20
   

What produces RUTHLESS DICTATORS?

 
 
old europe
 
  1  
Reply Tue 4 Aug, 2009 12:01 pm
@okie,
okie wrote:
Foxfyre, I think Hitler disdained parliamentary wrangling and procedures, which includes arguing and working out solutions according to legislative and democratic means.


That's not what the point you highlighted says, though. The point declares the intention of the National Socialist party to make German citizenship a prerequisite for political offices and to fight corruption within the parliamentary system.

Clearly Marxist, eh?
Walter Hinteler
 
  1  
Reply Tue 4 Aug, 2009 12:07 pm
@okie,
okie wrote:

Foxfyre, I think Hitler disdained parliamentary wrangling and procedures, which includes arguing and working out solutions according to legislative and democratic means. I think he wanted the party, the guys at the top, probably him ultimately, to make the decisions and policy. See, he thought he was the messiah, the only righteous judgement, the ultimate arbitor of what was right or wrong. This goes along with the belief in the State, a strong State, he didn't want all the people's little worthless opinions making their way into policy through the corrupting parliamentary procedures, etc.

Thats my take on it.


You are speaking about that Adolf Hitler, who co-wrote these 25 points with Anton Drexler and Gottfried Feder in 1919, based on the party program of the Austrian DNSDAP from 1918. Correct?

What Hitler actually thought about this can be seen by his own explanations, especially those from 1928.
0 Replies
 
Foxfyre
 
  1  
Reply Tue 4 Aug, 2009 12:09 pm
@old europe,
Here are the 25 'color coded' points again as Okie posted them:

Quote:
I have highlighted what I would judge leftist policies in red, and the most leftist policies in bold red. I have also highlighted in blue those policies that I have judged to be a result of World War I, simply a reaction to a German defeat and attempt to regain their footing, and in so doing, the hatreds and resentments of Hitler are evidenced by those points, that are neither left or right in my opinion, just Hitler and the German peoples mindset. I have left in black those points that seem to me to be fairly normal and reasonable for most countries. As you can see, the vast majority of the 25 points I think are clearly leftist in nature.

Nazi Party 25 Points:

1. We demand the union of all Germans in a Great Germany on the basis of the principle of self-determination of all peoples.

2. We demand that the German people have rights equal to those of other nations; and that the Peace Treaties of Versailles and St. Germain shall be abrogated.

3. We demand land and territory (colonies) for the maintenance of our people and the settlement of our surplus population.

4. Only those who are our fellow countrymen can become citizens. Only those who have German blood, regardless of creed, can be our countrymen. Hence no Jew can be a countryman.

5. Those who are not citizens must live in Germany as foreigners and must be subject to the law of aliens.


6. The right to choose the government and determine the laws of the State shall belong only to citizens. We therefore demand that no public office, of whatever nature, whether in the central government, the province, or the municipality, shall be held by anyone who is not a citizen.

We wage war against the corrupt parliamentary administration whereby men are appointed to posts by favor of the party without regard to character and fitness.

7. We demand that the State shall above all undertake to ensure that every citizen shall have the possibility of living decently and earning a livelihood. [/color] If it should not be possible to feed the whole population, then aliens (non-citizens) must be expelled from the Reich.

8. Any further immigration of non-Germans must be prevented. We demand that all non-Germans who have entered Germany since August 2, 1914, shall be compelled to leave the Reich immediately.

9. All citizens must possess equal rights and duties.

10. The first duty of every citizen must be to work mentally or physically. No individual shall do any work that offends against the interest of the community to the benefit of all.

Therefore we demand:

11. That all unearned income, and all income that does not arise from work, be abolished.

12. Since every war imposes on the people fearful sacrifices in blood and treasure, all personal profit arising from the war must be regarded as treason to the people. We therefore demand the total confiscation of all war profits.

