snood
 
  1  
Fri 17 Mar, 2006 11:51 pm
cicerone imposter wrote:
snood, I'm talking in terms of general feelings of blacks; I'm sure some blacks might consider their blackness irrelevant, but believe those would be in the small minority.

In other words, I would never say that my Asian ancestry was irrelevant, and I'm not sure I know of any other Asian that would say the same, but there may be some that may feel it is.


I understand. I was just responding to something Bill was saying he thinks he heard. I was saying that is something Obama would not do - dismiss his race as irrelevant. In all the several times I've heard him address race at all, he has without fail made it clear that he understands the unfortunately significant amount of relevance that race has.
0 Replies
 
OCCOM BILL
 
  1  
Sat 18 Mar, 2006 12:15 am
Perhaps I overspoke, snood. I thought I recalled a question being thrown at him about race once. His response was along the lines of "of course", but then moved to more relevant territory quickly instead of dwelling on it. Short, curt answer, now let's talk about a solution... kinda attitude. Does that sound more accurate? "Irrelevant" may have been overstating my point... which was in comparison to the former candidates Jackson or Sharpton who loved to focus on race.

Roxanne, you're reaching badly with your liking Uncle Tom nonsense. You insult both Obama and myself with such ignorance.
0 Replies
 
revel
 
  1  
Sat 18 Mar, 2006 07:01 am
If a person has cancer it is going to affect their life so of course they are going to talk about it.

Obama wrote a whole book which focused a good deal on racial issues in Dreams of My Father.

http://www.issues2000.org/Dreams_From_My_Father.htm

Both Rice and Powell still think race is a factor in today's America and talked about it during the Bush/ Michigan college thing.

http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2003/01/20/politics/main537203.shtml

"
Quote:
My own personal view is that there are circumstances in which it is necessary to use race as a factor among many factors in diversifying a college class," she told the network "And so I've been a supporter of affirmative action that is not quota based and that does not seek to make race the only factor, but that considers race as one of many factors."


http://www.cnn.com/2003/ALLPOLITICS/01/19/powell.race/

Quote:
"I wish it was possible for everything to be race-neutral in this country, but I'm afraid we're not yet at that point where things are race-neutral," Powell said on CNN's "Late Edition."

"I believe race should be a factor among many other factors in determining the makeup of a student body of a university."
0 Replies
 
snood
 
  1  
Sat 18 Mar, 2006 08:51 am
OCCOM BILL wrote:
Perhaps I overspoke, snood. I thought I recalled a question being thrown at him about race once. His response was along the lines of "of course", but then moved to more relevant territory quickly instead of dwelling on it. Short, curt answer, now let's talk about a solution... kinda attitude. Does that sound more accurate? "Irrelevant" may have been overstating my point... which was in comparison to the former candidates Jackson or Sharpton who loved to focus on race.

Roxanne, you're reaching badly with your liking Uncle Tom nonsense. You insult both Obama and myself with such ignorance.


Understood, Bill. And yes, that sounds a lot more like the Obama I know from listening and reading.

I think Roxxxanne went a bit far with the "Tom" comment.

I'd like to comment on the above reference to Colin and Condie, about them both acknowledging the relevance of race. I believe statements can be found by both of them to that effect - I don't doubt that.

What puts me off about them is how much of themselves they have been willing to subjugate for their administration. Neither goes on the record talking about things that are important to minority communities. They both have displayed an alarming tendency toward marching in lockstep, and parroting the party line. It could be argued that this is the reality of politics, but Powell is now on record as saying he is ashamed of the role he played in, for instance, the buildup to Iraq - I want that social consciousness to be present when its needed.

Obama is very open about the need for inclusion of the dispossessed, about the need to maintain some form of affirmative action, about the economic disparities still being suffered by women and minorities, about how those disparities affect an even playing field of education. It is this connectedness with the grassroots, and his easy communication with a broad spectrum of constituents that make him such an attractive possibility for many on this thread - including me.
0 Replies
 
Thomas
 
  1  
Sat 18 Mar, 2006 09:17 am
cicerone imposter wrote:
Thomas' opinion about having "baggage" from their ancestors might be one answer, but I think it's much more. What that is surely includes their parent's and peer attitudes.

Does Thomas Sowell explain this?

I haven't read Black Rednecks and White Liberals. The quality of Sowell's work varies widely between serious scholarly work and right-wing think tank sludge. Since he chose to publich his Black Rednecks with a publisher specialized in the latter, reading it ranks fairly low on my priority list. But in Ethnic America, which published with the reputable, scholarly, left-leaning Basic Books, his thesis consists of two parts: 1) culture tends to get transmitted from parents to children, and from peers to peers. 2) In multi-cultural societies, such as Russia, pre-1918 Austria-Hungary, and most countries in the Americas, ones peers likely are the ones who share ones cultural background, or live closely to one, or both. By putting 1) and 2) together, he gets a mechanism of how culture gets transmitted down the generation.

