Foxfyre wrote:I never heard of Ed Rogers and have no clue who he is. But from the short excerpt Blatham posted, it looks very much like he rejected a negative connotation to Obama's name and Matthews was trying to bait him into saying something negative about it. Chris Matthews is a dedicated card carrying Democrat. So who is the villain there?
And to try to extrapolate one person into being representative of everybody else in a political party or even a group is dishonest in itself.
Ditto, Foxfyre. I read part of the exchange, and Matthews displays what he always displays, that of an agitator, a banty rooster approach simply trying to stir up controversy.
The hypersensitivity to any hint of negativity toward Obama is astounding. What is the emotional connection to this guy at this stage of the game? I don't get it. After all, he is just another run of the mill politician still cutting his teeth. He is a guy that gave a speech that alot of people raved about, but a guy we know not much about yet, and a guy that has not done much in Congress that I know of, except vote very, very liberal. You get the feeling Obama is on the same level of reverence to some people as their own Mom or Dad. Is he the messiah and saviour of the Democratic Party, and the country, and the world? After all, it is his name for crying out loud. If he doesn't like it, then drop the name or change it.