djjd62
 
  1  
Sat 11 Sep, 2010 09:02 am
@mysteryman,
you know what political party really sucks?




all of them
0 Replies
 
cicerone imposter
 
  0  
Sat 11 Sep, 2010 09:05 am
@plainoldme,
That's funny, because most of us knew his "number" was up a long time ago.
0 Replies
 
okie
 
  1  
Sat 11 Sep, 2010 12:07 pm
@plainoldme,
plainoldme wrote:

Quote:
The only insult is you with your insult on our intelligence.


Because this thread, the one on American conservatism and the one on the economy are basically interchangeable, I am not certain which one has an okie post about what sounds like a self-sufficient but basically isolated -- perhaps, ghettoized or apartheid area -- rural area where there was a Black university.

pom, there you go making unsubstantiated statements. To be honest, I never regularly visited the community of Langston. All I know is we played them at the first university I attended for two years.
Quote:
okie has fond memories of the school, so he imagines the people are probably conservative.

I told you that I did not know about them for sure, but that it is common for rural or farming communities to be more conservative. Also business owners are often more conservative, and Langston would have both. I do not know now whether the community and the university are more integrated or not, but I am only aware that back in the 50's and 60's, I don't think it was. Now, pom, you can try to manufacture something derogatory out of that to direct toward me, I don't care, that is what you do, but I am only stating what I remember.

Quote:
The interesting thing about that post is that okie there admits that he went to more than one college. Did he flunk out of his first or second school? Did he have to attend a junior college in order to be admitted to a four year school? He says he never took remedial classes, but, there were none during okie's years are uni. However, junior colleges did function as a proving ground for students unable to gain admission to a four year school.

I did not flunk out. I transferred to a bigger school, which was Oklahoma State University, because a friend of mine also majoring in the same thing convinced me that we had a better chance at getting better jobs with a degree from there. The first college was a four year college offering the full degrees as I wanted, but it was much smaller, perhaps what would be part of the NAIA group of schools now as opposed to the NCAA. My friend turned out to probably be right, I did get a good job upon graduation. As I have told you before, I graduated with a major in geology and a minor in math. I was going to go onto graduate school but decided to go with the job, because it was what I considered a dream job at the time.

Quote:
I wonder if the apartheid school still exists.
You can make snide remarks, but it only shows your own ignorance. The colleges I attended had many blacks attending, while Langston was almost exclusively black. I have no idea if it was due to some kind of official policy of theirs, sort of a reverse discrimination situtation or what, but I doubt it would exist now and I would guess it is integrated. It might not be now, but it would be more due to tradition I would guess than it would be segregation factors. To be clear about this, I commend that university for operating a good institution.

As an aside that goes along with the above subject, a couple of years ago, I attended with my family including grandkids, a music festival in one of the towns of Oklahoma, where marching bands compete in a parade around the square of the town. I was told to expect it because a certain school out of Oklahoma City that had mostly black students because of the community population there, I was told that the band would probably take honors again as they usually did. When they came down the street, they were not only good at what they did, they knew it, and they put on a show with some extra jazz to the music and the marching. Also most of their musical selections were inspiring and patriotic in nature. You could tell the entire crowd was not only very enthusiastic but appreciative, with rousing rounds of clapping. If others did not have shivers going down their back as I did, I would be surprised.

So, yes, some towns and communities were segregated back in the early 50's until it began to change more and more, and thankfully it did. You can thank great men like Dwight D. Eisenhower for much of that. Common sense would tell you, however, that tradition itself continues to influence that concentrations of black populations in various communities as they existed in the past. That is where families grew up and therefore they tend to settle in those same areas. I would imagine that Langston would be an example of that.

pom, I have tried to provide a courteous and informative explanation of what I experienced and knew as a young person. Everything I post has always been what I believe to be the truth, and this post is no different. I will be interested to see if you respond with the same courtesy or if you go back to your pattern of insults.
plainoldme
 
  0  
Sat 11 Sep, 2010 12:46 pm
@okie,
I skim your posts because they are badly written and self-congratulatory but I did catch this:
Quote:
I have tried to provide a courteous and informative explanation of what I experienced and knew as a young person


While you may be "courteous," in your own mind, what you provided us with was a rather bland history without much information.

On one level, I can understand that sort of, shall we call it 'cloaking,' because it does protect your identity.

However, in general, you are not a courteous person. georgeob has, several times, tried to inform of you concepts you misunderstand and you attacked him. Several people attempted to contribute to your thread on liberals and conservatives a few years back, most notably, ehBeth. You were rude to all of them.

You seem to not understand basic social interaction. I suspect it is your ego. You are too self-involved to answer people kindly when they speak kindly to you.
plainoldme
 
  0  
Sat 11 Sep, 2010 12:53 pm
@plainoldme,
Now, let's touch on what you knew as a young person.

You condemn people you suspect might have been liberals or hippies or drug addicts or whatever, but, you never knew whether they were or were not. The problem is you see things through your lens of biases. In fact, look at the word, "prejudice" and see that it means pre-judgement, making a decision without knowledge.