I am speculating, not having read Black Rednecks, that Sowell treats the stereotypical, violence-mongering, macho attitude among hip-hoppers and black gangs as an odd special case of this. A special case where a mindset was transmitted from violence-mongering, Southern, proletarian Whites to the Black population they were oppressing. That aspect of redneck culture then whithered away among the Whites who originated it, but survives in parts of the inner-city Black culture. At least that's how I understand Sowell's thesis, not having read his book, going by third party summaries and his own Op-Ed talking points. (In other words: please take my summary with several spoons of salt.)

So, to answer your question ci, his view of cultural transmission seems quite compatible to yours.
0 Replies
 
sozobe
 
  1  
Sat 18 Mar, 2006 09:59 am
snood wrote:
It is this connectedness with the grassroots, and his easy communication with a broad spectrum of constituents that make him such an attractive possibility for many on this thread - including me.


Yup.

The "communication" aspect is really big. Thomas mentioned that the speeches, when viewed, were impressive, but when read were not that great. I can't think of a better problem to have. It means he knows how to communicate even with sub-standard material -- the comment in the New Yorker article I linked to from the guy who said something like, "I've never seen anyone who speaks like that; he seemed to be talking to me, not the crowd" comes to mind -- so imagine what he'd be able to do with better material? And better material is one of the very easiest things to come up with. (Find a good speechwriter.)
0 Replies
 
Setanta
 
  1  
Sat 18 Mar, 2006 10:13 am
Re: Obama '08?
OCCOM BILL wrote:
snood wrote:
Setanta wrote:
Upon a time, you were cordial enough.
Snood:As were you - that seems to stop everytime you don't feel sufficiently deferred to.
I'm not taking a side on this one, since you seem to be talking past each other for the most part, anyway. I would encourage you to consider this part though, Setanta.


That was pretty snotty of you, O'Bill. Snood has followed me around from thread to thread for months to make sneering, insulting remarks because he is enraged about my comments on christianity. I encourage you to examine you own haste to suggest about me something which applies far more to Snood, who becomes irrationally angry because i don't display a sufficient deference to the sanctity of his religious superstitions. I've sent him a PM so as not to further burden Soz' thread. I suggest you use the same avenue if you've got any more snotty observations to make to me.
0 Replies
 
sozobe
 
  1  
Sat 18 Mar, 2006 10:15 am
Thanks for taking the personal stuff to PMs, Setanta, appreciated.
0 Replies
 
snood
 
  1  
Sat 18 Mar, 2006 10:21 am
Re: Obama '08?
Setanta wrote:
OCCOM BILL wrote:
snood wrote:
Setanta wrote:
Upon a time, you were cordial enough.
Snood:As were you - that seems to stop everytime you don't feel sufficiently deferred to.
I'm not taking a side on this one, since you seem to be talking past each other for the most part, anyway. I would encourage you to consider this part though, Setanta.


That was pretty snotty of you, O'Bill. Snood has followed me around from thread to thread for months to make sneering, insulting remarks because he is enraged about my comments on christianity. I encourage you to examine you own haste to suggest about me something which applies far more to Snood, who becomes irrationally angry because i don't display a sufficient deference to the sanctity of his religious superstitions. I've sent him a PM so as not to further burden Soz' thread. I suggest you use the same avenue if you've got any more snotty observations to make to me.


If anyone cares, and I would thoroughly understand if no one did, they can look back through this thread to see who's "following" who around. Setanta is a legend in his own mind, and this thread is doing quite well without any further one-on-one exchanges between he and I. For my part, I will continue to attempt to address the matter sozobe raised - the possibility of, and ramifications of an Obama candidacy. I will not, however suffer the affront of anyone in silence.
0 Replies
 
Setanta
 
  1  
Sat 18 Mar, 2006 10:23 am
No problem, Boss.

I think we can dismiss the question of funds in the case of Obama. Mosley-Braun (sp?) made it clear that, at least initially, there ought to be sufficient financial support for an Illinois Senator to make a run in the primaries. Also, for as interesting as the race question obviously is, i think that Obama has demonstrated the ability to prevent it from expanding to dominate the political discussions in which he will need to engage in the course of offering his candidacy.

