neologist
 
  1  
Reply Mon 20 Mar, 2006 10:46 pm
Doktor S wrote:
My guess would be the one offered by the watchtower society?
Wink
Not until I ring yer doorbell a few times. Smile
0 Replies
 
Jason Proudmoore
 
  1  
Reply Mon 20 Mar, 2006 10:47 pm
neologist wrote:

Denis Diderot wrote:
Mankind will never truly be free until the last king has been strangled with the entrails of the last priest.


What the hell does this mean? And how can this possibly be called "truth"?
0 Replies
 
neologist
 
  1  
Reply Mon 20 Mar, 2006 10:51 pm
JLNobody wrote:
I'll repeat my position, if only to get us back on track. The subject of "freewill" (vs. determinism) is not the ego (an imagined agent of action within us); it is a system of usually conflicting (conditioned and unconditioned) drives clothed in cultural values, learned interests, ideas, etc.). This system is not the ego; it is a natural phenomenon, a facet of Nature, or the Cosmos (the Hindus called it Brahma or Brahmin; it may be what some Christians call God).
Ergo, our actions and thoughts are not the properties of a constrained agent (ego). They are the spontaneous operation of that system of drives which operate as an on-going expression of Nature/Cosmos/Brahmin/God. Everything is spontaneous and free, but may not seem so from the perspective of illusory Ego.
Are you postulating a separation between moral free will and our ability, or lack of ability, to outstrip our biological and mental limitations?
0 Replies
 
neologist
 
  1  
Reply Mon 20 Mar, 2006 10:57 pm
Jason Proudmoore wrote:
neologist wrote:

Denis Diderot wrote:
Mankind will never truly be free until the last king has been strangled with the entrails of the last priest.


What the hell does this mean? And how can this possibly be called "truth"?
I'm sorry to have offended you.

It was meant as a topic for consideration and not as an absolute.

Actually, Diderot has identified the two greatest obstacles to world peace.

Why should we not contemplate life without them?
0 Replies
 
Jason Proudmoore
 
  1  
Reply Mon 20 Mar, 2006 11:03 pm
neologist wrote:
Jason Proudmoore wrote:
neologist wrote:

Denis Diderot wrote:
Mankind will never truly be free until the last king has been strangled with the entrails of the last priest.


What the hell does this mean? And how can this possibly be called "truth"?
I'm sorry to have offended you.

It was meant as a topic for consideration and not as an absolute.

Actually, Diderot has identified the two greatest obstacles to world peace.

Why should we not contemplate life without them?


(1) You don't know what offends me.

(2) I don't know what you mean.

and (3) can you translate the rest of that nonsense into something that I would understand?
0 Replies
 
echi
 
  1  
Reply Mon 20 Mar, 2006 11:18 pm
JLNobody wrote:
The subject of "freewill" (vs. determinism) is not the ego (an imagined agent of action within us); it is a system of usually conflicting (conditioned and unconditioned) drives clothed in cultural values, learned interests, ideas, etc.)[...]Ergo, our actions and thoughts are not the properties of a constrained agent (ego). They are the spontaneous operation of that system of drives which operate as an on-going expression of Nature/Cosmos/Brahmin/God.


JL--

This system of conflicting drives may be different from the ego, but you seem to be describing it in terms of past and future. I consider "time" to be a product of the ego. I guess I am wanting an answer that is fixed in the present... eternal. Is it possible?
0 Replies
 
neologist
 
  1  
Reply Mon 20 Mar, 2006 11:22 pm
1] Sorry, I just concluded your use of profanity was an indication of offense.

2] You don't know what I mean by obstacles to peace? Apparently, world history has not been on your class schedule as yet.