13. We demand the nationalization of all trusts.

14. We demand profit-sharing in large industries.


15. We demand a generous increase in old-age pensions.

16. We demand the creation and maintenance of a sound middle-class, the immediate communalization of large stores which will be rented cheaply to small tradespeople, and the strongest consideration must be given to ensure that small traders shall deliver the supplies needed by the State, the provinces and municipalities.

17. We demand an agrarian reform in accordance with our national requirements, and the enactment of a law to expropriate the owners without compensation of any land needed for the common purpose. The abolition of ground rents, and the prohibition of all speculation in land.

18. We demand that ruthless war be waged against those who work to the injury of the common welfare. Traitors, usurers, profiteers, etc., are to be punished with death, regardless of creed or race.

19. We demand that Roman law, which serves a materialist ordering of the world, be replaced by German common law.


20. In order to make it possible for every capable and industrious German to obtain higher education, and thus the opportunity to reach into positions of leadership, the State must assume the responsibility of organizing thoroughly the entire cultural system of the people. The curricula of all educational establishments shall be adapted to practical life. The conception of the State Idea (science of citizenship) must be taught in the schools from the very beginning. We demand that specially talented children of poor parents, whatever their station or occupation, be educated at the expense of the State.

21. The State has the duty to help raise the standard of national health by providing maternity welfare centers, by prohibiting juvenile labor, by increasing physical fitness through the introduction of compulsory games and gymnastics, and by the greatest possible encouragement of associations concerned with the physical education of the young.

22. We demand the abolition of the regular army and the creation of a national (folk) army.

23. We demand that there be a legal campaign against those who propagate deliberate political lies and disseminate them through the press. In order to make possible the creation of a German press, we demand:

(a) All editors and their assistants on newspapers published in the German language shall be German citizens.

(b) Non-German newspapers shall only be published with the express permission of the State. They must not be published in the German language.

(c) All financial interests in or in any way affecting German newspapers shall be forbidden to non-Germans by law, and we demand that the punishment for transgressing this law be the immediate suppression of the newspaper and the expulsion of the non-Germans from the Reich.

Newspapers transgressing against the common welfare shall be suppressed. We demand legal action against those tendencies in art and literature that have a disruptive influence upon the life of our folk, and that any organizations that offend against the foregoing demands shall be dissolved.


24. We demand freedom for all religious faiths in the state, insofar as they do not endanger its existence or offend the moral and ethical sense of the Germanic race.

The party as such represents the point of view of a positive Christianity without binding itself to any one particular confession. It fights against the Jewish materialist spirit within and without, and is convinced that a lasting recovery of our folk can only come about from within on the pinciple:

COMMON GOOD BEFORE INDIVIDUAL GOOD

25. In order to carry out this program we demand: the creation of a strong central authority in the State, the unconditional authority by the political central parliament of the whole State and all its organizations.

The formation of professional committees and of committees representing the several estates of the realm, to ensure that the laws promulgated by the central authority shall be carried out by the federal states.

The leaders of the party undertake to promote the execution of the foregoing points at all costs, if necessary at the sacrifice of their own lives.


Now where do you find "The point declares the intention of the National Socialist party to make German citizenship a prerequisite for political offices and to fight corruption within the parliamentary system" in this?
Quote:
We wage war against the corrupt parliamentary administration whereby men are appointed to posts by favor of the party without regard to character and fitness.
Walter Hinteler
 
  1  
Reply Tue 4 Aug, 2009 12:12 pm
@Foxfyre,
Foxfyre wrote:

Most of the 'planks' in that list of Nazi principles are not ambiguous, but the question in this case is what was the meaning and intent in that particular 'plank' of the Nazi ideology? OE seemed to take exception to your interpretation of it as a 'leftist' goal. And I honestly don't know for sure what it intended.


