blatham
 
  1  
Sat 28 Apr, 2007 05:20 am
Thanks nimh...that is very interesting indeed. The seniority of the two terms "health" and "care" aren't by chance. Everyone must have polling data that the terms are highly relevant to americans presently. Hillary's cloud demonstrates that campaign's strategy to forward domestic middle class hopes...quite 'motherly'. You folks still think she has no chance?

On the deeply depressing side, the word "peace" makes no appearance at all that I could see. "Security" takes its place. Thanks to six years of war-mongering militarism fomented in the american psyche. What a phucking evil crowd these people and their supporters have become.
0 Replies
 
sozobe
 
  1  
Sat 28 Apr, 2007 07:44 am
blatham wrote:
..quite 'motherly'. You folks still think she has no chance?


How does one thought lead to the other? I just don't see "motherly" as being a particularly strong selling point, especially when combined with all of her other defects.

I think that she has some chance, especially if the Republican field remains as weak as it looks now. I just don't think she has a good chance much less the BEST chance, and I want the person who has the best chance. It's too important to change course.

By the way, that train of thought -- who I'd prefer to see get the nomination before Hillary -- Richardson's performance was probably the most disappointing in terms of my pre-debate expectations. He frequently looked confused. He didn't acquit himself well with the Gonzales thing. He was kind of mumbly and stumbly and jowly -- I don't know how his voice sounded but he didn't look like he was articulating that well. He's always been on my "to watch" list and I'm afraid he went down a few notches in my estimation.
0 Replies
 
Walter Hinteler
 
  1  
Sat 28 Apr, 2007 09:17 am
I found it interesting what the Guardian picked out in today's edition (page 7) as the main topics by the various candidates:

http://i11.tinypic.com/29mncb8.jpg
http://i18.tinypic.com/2vip891.jpg

Clinton leads - and only 544 days to go
0 Replies
 
sozobe
 
  1  
Sat 28 Apr, 2007 04:56 pm
One more thought... I wasn't that impressed with Dodd as presidential material, but he seemed promising as an Obama VP. Experience up the wazoo, personable, etc. Would be better if he were from a Southern state but since Obama's from Illinois, could be OK to have a Northeastern establishment type as the VP.
0 Replies
 
blatham
 
  1  
Sun 29 Apr, 2007 06:11 am
sozobe wrote:
blatham wrote:
..quite 'motherly'. You folks still think she has no chance?


How does one thought lead to the other? I just don't see "motherly" as being a particularly strong selling point, especially when combined with all of her other defects.

I think that she has some chance, especially if the Republican field remains as weak as it looks now. I just don't think she has a good chance much less the BEST chance, and I want the person who has the best chance. It's too important to change course.

By the way, that train of thought -- who I'd prefer to see get the nomination before Hillary -- Richardson's performance was probably the most disappointing in terms of my pre-debate expectations. He frequently looked confused. He didn't acquit himself well with the Gonzales thing. He was kind of mumbly and stumbly and jowly -- I don't know how his voice sounded but he didn't look like he was articulating that well. He's always been on my "to watch" list and I'm afraid he went down a few notches in my estimation.


Soz

Sorry, I ought to have placed that "motherly" sentence as new paragraph. Didn't mean to attach the two thoughts in the manner you read it. The word was meant to apply to the sentences preceding, not following.

She's not my first choice either, but I continue to hold that her chances in a general election are better than a lot of folks consider is the case. Then there's the question of once the election is done, who will be most effective at the tasks to hand. That's perhaps a tougher question even if it is my notion that Barack has the greatest potential for rehabilitating your system and electorate.

Richardson was surprisingly ineffective. I like the fellow a lot and find him very talented.
0 Replies
 
dyslexia
 
  1  
Sun 29 Apr, 2007 06:40 am
Quote:
"If it had not been for the discontent of a few fellows who had not been satisfied with their conditions, you would still be living in caves. Intelligent discontent is the mainspring of civilization. Progress is born of agitation. It is agitation or stagnation." -

Eugene V. Debs
0 Replies
 
sozobe
 
  1  
Sun 29 Apr, 2007 07:53 am
blatham wrote:
She's not my first choice either, but I continue to hold that her chances in a general election are better than a lot of folks consider is the case.


