So what is the new definition?
In the many reports that I have read, I have not found one that would quote the supposedly offending definition.
I have seen lots of different characterizations of it, but apparently very few journalists think that it's worthwhile to actually publish what it is that is actually being discussed.
How's this for a definition of science:
"Science is a systematic method of continuing investigation that uses observation, hypothesis testing, measurement, experimentation, logical argument, and theory building to lead to more adequate explanations of natural phenomena."
If school boards were to adopt a definition such as this, can it in any way be considered biased either for or against evolution, or for or against creation/ID?