sozobe
 
  1  
Sun 19 Mar, 2006 09:24 am
Oh and I think two of the main things a president needs in immediate, non-advisor situations is personal charm and intelligence, and he has both of those.
0 Replies
 
sozobe
 
  1  
Sun 19 Mar, 2006 09:24 am
Obama is currently 44 and was born in the US, yes.
0 Replies
 
Roxxxanne
 
  1  
Sun 19 Mar, 2006 09:31 am
Lash wrote:
Roxxxanne wrote:
Lash wrote:
That doesn't make them right.

About anything, it seems.

Happy alien hunting!


It doesn't make you right either. About anything.

Not sure if I can survive this blistering come back.

Laughing

Soz or anybody, to make amends for my alien sidebar--

Some would say Bush hadn't had much exprience pre-election, but a governor does manage a state. A Senator's job is not a good prereq for President.

Do you really think Obama is qualified?


BTW Lash, wanna discuss Texas politics? I lived in Austin and one of my best friend's father was Governor of Texas. Being Governor of Texas is not a good prereq for POTUS.
0 Replies
 
Lash
 
  1  
Sun 19 Mar, 2006 09:36 am
Makes me sad that you think charm is one of the three most important needs of a President, soz.
0 Replies
 
Roxxxanne
 
  1  
Sun 19 Mar, 2006 09:37 am
Lash wrote:
Makes me sad that you think charm is one of the three most important needs of a President, soz.


Needs?
0 Replies
 
sozobe
 
  1  
Sun 19 Mar, 2006 09:40 am
In non-advisor situations.

Why wouldn't it be?

This is about meeting foreign leaders -- being charming is extremely important there. About meeting with various political people who want something from him -- also important. The whole thing with McCain is a perfect example of how he deployed charm in a proactive way.

That's something you can't rely on advisors for, you have to do it yourself.
0 Replies
 
Roxxxanne
 
  1  
Sun 19 Mar, 2006 09:41 am
sozobe wrote:
Oh and I think two of the main things a president needs in immediate, non-advisor situations is personal charm and intelligence, and he has both of those.


Two of the main things does not equal the three most important things or even the two most important things.

I often wonder whether people can't read or whether they purposely misstate what someone says.
0 Replies
 
Roxxxanne
 
  1  
Sun 19 Mar, 2006 09:43 am
sozobe wrote:
In non-advisor situations.

Why wouldn't it be?

This is about meeting foreign leaders -- being charming is extremely important there. About meeting with various political people who want something from him -- also important. The whole thing with McCain is a perfect example of how he deployed charm in a proactive way.

That's something you can't rely on advisors for, you have to do it yourself.


It worked for Reagan, it worked for Clinton.
0 Replies
 
sozobe
 
  1  
Sun 19 Mar, 2006 09:44 am
Roxxxanne, is all that really necessary?

Can you just address what's being said without the hyperbole and extra stuff?

Let me ask this -- if Obama were the Democratic nominee in 2008, would YOU vote for him? Why or why not?
0 Replies
 
sozobe
 
  1  
Sun 19 Mar, 2006 09:45 am
(That was in re: to your second-to-last-post -- I agree that Reagan and Clinton are examples of why charm is important. I think Bush, too, actually -- I don't like the guy, but I think charm is one of his real strengths.)
0 Replies
 
snood
 
  1  
Sun 19 Mar, 2006 09:45 am
Lash wrote:
Makes me sad that you think charm is one of the three most important needs of a President, soz.


Oh, come on. Don't you remember all the "down-home" charm Bush was touted as having - that he'd be someone the bubbas would like to sit down with over a beer? Don't you remember how much charm Reagan was said to have - how disarming and likeable? How can you feign ignorance or suprise about the necessity of a pres candidate to be perceived as charming?
0 Replies
 
Lash
 
  1  
Sun 19 Mar, 2006 09:46 am
sozobe wrote:
In non-advisor situations.

Why wouldn't it be?

This is about meeting foreign leaders -- being charming is extremely important there. About meeting with various political people who want something from him -- also important. The whole thing with McCain is a perfect example of how he deployed charm in a proactive way.

