16
   

The 47th President and the Post-Biden World 2.0

 
 
hightor
 
  4  
Reply Sat 26 Sep, 2026 08:49 am
@izzythepush,
The guy is a total fraud, devoid of morals, lacking insight, and unable to see the consequences of his actions. He knows how to stir things up and take advantage of the temporary chaos that results. That's all. It was really stupid of him to become the chief executive of the US government. When he was a fraudulent businessman he could stiff creditors, declare bankruptcy, and move on. Hemmed in by the Constitution, our country's legal framework, and 250 years of civic history he's now caught in a trap of his own making. The eyes of the whole world are focused on him; his incompetence is there for all to see. He can insult and bluster all he wants but this is not a TV show. There will be, I'm afraid, an ugly reckoning which will rid us of him but damage the social fabric of this country for the foreseeable future.
0 Replies
 
hightor
 
  2  
Reply Sun 27 Sep, 2026 03:29 am
Quote:
Trump’s war on the free press is continuing. Last night, Scott Nover of the Washington Post reported that the White House would not allow reporters from CNN on Air Force One as part of the press pool to cover the president as he traveled to Tennessee for a college football game. CNN is a member of the pool made up of the five major TV networks. The other two outlets Trump tried to ban from the White House, MS NOW and Politico, are part of a different pool. CNN was scheduled to provide the television footage for the trip.

At 6:51 this morning, Trump’s social media account posted: “Why should perpetrators of FAKE NEWS, like CNN and MSDNC, be allowed access to a very sacred place, the White House? Despite my big Election Win, almost 100% of “TRUMP” coverage is negative, and has been for years!”

He followed up at 8:22 with “FAKE NEWS SHOULD NOT BE ALLOWED IN THE WHITE HOUSE!!! IT HAS GONE ON FAR TOO LONG, AT A TREMENDOUS COST TO OUR COUNTRY.”

Later in the morning, he told reporters: “I love an open, free press. What I don’t like is the fake press. What we don’t want is—we don’t want fake news.”

As bad news continues to plague the administration, Trump has reasons for wanting to control the press.

On Thursday, in a scathing letter, a key prosecutor in the case of the six people charged with felonies after a protest outside the Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) Broadview detention facility in Illinois—the Broadview Six—resigned under protest.

Sheri Mecklenburg was a career prosecutor in the Department of Justice who was near retirement and appeared to have doubts about the felony charges against the six protesters. In the protest, people surrounded an ICE vehicle, but only the six, all of whom were active in Democratic politics, were charged.

When the cases fell apart because of prosecutorial misconduct, U.S. Attorney for the Northern District of Illinois Andrew Boutros, a strong Trump supporter, laid all of the blame for the misconduct on Mecklenburg, claiming he had been out of the loop in how the case was progressing.

But in her resignation letter, Mecklenburg said she was retiring so she could defend herself. She wrote that she had kept Boutros fully informed of the case and that he was using her as a scapegoat for his own misconduct. She said he had “personally directed” the felony prosecution after she objected “that the case was better suited to misdemeanor charges.” She says he threatened to fire her if she tried to push back on the false allegations.

Mecklenburg’s resignation and allegations illuminate the Trump administration’s efforts to persecute political opponents. Boutros’s tenure as U.S. attorney has been so problematic that there had been an exodus of senior officials from the office, and more than 100 former prosecutors signed a letter warning of failure of leadership in the office and the poisoning of the office with “once-forbidden political considerations.”

Perhaps of more concern to Trump is the report yesterday from Julia Jacobs of the New York Times that whistleblowers who used to work at the John F. Kennedy Center for the Performing Arts say that six months ago, Trump loyalists running the center cancelled plans to fix the leaking roof they now claim is so dangerous the center must be closed and repaired. Those repairs, they say, will require the addition of Trump’s name to the building.

The whistleblowers claim that the center’s board put the $1.4 million that had been allocated to fix the roof toward Trump’s repainting of the building’s columns, which cost $4.4 million.

As his job approval numbers continue to decline and as individuals and the courts try to stop his unlawful actions, Trump is pushing ever harder to cement his power.

The courts have given him leeway in national security, and he is using that leeway. A recent New York Times/Siena poll showed that 69% of the American people disapprove of Trump’s handling of the war in Iran—59% of them strongly—and only 27% approve (15% strongly).

And yet, on Friday, September 25, Alexander Ward and Summer Said of the Wall Street Journal reported that Trump has told aides that he is planning to start bombing Iran again after the midterm elections. Iran has offered to reopen the Strait of Hormuz and reopen talks about nuclear weapons if the U.S. ends its blockade of Iranian ports, but Trump has rejected the offer, and his belief that the Iranians won’t meet his demands makes him think he’ll need to ramp up strikes again.

