@DontTreadOnMe,
I think it is tiresome to constantly malign, disparage, and call fools those who are exercising their Constitutionally protected right to peacefully express their convictions about what government should be. They were not demanding anything from you, not requesting anything of you other than your non interference. Their requests wouldn't have cost you a dime and, should they prevail in accomplishing their goals, would likely save you a bundle.
Not once have I made any inference as to your lifestyle or presumed to judge you for your opinion or what you think should be the rightful duty and responsibility of government. Nor were they doing that.
But the fact is, the Left often does profess it to be virtue to take what Citizen A legally and ethically acquired and give it to Citizen B for whatever reason. Obama's now famous pronouncement of 'spread the wealth around' could be a phrase from the modern liberal bible of what government should be about.
The Tea Parties were a peaceful protest of a government that has become far too large, too intrusive, too expensive, and too contrary to the principles upon which this country was founded. You can and presumably do trust the Keynesian theory that the government can spend itself rich and is the best vehicle to solve all of societies' problems. The Tea Party participants don't believe that to be possible and believe it will be destructive to the country to try.
Do you honestly see their point of view as so terrible? Or are you unable to accept it for what it is and, like so many liberals, must trash and humiliate and discredit any who express such a point of view?