These points were origianally those by the Austrian DNSAP ("Deutsche Nationalsozialistische Arbeiterpartei", German National Socialist Worker's Party), during the times of the Austrian-Hungarian empire.
They were adopted by the DAP in Bavaria, in 1918/9. In 1919, Hitler and his above named co-authors made a 'remake', especially to get attraction among those some dozens other party programs.
0 Replies
 
old europe
 
  2  
Reply Tue 4 Aug, 2009 12:15 pm
@Foxfyre,
Foxfyre wrote:
Now where do you find "The point declares the intention of the National Socialist party to make German citizenship a prerequisite for political offices and to fight corruption within the parliamentary system" in this?


Here:

Quote:
6. Das Recht, über Führung und Gesetze des Staates zu bestimmen, darf nur dem Staatsbürger zustehen. Daher fordern wir, daß jedes öffentliche Amt, gleichgültig welcher Art, gleich ob im Reich, Land oder Gemeinde, nur durch Staatsbürger bekleidet werden darf. Wir bekämpfen die korrumpierende Parlamentswirtschaft einer Stellenbesetzung nur nach Parteigesichtspunkten ohne Rücksichten auf Charakter und Fähigkeiten.


Which roughly translates into:

Quote:
6. The right to vote on the State's government and legislation shall be enjoyed by the citizens of the State alone. We demand therefore that all official appointments, of whatever kind, whether in the Reich, in the states or in the smaller localities, shall be held by none but citizens. We oppose the corrupting parliamentary custom of filling posts merely in accordance with party considerations, and without reference to character or abilities.


True, okie highlighted only parts of this point as a "most leftist policy", but a little context is always helpful, isn't it?
Walter Hinteler
 
  1  
Reply Tue 4 Aug, 2009 12:22 pm
@old europe,
old europe wrote:
Quote:
6. Das Recht, über Führung und Gesetze des Staates zu bestimmen, darf nur dem Staatsbürger zustehen. Daher fordern wir, daß jedes öffentliche Amt, gleichgültig welcher Art, gleich ob im Reich, Land oder Gemeinde, nur durch Staatsbürger bekleidet werden darf. Wir bekämpfen die korrumpierende Parlamentswirtschaft einer Stellenbesetzung nur nach Parteigesichtspunkten ohne Rücksichten auf Charakter und Fähigkeiten.


Which roughly translates into:

Quote:
6. The right to vote on the State's government and legislation shall be enjoyed by the citizens of the State alone. We demand therefore that all official appointments, of whatever kind, whether in the Reich, in the states or in the smaller localities, shall be held by none but citizens. We oppose the corrupting parliamentary custom of filling posts merely in accordance with party considerations, and without reference to character or abilities.


True, okie highlighted only parts of this point as a "most leftist policy", but a little context is always helpful, isn't it?


The official translation for the Nuremberg Trials reads:

Quote:
6. The right to determine matters concerning administration and law belongs only to the citizen. Therefore we demand that every public office, of any sort whatsoever, whether in the Reich, the county or municipality, be filled only by citizens. We combat the corrupting parliamentary economy, office-holding only according to party inclinations without consideration of character or abilities.
0 Replies
 
DrewDad
 
  1  
Reply Tue 4 Aug, 2009 12:23 pm
@old europe,
old europe wrote:
a little context is always helpful, isn't it?

That one earned a smirk from me.....
Foxfyre
 
  1  
Reply Tue 4 Aug, 2009 12:59 pm
@old europe,
old europe wrote:

Foxfyre wrote:
Now where do you find "The point declares the intention of the National Socialist party to make German citizenship a prerequisite for political offices and to fight corruption within the parliamentary system" in this?


Here:

Quote:
6. Das Recht, über Führung und Gesetze des Staates zu bestimmen, darf nur dem Staatsbürger zustehen. Daher fordern wir, daß jedes öffentliche Amt, gleichgültig welcher Art, gleich ob im Reich, Land oder Gemeinde, nur durch Staatsbürger bekleidet werden darf. Wir bekämpfen die korrumpierende Parlamentswirtschaft einer Stellenbesetzung nur nach Parteigesichtspunkten ohne Rücksichten auf Charakter und Fähigkeiten.