But, the reporters say, Trump’s views could shift over the coming weeks as conditions, including the midterms, change.

At the United Nations General Assembly on Tuesday, September 22, Trump told the heads of state and heads of government in the audience that his administration is “seeking a fundamental change” in the government of Cuba.

James LaPorta of CBS News reports that the U.S. Army Reserve is considering whether it can provide support units, including police forces and medical personnel, to the U.S. Southern Command, which covers Latin America south of Mexico, the waters around Central and South America, and the Caribbean, including Cuba.

The memo CBS reviewed doesn’t say for what operation the troops would be needed “in 90 to 120 days,” but LaPorta reports that “multiple U.S. officials” said the planning is for a potential operation aimed at Cuba.

On Wednesday, Secretary of State Marco Rubio told reporters that Trump has invited Russia’s president Vladimir Putin to the Group of 20 (G20) summit in December in Miami, Florida. The G20 is a forum of the world’s biggest advanced and emerging economies to coordinate economic policy, and by extending the invitation, Trump is offering to welcome Putin back into global organizations without ending his invasion of Ukraine. The administration suggests that Putin will be more likely to end the war if he is included than if he is not, a position critics note gives Putin legitimacy without changing his behavior.

Yesterday, as Casey He of Politico reported, fourteen senators led by Armed Services Committee chair Roger Wicker (R-MS) and Jeanne Shaheen (D-NH), the top-ranking Democrat on the Foreign Relations Committee, urged Trump to rescind the invitation. “President Putin bears sole responsibility for launching Russia’s full-scale war of aggression against Ukraine,” they wrote. “Allowing him to participate in a G20 Summit in the United States raises serious concerns about legitimizing and normalizing a government that continues to attack Ukrainian civilian targets every day.”

Today, Pranshu Verma of the Washington Post reported that earlier this month, the U.S. and Russia worked together to weaken a United Nations plan to regulate AI weapons. They stripped out a provision to make sure humans review the targets AI has selected for a military strike—a provision that would likely have avoided the U.S. strike on the Iranian school at the start of the Iran War—and took out requirements that AI systems must act in a “predictable” and “reliable” manner. They also removed a requirement that those using the systems take “ethical considerations” into account.

At the same time he is flexing U.S. muscle internationally, Trump is also continuing to try to cement as much power as he can at home.

Continuing to try to lock the United States into the use of fossil fuels, Today he announced he was getting rid of the vehicle fuel economy standards established under former President Joe Biden.

Yesterday the administration announced it is refusing to spend $810 million Congress appropriated on a bipartisan basis to fund research in Health and Human Services and for programs that serve immigrants and minority groups, calling it “wasteful and harmful government spending that does not benefit American citizens.”

The Government Accountability Office (GAO), an independent, nonpartisan agency that watches over how the federal government spends taxpayer dollars, is very clear that such “pocket rescissions” are illegal. The Constitution places the power of the purse in Congress alone, requiring the president to “take care that the laws be faithfully executed.” If the president can decide not to fund programs Congress has appropriated funding for, he effectively takes over the power of the purse. And yet, director of the Office of Management and Budget, Russell Vought, has claimed the right to such power.

As Frank Thorp V and Kyla Guilfoil of NBC News reported, Senator Patty Murray (D-WA), vice chair of the Appropriations Committee, called the move a “theft from the American people.”

“Russ Vought’s message to Congress is that your votes don’t count, and your laws are optional,” Murray said. “It is now time for my Republican colleagues who said they would never let this happen to stand up and join us to stop this, and remind this administration this is not how this works.”

And so, while Trump is trying to cement power, opposition continues to grow.

But now it appears that Trump has yet another power move on his mind.

Jake Spring and Stephanie Apstein of the Washington Post reported tonight that the administration is considering hosting a Major League Baseball game at a national park. It has been scouting where it could build a baseball facility in Grand Teton National Park.

hcr
0 Replies
 
izzythepush
 
  2  
Reply Sun 27 Sep, 2026 06:38 am
Terrorist alert just outside RAF Fairford in Gloustershire*.

Story is still breaking, but three vans with suspicious men and it now looks like explosives reported in the village of Whelford near the US base.

* pronounced Gloss ter shuh.
izzythepush
 
  2  
Reply Sun 27 Sep, 2026 08:06 am
@izzythepush,
Speculation about the attack centres around Iran.

Early days, but if so, it's no wonder they were caught.

Property prices in the Cotswolds are extortionate. It's where Harry & Meghan and Ellen Degeneres have houses.

Three white vans full of Middle Eastern looking men would stick out like a sore thumb.

If I was going to do something like that I would wait until there was a church/school fete, country show or something like that, and give the white vans a burger van livery or something like that.

