0
   

Kansas School Board Redefines Stupidity

 
 
farmerman
 
  1  
Reply Fri 25 Nov, 2005 09:51 am
If that would be the case RL, then "logical argument" is unneeded in the definition. The way its written, each of the components could be employed separately rather than part of a system. Just because Im paranoid doesnt mean Im wrong.
0 Replies
 
spendius
 
  1  
Reply Fri 25 Nov, 2005 10:15 am
Quote:
Science is a systematic method of continuing investigation that uses observation, hypothesis testing, measurement, experimentation, logical argument, and theory building to lead to more adequate explanations of natural phenomena.


Which natural phenomena?
0 Replies
 
username
 
  1  
Reply Fri 25 Nov, 2005 03:42 pm
Any and all
0 Replies
 
real life
 
  1  
Reply Sat 26 Nov, 2005 12:09 am
farmerman wrote:
If that would be the case RL, then "logical argument" is unneeded in the definition. The way its written, each of the components could be employed separately rather than part of a system. Just because Im paranoid doesnt mean Im wrong.


Ha. Good one.

I have no problem with "logical argument" either left in, or taken out of the definition.
0 Replies
 
timberlandko
 
  1  
Reply Sat 26 Nov, 2005 03:02 am
Posit a logical argument for creationism.
0 Replies
 
farmerman
 
  1  
Reply Sat 26 Nov, 2005 03:32 pm
rl, good, then lets take out the "logical argument" and weve agreed on something. We can live with the official definition of Kansas.
0 Replies
 
spendius
 
  1  
Reply Sat 26 Nov, 2005 06:15 pm
fm wrote
Quote:
Posit a logical argument for creationism.
.

That it might make things run more smoothly.A logical argument for SD has to face the same "might".Are you in favour of SD to the point where everything goes tits up.
0 Replies
 
spendius
 
  1  
Reply Sat 26 Nov, 2005 06:18 pm
username wrote in response to the question about whether science is up for studying EVERY phenomena was-

Quote:
Any and all


Are you sure?Have you thought it through.
0 Replies
 
farmerman
 
  1  
Reply Sat 26 Nov, 2005 06:52 pm
spendius
Quote:
That it might make things run more smoothly.A logical argument for SD has to face the same "might".Are you in favour of SD to the point where everything goes tits up.


First off, that request was by timber, not me. I was responding to real lifes post that quoted the Kansas definition of science. If you cant follow the bouncing ball, dont screw it up for others.
0 Replies
 
farmerman
 
  1  
Reply Sat 26 Nov, 2005 06:54 pm
Well, Ive indoctrinated about 20 young minds into the fold today MWAAAHAHAHAHAHAAAAAA.
Your children are belong to us.
0 Replies
 
timberlandko
 
  1  
Reply Sat 26 Nov, 2005 06:56 pm
spendius wrote:
fm wrote
Quote:
Posit a logical argument for creationism.
.
Actually, that was timber :wink:

Quote:
That it might make things run more smoothly.A logical argument for SD has to face the same "might".Are you in favour of SD to the point where everything goes tits up.

Meaningless; wholly conjectural. That "things might run more smoothly" given any state or condition of being not observed is wholly irrelevant. "Things" "run as they do", independent of and apart from the preferences of any observer or commentator. That's just the way things are, and introducing a mystical, undefinable concept violates the principle of Occam's Razor; it is nought but unnescessary complication.
0 Replies
 
Amigo
 
  1  
Reply Sat 26 Nov, 2005 07:03 pm
There better off making us swallow christianity by sword and gun. Thats were they have the best success. This pseudo-logic is pathetic.
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

700 Inconsistencies in the Bible - Discussion by onevoice
Why do we deliberately fool ourselves? - Discussion by coincidence
Spirituality - Question by Miller
Oneness vs. Trinity - Discussion by Arella Mae
give you chills - Discussion by Bartikus
Evidence for Evolution! - Discussion by Bartikus
Evidence of God! - Discussion by Bartikus
One World Order?! - Discussion by Bartikus
God loves us all....!? - Discussion by Bartikus
The Preambles to Our States - Discussion by Charli
 
Copyright © 2021 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.04 seconds on 03/04/2021 at 01:41:26