OK -- which "folks"?

Blatham wrote:
Then there's the question of once the election is done, who will be most effective at the tasks to hand. That's perhaps a tougher question even if it is my notion that Barack has the greatest potential for rehabilitating your system and electorate.


I agree. After him probably Edwards. Then perhaps Richardson.

Quote:
Richardson was surprisingly ineffective. I like the fellow a lot and find him very talented.


Yep.
0 Replies
 
blatham
 
  1  
Sun 29 Apr, 2007 10:27 am
sozobe wrote:
blatham wrote:
She's not my first choice either, but I continue to hold that her chances in a general election are better than a lot of folks consider is the case.


OK -- which "folks"?

Blatham wrote:
Then there's the question of once the election is done, who will be most effective at the tasks to hand. That's perhaps a tougher question even if it is my notion that Barack has the greatest potential for rehabilitating your system and electorate.


I agree. After him probably Edwards. Then perhaps Richardson.

Quote:
Richardson was surprisingly ineffective. I like the fellow a lot and find him very talented.


Yep.


Here, I don't know if I've seen anyone but me suggest she is likely to win a general election. Do I disrememberify?

But outside of a2k, that's been a recurring opinion voiced by many, left (Alterman a year ago, for example) and right (all the "please let Hillary be the opposing candidate" comments). It is an opinion which seems now to be less frequently advanced as folks re-evaluate the question in the context of continuing travails for republicans and the effectiveness (so far) of her electoral team.

Though it is unlikely that many voters watched the debate, if she continues to demonstrate the sort of mastery of subject that she demonstrated the other night (I don't think anyone matched her) and if she stays on balance, she'll be formidable.

A negative turned positive for her is that folks have already heard probably every species of character derogation that might be thrown up against her. We don't much care about the regular Fox viewers as they are lost in the wilderness in any event. The swing folks however, seem much more likely to increasingly build up disgust at the same old sliming game. I figures.
0 Replies
 
sozobe
 
  1  
Sun 29 Apr, 2007 11:48 am
Hmm. We've had several go-rounds on this subject already, I don't know that I can add anything new. I wouldn't characterize my position as saying she has no chance, in any circumstances, which is why I objected. I think that in the current circumstances -- the Republican field consisting of weak, weaker, and weakest -- she has some chance.

If there is less chatter now about how she's the kiss of death for the Democrats than previously, I'd say it's for that reason. The Republican field looks worse now than it has at any time so far in the run-up to the 2008 election, and I doubt it will look THIS bad for long. Someone will emerge, whether one of the current known quantities strengthens his position or someone completely new steps up.

The swing voter stuff is hogwash. It's not about new slime -- people already know her. People already know what they think about her. And people -- way too many of them -- have already decided that they don't like her one bit.
0 Replies
 
Butrflynet
 
  1  
Sun 29 Apr, 2007 04:05 pm
Barack Obama addresses the California Democratice Party Convention:

Watch it here (recommended)

For Soz, description of the convention's reactions during his speech from Daily Kos:


http://www.dailykos.com/story/2007/4/28/174811/213

Text of the prepared speech:

As you will see from reading his speech, he introduced himself to those watching inside and out of the convention hall and gave a very personal account of his life before talking about why he is running for President.

Here is a copy of his prepared remarks, although if you get a chance to see the speech (it should be available online and we will include the link when it is available) you need to do so to get the full flavor.
Quote:


Turn the Page

It has now been a little over two months since we began this campaign. In that time we have traveled all across this country. And before every event we do, I usually have a minute to sit quietly and collect my thoughts. And recently, I've found myself reflecting on what it was that led me to public service in the first place.