If one accepts that he will find, at least initially, the funding, and that he can prevent the question of his skin color from disproportionately dominating his public statements and debates--then a pertinent question to ask next is what he can or will offer in the way of ideas, "leadership qualities" (a vague enought term which disproportionately dominates political runs, as in the example of Bush, who was claimed to display leadership, but whose programs now appear disasterous to a majority of the electorate), and programs. It has already been suggested in this thread that if you subtract the charisma, he offers nothing new. What do folks think of that idea?
0 Replies
 
sozobe
 
  1  
Sat 18 Mar, 2006 10:26 am
I think he offers a substantially more proactive and positive message than has been typical. Kind of John Edwards-ian, but in a better package. Part of that is how he chooses to deliver it, part of it is what he actually does.

I'll see if I can find some examples...
0 Replies
 
Setanta
 
  1  
Sat 18 Mar, 2006 10:36 am
That would be good. In '04, i much preferred Ewards to Kerry, the latter of whom gave me misgivings from the outset. I voted for him, but definitely on a "lesser of two evils" basis. I'd much have preferred to have seen Edwards heading the ticket. Impossible to say if he'd have fared better than Kerry.
0 Replies
 
sozobe
 
  1  
Sat 18 Mar, 2006 10:44 am
Yeah, I personally preferred Edwards to Kerry, too. Impossible to say, agreed -- I thought that Edwards was too young, too pretty, too lawyery, and not military-ish enough for that political moment. Hmm, Obama is young, lawyery, not military-ish, but I think he falls in the handsome rather than pretty category. I also think (hope) that the political moment will be different in 2008.

Anyway, got distracted and haven't looked for examples yet, will see what I can find now.
0 Replies
 
sozobe
 
  1  
Sat 18 Mar, 2006 10:50 am
OK, here's a recent one (yesterday):

http://obama.senate.gov/press/060317-obama_lugar_introduce_the_american_fuels_act_to_reduce_us_dependence_on_foreign_oil/index.html

It's not huge, but it's typical of the kind of thing I've seen from him. Take a problem, propose a commonsensical solution. Do it in a proactive, bi-partisan way.

Quote:
Obama and Lugar's bipartisan legislation, the American Fuels Act of 2006 (S. 2446), would take a four-step approach to reducing America's dependence on foreign oil. First, the legislation would spur investment in alternative fuels by increasing the production of cellulosic biomass ethanol (CBE) to 250 million gallons by 2012. It would also create an Alternative Diesel Standard that will require 2 billion gallons of alternatives diesels be mixed into the 40 billion gallon annual national diesel pool by 2015. This proposal is modeled of the Renewable Fuels Standard, which has proved successful in increasing ethanol production and use.

Second, the legislation would help increase consumer demand for alternative fuels by providing a short-term, 35 cents per gallon tax credit for E85 fuel and by providing automakers with a $100 tax credit for every E85-capable Flexible Fuel Vehicle (FFV) produced.

Third, it would require the U.S. government to lead by example and increase access to alternative fuels by requiring the government to allow public access to alternative fueling stations located on federal government property and by requiring that only clean buses be eligible for federal cost sharing. It would also create establish a Department of Defense "fly-off competition" that would encourage private sector companies to compete to find the most energy efficient alternatives fuels for defense purposes.

Finally, the legislation would create a Director of Energy Security to oversee and keep America focused on its goal of energy independence. The Director of Energy Security would serve as the principal advisor to the President, the National Security Council, the National Economic Council and the Homeland Security Council.
0 Replies
 
Setanta
 
  1  
Sat 18 Mar, 2006 10:51 am
It is worth noting that the military angle might not play so well this next time--given the disenchantment with the National Guard draft dodger's military adventurism.
0 Replies
 
snood
 
  1  
Sat 18 Mar, 2006 11:32 am
That's very representative of his style, Sozobe. I was going to provide something not as substantive, but that highlights his commitment to inclusiveness of a broad spectrum or people.


From his site:

"Where I probably can make a unique contribution is in helping to bring people together and bridging what I call the 'empathy deficit,' helping to explain the disparate factions in this country and to show them how we're joined together, helping bridge divides between black and white, rich and poor, even conservative and liberal." Later, in a similar vein: "The story that I'm interested in telling is how we can restore that sense of commitment to each other in a way that doesn't inhibit our individual freedoms, doesn't diminish individual responsibility, but does promote collective responsibility."
0 Replies
 
cicerone imposter
 
  1  
Sat 18 Mar, 2006 11:44 am
He's the "Man." I'd vote for him any day of the week out of all the prospects now presented.
0 Replies
 
cicerone imposter
 
  1  
Sat 18 Mar, 2006 11:45 am
Especially out of all the prospects presented.
0 Replies
 
sozobe
 
  1  
Sat 18 Mar, 2006 12:02 pm
OK, that's it, I'm gonna sign up for some "Obama '08" activist group or MAKE it if it doesn't exist, dagnabit. I was looking at his speeches, saw this one, and am literally tearing up at this part -- I mean, how many times have you guys seen me say variations of this exact thing?

