okie
 
  0  
Mon 17 Nov, 2008 10:44 am
@Diest TKO,
Diest TKO wrote:

Untrue Okie.

Go take a stroll through southern Cali and go to any of the numerous grocery stores. Plenty of union there. They thrive in REAL competition amongst each other, unlike with giants like Wal-mart coming in, demanding money, treating its employees like trash, and creating costly creating eco-hazards then acting butthurt about the employees wanting better benefits or the fact that they benefit from horrible labor methods from China.

Take a trip to a grocery store in SoCal okie.
K
O

So I take it you are not interested in addressing the details of my post, Diest. I have been in union grocery stores, so what? I also have talked to people working for Walmart, and most I've talked to, do like their employer.

The unions would love to control Walmart, so that they can also ruin that company as well. I have no use at all for unions. I have had relatives personally threatened, and their families as well, by union thugs. No use, Diest, no use at all for thugs. I would rather have freedom, freedom to work wherever I wish to work. I have never belonged to a union, and I do not feel like I have missed out on anything.
0 Replies
 
okie
 
  0  
Mon 17 Nov, 2008 10:47 am
@Diest TKO,
Diest TKO wrote:
You are going to insist on being an idiot about this aren't you. The birth certificate HAS been released and is a matter of public record.

T
K
O

If the link I posted has any credibility, there is a vast difference between a birth certificate, and a Certificate of Live Birth. Just curious, Diest, thats all, I am curious. I seem to remember you were far more curious about Bush and 9/11, a subject that was totally without any credible evidence, while this weird issue seems to me to have some credence. After all, we do have Obama's relatives claiming he was born there, don't we? Maybe you think they are all lying?
okie
 
  0  
Mon 17 Nov, 2008 11:43 am
@spendius,
spendius wrote:

Quote:
If unions bargain for such high wages and benefits that their employers are no longer able to compete in the marketplace, and their company goes broke, thus leaving them without a job, what would be the possible answers as to why the union would do that?


Here's one. They force the politicians to either face up to the unpopularity of having large companies laying off thousands of workers in a key electoral location or to bring in import restrictions on foreign competitors. If the union leaders call for import restrictions it is possibly what their plan was all along having sensed that the politicians would be forced to choose them. Not unlike playing poker.

That then requires some kind of subsidy and subsidies to one industry automatically damage all other industries. Thus the auto industry, say, ends up top dog in the industrial status league and has more power in political circles.

Good points, spendius. I do think its about power. Unions want power, and they love to weild it over the companies and industries they can control, as well as power politically. I think also that unions / union bosses have a mindset more in alignment with socialistic political theory, and so even though their members working for auto companies depend upon capitalism, I think their mindset is more in alignment with anti-capitalistic ideas. This explains why unions are always in the hip pockets of Democrats here, and why I think unions philosophically do not mind it too badly when their companies go broke. It does seem self defeating, but perhaps they do not see it that way, that long term they see companies going broke as just a short term event in context with their long term philosophies. And I think they love it when they can unionize government employees, this would be the ultimate ideal in their minds.

Bottom line, unions do not believe totally in free markets, which by definition require individual freedom and responsibility, after all, the whole concept of a union is anti-freedom for individuals, but instead they believe in power of groups, or in society as a collective. The power of labor movements have been used many times by tyrants and dictators to take power from individuals in order to give it to the masses.
Cycloptichorn
 
  1  
Mon 17 Nov, 2008 11:52 am
@okie,
Okie,

You know very, very little about unions. I've been in three in my life and every time I benefited from the membership; higher wages, better work environment, and someone who counter-balances the power of management. Why the hell should the management have all the power in a company? We workers tend to outnumber then 5 or 10 to one. Unionism is about keeping the balance correct between management and labor.

Yaknow, perhaps the reason unions tend to vote Democratic is the fact that Republicans such as yourself openly call them socialist crooks and treat them with contempt.

Cycloptichorn
okie
 
  0  
Mon 17 Nov, 2008 11:56 am
@Cycloptichorn,
Cycloptichorn wrote:
Why the hell should the management have all the power in a company?
Cycloptichorn

How about because they own and run the company, cyclops? That would be a pretty good reason. And nobody was holding a gun to your head to force you to work for anybody, if you don't like it. I quit a job like that once, to the surprise of the owner. He wanted to know why, and I told him I found a job with better hours and better pay.