It really is a no brainer.
izzythepush
 
  2  
Reply Sun 27 Sep, 2026 08:38 am
@izzythepush,
There is footage of the vans on the Guardian website.

There is some writing on one of the vans, it's not completely clear, but it does look like "**** You."
eurocelticyankee
 
  1  
Reply Sun 27 Sep, 2026 08:44 am
@izzythepush,
Quote:
If I was going to do something like that I would wait until there was a church/school fete, country show or something like that, and give the white vans a burger van livery or something like that.
Quote:


''Ze English infidel is right Ahmed, we will buy a kebab van and wait for a fete.''
''Many thanks English infidal.''
izzythepush
 
  1  
Reply Sun 27 Sep, 2026 08:46 am
@eurocelticyankee,
It's not rocket science.
0 Replies
 
izzythepush
 
  2  
Reply Sun 27 Sep, 2026 08:47 am
@eurocelticyankee,
To be honest, I'd rather the bases weren't there.

I'm with Iran on that.
0 Replies
 
izzythepush
 
  1  
Reply Sun 27 Sep, 2026 08:49 am
@izzythepush,
They might have thought they'd be mistaken for Prince Harry, driving around a van with **** You on the side.
0 Replies
 
Region Philbis
 
  2  
Reply Mon 28 Sep, 2026 06:59 am
JoJo From Jerz wrote:
Be Best. Be Quiet. Or Be Bankrupted.

For the first half of this year, Melania Trump was doing everything in her power to get me to shut up.

I wasn’t sure I wanted to talk about this. I didn’t know how to talk about it. And if I’m being ******* honest, I’m scared to talk about it right now.

But I’m sick and tired of carrying it around, and I need to put it down.

And watching my ******* feed turn into a propaganda pageant for that self-anointed patron saint of women has exhausted whatever restraint I had left.

If you’ve followed me for a while, you know something was happening earlier this year. I was trying to keep doing my work while worrying about my children, our home, my livelihood, and whether telling you what was happening could cost us everything.

Here’s what I didn’t tell you.

The president and the first lady of the United States of America were threatening to sue me.

Me. A single mother of two in New Jersey.

At first, the letters were about things I’d said about both of them, although mostly her, but over the next several months it became entirely about Melania. She wanted me to retract what I’d said and apologize, and when I wouldn’t, another letter would come, another accusation of defamation, another demand for money I didn’t have, until this woman’s wounded feelings had become something I had to consider every time I thought about my family’s future.

A prominent attorney who wasn’t able to help me told me I should do everything they asked because otherwise they would ruin me.

They would take my home.

And I don’t know how to explain what those words do to you when you’ve already had to rebuild your life from scratch, when the home somebody is telling you to be afraid of losing is the place you made out of everything you managed to save of yourself. There wasn’t some other fortune underneath us. There was this house, my work, and two children who depended on me to make it enough.

I cried every day for months, but I kept going because I had to keep going, because I didn’t have a choice, because my kids need me and their lives don’t stop to indulge two petulant narcissists who can’t stomach being criticized. There’s still dinner and soccer and baseball and laundry and life—the life I’ve worked so hard to make ordinary for them. They get to have that. They get to need things and forget things and go on being children without having to make room for whatever the first lady thinks she’s entitled to take out of their mother.

And I never told them. They still don’t know.

I didn’t want to scare them, didn’t want to give them a reason to look around their own home and wonder whether they would get to keep it, so I kept it from them, even as this constant background noise ran underneath everything else: two of the most powerful people in the world, with all their money and lawyers and access to the levers of power, had targeted me.

My livelihood. My family. The life I was right there in the middle of trying to live. And I couldn’t make the enormity of that fit with how ordinary we were, how little we had to spare, how much damage they could do without it costing them anything they would miss.

She was swinging a ******* wrecking ball at a mosquito, and my children lived in the building.

For months, I told only the people closest to me and some incredible, heroic human beings—elected officials, people you might recognize from television—who showed up when I needed help. I sat on the rest because I was scared, and I hate that for me, but I ******* hate it for my country, too. I was afraid to tell you what the president and first lady were doing because I didn’t know what telling you might make them do next.

She never had to set foot in our house to make her presence felt in every room.

That’s the brutal, grotesque, ******* disgraceful truth.

And let’s be clear about what I do: I have never intentionally lied about her. When I’m talking about what these people say and do, I’m working from my understanding of the truth, what I can see with my own eyes and hear with my own ears. But a hell of a lot of my work is mockery and ridicule, because I’m a satirist and they’re public figures, and I have a right to point at the ridiculous ******* spectacle they’re making of this country and laugh.

They don’t have to like it. That couture-clad, cash-cushioned control freak was trying to turn free speech into a luxury item and price me out of my own ******* voice.

I don’t need to make **** up. With these two, the problem has never been a shortage of material.

