Raul-7 wrote:Some Muslims are twisting some portions of the Quran to justify their actions. At the same time there are many non-Muslims are misunderstanding certain verses about the Islamic conduct of war when it is forced upon them. Below is a clear explanation that can help clarify misconceptions.
Could these fanatic Muslims not as well claim that it is
you who are twisting portions of the Quran to justify your actions and beliefs? At what point is language - which is limited, frozen in time, hostage to translation, and most importantly, subject to human perception and interpretation - somehow infallible?
It is akin to the U.S. Constitution, and the Constitutionalists who claim strict adherence to the Constitution. They claim that all the big government nonsense is a perversion and misinterpration of the Constitution. In essence they claim the Constitution was twisted. But how is interpretation anything but twisting?
And who is right in what is essentially the
flaw with language itself? This approach forgets the most essential rule of language, that all languages are elastic and must ultimately depend on interpretation. Words and writings are all abstractions of reality and in order to apply to reality and our real world, they must first be interpreted, and guess what: there is no set of standards that is
the way it is supposed to be interpreted. People do it as they see fit.