Go own your own company and try it for a while.
okie
 
  0  
Mon 17 Nov, 2008 11:57 am
@Cycloptichorn,
Cycloptichorn wrote:
Yaknow, perhaps the reason unions tend to vote Democratic is the fact that Republicans such as yourself openly call them socialist crooks and treat them with contempt.

Cycloptichorn

I do have contempt for union thugs that have personally threatened anybody I know. Maybe you admire them? I don't.
0 Replies
 
Cycloptichorn
 
  1  
Mon 17 Nov, 2008 12:00 pm
@okie,
okie wrote:

Cycloptichorn wrote:
Why the hell should the management have all the power in a company?
Cycloptichorn

How about because they own and run the company, cyclops? That would be a pretty good reason.


No, it's not a good reason. They can't run the damn company themselves, Okie. It's the hard work of dozens, hundreds, or thousands of people which make the product roll off of the line at the end of the day. Not everyone can own a business; but everyone deserves to have their rights represented while working for one. That's what unions do.

Quote:
And nobody was holding a gun to your head to force you to work for anybody, if you don't like it. I quit a job like that once, to the surprise of the owner. He wanted to know why, and I told him I found a job with better hours and better pay.

Go own your own company and try it for a while.


I'm pretty tired of this boring, non-response to what I write. Yes, I'm sure if you are the owner of a business, you don't want your employees unionized, for it means they have more power and control, where previously you had all the power and control. Too bad, Okie. You simply don't give a **** for the rights or lives of workers at all, merely seeing them as replaceable cogs in the money machine.

As I said, you don't understand anything at all about Unions or why they are a necessary and good thing.

Quote:

I do have contempt for union thugs that have personally threatened anybody I know. Maybe you admire them? I don't.


You're a liar, and I don't believe you, Okie. I think you made this up. And even if they did, why does that affect all union members?

I'll tell you this much - I've walked a picket line before, it ended with us getting more money and actual sick time (instead of none), and if you had tried to scab, I would have attempted to bash your f*cking head in just like the other guys who tried to break the picket line; it's an American tradition and not one to be ashamed of.

Cycloptichorn
okie
 
  0  
Mon 17 Nov, 2008 12:19 pm
@Cycloptichorn,
Cycloptichorn wrote:

Quote:

I do have contempt for union thugs that have personally threatened anybody I know. Maybe you admire them? I don't.


You're a liar, and I don't believe you, Okie. I think you made this up. And even if they did, why does that affect all union members?

I'll tell you this much - I've walked a picket line before, it ended with us getting more money and actual sick time (instead of none), and if you had tried to scab, I would have attempted to bash your f*cking head in just like the other guys who tried to break the picket line; it's an American tradition and not one to be ashamed of.

Cycloptichorn

That says it all. You have finally said what you apparently feel, your mindset, cyclops, and I think you've crossed the line. When you call somebody a liar without one iota of evidence, you have crossed the line. The incident happened a long time ago in regard to a unionized company at a government or military installation. The threats were real, and beyond that, there was alot of harassment besides the threat that came over a phone call. And why would you doubt what I said, the practice is not only known to have happened in many places, but can be commonplace or standard practice with some unions in the past.

What you just said makes me think you might make a great brown shirt, union thugs certainly would. Power of the masses.

Are you so emotionally weak that you are so totally helpless to help yourself without some group to bail your sorry soul out? I feel sorry for you, but this last post of yours has lowered what respect I have had for any reasonable dialogue on any subject here on this forum. Pathetic, cyclops. Instead of providing any reasonable argument in favor of unions, you have instead provided your own personal example of why unions are not to be admired.
Cycloptichorn
 
  1  
Mon 17 Nov, 2008 12:38 pm
@okie,
Everybody's a Brown Shirt to you these days, Okie. The whole world is full of thugs and Socialists.

You didn't respond to the meat of my post, so I'm forced to assume that you don't have a good response to it; and instead have chosen to move forward with discussion of an unprovable story for which you have no facts or evidence.

Quote:
When you call somebody a liar without one iota of evidence, you have crossed the line.


