Sorry Pachelbel, but a rose by any other name is still another personal attack on me.
pachelbel wrote:No, not an attack on you
Yes, in fact that is exactly what they were, and exactly as I have outlined it.
pachelbel wrote: - an observation that you, as a Canadian,
Here comes another of your personal attacks, this time you try and disguise it as a so-called "observation", as if somehow you are acting as a reasonable unbiased observer, it comes across as disingenuous instead.
pachelbel wrote:could be so blind as to support someone like Bush,
Here is another personal attack calling me "blind", then you go on to say that I "support someone like Bush" which is not something I have stated, and is false, and is an overt logical fallacy derailing to any semblance of a congruent logical dialogue.
pachelbel wrote:Since you seem so pro-American, would you not be happier in that wondrous land of the free?
Another overt logical fallacy, derailing to any semblance of a congruent logical dialogue.
pachelbel wrote:I'm ashamed that you call yourself a Canadian.
here is another classic example of your personal attacks, this time saying you are "ashamed" of me.
Good luck trying to get anyone to take you as sincere and rational.