1  
Thu 21 Feb, 2008 12:38 pm
he may very well be sincere. Once bitten twice shy however.
0 Replies
 
cicerone imposter
 
  1  
Thu 21 Feb, 2008 12:39 pm
No matter how people interpret what the candidates say during their campaign to win, we must live with the message they share with the electorate. Otherwise, campaigning has no meaning or use. It's a matter of "trust." They can maintain it or lose it by their actions.

Bush lost it a long time ago.
0 Replies
 
Gargamel
 
  1  
Thu 21 Feb, 2008 12:42 pm
Maybe, if Bush and Obama are mentioned in the same sentence enough times, people will become deluded enough to believe there is anything remotely similar about them!
0 Replies
 
spendius
 
  1  
Thu 21 Feb, 2008 12:43 pm
Isn't "inclusiveness" the Hegelian idea and that's on the way to Marx and Lenin and so on and so on.
0 Replies
 
cicerone imposter
 
  1  
Thu 21 Feb, 2008 12:45 pm
spendi, You're confusing a communistic state vs a democratic one; the difference is HUGE.
0 Replies
 
nappyheadedhohoho
 
  1  
Thu 21 Feb, 2008 12:58 pm
cicerone imposter wrote:
No matter how people interpret what the candidates say during their campaign to win, we must live with the message they share with the electorate. Otherwise, campaigning has no meaning or use. It's a matter of "trust." They can maintain it or lose it by their actions.

Bush lost it a long time ago.


I find Michelle and Barack Obama's message to be overwhelmingly negative. But then, I'm among the majority in this country that are satisfied with their lives (despite what Obama tells us).

From reading some of your posts, Obama seems to be the perfect candidate for you. He'll fix your broken soul. Whether you want him to or not.
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

So....Will Biden Be VP? - Question by blueveinedthrobber
My view on Obama - Discussion by McGentrix
Obama/ Love Him or Hate Him, We've Got Him - Discussion by Phoenix32890
Obama fumbles at Faith Forum - Discussion by slkshock7
Expert: Obama is not the antichrist - Discussion by joefromchicago
Obama's State of the Union - Discussion by maxdancona
Obama 2012? - Discussion by snood
 
  1. Forums
  2. » Obama '08?
  3. » Page 519
Copyright © 2025 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.19 seconds on 05/04/2025 at 03:53:25