3] The nonsense can be understood by contemplating the answer to this question: Who servess the politicians by maintaining social order and delivering troops to the front?
0 Replies
 
Doktor S
 
  1  
Reply Mon 20 Mar, 2006 11:22 pm
neologist wrote:
Doktor S wrote:
My guess would be the one offered by the watchtower society?
Wink
Not until I ring yer doorbell a few times. Smile

I had jehovahs witnesses over at my apartment once. I invited them in. two men and a little girl. They showed me their literature.They asked me what I believed. I showed them my literature and told them.
They never came back.
0 Replies
 
Doktor S
 
  1  
Reply Mon 20 Mar, 2006 11:24 pm
ps Neo..do you really do the whole door knocking trip?
0 Replies
 
neologist
 
  1  
Reply Mon 20 Mar, 2006 11:25 pm
Doktor S wrote:
neologist wrote:
Doktor S wrote:
My guess would be the one offered by the watchtower society?
Wink
Not until I ring yer doorbell a few times. Smile

I had jehovahs witnesses over at my apartment once. I invited them in. two men and a little girl. They showed me their literature.They asked me what I believed. I showed them my literature and told them.
They never came back.
Didn't serve coffee,either, I'll bet.
0 Replies
 
Doktor S
 
  1  
Reply Mon 20 Mar, 2006 11:26 pm
neologist wrote:
Doktor S wrote:
neologist wrote:
Doktor S wrote:
My guess would be the one offered by the watchtower society?
Wink
Not until I ring yer doorbell a few times. Smile

I had jehovahs witnesses over at my apartment once. I invited them in. two men and a little girl. They showed me their literature.They asked me what I believed. I showed them my literature and told them.
They never came back.
Didn't serve coffee,either, I'll bet.

As a matter of fact, I did offer. But right about the time I told them I was a registered member of the Church of Satan they seemed to lose interest.
0 Replies
 
neologist
 
  1  
Reply Mon 20 Mar, 2006 11:27 pm
Doktor S wrote:
ps Neo..do you really do the whole door knocking trip?
It may be hard to believe, but I prefer talking with non believers.
0 Replies
 
Doktor S
 
  1  
Reply Mon 20 Mar, 2006 11:28 pm
neologist wrote:
Doktor S wrote:
ps Neo..do you really do the whole door knocking trip?
It may be hard to believe, but I prefer talking with non believers.

So yes then.
0 Replies
 
echi
 
  1  
Reply Mon 20 Mar, 2006 11:29 pm
neologist wrote:
3] The nonsense can be understood by contemplating the answer to this question: Who servess the politicians by maintaining social order and delivering troops to the front?

Never mind all that... Who do the politicians serve?
0 Replies
 
neologist
 
  1  
Reply Mon 20 Mar, 2006 11:31 pm
Doktor S wrote:
. . . As a matter of fact, I did offer. But right about the time I told them I was a registered member of the Church of Satan they seemed to lose interest.
Ya couldn't get rid of me so easy. We have too many points of agreement.

I don't think Jason would have invited me in, though. What do you think?
0 Replies
 
neologist
 
  1  
Reply Mon 20 Mar, 2006 11:32 pm
echi wrote:
neologist wrote:
3] The nonsense can be understood by contemplating the answer to this question: Who servess the politicians by maintaining social order and delivering troops to the front?

Never mind all that... Who do the politicians serve?
Themselves, of course.
0 Replies
 
neologist
 
  1  
Reply Mon 20 Mar, 2006 11:33 pm
In any show, even a power play, the toadie is the one who wears the skirt.
0 Replies
 
Jason Proudmoore
 
  1  
Reply Mon 20 Mar, 2006 11:35 pm
neologist wrote:
1] Sorry, I just concluded your use of profanity was an indication of offense.


Is the word "hell" offensive? If I use "heck" instead of "hell," would it make it less offensive?

"Bloody HECK!!!"

neologist wrote:

2] You don't know what I mean by obstacles to peace?


Not in the context of incoherence...no.

neologist wrote:

Apparently, world history has not been on your class schedule as yet.


apparently not.

neologist wrote:

3] The nonsense can be understood by contemplating the answer to this question: Who servess the politicians by maintaining social order and delivering troops to the front?


Your nonsense could be understood if you took the time (and not be lazy) to articulate your ideas better.
0 Replies
 
neologist
 
  1  
Reply Mon 20 Mar, 2006 11:37 pm
Time to exfoliate
0 Replies
 
Jason Proudmoore
 
  1  
Reply Mon 20 Mar, 2006 11:45 pm
neologist wrote:
Time to exfoliate


indeed
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

 
  1. Forums
  2. » Free Will
  3. » Page 21
Copyright © 2025 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.05 seconds on 01/11/2025 at 08:40:11