Quote:
From the moment our children step into a classroom, new evidence shows that the single most important factor in determining their achievement today is not the color of their skin or where they come from; it's not who their parents are or how much money they have.

It's who their teacher is. It's the person who will brave some of the most difficult schools, the most challenging children, and accept the most meager compensation simply to give someone else the chance to succeed.

One study shows that two groups of students who started third grade at about the same level of math achievement finished fifth grade at vastly different levels. The group with the effective teacher saw their scores rise by nearly 25%. The group with the ineffective teacher actually saw their scores drop by 25%.

But even though we know how much teaching matters, in too many places we've abandoned our teachers and principals, sending them into some of the most impoverished, underperforming schools with little experience or pay; little preparation or support. After a few years of experience, most will leave to pick wealthier, less challenging schools.

The result is that some of our neediest children end up with less-experienced, poorly-paid teachers who are far more likely to be teaching subjects in which they have no training. Minority students are twice as likely to have these teachers. In Illinois, students in high-poverty schools are more than three times as likely to have them.

If we hope to give our children a chance, it's time we start giving our teachers and our principals a chance
. We can't change the whole country overnight. But what we can do is give more school districts the chance to revolutionize the way they approach teaching. By helping spark complete reform across an entire school district, we can learn what actually works for our kids and then replicate those policies throughout the country.

So here's the legislation I'm introducing this week - it's the creation of what I call Innovation Districts. School districts from around the country that want to become seedbeds of reform would apply and we'd select the twenty with the best plans to put effective, supported teachers in all classrooms and increase achievement for all students. We'd offer these districts substantial new resources to do this, but in return, we'd ask them to try systemic new reforms. Above all, we'd require results.

In Innovation Districts, we'd begin by working with these districts to strengthen their teaching, and we'd start with recruitment.

Right now we don't have nearly enough effective teachers and principals in the places we need them most: urban and rural schools, and subject areas like math and science. One of the main reasons for this, cited by most teachers who leave the profession, is that no one gives them the necessary training and preparation.

Around the country, organizations like the Academy for Urban School Leadership right here in Chicago are changing this by recruiting and training new, highly-qualified teachers for some of the hardest-to-teach classrooms in the country. We need to expand this by giving districts help in creating new teacher academies that will partner with organizations like this to recruit effective teachers for low-performing, high-poverty schools. Each teacher would undergo an extensive training program before they begin, including classroom observation and participation.

These teacher academies are also showing us that it's not enough to just put outstanding teachers in the classroom - we have to place outstanding principals in the schools as well. In districts across the country, the role of principal is being transformed from bureaucratic manager to instructional leader who can set high standards and recruit great talent. With 230 New Leaders serving more than 100,000 kids annually, New Leaders for New Schools has been at the cutting edge of this process - a process we need to expand nationally.

After we recruit great teachers, we need to pay them better. Right now, teaching is one of the only professions where no matter how well you perform at your job, you're almost never rewarded for success. But with six-figure salaries luring away some of our most talented college graduates from some of our neediest schools, this needs to change.

That's why teachers in these Innovation Districts who are successful in improving student achievement would receive substantial pay increases, as would those who choose to teach in the most troubled schools and the highest-need subject areas, like math and science. The city of Denver is trying pay increases in partnership with the local union, and when Chattanooga, Tennessee offered similar incentives for teachers who taught in high-need schools, student reading scores went up by over 10%.

Of course, teachers don't just need more pay, they need more support. One thing I kept hearing when I visited Dodge Elementary here in Chicago is how much an encouraging principal or the advice of an experienced teacher can make a difference. That's why teachers would be paired with mentor teachers who've been there before. After a few years of experience, they'd then have the chance to become mentor teachers themselves.


I cut it off rather arbitrarily, there is more good stuff before and after but it was getting way too long.

http://obama.senate.gov/speech/060313-21st_century_schools_for_a_21st_century_economy/index.html

And I get all verklempt just from reading the speech, and Thomas says they're so much better live.

I want this guy. <resolute set of jaw...>
0 Replies
 
sozobe
 
  1  
Sat 18 Mar, 2006 12:29 pm
(OK I have to be realistic, but the more I see, the more exciting his candidacy seems.)
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

So....Will Biden Be VP? - Question by blueveinedthrobber
My view on Obama - Discussion by McGentrix
Obama/ Love Him or Hate Him, We've Got Him - Discussion by Phoenix32890
Obama fumbles at Faith Forum - Discussion by slkshock7
Expert: Obama is not the antichrist - Discussion by joefromchicago
Obama's State of the Union - Discussion by maxdancona
Obama 2012? - Discussion by snood
 
  1. Forums
  2. » Obama '08?
  3. » Page 12
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.34 seconds on 12/23/2024 at 12:50:54