Matt Platkin, New Jersey’s former attorney general, helped me for free, spending hours on the phone with me, giving his time and expertise at considerable personal cost, shepherding me through something I could never have begun to navigate alone. And he listened to me. He advised, explained, helped me understand what I was facing, but the decisions stayed mine. I still cry when I think about the sheer luck of somebody that good showing up in the middle of something that ugly, when I needed help I couldn’t afford and didn’t know how to find.

He’s an extraordinary ******* human being, and I owe him in ways I’ll never be able to adequately express, let alone repay.

Having him beside me felt like somebody putting a hand beneath a box I’d been holding so long my arms had started to shake. I still had to decide where to go with it, but I could finally take a breath without being afraid I’d drop everything. I kept returning to Timothy Snyder’s first lesson in On Tyranny: “Do not obey in advance.”

https://i.postimg.cc/ydpPCVyJ/capture.jpg

I wouldn’t comply. I wouldn’t capitulate. I wouldn’t cave.

That thin-skinned, trophy-wife tyrant wanted me on my hands and knees begging forgiveness for something I hadn’t done wrong, and every refusal brought more pressure. I was told, more than once, that I needed to do what other people had done, retract and apologize, or risk losing everything.

And Jesus Christ, I understand why people do it. I know what it feels like to weigh your refusal against the roof over your children’s heads. But I also know how a bully takes the inch you give them and starts measuring for the rest of your life, how the apology you hope will buy you peace becomes something they wave at the next person who resists.

She wanted an apology she could mount like a hunting trophy, something to point at when the next woman needed reminding of what happens when you open your mouth.

I wasn’t going on that ******* wall.

So I kept doing my work, and she never got what she wanted from me. I guess it got boring for her, because at some point the emails stopped, the letters stopped, the phone calls stopped. The silence felt like a smoke alarm shutting off before anybody had told me whether the fire was out. I don’t know what changed on her end. I know I hadn’t changed my answer.

She went away right around the time she gave that weird-ass statement about Jeffrey Epstein, that press conference that wasn’t a press conference, and read off the names of people who had retracted and apologized.

Mine wasn’t among them.

Matt advised me against going public after they’d backed off, and I understood why: their silence came with no promise that they wouldn’t start again. I’d kept criticizing her through all of it, but revealing THIS story meant opening the closet where I’d shoved that ****-flinging bogeyman and finding out whether it had gone away or simply been waiting for my hand to close around the ******* handle. And after months of trying to protect my children from something they didn’t even know was happening, I wanted so badly to believe we were done that I left the door alone.

But for the last week and a half, my feed has been full of Melania Trump on Fox, promoting some ******* seminar about empowering women as though the rest of us can’t remember anything that happened before her last wardrobe change.

She’s for women’s empowerment, and I’m a ******* natural blonde.

And I’m watching this woman congratulate herself while remembering what it felt like to open those letters, to hear that I could lose my home, to cry and then pull myself together because my children needed something and they couldn’t know what was wrong.

I was a woman trying to support her family with her work, and she wanted to make continuing that work so frightening, so expensive, that I would do whatever she asked just to make it stop. Now she gets to go on television and tell other women to believe in themselves?

**** you, Melania. I believed in myself enough to tell you no, and you kept coming.

That’s why I’m telling this now. I’ve already spent years helping somebody look good by swallowing what they did to me, and I know how much of yourself disappears while you’re making sure nobody sees an unflattering side of them. I’m not doing that for her. She can explain how threatening a mother’s livelihood fits into her ******* seminar.

And all this talk about how focused she is on helping the American people—Jesus Christ, you would think she had more pressing concerns than what a single mom in New Jersey was saying about her on Twitter. But she found time for me, and she really, REALLY didn’t like it when I made fun of her for being robotic, especially around the time they brought actual robots into the White House.

The material came with ******* wheels, Melania. What did you expect me to do?

In case anybody wanted some free advice on which buttons to push.

A women’s empowerment seminar from her is a bear trap with a ******* gift bow. That Fox-fluffed faux-feminist fraud wants applause for telling women to find their voices after trying to make using mine cost me the roof over my children’s heads, and I’m supposed to admire the ribbon without mentioning the teeth. You don’t get to sell women the courage to stand up for themselves while trying to ruin the ones who stand up to you.

Her enthusiasm for women speaking up ends the second one of us makes her the punch line. Authoritarians hate mockery, and she and her meal ticket are no exception. They expect us to handle their egos like borrowed Waterford, to tiptoe through our own country apologizing every time one of these vainglorious assholes hears a clink.

And spare me the story about that Be Besting birther bitch being some helpless captive. She isn’t Rapunzel. She’s charging admission to the ******* tower. She knows who he is, supports him, and benefits from every bit of it. Save your sympathy for women trying to escape men like him; she tried to silence one.