That's something you can't rely on advisors for, you have to do it yourself.

I think of Lincoln, Truman,...

Resolutionor strength of will, when you need to stand firm, conviction about your vision, curiosity in seeking the right, best answers, compassion, flexibility, honesty...

Charm would come in handy getting you there, but in many spots of this thread, it seems as though he's being judged for a beauty contest.

Don't want to throw a wet blanket, though. Just thought it was an important observation, and actually, a seeming characteristic of the Democrat party's considerations.
0 Replies
 
Roxxxanne
 
  1  
Sun 19 Mar, 2006 09:47 am
sozobe wrote:
Roxxxanne, is all that really necessary?

Can you just address what's being said without the hyperbole and extra stuff?



I did adress what was being said. Lash mischaracterized what you said. How is it possible to have a fruitful discussion when people are either dishonest or not capabale of comperhending simple points?
0 Replies
 
Roxxxanne
 
  1  
Sun 19 Mar, 2006 09:49 am
sozobe wrote:


Let me ask this -- if Obama were the Democratic nominee in 2008, would YOU vote for him? Why or why not?


Yes but I would vote for ANY possible Dem candidate except Joe Lieberman.
0 Replies
 
sozobe
 
  1  
Sun 19 Mar, 2006 09:50 am
...like the one that impeachment proceedings would be really bad news for the Dems?

Lash, I think it's one piece of the puzzle. If it charm were the only or even the main element to him, no. But if he were just intelligence and experience with no charm, also no. (cough *Kerry* cough).
0 Replies
 
Roxxxanne
 
  1  
Sun 19 Mar, 2006 09:52 am
Lash wrote:
sozobe wrote:
In non-advisor situations.

Why wouldn't it be?

This is about meeting foreign leaders -- being charming is extremely important there. About meeting with various political people who want something from him -- also important. The whole thing with McCain is a perfect example of how he deployed charm in a proactive way.

That's something you can't rely on advisors for, you have to do it yourself.

I think of Lincoln, Truman,...

Resolutionor strength of will, when you need to stand firm, conviction about your vision, curiosity in seeking the right, best answers, compassion, flexibility, honesty...

Charm would come in handy getting you there, but in many spots of this thread, it seems as though he's being judged for a beauty contest.

Don't want to throw a wet blanket, though. Just thought it was an important observation, and actually, a seeming characteristic of the Democrat party's considerations.


I would agree that in Lincoln's time, charm wasn't something that one would put at the top of their qualification checklist. But that was a very different time. Truman? He was charming in his own way.
0 Replies
 
sozobe
 
  1  
Sun 19 Mar, 2006 09:54 am
I'd agree with that... I can't imagine voting for Lieberman. Luckily, I doubt we'll have to. (Is he being seriously considered by anyone for '08?)
0 Replies
 
Roxxxanne
 
  1  
Sun 19 Mar, 2006 09:58 am
sozobe wrote:
...like the one that impeachment proceedings would be really bad news for the Dems?



Wow! I was just talking about misstating what a poster says and you turn right around and do it yourself!

The statement in dispute was that the elevation of Murtha to SOTH and his succession to the Presidency would guarantee the defeat of the Dems in 2006.
0 Replies
 
Roxxxanne
 
  1  
Sun 19 Mar, 2006 10:00 am
sozobe wrote:
I'd agree with that... I can't imagine voting for Lieberman. Luckily, I doubt we'll have to. (Is he being seriously considered by anyone for '08?)


Maybe Hadassah. Very Happy
0 Replies
 
sozobe
 
  1  
Sun 19 Mar, 2006 10:01 am
OK.
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

So....Will Biden Be VP? - Question by blueveinedthrobber
My view on Obama - Discussion by McGentrix
Obama/ Love Him or Hate Him, We've Got Him - Discussion by Phoenix32890
Obama fumbles at Faith Forum - Discussion by slkshock7
Expert: Obama is not the antichrist - Discussion by joefromchicago
Obama's State of the Union - Discussion by maxdancona
Obama 2012? - Discussion by snood
 
  1. Forums
  2. » Obama '08?
  3. » Page 16
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.18 seconds on 12/25/2024 at 12:19:24