@bobsal u1553115,
bobsal u1553115 wrote:First and third.
Only the first two are Xmas movies, but according to Rotten Tomatoes the best ones are first and fourth.
Interesting how the critics and the audience diverge on their view of the third.
Die Hard (1988)
Certified Fresh
Top Critics: 83%
Critics: 94%
Audience: 94%
Critics' Consensus: Its many imitators (and sequels) have never come close to matching the taut thrills of the definitive holiday action classic.
https://www.rottentomatoes.com/m/die_hard
Die Hard 2 (1990)
Top Critics: 70%
Critics: 69%
Audience: 70%
Critics' Consensus: It lacks the fresh thrills of its predecessor, but Die Hard 2 still works as an over-the-top -- and reasonably taut -- big-budget sequel, with plenty of set pieces to paper over the plot deficiencies.
https://www.rottentomatoes.com/m/die_hard_2_1990
Die Hard with a Vengeance (1995)
Top Critics: 48%
Critics: 58%
Audience: 83%
Critics' Consensus: Die Hard with a Vengeance benefits from Bruce Willis and Samuel L. Jackson's barbed interplay, but clatters to a bombastic finish in a vain effort to cover for an overall lack of fresh ideas.
https://www.rottentomatoes.com/m/die_hard_with_a_vengeance
Live Free or Die Hard (2007)
Certified Fresh
Top Critics: 75%
Critics: 82%
Audience: 86%
Critics' Consensus: Live Free or Die Hard may be preposterous, but it's an efficient, action-packed summer popcorn flick with thrilling stunts and a commanding performance by Bruce Willis. Fans of the previous Die Hard films will not be disappointed.
https://www.rottentomatoes.com/m/live_free_or_die_hard
A Good Day to Die Hard (2013)
Top Critics: 13%
Critics: 15%
Audience: 40%
Critics' Consensus: A Good Day to Die Hard is the weakest entry in a storied franchise, and not even Bruce Willis' smirking demeanor can enliven a cliched, uninspired script.
https://www.rottentomatoes.com/m/a_good_day_to_die_hard