I live in Chicago now, but I am not a native of that great city. I moved there when I was just a year out of college, and a group of churches offered me a job as a community organizer so I could help rebuild neighborhoods that had been devastated by the closing of steel plants.

The salary was $12,000 a year plus enough money to buy an old, beat-up car, and so I took the job and drove out to Chicago, where I didn't know a soul. And during the time I was there, we worked to set up job training programs for the unemployed and after school programs for kids.

And it was the best education I ever had, because I learned in those neighborhoods that when ordinary people come together, they can achieve extraordinary things.

After three years, I went back to law school. I left there with a degree and a lifetime of debt, but I turned down the corporate job offers so I could come back to Chicago and organize a voter registration drive. I also started a civil rights practice, and began to teach constitutional law.

And after a few years, people started coming up to me and telling me I should run for state Senate. So I did what every man does when he's faced with a big decision - I prayed, and I asked my wife. And after consulting those two higher powers, I decided to get in the race.

And everywhere I'd go, I'd get two questions. First, they'd ask, "Where'd you get that funny name, Barack Obama?" Because people just couldn't pronounce it. They'd call me "Alabama," or they'd call me "Yo Mama." And I'd tell them that my father was from Kenya, and that's where I got my name. And my mother was from Kansas, and that's where I got my accent from.

And the second thing people would ask me was, "You seem like a nice young man. You've done all this great work. You've been a community organizer, and you teach law school, you're a civil rights attorney, you're a family man - why would you wanna go into something dirty and nasty like politics?"

And I understand the question, and the cynicism. We all understand it.

We understand it because we get the sense today that politics has become a business and not a mission. In the last several years, we have seen Washington become a place where keeping score of who's up and who's down is more important than who's working on behalf of the American people.

We have been told that our mounting debts don't matter, that the economy is doing great, and so Americans should be left to face their anxiety about rising health care costs and disappearing pensions on their own.

We've been told that climate change is a hoax, that our broken schools cannot be fixed, that we are destined to send millions of dollars a day to Mideast dictators for their oil. And we've seen how a foreign policy based on bluster and bombast can lead us into a war that should've never been authorized and never been waged.

And when we try to have an honest debate about the crises we face, whether it's on the Senate floor or a Sunday talk show, the conversation isn't about finding common ground, it's about finding someone to blame. We're divided into Red States and Blue States, and told to always point the finger at somebody else - the other party, or gay people, or immigrants.

For good reason, the rest of us have become cynical about what politics can achieve in this country, and as we've turned away in frustration, we know what's filled the void. The lobbyists and influence-peddlers with the cash and the connections - the ones who've turned government into a game only they can afford to play.

They write the checks and you get stuck with the bills, they get the access while you get to write a letter, they think they own this government, but we're here to tell them it's not for sale.
People tell me I haven't spent a lot of time learning the ways of Washington. But I promise you this - I've been there long enough to know that the ways of Washington must change.
I'm running for President because the time for the can't-do, won't-do, won't-even-try style of politics is over. It's time to turn the page.
There is an awakening taking place in America today. From New Hampshire to California, from Texas to Iowa, we are seeing crowds we've never seen before; we're seeing people showing up to the very first political event of their lives.

They're coming because they know we are at a crossroads right now. Because we are facing a set of challenges we haven't seen in a generation - and if we don't meet those challenges, we could end up leaving our children a world that's a little poorer and a little meaner than we found it.

And so the American people are hungry for a different kind of politics - the kind of politics based on the ideals this country was founded upon. The idea that we are all connected as one people. That we all have a stake in one another.

It's what I learned as a state Senator in Illinois. That you can turn the page on old debates; that it's possible to compromise so long as you as you never compromise your principles; and that so long as we're willing to listen to each other, we can assume the best in people instead of the worst.

That's how we were able to reform a death penalty system that sent 13 innocent people to death row. That's how we were able to give health insurance to 20,000 more children who needed it. That's how we gave $100 million worth of tax cuts to working families in Illinois. And that's how we passed the first ethics reform in twenty-five years.