You have been on this forum long enough so that all of us know who and what you are.

I was struck by your characterization of the band from the all Black school as good. You've never contributed to a music thread, so I have no idea what your taste in music is. However, given that you don't evidence any knowledge of history or understanding of politics and that you misinterpret a large percentage of the posts to which you respond, I suspect that your taste in music is narrow at best.

You see, okie, you have presented yourself as a limited person. You are easily angered. You are rude. You have never shown us to have interests of any kind. Do you see how easy it is to judge you badly?
djjd62
 
  1  
Sat 11 Sep, 2010 12:58 pm
@plainoldme,
some of my best friends were drug addicts, and a few of the coke heads i knew in the 80's were definitely conservatives (financial guys)
okie
 
  0  
Sat 11 Sep, 2010 01:08 pm
@plainoldme,
plainoldme wrote:

I skim your posts because they are badly written and self-congratulatory but I did catch this:
Quote:
I have tried to provide a courteous and informative explanation of what I experienced and knew as a young person


While you may be "courteous," in your own mind, what you provided us with was a rather bland history without much information.

On one level, I can understand that sort of, shall we call it 'cloaking,' because it does protect your identity.

I don't feel like I have to provide every last detail of my personal life, and I doubt anyone else here does either.

Quote:
However, in general, you are not a courteous person. georgeob has, several times, tried to inform of you concepts you misunderstand and you attacked him. Several people attempted to contribute to your thread on liberals and conservatives a few years back, most notably, ehBeth. You were rude to all of them.
I think what you are calling being rude and attacking was merely disagreeing with them. Perhaps you don't like my abrupt style of just stating it clearly, but maybe thats a cultural thing, okies tend to do that, they don't beat around the bush.

Quote:
You seem to not understand basic social interaction. I suspect it is your ego. You are too self-involved to answer people kindly when they speak kindly to you.

pom, you need to understand that kindness is not always agreement and vice versa. I have noticed that often liberals interpret a disagreement with their lifestyle or opinion as hatred, when it is nothing like that at all. Unconditional love is not the same as unconditional approval, so to love our neighbors, it doesn't mean we have to approve of everything they do and think. In fact sometimes one of the biggest favors we can do for somebody is to tell them they are making a bad decision about something or they are thinking wrong.
ican711nm
 
  0  
Sat 11 Sep, 2010 03:19 pm
@okie,
okie wrote:
... understand that kindness is not always agreement and vice versa. I have noticed that often liberals interpret a disagreement with their lifestyle or opinion as hatred, when it is nothing like that at all. Unconditional love is not the same as unconditional approval, so to love our neighbors, it doesn't mean we have to approve of everything they do and think. In fact sometimes one of the biggest favors we can do for somebody is to tell them they are making a bad decision about something or they are thinking wrong.

This remark of yours, okie, is "unconditional" wisdom.
cicerone imposter
 
  2  
Sat 11 Sep, 2010 04:39 pm
@ican711nm,
Nah, all you have to do is denigrate other humans, even our president, because you're such a kind soul. Those are just opinions, and not hatred. When liars like you post contradictions repeatedly, we don't buy into your silliness when you want to sound rational. That means, we don't approve of you as an American, a patriot, or anything close to being rational.
okie
 
  0  
Sat 11 Sep, 2010 07:25 pm
@cicerone imposter,
ci, conservatives like ican and I love the country, and that is precisely why we want the best for this country, which means opposing Democratic and Obama's, Pelosi's, and Reid's wrong headed policies.
cicerone imposter
 
  1  
Sat 11 Sep, 2010 07:27 pm
@okie,
okie wrote:
Quote:
Democratic and Obama's wrong headed policies


You are so stupid, even after we tell you to provide evidence, all you do is use your big brush to post bull **** that has no reality or evidence for it.
0 Replies
 
okie
 
  1  
Sat 11 Sep, 2010 07:41 pm
@ican711nm,
ican711nm wrote:

okie wrote:
... understand that kindness is not always agreement and vice versa. I have noticed that often liberals interpret a disagreement with their lifestyle or opinion as hatred, when it is nothing like that at all. Unconditional love is not the same as unconditional approval, so to love our neighbors, it doesn't mean we have to approve of everything they do and think. In fact sometimes one of the biggest favors we can do for somebody is to tell them they are making a bad decision about something or they are thinking wrong.

This remark of yours, okie, is "unconditional" wisdom.