And while she was doing that, you were here, surrounding me with love even though all you knew was that something was wrong. I’m sorry I couldn’t tell you more while it was happening. The honest-to-God truth is that I was afraid. Every time I considered going public, I thought about what it might mean for my children if I made things worse, and I didn’t know how to get past that. You kept showing up for me anyway, letting me bring whatever I could put into words without demanding the rest. I spend so much of my life trying to find something funny, something useful, something that might help somebody else get through the day, and during those months, you were helping me get through mine.

Your kindness came through like light beneath a closed door; you didn’t need to see the whole room to make it less dark.

I’ve written about the things I’ve survived, about what bullies can take from you and what it costs to get yourself back. Donald and Melania Trump are the biggest ******* bullies on the planet, but I know their kind.

There was the Halloween I stood on the blacktop in my Hefty bag witch costume while kids called me the “Hefty bag hag,” my face burning, tears gathering in my throat, and I smiled anyway. They’d had their fun with the costume. I wasn’t handing them my tears to play with, too.

And there was my first day at a new school, when a boy stepped on the brand-new white high-tops I was so proud of and I punched him in the nose, right in front of the principal. I didn’t give a ****. He never bullied me again.

For so much of my life, I was that girl—the one who stood there and smiled, who swung back, who didn’t assume the biggest asshole in the room got to make the rules. But somewhere along the way, she was whittled down to something brittle and afraid, and I learned to swallow whatever I was about to say before it could upset somebody else’s ego. I learned to keep up appearances, to make the adjustments, to accept a smaller and smaller version of myself as the price of getting through the day.

Nice girls stay quiet. Nice girls shut up.

And I did, until there was so little of me in my own life that I didn’t think I wanted to live it anymore. I have a scar on my upper lip, one small place where the past still shows through, but there is so much you wouldn’t know by looking at me. I’ve been punched in the face, kicked in the stomach, strangled, and I wish I could reach back through those years and put my arms around the woman who kept making herself smaller, as though there were some version of her small enough to be safe. I know how far inside somebody else’s control you can get before you realize you’ve been negotiating for your own oxygen.

I spent years living like a tenant in my own skin, asking permission to feel at home in it. Getting out meant learning to trust my own judgment again, finding the voice I’d spent so long treating as something that would get me in trouble, and remembering that somebody being angry with me wasn’t proof that I’d done something wrong.

That girl found her way back, and for the better part of the last decade, she’s had a ******* microphone. I use it because I care about the country my children will inherit, because they deserve more than instructions on how to stay out of a bully’s way. I didn’t fight that hard to hear myself again just to let her sit there with her hand on the ******* volume knob.

I’m 52. I don’t know how many years I have left on this rock, but I know there are whole stretches of my life I can never get back—years I paid out in little installments of silence so somebody else could keep feeling powerful. What’s left belongs to me and the people I love, and I’ll be goddamned if some malevolent bitch in Manolos thinks she gets to collect another ******* minute.

So let them come. Let them threaten me again.

It means I’m over the target. It means I’m hitting a nerve. It means all that money and all that power still can’t make a single mother in New Jersey shut her ******* mouth.

And they’d better get used to it.

Because I am never, EVER going to stop.

***

I love you guys! I mean that from the bottom of my heart! I wouldn’t have been able to get through this year without you.

Stay safe out there, stay strong, and stay connected to each other. You mean more than you’ll ever know.

💙 Jo
https://substack.com/@jojofromjerz
0 Replies
 
izzythepush
 
  1  
Reply Mon 28 Sep, 2026 12:11 pm
Quote:
The five men arrested on Sunday morning have all been released on police bail.

But detectives said they “absolutely” remain under investigation.

It means this case did not get to the stage where there was such major concern that the suspects had to remain in custody or be charged.

Whether these men were involved in some kind of activism or were acting unknowingly on behalf of a foreign state are still part of the investigation.

But we can probably rule out some enormous set of explosives being found in those vehicles.

There is still quite a lot of concern about what those men were doing so close to RAF Fairford in the early hours of Sunday morning, however this is not the plot some were fearing at the time of their arrest.

But that begs the question of how these developments fit with what Trump said about the arrests?

He told reporters on Sunday: "We had them under investigation. They were looking to do big damage to our fort.”

It's possible Trump was talking off the cuff, or that he was talking about something unconnected. We have seen security tightened up over the week around RAF Fairford, according to local residents.

But what involvement these men had in that seems to have got the point where it was so unclear that they have been released on police bail.

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/live/c65y7nl29k0et
hightor
 
  2  
Reply Tue 29 Sep, 2026 05:02 am
Quote:
It has become routine for Trump to spend the weekend posting wildly on social media, and this weekend was no exception.

