Steve (as 41oo) wrote:Thanks nimh, had some difficulty with the big foreign words.
The summaries are for those who dont want to read the whole thing, duh. You copy-paste a whole article, noone reads it. Its a kind of teaser to pull you in. Also service to the public, kinda (arent people railing about integral copy/pastes all the time?) - you can quickly check whether theres something in it for you.
But hey, no need to thank me.
Steve (as 41oo) wrote:Molly Moore's piece is evidence for nothing at all except as we say in these parts, the bleeding obvious.
Well, its not obvious for those who insist that there needs to be some overarching Islamist comspiracy with religious ardor firing the rioters on to explain why, gosh, riots like these could happen, apparently.
The reasons why riots like these could happen ARE bleeding obvious, yeah, thats what
I'd say, anyway. But apparently they're not to others: they need poligamy, or Hizb-i-Tahar-like groups to explain the riots. Even if any kind of widespread evidence of
those motivations is largely missing, whereas the obvious, as outlined once more in Moore's pieces, is right there in front of you.