Thanks, ican. Actually, I borrowed the line "unconditional love does not mean unconditional approval," from a very close friend of mine. Mainly, it was a philosophy employed with raising children, and the man obviously had employed that philosophy to perfection, as there is nothing but admiration for how successful he was with that.
0 Replies
 
JTT
 
  1  
Sat 11 Sep, 2010 10:38 pm
@okie,
Quote:
conservatives like ican and I love the country, and that is precisely why we want the best for this country,


The best for the country is to have successive administrations brutalize, torture and murder innocents, Okie? The best for the country is to have successive war criminals as presidents?

You conservatives sure do have a strange idea of what's best for a country. And did I mention hypocrisy? You folks are always mouthing off about what a great country the USA is when it's actually well up in the running for evil empire.

Was that coined by that renowned war criminal, Ronny nothin' between the ears Reagan? See what I mean about hypocrisy. He's bad mouthing the Russians, and others, all the while he's organizing and supporting proxies to rape, torture and murder innocent Nicaraguans.
0 Replies
 
plainoldme
 
  0  
Sat 11 Sep, 2010 10:52 pm
@djjd62,
Some of Hollywood's leading conservatives like John Travolta have serious drug and other problems.

Where I formerly lived, a child of parents who served in the Nixon and Bush 1 administrations had a terrible drug habit and her parents were in complete denial.

The kids who supported Bush 2 were not just pot smokers but pot dealers.
0 Replies
 
plainoldme
 
  -1  
Sat 11 Sep, 2010 10:54 pm
@okie,
You totally lack social graces. Your style is one of self-proclaimed superiority. You probably have little to no social contact.

BTW, there is nothing you can tell me that is of any value to me.
0 Replies
 
cicerone imposter
 
  -1  
Sun 12 Sep, 2010 10:48 am
@okie,
If you loved your country, you wouldn't try so hard to destroy our government.

Your rhetoric proves you hate this country. Over 90% of what you say is against our constitution and our president.

If that's love, your wife must be living in hell on earth.
0 Replies
 
ican711nm
 
  -2  
Sun 12 Sep, 2010 03:38 pm
Today's Obama Leftist Liberals claim they are seeking government directed redistribution of wealth. They fail to understand that the redistribution of wealth by government, if allowed to persist, leads to a dictatorship under which everyone except the members of the dictatorship have less wealth. If that is allowed to persist, that will lead to the mass murder of hundred's of millions.

How shall we save ourselves? We can only save ourselves by removing Obama Leftist Liberals from our government. They have no respect for truth, but are repeatedly accusing their opposition of possessing that evil condition. They are following Saul Alinsky's principles.

Quote:
Saul Alinsky said and wrote:
->The radical is not a reformer of the system but its would-be destroyer;
->The revolutionary’s purpose is to undermine the system;
->The radical is building his own kingdom, a kingdom of heaven on earth;
->The radical underrmines the system by taking from the haves and giving it to the have nots;
->The most basic principle for radicals is lie to opponents;
->The issue is never the issue;
->The issue is always the revolution;
->The radical organizer does not have a fixed truth—truth to him is relative and changing;
->The stated cause is never the real cause, but only an occasion to advance the real cause;
->The real cause is the accumulation of power to make the revolution.

0 Replies
 
plainoldme
 
  1  
Sun 12 Sep, 2010 08:08 pm
ican: When are you going to catch on that no one gives a tinker's damn for Saul Alinsky?

Now, let's discuss someone whose influence has been harmful to America: Leo Strauss.
mysteryman
 
  1  
Mon 13 Sep, 2010 09:36 am
President Pbama has become a national icon...in China

http://www.upi.com/News_Photos/Features/Obama-as-seen-in-China/3799/1/
okie
 
  0  
Mon 13 Sep, 2010 09:49 am
@mysteryman,
mm, how do you interpret that? Is that some kind of indication that they think Obama is a revolutionary and that the mantra "Oh Yes We Can" is Obama's battle cry that will succeed in changing America into some kind of ultra socialist or communist society or something? It seems the showing of Obama with the militaristic type hat also indicates to me they think he may be somewhat like other communist revolutionaries like Chairman Mao, Fidel Castro, Hugo Chavez, and others. That is the way I take it, but I am not sure how it strikes others? I frankly find it somewhat repulsive to see an American president portrayed in that manner, so I don't view that stuff being common in China as being any kind of a compliment for the president at all. If anything, it seems to enforce or further legitimize the fears that we conservatives have about Obama. How about you?
 

Related Topics

So....Will Biden Be VP? - Question by blueveinedthrobber
My view on Obama - Discussion by McGentrix
Obama/ Love Him or Hate Him, We've Got Him - Discussion by Phoenix32890
Obama fumbles at Faith Forum - Discussion by slkshock7
Expert: Obama is not the antichrist - Discussion by joefromchicago
Obama's State of the Union - Discussion by maxdancona
Obama 2012? - Discussion by snood
 
  1. Forums
  2. » Obama '08?
  3. » Page 1782
Copyright © 2025 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.21 seconds on 07/15/2025 at 08:54:50