You didn't provide any evidence either, Okie. When you accuse people of intimidation with no evidence, you've crossed the line. Right?

Quote:

Are you so emotionally weak that you are so totally helpless to help yourself without some group to bail your sorry soul out? I feel sorry for you, but this last post of yours has lowered what respect I have had for any reasonable dialogue on any subject here on this forum. Pathetic, cyclops. Instead of providing any reasonable argument in favor of unions, you have instead provided your own personal example of why unions are not to be admired.


Okie, with every day that it became more apparent that Obama was going to win, you've dropped in respectability. Everything you write nowadays is bitter and full of angst and predictions of doom for America. And you have very little respect for things like facts or accuracy when it comes to accusing others of doing bad things, yet demand that others respect it in your case. It's pretty funny, really.

I did provide a reasonable argument in favor of unions. You didn't respond to that argument. Neither I nor any members of my former union needed someone to 'bail us out;' we bailed ourselves out. That's the entire point.

Cycloptichorn
revel
 
  1  
Mon 17 Nov, 2008 01:21 pm
When talking of unions just think back to what conditions were for coal miners before unions as an example.

Quote:
The feudal system (coal companies being the "Barons of the Manor" and coal miners being the serfs) made it possible for the miner to live in housing consisting of rough lumber with no indoor plumbing and to do his necessary shopping at the company store where he might purchase on credit. He was paid in a "play money" called "scrip" which was exchangeable only at the company store. He was required to furnish his own tools and blasting powder, which he purchased at the company store.

If he were married, the needs of a growing family usually outstripped his ability to provide for them on the wages he earned, thus most of them were perpetually in debt to the company store. Most married miners had a little kitchen garden to produce some of their food needs. When his wife had need of obstetrical attention, or if there were family illnesses, the company doctor was called in, and the miner had that expense deducted from his wages. more than one miner, at the end of a pay period, would pick up an empty pay envelope because his indebtedness had taken all he earned.

A miner's sons would often follow him into the mines. The sons had grown up with mining and it was all they knew. It is not uncommon in these MINE REPORTS to see not only fathers and sons killed in a mine explosion, but to see many brothers perish, too.

The daily living conditions of coal miners "pre-Unions" is so well known that historians need only consult older family members for more details. Mr. William O. Williams, now deceased, had worked in the mines of Logan, Boone, and Kanawha Counties, also in Pittsburgh, Pa., for 40 years and spoke of coal mining, as he had known it, as being "The meanest life in the world". He spoke of bad air, miners being trapped behind smoke and being Unable to get out, pins not holding and causing the slate to fall, water seeping into the mine shafts making working conditions damp and cold, and the sheer physical agony of working in a narrow seam of coal all stooped over, or laboring on his knees in a puddle of water for the entire duration of a shift.

Deadly methane gas, being odorless, was a silent killer °ree;of many miners" but far more miners died of black lung, a disease where the air sacs of the lungs are destroyed from breathing coal dust- Mr. Williams said that the coal companies for many years, until legislation forced some changes, refused to recognize black lung as a valid medical disability caused by working conditions. Many company doctors would diagnose respiratory disorders as nearly anything but black lung. One coal company doctor had told Mr. Williams, "Breathe coal dust! It's good for you!". At the time of his death in 1983, he was receiving benefits for black lung.

In many instances, miners were trapped by economic conditions into this particular vocation and, once in it, few could see their way out of it. Mouths had to be fed, bodies had to be clothed and housed, and the wage earner must do what he must to accomplish this.

As the reader will note from these REPORTS, many miners who perished left widows and orphans. It was the rare miner who had or who could afford, life insurance policies.

Harsh working conditions, and inability of miners and coal companies to negotiate and make changes, led to militant unionizing efforts, which were eventually given the stamp of approval by President Franklin D. Roosevelt. Before unions became "acceptable", there were many harsh skirmishes between opposing factions. To this day, in Kanawha County, one may still find bunkers where gunfire was exchanged in this deadly struggle to improve working conditions for coal miners.

Even with improving working conditions, mining was still dangerous work. Experienced miners learned to be cautious, and the REPORTS OF MINE INSPECTORS indicated that experienced miners were far less likely to die in an accident than novices. Not so surprisingly, more mining accidents happened on Monday than on other days of the week. Those statistics, and many other interesting facts, are not included in the enclosed materials, but the reader is encouraged to see the original books if he wishes to learn more.

