1
   

Can You Make Me See Red?

 
 
sozobe
 
  1  
Reply Sun 22 Jan, 2006 06:55 pm
Oooh, nicely put, roger.
0 Replies
 
littlek
 
  1  
Reply Sun 22 Jan, 2006 06:57 pm
Thanks soz, I was trying to think out the analogy and was becoming muddled.
0 Replies
 
Arella Mae
 
  1  
Reply Sun 22 Jan, 2006 06:57 pm
littlek,

I am not asking anyone to dumb down. That is not what I mean. I am asking everyone to drop the thought of evidence for the purpose of this thread. I am getting frustrated because so many are trying to make this so much more complicated than it is.

I am talking about simple basic experiences and trying to share that experience with others. I am not talking about proving God or proving anything.
0 Replies
 
littlek
 
  1  
Reply Sun 22 Jan, 2006 06:58 pm
But, it's a very complicated issue!
0 Replies
 
sozobe
 
  1  
Reply Sun 22 Jan, 2006 07:01 pm
You've made it in terms of god from the opening post, Momma Angel, not to mention your choice of forums.
0 Replies
 
Doktor S
 
  1  
Reply Sun 22 Jan, 2006 07:01 pm
Ok. I for one will concede that you can't communicate all experience through language without contextual reference.
Now what?
Where's the beef?
0 Replies
 
Intrepid
 
  1  
Reply Sun 22 Jan, 2006 07:03 pm
Momma, I understand what you are trying to say with this thread. Unfortunately, it is not being taken in the way that you intended. Are you surprised?
0 Replies
 
aktorist
 
  1  
Reply Sun 22 Jan, 2006 07:04 pm
Quote:
Personally, I'm not interested in making people who are religious provide proof of god -- it's kind of pointless to me, especially if they acknowledge that it's a simple matter of faith, proof doesn't enter into it.


Truth doesn't enter into it either. Because truth is not faith.

Quote:
I am talking about simple basic experiences and trying to share that experience with others. I am not talking about proving God or proving anything.


You can't, unless you give some permanent evidence.
That's how TRUTH works.
0 Replies
 
Arella Mae
 
  1  
Reply Sun 22 Jan, 2006 07:08 pm
sozobe Wrote:

Quote:
Oh, hi.

I appreciate that it's a foray into metaphorical thinking for Momma Angel, it has some potential, but ultimately doesn't work. As Doktor S. says, if we are talking about some objective reality that can or can not be perceived by individuals, there are other ways to measure that objective reality.

Personally, I'm not interested in making people who are religious provide proof of god -- it's kind of pointless to me, especially if they acknowledge that it's a simple matter of faith, proof doesn't enter into it.

I dislike the obvious point of the analogy that people who don't believe in god are blind/ deaf/ colorblind -- what does that make people who don't believe in unicorns?

But whatever. <shrug>


sozobe,

Still thinking on too high a level for me here, girl. Yes, to me and others there is evidence of the color red, sight, and sound. But to these three people there just isn't any way to prove evidence to them. So, in order to make them understand red, sight, and sound, one would have to explain it to them. I don't think it can be done.

And as to the obvious analogy Shocked I promise you, that thought never crossed my mind. I just thought of three things that I didn't feel anyone could explain to another person.
0 Replies
 
sozobe
 
  1  
Reply Sun 22 Jan, 2006 07:08 pm
I didn't say truth was faith. Faith is not inherently invalid. I am not personally a Christian, but there are things that I have an element of faith in even though I know there is no objective truth to them -- I've mentioned karma before. I have a certain faith that if someone acts badly, it'll bite 'em in the butt eventually, but I recognize that it's just faith and nothing particularly fact-based.
0 Replies
 
sozobe
 
  1  
Reply Sun 22 Jan, 2006 07:09 pm
Quote:
So, in order to make them understand red, sight, and sound, one would have to explain it to them. I don't think it can be done.


Not al all. I have worked with many Deaf people to whom all of this has been explained. They understand and believe that these things exist. They don't think sound doesn't exist because they can't personally experience it.
0 Replies
 
Arella Mae
 
  1  
Reply Sun 22 Jan, 2006 07:10 pm
Doktor S,

Thank you!
0 Replies
 
Arella Mae
 
  1  
Reply Sun 22 Jan, 2006 07:11 pm
Sozobe,

Yes, I understand that. But you cannot make them experience sound. That is what I am getting at. You can explain it but you can't make someone actually experience it.
0 Replies
 
sozobe
 
  1  
Reply Sun 22 Jan, 2006 07:11 pm
(But then where IS the beef, sweetie? ;-))
0 Replies
 
Doktor S
 
  1  
Reply Sun 22 Jan, 2006 07:12 pm
Momma Angel wrote:
Doktor S,

Thank you!

Well if all you were after was that one point, you can have it. You're welcome Smile
0 Replies
 
sozobe
 
  1  
Reply Sun 22 Jan, 2006 07:12 pm
The response above was after your response to Doktor S., but it goes for your latest response too... so? Relevance?
0 Replies
 
Arella Mae
 
  1  
Reply Sun 22 Jan, 2006 07:15 pm
Sozobe,

The beef is so many ask why can't we give evidence of God or why can't we explain God from our viewpoint. It's just like trying to make someone experience red, sight, or sound. It cannot be done. Many times we have been accused of dodging the issue or being afraid to answer the questions.

We aren't. We just can't make you experience what we have experienced no matter how hard we try or want to. I was just hoping if everyone realized that BASIC point, it might make it a bit easier on all of us. Laughing
0 Replies
 
aktorist
 
  1  
Reply Sun 22 Jan, 2006 07:18 pm
This is only your victory against phenomenalism, angel, nothing else.
Thank you for point out the obvious.

Quote:
Faith is not inherently invalid. I am not personally a Christian, but there are things that I have an element of faith in even though I know there is no objective truth to them -- I've mentioned karma before. I have a certain faith that if someone acts badly, it'll bite 'em in the butt eventually, but I recognize that it's just faith and nothing particularly fact-based.


It isn't? Anyone could believe anything they want? They can believe that their live is just a conspiracy staged by everyone else, and to them, that's true?

Faith has no correlation with reality. And faith is invalid. "I believe in C" does not imply that C is true.
0 Replies
 
littlek
 
  1  
Reply Sun 22 Jan, 2006 07:18 pm
I, for one, don't doubt what you experience, momma. But, your experience does not equate to evidence.
0 Replies
 
aktorist
 
  1  
Reply Sun 22 Jan, 2006 07:19 pm
Quote:
The beef is so many ask why can't we give evidence of God or why can't we explain God from our viewpoint. It's just like trying to make someone experience red, sight, or sound. It cannot be done. Many times we have been accused of dodging the issue or being afraid to answer the questions.

We aren't. We just can't make you experience what we have experienced no matter how hard we try or want to. I was just hoping if everyone realized that BASIC point, it might make it a bit easier on all of us.


Where is the manifestation of God?
God makes no manifestations, whereas color and sound does.
Simple.
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

700 Inconsistencies in the Bible - Discussion by onevoice
Why do we deliberately fool ourselves? - Discussion by coincidence
Spirituality - Question by Miller
Oneness vs. Trinity - Discussion by Arella Mae
give you chills - Discussion by Bartikus
Evidence for Evolution! - Discussion by Bartikus
Evidence of God! - Discussion by Bartikus
One World Order?! - Discussion by Bartikus
God loves us all....!? - Discussion by Bartikus
The Preambles to Our States - Discussion by Charli
 
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.04 seconds on 04/28/2024 at 08:46:03