H2O MAN
 
  0  
Tue 5 May, 2009 07:01 am


Obama and the democommunists want to turn the country into a 3rd world socialist
hellhole populated by cheese eating, surrender monkey, unionized metrosexuals.
spendius
 
  0  
Tue 5 May, 2009 07:04 am
@H2O MAN,
Leave him alone mate. He does more damage to the liberal cause than anything we can think up.
H2O MAN
 
  -1  
Tue 5 May, 2009 07:23 am
@spendius,
True.
0 Replies
 
realjohnboy
 
  2  
Tue 5 May, 2009 05:41 pm
@H2O MAN,
H2O MAN wrote:

Obama and the democommunists want to turn the country into a 3rd world socialist
hellhole populated by cheese eating, surrender monkey, unionized metrosexuals.

Do you have a problem with people eating cheese?
MontereyJack
 
  3  
Tue 5 May, 2009 05:46 pm
"democommunists"? Takes a conservafascist like H2 OBoy to come up with something as loony as that.
0 Replies
 
DontTreadOnMe
 
  2  
Tue 5 May, 2009 05:53 pm
@realjohnboy,
realjohnboy wrote:

H2O MAN wrote:

Obama and the democommunists want to turn the country into a 3rd world socialist
hellhole populated by cheese eating, surrender monkey, unionized metrosexuals.

Do you have a problem with people eating cheese?


maybe the all-wet one is under the impression that it's only produced in california?

or, because ours comes from happy cows.

cicerone imposter
 
  1  
Tue 5 May, 2009 06:02 pm
@DontTreadOnMe,
waterboy doesn't contribute anything of value on a2k, but he does have an above average imagination like most conservatives who feed on ad hominems, straw man, fear, and nonsense.
0 Replies
 
MontereyJack
 
  1  
Tue 5 May, 2009 06:08 pm
Now I LOVE the California cows video. Did you notice how, at the end, the Real California Cheese people swiped the Obama O "New Dawn" logo from the campaign for their logo? Just check out that signboard. Subliminal Blue State liberal mind control techniques for sure. All the far right conspiracy theory buffs, like H2 OBoy, are gonna have a field day with that one.
realjohnboy
 
  1  
Tue 5 May, 2009 06:15 pm
@MontereyJack,
The line at the end made me guffaw: "She's been tipped one too many times." I wonder how many folks seeing the ad caught the joke there?
0 Replies
 
MontereyJack
 
  1  
Tue 5 May, 2009 06:24 pm
RJB: Cool. I don't get that much volume out of my laptop and I missed that.
0 Replies
 
mysteryman
 
  1  
Tue 5 May, 2009 06:31 pm
This is sick, and waaaay out of line...

http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2009/may/04/specter-hints-kemp-died-of-gop-agenda/?fark

Apparently, the newest dem senator has said that the reason Jack Kemp died is because of the repubs.

Quote:
Sen. Arlen Specter, Pennsylvania Democrat, said part of the reason that he left the Republican Party last week was disillusionment with its health-care priorities, and suggested that had the Republicans taken a more moderate track, Jack Kemp may have won his battle with cancer.


snip

Quote:
Mr. Specter continued: "If we had pursued what President Nixon declared in 1970 as the war on cancer, we would have cured many strains. I think Jack Kemp would be alive today. And that research has saved or prolonged many lives, including mine."


And if the dems had been in power, Chris Reeves would have gotten out of his chair and walked.

Please tell me that Specter isnt speaking for the dems, and that he just made an ass out of himself.
0 Replies
 
MontereyJack
 
  5  
Tue 5 May, 2009 06:47 pm
No, he didn't. What he was saying was that the Republican priorities for spending on cancer research and treatment were wrong, and that if they'd followed Nixon's lead we'd have been farther ahead today, and more people's lives would have been saved, including possibly Jack Kemp. And he's probably right. Republican intransigence during the Clinton administration produced the healthcare mess we're in today.
MontereyJack
 
  1  
Tue 5 May, 2009 07:09 pm
someone wants to know about Hague Watermaxes, H20. Go help them out.
0 Replies
 
ehBeth
 
  2  
Tue 5 May, 2009 08:09 pm
@H2O MAN,
Not got any friends in Wisconsin eh.
0 Replies
 
nimh
 
  2  
Wed 6 May, 2009 02:03 am
@MontereyJack,
Yep. And Arlen himself battled with cancer, and feels very strongly about policies re cancer research + treatment, and health care policy in general.
0 Replies
 
mysteryman
 
  1  
Wed 6 May, 2009 02:17 am
@MontereyJack,
And how many of the years from Nixon to now did dems control congress?
Why did Specter wait till now to attack the repubs?