Each death reported herein is a story in itself, whether it be the story of the son of a former landowner who becomes a serf, or whether it is the story of an immigrant who has come to America to seek a better way of life, only to meet Death face to face in the bowels of the earth.

Many miners trapped underground during explosions did not have their bodies recovered. The mine shaft was sometimes Permanently sealed off, and somewhere inside another "statistic" sleeps until the resurrection. An in-depth look at these REPORTS reveals that some miners were not even known by name. "Italian #14 , for example, perished in a Kanawha County coal mine, and only those who spoke his native tongue might have known who he was.

The story of coal mining in the early days of this century is in many ways a solemn one, but the relentless desire of the miners for a better way of life has borne fruit as we see safety features in mines rigorously enforced, children of miners receiving university educations, and the miner himself being paid a living wage so that he might enjoy some of the fruits of his labors.



source


0 Replies
 
okie
 
  0  
Mon 17 Nov, 2008 01:30 pm
@Cycloptichorn,
Yeah, you bailed yourself out with a monopoly, and anyone that would cross the picket line, you label a scab and you will bash their head in. You call it an American tradition. Pathetic. You apparently care not a whit about personal freedom, it appears to me, only what serves yourself and fellow union members. You love to talk about the greed of businesses, well take a look in the mirror.

I agree with Finn, unions have become blood sucking leaches, a drag on the economy, and the chickens are now coming home to roost in those industries that succumbed to it.

If I sound anti-union, and a little resentful, I think I do resent what unions have done to the economy of this country, you are right, I am, I think they are anti personal freedom and anti personal responsibility. I think they have taken something that might have been reasonable in the beginning and have run it into the ground. Safety and working conditions issues, I think the government has enough rules and regulations in place that unions have basically become antiquated.
spendius
 
  1  
Mon 17 Nov, 2008 02:58 pm
@okie,
We had a lady bus driver working in the pub who had union officials traipsing 30 miles back and forth, on expenses need I add, for hearings into her appeal against a suspension for habitual absenteeism, which was all on the record.

The idea that she was up against the management is frivolous. They only represent the public which doesn't like buses not turning up or paying fares at a level which allows for spare drivers to be on hand in case somebody ducks. And that public includes the transport union's members who don't like buses not turning up or paying fares at a level which allows for spare drivers to be on hand in case somebody ducks either. The case dragged on for months. I told her that if she won they would find away to pot her and so her best bet was to go into the boss, act contrite about all the fuss and promise to be gooder in the future. She did that eventually and was reinstated.

I get the impression that most union work concerns arguing about the government's rules and regulations. It's a good thing on balance. It keeps a certain type on the sidelines. They send farmerman on geological survey in remote places to get him out of their hair.

(It's alright--he has me on Ignore.)
0 Replies
 
Diest TKO
 
  1  
Mon 17 Nov, 2008 03:23 pm
@okie,
okie wrote:

Diest TKO wrote:
You are going to insist on being an idiot about this aren't you. The birth certificate HAS been released and is a matter of public record.

T
K
O

If the link I posted has any credibility, there is a vast difference between a birth certificate, and a Certificate of Live Birth. Just curious, Diest, thats all, I am curious. I seem to remember you were far more curious about Bush and 9/11, a subject that was totally without any credible evidence, while this weird issue seems to me to have some credence. After all, we do have Obama's relatives claiming he was born there, don't we? Maybe you think they are all lying?

No okie. I have never had any Bush 9/11 conspiracy theories. I was not "curious." I have a rational brain, and I knew that Bush's involvement in 9/11 at maximum was just negligence. That's a "maybe" as well, I'm nobody to say that 9/11 would not have happened to Gore or something like that. No dramatic plot theories from me.

T
K
O
Cycloptichorn
 
  1  
Mon 17 Nov, 2008 03:39 pm
@okie,
Yaknow, Okie, it was unions who won you the rights that you have enjoyed your whole life while working. Unions who brought you the 40-hour week and things like overtime and disability and other work insurances. You might want to be a little more grateful for their sacrifice, because you would not enjoy a world in which they had not put themselves on the line for your and my rights.