After attacking the press on Saturday morning, at 9:18 he posted a video with foreboding music that sped up as the video played, showing a glowering Trump walking down a hall toward the camera while his voice intoned: “This is the final battle. With you at my side, we will demolish the deep state. We will expel the warmongers from our government. We will drive out the globalists, we will cast out the communists, Marxists, and fascists. We will throw off the sick political class that hates our country. We will rout the fake news media, and we will liberate America from these villains once and for all.”

The administration clearly set out to provoke a backlash when it played what appeared to be the same ad later in the day during NFL games, Fox News Sunday, Saturday Night Live, and several college football games with the addition of the words: “Paid for by the U.S. Government.”

As Stephen Collinson of CNN noted, Trump often tries to provoke a response to his outrageous behavior in order to feed the narrative that he is under attack from an establishment deep state because he is trying to save the nation. And this did, indeed, provoke a response. While the White House maintained the ad was a “public service announcement,” Richard Painter, who served as a White House ethics lawyer under President George W. Bush, said using public funds for “government-sponsored propaganda” could be “an impeachable offense.”

That image worked well enough in his 2016 campaign that he recycled it for the 2024 campaign, when videos nearly identical to the one he posted on Saturday appeared repeatedly. But its power now seems to be primarily in its ability to reinforce Trump’s fantasy of himself. Thirty-six thousand social media users liked a post that read: “Why is there a Donald Trump ad during an NFL game when he’s not running for office and why is the US government paying for a political ad[?]”

Trump seemed to be working overtime on boosting his self-image on social media on Saturday, posting a series of videos showing a triumphal movie version of his second term, narrated by MAGA supporters. One video from2023 showed him attacking Democrats, other videos showed him winning his second term, setting out at top speed to fulfill his campaign promises, hosting the UFC mixed martial arts fight at the White House, and launching Operation Epic Fury against Iran. Still others intoned heroic literature, including “If” by Rudyard Kipling (that’s the one that starts: “If you can keep your head when all about you/ Are losing theirs and blaming it on you”) with Trump as the hero.

While the first video seemed intended to rally his supporters, the rest of the videos, with their litany of broken promises—“expel the warmongers”?—and the praise of supporters who have left or been cast out of the government, felt weirdly like a requiem.

And the ads created yet another headache for Republican lawmakers hoping to retain control of Congress after the midterm elections. On Friday the administration announced it is refusing to spend about a billion dollars Congress appropriated for programs that help the American people—a refusal the nonpartisan Government Accountability Office (GAO) says is illegal—and on Saturday, Trump used taxpayer money for his own vanity ads.

That misuse of public money comes on top of the administration announcement last week that it was removing about 760,000 people from Affordable Care Act health coverage rolls, claiming they were fraudulently enrolled in the program and that cutting them and dishonest brokers would save $2.2 billion.

For the past week, Trump’s collapsing job approval numbers and the increasing chances that the Democrats will prevail in the upcoming midterm elections have dominated the media. In the New Yorker, Susan Glasser wrote about “The Week Republicans Finally Panicked About Trump.” She notes that “[n]o modern president has ever gone into a midterm election this unpopular.” His approval rating is now twice as low as it was in 2018 when Republicans lost forty-one House seats.

At Strength in Numbers, G. Elliott Morris reported on September 25 that only 24% of American adults say the U.S. is better off under Trump than it had been under Biden. Fifty-eight percent say it’s worse off, and most of them say it’s much worse. Morris notes that in the last month, Trump’s approval rating has fallen most sharply among voters who identified themselves as Republicans.

Today Morris reported that media coverage of the Republicans’ midterm convention failed to come close to the number of stories about the Iran war, about Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE), and about the Justice Department, the FBI, and the Epstein files.

On Saturday, Patrick Thomas and Lindsay Wise of the Wall Street Journal reported that Trump’s tariffs that undermined the sales of agricultural products, his imports of foreign beef, and the rising costs of diesel, gas, and fertilizer have eroded his support in the agricultural areas that used to be the backbone of his support.

On Sunday, Samuel Benson and Eric Bazail-Eimil of Politico reported that Republicans in battleground states—Kansas, Maine, Michigan, Texas, and even Florida—are on defense as their voters turn against the ICE agents conducting raids in the states. An ICE agent’s shooting of a food delivery driver from Venezuela in Austin, Texas, on September 20 is highlighting the issue, especially since the agent was not wearing a body camera as required.

Like the tariffs, the raids are challenging the loyalty of even those who voted overwhelmingly for Trump in 2024. Although voters in counties that depend on agriculture supported Trump by almost 78%, on September 24 the Kansas Livestock Association, Oklahoma Cattlemen’s Association, and Texas Cattle Feeders Association released a statement warning that ICE activity is endangering their animals and operations, and has a “massive chilling effect” on “the legal, documented, skilled workers that put beef on the table and keep the cattle supply chain moving.”