We have seen too many campaigns where our problems are talked to death. Where ten-point plans are crushed under the weight of the same old politics once the election's over. Where experience in Washington doesn't always translate to results for the American people.

And so if we do not change our politics - if we do not fundamentally change the way Washington works - then the problems we've been talking about for the last generation will be the same ones that haunt us for generations to come.

We must find a way to come together in this country - to realize that the responsibility we have to one another as Americans is greater than the pursuit of any ideological agenda or corporate bottom line.
Democrats of California, it's time to turn the page.

It's time to turn the page on health care - to bring together unions and businesses, Democrats and Republicans, and to let the insurance and drug companies know that while they get a seat at the table, they don't get to buy every chair.

When I am president, I will sign a universal health care law by the end of my first term. My plan will cover the uninsured by letting people buy into the same kind of health care plan that members of Congress give themselves. It will bring down costs by investing in information technology, and preventative care, and by stopping the drug companies from price-gouging when patients need their medicine.

It will help business and families shoulder the burden of catastrophic care so that an illness doesn't lead to a bankruptcy. And it will save the average family a thousand dollars a year on their premiums. We can do this.

It's time to turn the page on education - to move past the slow decay of indifference that says some schools can't be fixed and some kids just can't learn.

As President, I will launch a campaign to recruit and support hundreds of thousands of new teachers across the country, because the most important part of any education is the person standing in the front of the classroom. It's time to treat teaching like the profession it is - paying teachers what they deserve and working with them - not against them - to develop the high standards we need. We can do this.

It's time to turn the page on energy - to break the political stalemate that's kept our fuel efficiency standards in the same place for twenty years; to tell the oil and auto industries that they must act, not only because their future's at stake, but because the future of our country and our planet is at stake as well.

As President, I will institute a cap-and-trade system that would dramatically reduce carbon emissions and auction off emissions credits that would generate millions of dollars to invest in renewable sources of energy. I'll put in place a low-carbon fuel standard like you have here in California that will take 32 million cars' worth of pollution off the road. And I'd raise the fuel efficiency standards for our cars and trucks because we know we have the technology to do it and it's time we did. We can do this.

We can do all of this. But most of all, we have to turn the page on this disaster in Iraq and restore our standing in the world.
I am proud that I stood up in 2002 and urged our leaders not to take us down this dangerous path. And so many of you did the same, even when it wasn't popular to do so.

We knew back then this war was a mistake. We knew back then that it was dangerous diversion from the struggle against the terrorists who attacked us on September 11th. We knew back then that we could find ourselves in an occupation of undetermined length, at undetermined cost, with undetermined consequences.

But the war went forward. And now, we've seen those consequences and we mourn for the dead and wounded.

I was in New Hampshire the other week when a woman told me that her nephew was leaving for Iraq. And as she started telling me how much she'd miss him and how worried she was about him, she began to cry.

And she said to me, "I can't breathe. I want to know, when am I going to be able to breathe again?"

It is time to let this woman know she can breathe again. It is time to put an end this war.

The majority of both houses of the American Congress - Republicans and Democrats - just passed a bill that would do exactly that. It's a bill similar to the plan I introduced in January that says there is no military solution to this civil war - that the last, best hope to pressure the warring factions to reach a political settlement is to let the Iraqi government know that America will not be there forever - to begin a phased withdrawal with the goal of bringing all combat brigades home by March 31st, 2008.

We are one signature away from ending this war. If the President refuses to sign it, we will go back and find the sixteen votes we need to end this war without him. We will turn up the pressure on all those Republican Congressmen and Senators who refuse to acknowledge the reality that the American people know so well, and we will get this done. We will bring our troops home. It's time to turn the page.

It's time to show the world that America is still the last, best hope of Earth. This President may occupy the White House, but for the last six years the position of leader of the free world has remained open.
It's time to fill that role once more. Whether it's terrorism or climate change, global AIDS or the spread of weapons of mass destruction, America cannot meet the threats of this new century alone, but the world cannot meet them without America. It's time for us to lead.

