okie
 
  0  
Thu 27 Aug, 2009 05:05 pm
@FreeDuck,
FreeDuck wrote:

okie wrote:

FreeDuck wrote:

So, okie, you seem to be concerned about the possibility of a parallel military that is not under the same command and control as the US military and that might not be loyal to the US but rather some political faction or person. I wonder how you feel about Blackwater.

I have not studied Blackwater. Isn't it a civilian security contractor to do work for us in foreign countries? Good grief, whats the problem? Even here in this country, there are many security firms that contract with for example shopping malls, to protect their private property. That is worlds apart from some kind of government civilian security force.

It's a security force made up of US and foreign mercenaries who operated in Iraq as soldiers with an immunity our soldiers are not afforded. It owns weapons, airplanes, armored vehicles, helicopters, and even a ship. It is run by a highly ideological right-wing Christianist. Unlike our own military, they could be deployed against US citizens. Scary to you?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Blackwater_USA

Run by idealogical right wing Christianists? What is a Christianist? And you have any evidence at all? And so if the people that own the company belong to a religion, I am not aware that breaks any laws. Any evidence they can be deployed against us? Or did you just make this all up? No, this is not scary, unless you have a guy like Obama that cannot be trusted and he decides to try to use something like this.
Cycloptichorn
 
  1  
Thu 27 Aug, 2009 05:13 pm
@okie,
okie wrote:

FreeDuck wrote:

okie wrote:

FreeDuck wrote:

So, okie, you seem to be concerned about the possibility of a parallel military that is not under the same command and control as the US military and that might not be loyal to the US but rather some political faction or person. I wonder how you feel about Blackwater.

I have not studied Blackwater. Isn't it a civilian security contractor to do work for us in foreign countries? Good grief, whats the problem? Even here in this country, there are many security firms that contract with for example shopping malls, to protect their private property. That is worlds apart from some kind of government civilian security force.

It's a security force made up of US and foreign mercenaries who operated in Iraq as soldiers with an immunity our soldiers are not afforded. It owns weapons, airplanes, armored vehicles, helicopters, and even a ship. It is run by a highly ideological right-wing Christianist. Unlike our own military, they could be deployed against US citizens. Scary to you?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Blackwater_USA

Run by idealogical right wing Christianists? What is a Christianist? And you have any evidence at all? And so if the people that own the company belong to a religion, I am not aware that breaks any laws.


So, you don't care if companies which operate in America and funded by the US government are ran by Radical Islamists? That's the exact equivalent of what we are talking about here.

Quote:
Any evidence they can be deployed against us? Or did you just make this all up? No, this is not scary, unless you have a guy like Obama that cannot be trusted and he decides to try to use something like this.


Why turn this to your boogeyman, Obama? They were deployed in America - by Bush.

Quote:
Tens of thousands of Hurricane Katrina victims remain without homes. The environment is devastated. People are disenfranchised. Financial resources, desperate residents are told, are scarce. But at least New Orleans has a Wal-Mart parking lot serving as a FEMA Disaster Recovery Center with perhaps the tightest security of any parking lot in the world. That's thanks to the more than $30 million Washington has shelled out to the Blackwater USA security firm since its men deployed after Katrina hit. Under contract with the Department of Homeland Security's (DHS) Federal Protective Service, Blackwater's men are ostensibly protecting federal reconstruction projects for FEMA. Documents show that the government paid Blackwater $950 a day for each of its guards in the area. Interviewed by The Nation last September, several of the company's guards stationed in New Orleans said they were being paid $350 a day. That would have left Blackwater with $600 per man, per day to cover lodging, ammo, other overhead--and profits.


http://www.thenation.com/doc/20060605/scahill

Blackwater has already been used as a domestic, non-military security force under the direct control of the executive branch, immune to prosecution, accountable to nobody at all. The very **** you complain that Obama wants to do, Bush and the Republicans DID do. And not a word out of you about how wrong that is, to employ mercenaries to provide security within one's own country.

Cycloptichorn
0 Replies
 
Foxfyre
 
  1  
Thu 27 Aug, 2009 05:24 pm
@okie,
Several (four or five) Blackwater employees were indicted last December for recklessly shooting into a group of civilians and killing several. They probably would have done more mayhem if other Blackwater employees had not ordered them, at gunpoint, to cease and desist. There was no justification for the killings and in my opinion those indicted deserved whatever sentence they receive. They will almost certainly be found guilty. They were government contractors training Iraqi security forces, and they do have some Republican ties, but mostly with Bush 41. I haven't seen anything suggesting they were a bunch of Christianists though, whatever in the hell that is.
FreeDuck
 
  2  
Thu 27 Aug, 2009 06:28 pm
@Foxfyre,
Christianist is to Christians what Islamist is to Muslims.

You can read all kinds of info on Erik Prince from all sorts of sources. Whether or not you believe as I do that he is a Christian extremist, you (okie) should admit that if this were someone closely tied to Democrats you would be crying foul.

