Most Important Question Ever!

Two months away and on return all you do is cut and paste your last post.

For shits and giggles explain that non sequitur.

Most Important Question Ever!

HOW DOES THE HOLY TRINITY POOP

When bidet to so do:

God moves in a mysterious way,
His wonders to perform;
He plants his footsteps in the sea,
And rides upon the storm.

Hey! Long time; no see.

If you don’t know if a and b are the same or different and you want to be certain of a balanced equation then a and b = a and b gives you that balanced equation.

It’s just a different philosophical approach to a=b and b=a that’s all.

Just an idea.

He like the eponymous character in Coleridge, cursed to wander the earth telling the same tale over and over again.

The Rime of the Ancient Magnetiser.

These theories have its pluses and minuses.

He wanders the world in circles.

Pluses, minuses everywhere and not a volume control in sight.

A different philosophy produces a different science and until scientists can explain how the 2 equal but opposite electromagnetic forces in nature cancel out we have reached a cross roads.

I prefer a philosophical certainty myself rather than a philosophical guess.

Read up on my post SELF.

He holds him with his skinny hand,
'Phillysiffycal certaintee.'
'Hold off! unhand me, grey-beard loon!'
Eftsoons his hand waspee.

There's a character in Mervyn Peake's Titus Alone who lives in the sewers surrounded by copies of his own book which he can't even persuade anyone else to pick up let alone read or buy.

That's not philosophical certainty, it's an albatross.

Hey, they are special pluses and minuses, we just "don't get it"!...

All I am saying is that there is nothing wrong with adopting a different starting philosophy to that of modern day science especially when modern day science is unable to explain how the two equal but opposite electromagnetic forces in nature cancel out.This is clearly a major flaw with its philosophical foundation.

I do adopt a different starting philosophy which adopts known forces to perfectly explain an alternative balanced and symmetrical levitation science.

I prefer not to adopt a philosophical guess and unknown forces to explain the psychological.

I prefer to adopt a philosophical certainty and known forces to explain the psychological.

Each to their own.

Your philosophy is based around your inability to understand scientific explanations, or explanations in general.

That's it, if there was anything else you wouldn't be going round and round in circles convincing nobody.

That's it, in all the time you've been here you've convinced nobody, not one person.

That should tell you something, but it won't because your vanity won't allow it.

You'd rather believe you have something special which give you a sense of clarity beyond us mere mortals.

Even that's not special, we can all lie in pseudo solipsism while in trance like slumber, imagining we're constructing the universe, understanding everything, convincing ourselves we're some sort of chosen one, a messiah, maybe even the godhead itself.

It's easily done, most people have done it, and most can see it for what it is.

But not you.

It’s modern day science that has made the claim that the + and - electromagnetic forces in nature cancel out.

It’s a shame that it’s unable to explain how though.

So it’s science is based upon a philosophical GUESS.

If you want to base all your science on a philosophical GUESS then I say that’s ok but don’t be surprised if observations don’t back up your science.

Surely, as a back up and if your first approach fails you could try basing your science on a philosophical certainty and build both electromagnetic forces into your scientific equations.

Just saying,that’s all.

Scientist also know that matter is entering and exiting the cosmos at multiple points at varying timescales so they have now given themselves the impossible task of trying to explain why they claim that matter entered and will exit the cosmos from a single point because of an unknown force that they only invented after they guessed that the 2 electromagnetic forces in the cosmos cancelled out,

They now just keep pumping different data into the same philosophical model.

They don’t have a plan B.

Put me right into an internet surf. I've never heard of Mervyn Peake before, but between writing and graphic art, I'm going to be looking at him intensively into the future. He seems sort of like John Barth or Thomas Pynchon or John Kennedy Toole. And was an accomplished oil painter.