Tony Blankley, author of the above Townhall column (and also the Editorial page editor for the Washington Times), in that column also wrote:
Quote:Muslim parts of Paris, Rotterdam and other European cities are already labeled no-go zones for ethnic Europeans, including armed policemen.
Regarding Rotterdam, I can only say: bull ****. Sorry, but it's simply bull. There's no part of Rotterdam I would not dare to go to.
There are no parts of Rotterdam that "ethnic Europeans" can not go to, simply even because even in the worst of the city's neighbourhoods, there are still many whites living as well. Ie, even in the district Feijenoord (known from the soccer club of the same name), over a third of the population is still "authochthonous"; in Delfshaven, the most multicultural of the city's districts, it's close to 30%.
So that might have to make one wonder about the credibility of Blankley's other assertions as well.
Blankley here, I suspect, was merely parroting Pim Fortuyn's claim that there were "no-go areas" in Rotterdam; but Fortuyn (the populist, anti-immigration politician) meant "no-go areas" for him, personally, saying that if he would show himself in some neighbourhoods he would get beaten up. He said so in response to Green Left's leader Paul Rosenmoller's invitation to go into those neighbourhoods Fortuyn was always talking about together.
Also note - I personally got confused by the snip above for a second, thinking: Abou Jahjah saying Muslims will rule Germany? That sounds odd, he's more of an Arab nationalist than a religious fundamentalist - but that wasn't him, the second quote there is from an unspecified German radical Islamist.