Bi-Polar Bear wrote:I too painfully agree that Obama will probably get the nomination. It is really a reflection on americas obsession with the candidate as rock star and a mistake. That's my opinion and it would take something REALLY huge to get me to change it.
I won't and don't hate the guy and I'll give him the benefit of the doubt once he's in but I won't vote for him and I'm totally pessimistic about him.
He'll be a better president than bush, but that's the meaningless award of the century.
hi bear
Not meaning to challenge your right to hold any wrong opinion, but... :wink:
You earlier suggested that the present attraction to Obama has a precedent in the attraction some felt for George W Bush. I think that's a very innaccurate comparison.
We knew Bush wasn't very intelligent. That was evident to all and it was a serious point of discussion before he gained the nomination. The kudos gained for picking Cheney as vice after he'd won the nomination related to how this added 'gravitas' or 'experience' or 'sober and thoughtful adult' to the ticket.
We know, on the other hand, that Obama is very intelligent indeed. It's a characteristic noted by all, including rightwing folks like Brooks.
We knew Bush wasn't curious. His lack of knowledge about history and about the world demonstrated not only how ill-prepared he was for this post but also that he'd apparently gone through his adult life without ever opening a book.
Something quite opposite is true of Obama (as it was of Bill Clinton). Not only has he bothered to get himself extremely well educated, but he's even written a couple of books. Can we imagine George writing a book?
And, he loves music and may need a DJ of the sublimest taste.