Here's a good start: http://www.time.com/time/nation/article/0,8599,1914822,00.html
DontTreadOnMe
 
  2  
Thu 27 Aug, 2009 06:50 pm
Quote:
Prince's father co-founded the Family Research Council with Gary Bauer.[13] Prince is the brother of Betsy DeVos, a former chairwoman of the Michigan Republican Party and wife of former Alticor (Amway) president and Gubernatorial candidate Dick DeVos[11], son of Richard DeVos, Sr. (listed by Forbes in 2007 as one of the world's richest men, with a net worth of $2.4 billion).[14]




Quote:
Prince serves as vice president of the Edgar and Elsa Prince Foundation. Salon reports that "between July 2003 and July 2006, the foundation gave at least $670,000 to the Family Research Council, which his family founded, and $531,000 to Focus on the Family"[16] headed by James Dobson. The foundation is also a major donor to Calvin College[17], a Christian institution in Grand Rapids, Michigan. Prince also serves as a board member of Christian Freedom International, a non-profit group with a mission of helping "Christians who are persecuted for their faith in Jesus Christ."
Since 1998, Prince has personally donated over $200, 000 to Republican causes.[18][19][20] Prince is a donor, along with others to the Alliance Defense Fund, a conservative Christian legal group.[21] Prince had also contributed money to the Green Party of Luzerne County, Pennsylvania, though this has been interpreted as an unsuccessful attempt to help Republican candidate Rick Santorum in his race against Democratic challenger Bob Casey.



Quote:
He was an intern in the White House under President George H. W. Bush[10] and subsequently criticized that administration's policies to the Grand Rapids Press, saying: "I saw a lot of things I didn't agree with"homosexual groups being invited in, the budget agreement, the Clean Air Act, those kinds of bills."[6] He also served as an intern to California Republican Rep. Dana Rohrabacher. While at Hillsdale, Prince campaigned for presidential candidate Pat Buchanan, and interned at his father's co-founded Gary Bauer's Family Research Council


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Erik_Prince#Philanthropy_and_political_donations

Quote:
Prince has been a steady contributor to the Republican National Committee, giving more than $200,000 since 1998. He also has supported various conservative candidates, including President Bush, Sens. Tom Coburn (R-OK) and Rick Santorum (R-PA), Rep. Duncan Hunter (R-CA), and indicted former House Majority Leader Tom DeLay (R-TX).


http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=14659780

DontTreadOnMe
 
  1  
Thu 27 Aug, 2009 06:56 pm
http://www.nndb.com/org/308/000164813/

http://www.nndb.com/org/960/000169453/

http://www.nndb.com/people/926/000117575/
0 Replies
 
okie
 
  -1  
Thu 27 Aug, 2009 09:16 pm
@FreeDuck,
FreeDuck wrote:

Christianist is to Christians what Islamist is to Muslims.

You can read all kinds of info on Erik Prince from all sorts of sources. Whether or not you believe as I do that he is a Christian extremist, you (okie) should admit that if this were someone closely tied to Democrats you would be crying foul.

Here's a good start: http://www.time.com/time/nation/article/0,8599,1914822,00.html

Never heard of a "Christianist." Is that a new invented term by libs? If your website is to be believed, Prince does not sound all that great, and I think there are checks and balances, remedies if you will, for a contractor that oversteps its bounds. There is oversight. But seriously, there was a legitimate mission given for private security firms to do jobs, do work, provide a service in Iraq. Private contractors have done all kinds of work in Iraq, not just security. But that is far different than having a civilian security force in the United States, as there is no need, no reason, no legitimate constitutional reason for creating one like Obama suggested. Seriously Duck, I think you need a sense of comparison here.
okie
 
  -1  
Thu 27 Aug, 2009 09:20 pm
@DontTreadOnMe,
So what is the conclusion? There are rich Republicans that support Republican candidates. What a surprise! Where is the interest in Leftist moguls, like George Soros?
joefromchicago
 
  2  
Thu 27 Aug, 2009 09:38 pm
@mysteryman,
mysteryman wrote:

Thanks, but from the link...