Which roughly translates into:

Quote:
6. The right to vote on the State's government and legislation shall be enjoyed by the citizens of the State alone. We demand therefore that all official appointments, of whatever kind, whether in the Reich, in the states or in the smaller localities, shall be held by none but citizens. We oppose the corrupting parliamentary custom of filling posts merely in accordance with party considerations, and without reference to character or abilities.


True, okie highlighted only parts of this point as a "most leftist policy", but a little context is always helpful, isn't it?


But all of that was not included in the text that Okie quoted--the text we are discussing--because it was not included on the abbreviated list. Had the entire text been available to Okie, his interpretation of that would most likely have been different.

But now, moving on, what do you think the intent of the Nazi Party was with the point that you provided the full translation for?
spendius
 
  1  
Reply Tue 4 Aug, 2009 01:16 pm
@Foxfyre,
Obviously--too marginalise non citizens and inaugurate a rate-busting meritocracy which will always have the jump on those having a good time.

As conservatives are always up for a good time it would seem by the logic of mutual exclusion that the policy is socialist.

The intellectual error is to think the good time won't be defended, when push comes to shove, more strongly than a uniformed and disciplined bunch of rate-busters can attack it. "Who do you think you are kidding Mr Hitler?"

0 Replies
 
Foxfyre
 
  1  
Reply Tue 4 Aug, 2009 01:28 pm
@DrewDad,
DrewDad wrote:

old europe wrote:
a little context is always helpful, isn't it?

That one earned a smirk from me.....


Yes context is helpful, which is why I objected to OE initially changing the context of what was written on the list. Now I would appreciate his opinion of what the Nazis intended by the full context as he has translated it.
0 Replies
 
Walter Hinteler
 
  1  
Reply Tue 4 Aug, 2009 01:34 pm
@Foxfyre,
Foxfyre wrote:

But now, moving on, what do you think the intent of the Nazi Party was with the point that you provided the full translation for?


As said earlier, but I seem to be on your ignored list now, too, those points were already within the party program of the DAP and, even earlier, develloped in Austria.

Munich (and Bavaria) were a Soviet Republic 1918-1919. Besides that, Munich was a centre for the far right Free Corps as well as other ex-armed forces militia. So, a small party with just a couple of members had to give a broad spectrum if they wanted to get attention. And good neerhall speakers, which was even more important.
When the DAP in 1920 became the NSDAP, they had both.
Foxfyre
 
  1  
Reply Tue 4 Aug, 2009 01:40 pm
@Walter Hinteler,
No, you are not on my ignored list. Only a very few numbnuts who fit my 'numbnut' definition are on my ignore list. It makes things more pleasant for me and doesn't hurt anybody else.

But if I don't understand what point is being made or it seems unrelated to what I am discussing, I might not respond to a post by any member. Obviously none of us can (or should) comment on everything that is said by everybody.

And here, I am uncertain how your comments relate to the question I put to OE. Are you answering the question? If so, could you please explain how it answers the question?

Walter Hinteler
 
  1  
Reply Tue 4 Aug, 2009 01:48 pm
@Foxfyre,
Well, I tried to put the NSDAP's 25 points in the historic context, who wrote them and when and (for the actual NSDAP points) why.
Foxfyre
 
  1  
Reply Tue 4 Aug, 2009 01:49 pm
@Walter Hinteler,
That's nice, and even interesting, but I wasn't asking about the historic context.

I want to know what the Nazis meant by the phrase as OE translated it.

Spendi took a shot at it. Do you agree with him?
Walter Hinteler
 
  1  
Reply Tue 4 Aug, 2009 02:36 pm
@Foxfyre,
Foxfyre wrote:

That's nice, and even interesting, but I wasn't asking about the historic context.

I want to know what the Nazis meant by the phrase as OE translated it.

Spendi took a shot at it. Do you agree with him?


I know that you weren't asking for the historic context - but that would make it a lot easier to understand.