And if it was that important, why didnt the Carter admin do anything.
I just find his timing suspect, and his comments outrageous.
0 Replies
 
H2O MAN
 
  -2  
Thu 7 May, 2009 02:26 pm
Kinda scary...

http://www.theakforum.net/phpBB2/images/avatars/130042075149e12a61f234d.jpg
0 Replies
 
realjohnboy
 
  1  
Thu 7 May, 2009 05:08 pm
President Obama today came out with a list of $17B in budget cuts that he would like to see happen immediately. I was amused by the response.
House Republican Leader John Boehner: "...(T)he resulting savings are minor..."
He did not make any suggestions as to where additional cuts should be made.
And we have yet to hear from members of Congress objecting to the cuts Mr Obama proposed affecting their "deserving" constituents, including wealthy ranchers or a defense contractor working on a product the military doesn't want.
There is a certain amount of ridicule about this $17B compared to the total budget of $3.4T. It is a mere 1/2 of 1%, critics scoff.
Here is the way I would spin it:
Last year, RJB paid Federal taxes of $10,000.
A $100M cut in Federal spending equates to all of the tax payments made by 10,000 families (roughly the size of Liberal, KS).
A $1B cut works out to the 100,000 population of Cowlitz, WA.
$17B? You can do the math.
cicerone imposter
 
  1  
Thu 7 May, 2009 05:53 pm
@realjohnboy,
All the conservatives know how to do is bitch, bitch, and bitch with no solutions coming from their side of the isle. Wonder of wonders that they did nothing to stop Bush and his spending - while the GOP congress approved almost everything Bush wanted - including the veto power the president didn't use to cut the budget.

Bunch of hypocrites.
Foxfyre
 
  0  
Thu 7 May, 2009 05:57 pm
@realjohnboy,
(At a) joint Senate-House Republican leadership press conference on March 8, 1962, (Senator Everitt) Dirksen said, "The favorite sum of money is $1 billion " a billion a year for a fatter federal payroll, a billion here, a billion there." (Pundits quipped "and pretty soon you're talking about real money" that got added to the line but which there is no evidence that Dirksen actually said.)

From the Dirksen files:
Quote:
"One time in the House of Representatives [a colleague] told me a story about a proposition that a teacher put to a boy. He said, ‘Johnny, a cat fell in a well 100 feet deep. Suppose that cat climbed up 1 foot and then fell back 2 feet. How long would it take the cat to get out of the well?'

"Johnny worked assiduously with his slate and slate pencil for quite a while, and then when the teacher came down and said, ‘How are you getting along?' Johnny said, ‘Teacher, if you give me another slate and a couple of slate pencils, I am pretty sure that in the next 30 minutes I can land that cat in hell.'

"If some people get any cheer out of a $328 billion debt ceiling, I do not find much to cheer about concerning it." [Congressional Record, June 16, 1965, p. 13884].


And also:
Quote:
"As I think of this bill, and the fact that the more progress we make the deeper we go into the hole, I am reminded of a group of men who were working on a street. They had dug quite a number of holes. When they got through, they failed to puddle or tamp the earth when it was returned to the hole, and they had a nice little mound, which was quite a traffic hazard.

"Not knowing what to do with it, they sat down on the curb and had a conference. After a while, one of the fellows snapped his fingers and said, ‘I have it. I know how we will get rid of that overriding earth and remove the hazard. We will just dig the hole deeper.'" [Congressional Record, June 16, 1965, p. 13884].


I wonder what Senator Dirksen would have said about a $3.4 trillion dollar budget, and more than $9 trillion in projected deficits? Probably, a trillion here and a trillion there and pretty soon we're talking about real money.

It is disheartening when we look at $17 billion in proposed spending reductions and declare that a 'drop in the bucket'.
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

So....Will Biden Be VP? - Question by blueveinedthrobber
My view on Obama - Discussion by McGentrix
Obama/ Love Him or Hate Him, We've Got Him - Discussion by Phoenix32890
Obama fumbles at Faith Forum - Discussion by slkshock7
Expert: Obama is not the antichrist - Discussion by joefromchicago
Obama's State of the Union - Discussion by maxdancona
Obama 2012? - Discussion by snood
 
  1. Forums
  2. » Obama '08?
  3. » Page 1244
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.38 seconds on 11/24/2024 at 04:35:21