It's time for us to show the world that we are not a country that ships prisoners in the dead of night to be tortured in far off countries. That we are not a country that runs prisons which lock people away without ever telling them why they are there or what they are charged with. We are not a country which preaches compassion to others while we allow bodies to float down the streets of a major American city.

That is not who we are.

We are America. We are the nation that liberated a continent from a madman, that lifted ourselves from the depths of Depression, that won Civil Rights, and Women's Rights, and Voting Rights for all our people. We are the beacon that has led generations of weary travelers to find opportunity, and liberty, and hope on our doorstep. That's who we are.

I was down in Selma, Alabama awhile back, and we were celebrating the 42nd anniversary of the march across the Edmund Pettus Bridge. It was a march of ordinary Americans - maids and cooks, preachers and Pullman porters who faced down fire hoses and dogs, tear gas and billy clubs when they tried to get to the other side. But every time they were stopped, every time they were knocked down, they got back up, they came back, and they kept on marching. And finally they crossed over. It was called Bloody Sunday, and it was the culmination of the Civil Rights Movement.

When I came back from that celebration, people would say, oh, what a wonderful celebration of African-American history that must have been. And I would say, no, that wasn't African-American history. That was a celebration of American history - it's our story.

And it reminds us of a simple truth - a truth I learned all those years ago as an organizer in Chicago - a truth you carry by being here today - that in the face of impossible odds, people who love their country can change it.

I am confident about my ability to lead this country. But I also know that I can't do it without you. There will be times when I get tired, there will be times when I make a mistake - it's true, talk to my wife, she'll tell you. But this campaign that we're running has to be about your hopes, and your dreams, and what you will do. Because there are few obstacles that can withstand the power of millions of voices calling for change.

That's how change has always happened - not from the top-down, but from the bottom-up.

And that's exactly how you and I will change this country.
California, if you want a new kind of politics, it's time to turn the page.

If you want an end to the old divisions, and the stale debates, and the score-keeping and the name-calling, it's time to turn the page.

If you want health care for every American and a world-class education for all our children; if you want energy independence and an end to this war in Iraq; if you believe America is still that last, best hope of Earth, then it's time to turn the page.

It's time to turn the page for hope. It's time to turn the page for justice. It is time to turn the page and write the next chapter in the great American story. Let's begin the work. Let's do this together. Let's turn that page. Thank you.
0 Replies
 
au1929
 
  1  
Mon 30 Apr, 2007 07:10 am
A Candidate, His Minister and the Search for Faith

http://www.nytimes.com/2007/04/30/us/politics/30obama.html?th&emc=th

Where does his pastor end and Obama begin?
0 Replies
 
Butrflynet
 
  1  
Mon 30 Apr, 2007 03:12 pm
au1929 wrote:
Where does his pastor end and Obama begin?



"I fully understand that the job of the president is and must always be protecting the great right of people to worship or not worship as they see fit. That's what distinguishes us from the Taliban. The greatest freedom we have or one of the greatest freedoms is the right to worship the way you see fit.
"On the other hand, I don't see how you can be president at least from my perspective, how you can be president, without a relationship with the Lord."
[...]
"What we are going to do in the second term is to make sure that the grant money is available for faith communities to bid on, to make sure these faith-based offices are staffed and open. But the key thing is, is that we do have the capacity to allow faith programs to access enormous sums of social service money, which I think is important."
--George W. Bush, January 11, 2005



"I feel like God wants me to run for President. I can't explain it, but I sense my country is going to need me. Something is going to happen... I know it won't be easy on me or my family, but God wants me to do it."
--George W. Bush commenting to Texas evangelist James Robinson in the run-up to his presidential campaign



"We share common goals and a common faith."
--George W. Bush, addressing the Christian Coalition's "Road To Victory" convention