Quote:
The idea is that unethical or illegal behavior by the ruling party is protected by an unspoken IOKIYAR mentality


So now, wouldnt it be IOKIYAD

For Republicans, it's always IOKIYAR.
mysteryman
 
  -1  
Thu 27 Aug, 2009 09:43 pm
@joefromchicago,
And for dems, its always IOKIYAD
0 Replies
 
DontTreadOnMe
 
  1  
Fri 28 Aug, 2009 01:26 am
@okie,
okie wrote:

So what is the conclusion? There are rich Republicans that support Republican candidates. What a surprise! Where is the interest in Leftist moguls, like George Soros?


we weren't talking about his money. we were talking about his radical christianist affiliations.
revel
 
  2  
Fri 28 Aug, 2009 07:04 am
Quote:
Prince does not sound all that great, and I think there are checks and balances, remedies if you will, for a contractor that oversteps its bounds
.

So far there hasn't been any checks and balances or remedies because a company apparently can't be held responsible or put into jail. Only its officers or employees. This company could just resume its practices with others in the place of the officers. Prince has been let go (or resigned) as CEO but he still owns the company and is still the chairman . Apparently he is some kind of renegade with a mission all of his own to fight Islam any way he sees fit and provide hookers for his employees.

go here for links

Obama should not have renewed their contract back in may or whenever it was and I hold him responsible for that. As for the new company, a rose by another name is still a rose and it should not be given any kind of contract and Prince as owner of Blackwater should be held responsible for the actions he facilitated in his company and all those who committed those acts should be held accountable as well. Perhaps with these new allegations from Blackwater employees, they will all be held accountable, but I have become realist over the years and don't hold my breath.
0 Replies
 
ehBeth
 
  1  
Fri 28 Aug, 2009 07:08 am
@okie,
okie wrote:
Where is the interest in Leftist moguls, like George Soros?


I'm interested in George Soros.

What is your problem with the spread of democracy?
dyslexia
 
  1  
Fri 28 Aug, 2009 07:17 am
@ehBeth,
well, it's pretty clear Okie distains democracy because it allows for the election (by the people) of such as Obama democrats as well as George W Bush.
okie
 
  0  
Fri 28 Aug, 2009 09:06 am
@ehBeth,
ehBeth wrote:

okie wrote:
Where is the interest in Leftist moguls, like George Soros?


I'm interested in George Soros.

What is your problem with the spread of democracy?

Soros uses democracy, but I doubt seriously he believes in it.
0 Replies
 
okie
 
  0  
Fri 28 Aug, 2009 09:09 am
@dyslexia,
dyslexia wrote:

well, it's pretty clear Okie distains democracy because it allows for the election (by the people) of such as Obama democrats as well as George W Bush.

dys, thats an off the wall statement with no basis in fact of course. I believe Obama was elected, we are stuck with him, because of voters like you, but I will try to convince everyone I know to vote him out next election, and I would also like to see honest elections, which would dictate we get rid of groups like ACORN that are working to rig the elections with fraud. So if you believe in corruption free elections, you would also oppose ACORN. And so would Soros, which I doubt seriously that he does.
dyslexia
 
  1  
Fri 28 Aug, 2009 09:20 am
@okie,
I seriously believe Okie doesn't believe in democracy.
okie
 
  0  
Fri 28 Aug, 2009 09:32 am
@dyslexia,
You may believe alot of stuff that isn't true, dys. I think that is probably the case. As I said, if you believed in elections free of corruption, you would be opposed to groups like ACORN. But then again, perhaps you think people are so helpless they cannot go register or vote without ACORN to help them sign up a few dozen times each? So if your idea of democracy is to vote early and vote often, no wonder you are confused.
Cycloptichorn
 
  1  
Fri 28 Aug, 2009 09:34 am
@okie,
okie wrote:

You may believe alot of stuff that isn't true, dys. I think that is probably the case. As I said, if you believed in elections free of corruption, you would be opposed to groups like ACORN.


There's no evidence that ACORN contributed to any corruption in any election at all.

Quote:
But then again, perhaps you think people are so helpless they cannot go register or vote without ACORN to help them sign up a few dozen times each? So if your idea of democracy is to vote early and vote often, no wonder you are confused.


The RNC signs people up to vote, and various other Republican groups, in the same fashion as ACORN.

Cycloptichorn
dyslexia
 
  1  
Fri 28 Aug, 2009 09:41 am
@okie,
yes indeed okie, my sense of humour runs to the extreme such as
vote early
vote often
vote kucinich.
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

So....Will Biden Be VP? - Question by blueveinedthrobber
My view on Obama - Discussion by McGentrix
Obama/ Love Him or Hate Him, We've Got Him - Discussion by Phoenix32890
Obama fumbles at Faith Forum - Discussion by slkshock7
Expert: Obama is not the antichrist - Discussion by joefromchicago
Obama's State of the Union - Discussion by maxdancona
Obama 2012? - Discussion by snood
 
  1. Forums
  2. » Obama '08?
  3. » Page 1397
Copyright © 2025 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.19 seconds on 03/04/2025 at 03:39:08