In what appears to be a dig at the president, they note that their supply chains are already under pressure and call the raids “a costly and unnecessary impact to cattle producers already suffering from unwelcome political interference to both the markets as well as the physical supply chain.”

Rural areas, which tend to have more people employed in agriculture, fishing, and logging, as well as longer travel distances, are particularly hard hit by the high prices of diesel and gasoline caused by the Iran war. Yesterday, Gregory S. Schneider and Evan Halper of the Washington Post reported that the skyrocketing price of diesel has pushed Republican candidates even in staunchly Republican districts to call for an end to the war in Iran.

In Iowa, Representative Ashley Hinson, who voted four times against forcing Trump to end the Iran war and is now the Republican candidate for the U.S. Senate, is one of those now complaining about the high cost of gas and diesel. Republican Senate candidate Mike Rogers of Michigan also previously supported the war but now is saying “[t]he war with Iran needs to end and end quickly.”

Republicans hoping to retain control of Congress after the midterms are fighting uphill battles in contested states, and some of their candidates are in the news for all the wrong reasons. In Maine the Portland Press Herald today published a scathing op-ed from the Editorial Board titled: “It’s Maine’s turn to be concerned about Susan Collins.”

The board ripped into Senator Collins’s dismissive response to ProPublica’s story that her 2020 campaign accepted an illegal $150,000 contribution from a defense contractor in exchange for a U.S. government contract. Indeed, Collins’s attacks on ProPublica to undermine the story prompted it to issue a follow-up report calling her claims “incorrect and misleading.”

In Texas, some Republican leaders backed away from Bo French, the Republican nominee for the Texas Railroad Commission, which regulates the oil and gas industry in the state, after a racist social media post about University of Texas football fans, but it turns out that post is the tip of the iceberg. Today Andrew Kaczynski of CNN reported that in the past six years, French has repeatedly called for public executions of his political opponents, including former president Barack Obama, using the hashtag “HangEmHigh.”

Kaczynski reports that neither Texas governor Greg Abbott, who is running for reelection, nor the Republican nominee for U.S. Senate, state attorney general Ken Paxton, has withdrawn his endorsement of French.

In Kansas, Senator Roger Marshall is facing outrage after a New York Times story by Sarah Kliff on September 8 revealed that Marshall, an obstetrician-gynecologist, sued more than 700 of his patients for outstanding bills. Kliff reports that Marshall’s office charged patients an 18% annual interest rate and garnished their wages and their bank accounts, and that eighty-one of his patients were arrested for missing court dates. Most of those unable to pay their bills were from a rural county with higher than average rates of poverty and lack of health insurance. The unpaid bills were as little as $101.

Meanwhile, Republican lawmakers are starting to blame Trump and his appointees for their unpopularity with voters. Although—or perhaps because—Republican senators confirmed a number of those appointees, they are now turning on at least some of them.

Homeland Security Secretary Markwayne Mullins’s raids are unpopular with Republican lawmakers, but Burgess Everett and Shelby Talcott of Semafor reported today that Republican senators are fed up with Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth. A Republican senator told the reporters: “There are a lot of people that are really upset with the war in Iran and how it’s being played out. We feel it’s hurting our chances in the elections in the fall, and it seems rather haphazard.” The senator continued: “We don’t like what we’re seeing when it comes to the pulling of officers off of the promotion lists. We don’t like what we see with…indiscriminate firings of admirals and generals across the force.”

And Trump apparently can no longer command the attention of those who supported his MAGA agenda. On September 23, Neil Mehta, Brian Whitton, and Sabrina Rodriguez of the Wall Street Journal reported the results of their analysis of almost 70,000 hours of podcasts by right-wing creators. Mentions of Trump’s name have dropped nearly 70% from their peak before the 2024 election. Suggesting just how unpopular he is, the people still talking about Trump are his opponents.

On Thursday, Zach Everson, research director for Public Citizen’s Trump Accountability Project reports, a Trump company filed a trademark application for “TRUMP TV,” the new streaming channel the White House launched after Trump’s ban of reporters from CNN, MS NOW, and Politico from the White House campus left him without television coverage for a day.

On Friday, Everson reports, “a Trump-owned company applied…to trademark ‘MAGA’ and ‘45-47’ for streaming apps, TV broadcasting, and news and commentary on politics and current events.”

hcr
0 Replies
 
izzythepush
 
  2  
Reply Tue 29 Sep, 2026 07:27 am
@izzythepush,
**** ton of mis/disinformation about the alleged terrorist attempt on RAF Fairford.

First of all that ranine fascist arsehole Farage tried to link it to the small boats crisis, claiming that they were Iranians who had come over on small boats who ended up in hostels while seeking asylum.