"God told me to strike at al Qaeda and I struck them, and then he instructed me to strike at Saddam [Hussein], which I did, and now I am determined to solve the problem in the Middle East. If you help me I will act, and if not, the elections will come and I will have to focus on them."
--Palestinian Authority Prime Minister Abu Mazen quoting Bush when they met in Aqaba; reported in The Haaretz Reporter by Arnon Regular



"I don't think that witchcraft is a religion. I wish the military would rethink this decision." - to ABC NEWS, June 1999, regarding Ft. Hood's decision to allow Wiccan rituals



"I do not think witchcraft is a religion, and I do not think it is in any way appropriate for the U.S. military to promote it." - October 15, 2000



"I urge all Texans to answer the call to serve those in need. By volunteering their time, energy or resources to helping others, adults and youngsters follow Christ's message of love and service in thought and deed."
Therefore, I, George W. Bush, Governor of Texas, do hereby proclaim June 10, 2000, Jesus Day in Texas and urge the appropriate recognition whereof,
In official recognition whereof,
I hereby affix my signature this
17th day of April, 2000.
"Jesus Day 2000" Proclamation
0 Replies
 
eoe
 
  1  
Mon 30 Apr, 2007 03:25 pm
au1929 wrote:
A Candidate, His Minister and the Search for Faith

http://www.nytimes.com/2007/04/30/us/politics/30obama.html?th&emc=th

Where does his pastor end and Obama begin?


I don't think there's any need for concern. In the article, both he and his pastor acknowledge that they don't see eye-to-eye on everything so, for me at least, that says that Obama is a thinking man and not just one of the brainless flock following his shepherd.
0 Replies
 
Butrflynet
 
  1  
Mon 30 Apr, 2007 04:06 pm
From the article linked to by Au:

Quote:
As a presidential candidate, Mr. Obama is reaching out to both liberal skeptics and committed Christians. In many speeches or discussions, he never mentions religion. When Mr. Obama, a former constitutional law professor, does speak of faith, he tends to add a footnote about keeping church and state separate.

But he also talks of building a consensus among secular liberal and conservative Christian voters. Mr. Wallis, the antipoverty advocate who calls himself a "progressive evangelical," first met Mr. Obama 10 years ago when both participated in traveling seminars on American civic life. On bus rides, Mr. Wallis and Mr. Obama would huddle, away from company like George Stephanopoulos and Ralph Reed, to plot building a coalition of progressive and religious voters.




First it was he is too Black, then it was his middle name, then it was his Islamic elementary school in Kenya, then it was that he's not Black enough. Now it is that he's too Christian.

I guess Jodi Kantor's article didn't have legs when she wrote it the first time on March 6th. Now she's hoping to get some traction on the inuendos by repeating it nearly 60 days later after the Debates.

Wonder what she'll try next time in her gallant effort to stir up controversy to draw readers to the dying New Yuck Times.
0 Replies
 
sozobe
 
  1  
Wed 2 May, 2007 12:32 pm
("New Yuck Times"?)



Just got this week's New Yorker. OOOOOH!!!

http://www.newyorker.com/images/2007/05/07/p465/070507_r16192b_p465.jpg
(That photo's a two-page spread in the magazine.)

http://www.newyorker.com/reporting/2007/05/07/070507fa_fact_macfarquhar

11 pages. Reading it now. (About to go somewhere though.)

This should be good!
0 Replies
 
sozobe
 
  1  
Wed 2 May, 2007 01:21 pm
Oh.



Wow.


I mean,



WOW.


A few recent things had my enthusiasm flagging. I'm now fully hyped up again.

Good grief. This guy has to become president.

