edgarblythe wrote:Oh I can't support a candidate that's not flawless. Goodness me. That's why I'm voting for (fill in the blank).
I know you're being sarcastic, and taken a certain way I can really agree with the sarcastic sentiment. I don't know if you meant it the same way I would have, if I'd written it.
Obama is torn on gay marriage. So what? As it is, he holds the same view as probably the majority of presidential hopefuls (support of legal union but not marriage), but of that I'm not sure. The only one I know of for sure that supports gay marriage is Giuliani.
It seems that Obama is not allowed any wiggle room on the issue because he is black, and therefore somehow should "know better". I've never bought the line that blacks should support gays because our struggles are alike. Gay marriage is not at this point a foregone conclusion (no matter how rude anyone gets with those on the fence about it), but only intensely politically correct. This point is ironically lost on those who excoriate any who don't abjectly capitulate to 100% support of gay marriages. Some of these same people make lengthy statements about freedom of speech, talking about how they should have the use of any word they damn well want.
They will go to figurative war for the conservative blacks who "dare" to not toe the liberal democrat party line - they say that this is America at its finest - the right to think individually.
But this - the manifest right of same sex marriage - this is too sacrosanct a concept - this is so obviously the right way to go that it is below idiotic to even think aloud about it. So sure are they of their righteousness that they become haughty in their denouncements of those, like Obama, who are still struggling with it.
And I say struggle on, Obama - answer to your own conscience and you will come to your own conclusions. You have that right.
Taken as a whole, this is the kind of "flaw" I can live with.