BIODIESEL, Try it youll like it.

If i am not mistaken, and i did a quick web search to be certain, Adam Smith never set foot on the North American continent . . .

farmerman - if you're serious about making biodiesel and having an employee do the work, you may be setting yourself up for some serious liability issues, particularly if your employee is merely following a recipe without an understanding of what he is doing. These "garage batch" operations can be very ugly in terms of safety and waste disposal.

This attitude on the part of English mill workers was not a mere epidode, either. In the late 1920's, Ghandi called for a boycott of English goods, and especially, this affected the mill workers, as Ghandi took a loom to weave cloth at home--the loss of the revenues from the boycott of English cotton goods worked a substantial hardship on the millworkers.

Nevertheless, when Ghandi visited England in 1930, he was enthusiastically greeted by the millworkers of Lancashire, who were impressed with his sincerity, and lent their support to his movement for Indian independence.

Setanta wrote:

If i am not mistaken, and i did a quick web search to be certain, Adam Smith never set foot on the North American continent . . .

He didn't. He did correspond with Americans though.

... It's an exhilirating ride, but often not a comfortable one.

georgeob1 wrote:

... It's an exhilirating ride, but often not a comfortable one.

Its a little more bearable if you cinch up the harness real tight and inflate the bladders. Keeping your head sorta tucked down and pressed tight against the seatback helps some too, as does locking your gaze on some external fixed point. Don't fixate on the target though; you never wanna lose track of what's happening on your 6.

... what on earth? is this donkeys again?

If you think Setanta is a rocky ride you must be still hanging on to your mummy's apron strings.

That's not for me to judge George.It's pretty smooth from here.I can distinguish primary from secondary drives.

I did a much longer answer but I've thought better of it.I do bear in mind young readers on here.

But I'll go this far:one can distinguish natural strivings for happiness from the secondary drives and especially the antisocial aspects of them which are the result of compulsive education.These latter can only be inhibited by morality and because evolution has nothing to say on that I am inevitably driven into the Intelligent Design camp despite the ridiculous claims of some I find there if only because it seems a more humane approach than the only other alternative which is state terror.The general intolerance of the evolutionists is already quite evident.They thrive on ignoring the social functions of religion as can be seen by their failure to address any of my salient points on the matter.They do not seem able to appreciate that science is concerned with what is and that social pragmatism is concerned with what ought to be.The idea of an evolutionist being opposed to price gouging or porn or brawling seems quaint to say the least.Their credo is let the devil take the hindmost.What use has an evolutionist for constitutions and laws and customs when he believes in the survival of the fittest which is precisely what constitutions,laws and customs are designed to mitigate.