(Please read it, everyone!)
0 Replies
 
sozobe
 
  1  
Wed 2 May, 2007 01:31 pm
Lots and lots of stuff I want to quote, but will try to limit myself. First, he expands on the stuff we talked about earlier re: prevention and intervention (health care). To recap some of that discussion:

jpinMilwaukee wrote:
As far as the whole getting people to take their medicine/control their diet thing... perhaps the word intervention is what scares me. When you talk about making sure patients understand and doctors and patients having all the information and home visits... that is an idea I can get behind. In my mind, an "intervention" has a very different meaning. Does he expand on the idea of these interventions at all?


sozobe wrote:
I don't think so. When I see "intervention" in that context, that's the kind of thing I think of though. "Early intervention" for deaf kids = deaf mentors, socializing opportunities with other deaf kids, rich language environment, storytelling, etc. I think some of what my mom has done was called intervention (home visits mostly). Pretty standard terminology for that kind of thing.


(That discussion starts about here.)

From the article:

Quote:
"We've got to put more money in prevention," he said. "It makes no sense for children to be going to the emergency room for treatable ailments like asthma. Twenty per cent of our patients who have chronic illnesses account for eighty per cent of the costs, so it's absolutely critical that we invest in managing those with chronic illnesses like diabetes. If we hire a case manager to work with them to insure that they're taking the proper treatments, then potentially we're not going to have to spend thirty thousand dollars on a leg amputation." A young man asked about health care for minorities. "Obesity and diabetes in minority communities are more severe," Obama said, "so I think we need targeted programs, particularly to children in those communities, to make sure that they've got sound nutrition, that they have access to fruits and vegetables and not just Popeyes, and that they have decent spaces to play in instead of being cooped up in the house all day."


And one more thing I really liked, I've commented on this before, how I identify with it and love to see it in a candidate, but would like to quote, "He distrusts abstractions, generalizations, extrapolations, projections."

I also loved, LOVED the part about "innocence," especially as it relates to his early objection to the Iraq war.
0 Replies
 
Vietnamnurse
 
  1  
Wed 2 May, 2007 07:12 pm
Sozobe:

I am watching and really enthusiastic too. I wish Mamajuana was here...she would like him very much too, I think.
0 Replies
 
snood
 
  1  
Wed 2 May, 2007 07:13 pm
I like (although the thought scares me) the part about how unfamiliar he is with the kind of campaigning that this will take - where the "Barack Obama" persona will sometimes seem to block out the real Barack Obama.
The article said something like "we have a real human being running here". And somehow that has always come through to me when I see, listen to, or read the man...
0 Replies
 
sozobe
 
  1  
Wed 2 May, 2007 07:19 pm
Exactly. I really like that part too (though it scares me too, I know what you mean). This both reinforced what I like about it and makes me a little less scared:

Quote:
Late last year, when he was thinking about whether to run, friends asked him if he was ready for a fight, if the thought got his adrenaline going, and he would say,


Quote:
This is not Obama's style at all. He doesn't seem hungry. He seems to like people but not to need them. When most politicians speak to a crowd, they give the impression that that is what they live for; Obama at town-hall meetings appears engaged but not fervently so, as if there were several other things that he would be equally happy doing that day.


(I especially like that one.)

Quote:
it seems, also, to be his theory of campaigning: don't try to score huge points at every moment, This is gonna be fun! Valerie, you're not a guy but let me explain it to you in sport terms. It's like we're in a basketball game, and I'm gonna fumble the ball, and someone's gonna steal the ball, and I'm gonna miss a free throw, but we're gonna win the game. You can't get yourself worked up over every little thing that somebody says about me or you're gonna go crazy.' "


I so identify with the "this is gonna be fun!" part.
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

So....Will Biden Be VP? - Question by blueveinedthrobber
My view on Obama - Discussion by McGentrix
Obama/ Love Him or Hate Him, We've Got Him - Discussion by Phoenix32890
Obama fumbles at Faith Forum - Discussion by slkshock7
Expert: Obama is not the antichrist - Discussion by joefromchicago
Obama's State of the Union - Discussion by maxdancona
Obama 2012? - Discussion by snood
 
  1. Forums
  2. » Obama '08?
  3. » Page 190
Copyright © 2025 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.18 seconds on 08/07/2025 at 03:38:47