Cycloptichorn
spendius
 
  1  
Mon 17 Nov, 2008 04:28 pm
@Cycloptichorn,
Look Cyclo-- you are supposed to show, or at least try to, that my explanation that those rights arise out of the efficiencies of mechanisation and the Christian ethic and without both of those the unions wouldn't even exist. It's not many posts back. You are not supposed in a discussion to keep repeating that mantra about the unions doing it as if that post doesn't exist. You can start sounding like a character in Pinter with that.

What sacrifices have you got in mind? Compared to the Russian sacrifices that got Hitler out of business. He would have shut unions down.

Now they are shoving tax rebates up your ass, borrowed off your grandkids, with explicit instructions to have a good blow-out in the festive season which here is scheduled to last longer than ever.

Can you not understand? How do unions make the pie bigger?
Cycloptichorn
 
  1  
Mon 17 Nov, 2008 04:31 pm
@spendius,
spendius wrote:

Look Cyclo-- you are supposed to show, or at least try to, that my explanation that those rights arise out of the efficiencies of mechanisation and the Christian ethic and without both of those the unions wouldn't even exist. It's not many posts back. You are not supposed in a discussion to keep repeating that mantra about the unions doing it as if that post doesn't exist. You can start sounding like a character in Pinter with that.



I'm not 'supposed' to do that, in fact, for I do not consider it to be a salient point worth conversation.

Stick to alcohol. Union-made if possible.

Cycloptichorn
Diest TKO
 
  1  
Mon 17 Nov, 2008 04:41 pm
@Cycloptichorn,
Second that.

Note: Spendi has invoked a Hitler argument.

T
K
O
spendius
 
  1  
Mon 17 Nov, 2008 06:07 pm
@Diest TKO,
Does that alter anything I said TK? That I mentioned Hitler.

I rather think that you have no answer and are invoking Godwin as a sort of veil.
0 Replies
 
Butrflynet
 
  2  
Mon 17 Nov, 2008 06:21 pm
Quote:
I have no use at all for unions. I have had relatives personally threatened, and their families as well, by union thugs. No use, Diest, no use at all for thugs. I would rather have freedom, freedom to work wherever I wish to work. I have never belonged to a union, and I do not feel like I have missed out on anything.


Translation:

Yeah, and because I can tell a personal tale about some relatives who had a bit of trouble with a union worker a few decades ago, that's good enough reason for me to rant about any and all of them.

Quote:
Pathetic, cyclops. Instead of providing any reasonable argument in favor of unions, you have instead provided your own personal example of why unions are not to be admired.


Translation:

Yeah, how dare you tell your own personal tale of union involvement. Only I am allowed to color my opinions with my personal experiences.

Quote:
You apparently care not a whit about personal freedom, it appears to me, only what serves yourself and fellow union members.


Translation:

Yeah, I care about personal freedom and because I dislike unions that means they are useless to anyone else and no one else is ever to be allowed to belong to one.
okie
 
  0  
Mon 17 Nov, 2008 09:50 pm
@Diest TKO,
Diest TKO wrote:
No okie. I have never had any Bush 9/11 conspiracy theories. I was not "curious." I have a rational brain, and I knew that Bush's involvement in 9/11 at maximum was just negligence. That's a "maybe" as well, I'm nobody to say that 9/11 would not have happened to Gore or something like that. No dramatic plot theories from me.

T
K
O

Sorry, I may have mixed you up with someone else in regard to that subject. But are you being completely honest? I thought I recalled you being curious to hinting at Bush being possibly involved? Sorry is that was not the case.

I maintain that there are legitimate questions about Obama's birth place that have not been satisfactorily answered, in my opinion.
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

So....Will Biden Be VP? - Question by blueveinedthrobber
My view on Obama - Discussion by McGentrix
Obama/ Love Him or Hate Him, We've Got Him - Discussion by Phoenix32890
Obama fumbles at Faith Forum - Discussion by slkshock7
Expert: Obama is not the antichrist - Discussion by joefromchicago
Obama's State of the Union - Discussion by maxdancona
Obama 2012? - Discussion by snood
 
  1. Forums
  2. » Obama '08?
  3. » Page 1110
Copyright © 2025 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.2 seconds on 05/10/2025 at 01:53:29