This, he claimed, was another reason all asylum seekers should be locked up while their cases are being heard.

This was a complete lie, and the police, (not the government,) quickly had to state that all four were British nationals from London.

Then we have all the nonsense about whether these men were known to police beforehand, with the police initially saying this was not intelligence led.

I really get the feeling that the Trump administration is trying to make this a much bigger deal than warrented.

After the police said it was not intelligence led Trump weighed in saying they knew about them for a long time and they were intent on causing major damage.

The official story changed after that.

So much is murky, if the police were following these men how did they get so close to the base before being arrested, and why did the police only appear 10 minutes after a member of the public dialed 999?

Rubio has claimed that these men were working as proxies for another country, most likely Iran.

Now this narrative has ran smack ban into reality. In the UK terrorist suspects can be held for up to two weeks without being charged.

That has not happened, the men have now been released on police bail.

Donald Trump is not happy, but the UK response is we trust our police, it's their decision.

Now, if these men had firearms or viable explosives, they would not be out on bail, they would still be being questioned.

Trump is not happy because, unlike Trump's DOJ, we are not colluding with his narrative.

These men could be Iranian proxies, but it's more likely they were about to take direct action, nothing deadly, but lots of criminal damage, graffiti, red paint etc.

The vast majority of people over here are against the war and RAF Fairford has seen a few anti war demonstrations.

There is also outrage about the lax treatment of of US personnel who rape British women. They do not face British justice but instead face a much lesser charge of sexual assault and the victim is subjected to demeaning questioning in a foreign military court.

There is also the paedophile working at the US embassy in London who was quickly moved back to the US after finding a cache of child porn on his computer, ensuring he was not questioned by UK police.

The truth will out.
izzythepush
 
  1  
Reply Tue 29 Sep, 2026 07:35 am
@izzythepush,
Quote:
Ex-police officer Aldworth, who now runs security consultancy Risk to Resolution, said he has “every confidence” that the suspects do not pose a risk to the public.

He said:

The provision of bail is set from a concrete foundation devoid of political or even investigative influence.

A custody officer will determine if those in custody will present any of a number of statutory risks and if they do not, then bail is usually granted if there is a need to conduct further investigation.

I’m conscious of a number of comments from US politicians and we need to be guarded that these may be made for any number of reasons, not least of all geopolitical as well as domestic political influence.

Aldworth added:

I have every confidence that if the police have released these individuals on bail, that they do not pose any ongoing risks to the public at large. The rest will undoubtedly come out in the ongoing investigation.



https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/live/2026/sep/29/raf-fairford-counter-terror-suspected-plot-iran-donald-trump-marco-rubio-latest-news-updates
0 Replies
 
hightor
 
  2  
Reply Tue 29 Sep, 2026 08:28 am
@izzythepush,
Typical Trump...he wants to get out in front of the story so he makes up some line of "we knew it all along" bullshit.
izzythepush
 
  1  
Reply Tue 29 Sep, 2026 08:57 am
@hightor,
Quote:
An initial examination of the vans led police to suspect they carried explosive materials, with assessments made as to whether they were viable improvised explosive devices. After the suspects’ release it emerged that no explosive material had been found.


https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2026/sep/29/raf-fairford-uk-bomb-plot-marco-rubio-claims-foreign-actor

Trump and Rubio are trying to manufacture further reasons to attack Iran.
izzythepush
 
  1  
Reply Tue 29 Sep, 2026 09:04 am
Our judiciary, as far as possible, is non political.

Judges are appointed by a professional, not a political body.

That means politicians can keep such decisions at arm's length while professionals decide.

I think these men will be charged with criminal tresspass, which may or may not result in a custodial sentence.

Any custodial sentence would be for months, not years.
izzythepush
 
  1  
Reply Tue 29 Sep, 2026 09:12 am
@izzythepush,
Meanwhile the farcical situation over the Drumcree march by Orangemen continues.
izzythepush
 
  1  
Reply Tue 29 Sep, 2026 12:11 pm
@izzythepush,
"A quantity of petrol," was found, according to a police spokesperson.

That is quite vague. It could just be a gallon in a can for emergencies. Lots of people have a can of petrol in the car just in case.

Or it could be a significant amount.

Which begs the question why were they let out.

If it turns out it's nothing more than red paint and wire cutters then the police did well to grant bail.

The judiciary don't look favourably on public servants licking Trump's arse over here.

izzythepush
 
  1  
Reply Tue 29 Sep, 2026 12:23 pm
@izzythepush,
There is also very recent dashcam footage showing the front gate to the base unmanned with the security barrier up.

The bloke who took it was incredulous, he said there was nothing to stop him driving onto the base.
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

 
Copyright © 2026 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.04 seconds on 10/23/2026 at 01:03:40
▲ ▼