This paragraph was originally (with a -more or less- just slightly different wording) written by the Austrian party, when the Austrian-Hungarian Empire still was in existence. And "korrumpierende Parlamentswirtschaft" is something, you can find even in today's Austria.

I don't know what they (= the writers of NSDAP points) meant with it. Actually, this wasn't a topic in Germany in those days. (No non-German could go to elections, get a public office, and parliaments in Austria are still quite famous for a "korrumierende Parteienwirtschaft" (= civil service appointments in Austria are still made according to the political proportional representation, by the Social-Democratic and the conservative party.)
Foxfyre
 
  1  
Reply Tue 4 Aug, 2009 02:38 pm
@Walter Hinteler,
So if you don't know what they meant by it, is it safe to say you don't know that Okie's interpretation was wrong?
Walter Hinteler
 
  1  
Reply Tue 4 Aug, 2009 03:45 pm
@Foxfyre,
Well, certainly okie might understand the 1917/8 situation in Austria, those in the 'Café Gasteig' and the 'Fürstenfelder Hof' in 1918 and 1919 as well as the various meetings in other beer cellars in Munich better than I do.
I've only the knowledge from the primary sources which are in the archives and from some books.

He clearly must have a better knowledge. So it's even safe to say that his interpretation is very correct.
Walter Hinteler
 
  1  
Reply Tue 4 Aug, 2009 04:03 pm
@Walter Hinteler,
I mean, there was a rough time in Germany in 1918/1919, and especially in Bavaria, and here in Munich.

I haven't found any author or source telling exactly how many right wing parties and political organisations were active there in those couple of months - 40 could be as correct as any higher number.

You don't find many sources, especially not many -if at all- meeting minutes.
The main Bavarian State Archive though has archived some. Not surprisingly, mainly about the NSDAP and its precursors DAP and Thule organisation.
However, all that doesn't give really a clue what was meant by what.

You can do it like historians and use later sources to watch if and how they refer to the earlier. Or you can just speculate and guess. Or say that's so, totally neglecting the sources. Ad gustum.

0 Replies
 
old europe
 
  1  
Reply Tue 4 Aug, 2009 04:09 pm
@Foxfyre,
Foxfyre wrote:
But all of that was not included in the text that Okie quoted--the text we are discussing--because it was not included on the abbreviated list. Had the entire text been available to Okie, his interpretation of that would most likely have been different.


It actually is in the text okie posted at the beginning of this thread.

Foxfyre wrote:
But now, moving on, what do you think the intent of the Nazi Party was with the point that you provided the full translation for?


If I had to venture a guess, I would say that the intention of this point in the party program was to emphasize the party's focus on nation and citizenship and to announce that the party would aim to introduce a meritocracy for public offices in lieu of appointment by quotas and party membership.

I don't find the it particularly surprising to see an emphasis on the legal status of people, issues of citizenship and some kind of proposed German-only legislation in the platform of a right-wing, nationalist party.

I would say that it's a bit more difficult to evaluate the lament about the corrupting circumstances of a parliamentary party system. Taken at face value, I would probably interpret it as a staple in a party platform - kind of like every presidential candidate in the American primaries will promise you to fight waste and bureaucracy in Washington. If you want a more fanciful interpretation that doesn't stick that much to the actual text, I'd say that it could also be seen as code for an opposition to a parliamentary system or a multi-party system in general.... but that's kind of reaching.
0 Replies
 
old europe
 
  1  
Reply Tue 4 Aug, 2009 04:18 pm
@Foxfyre,
Foxfyre wrote:
So if you don't know what they meant by it, is it safe to say you don't know that Okie's interpretation was wrong?


I must have missed the post where okie offered an interpretation of the point under discussion. I saw him offering an opinion about Hitler's character traits, and then comparing Hitler's personality to the personality that makes someone a "leftist", but that's really it.
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

 
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.06 seconds on 12/26/2024 at 01:36:58