0
   

New perspectives in physics

 
 
pragmatical45
 
  0  
Thu 4 Apr, 2024 07:49 am
@pragmatical45,
in paragraph 3 I added the text:

These evaporating micro black holes can produce all the particles from the galactical model (compare stars in the galaxy). The only issue is that these particles can also be building blocks of, for example, quarks.
0 Replies
 
pragmatical45
 
  0  
Sat 11 May, 2024 01:48 am
@pragmatical45,
New version of paragraph 5 in New horizons in physics:

5. Solution of the problem of Wave-particle duality, condensing model

One of the biggest puzzles is the problem of how light in classical physics can be a wave, while in quantum physics it is in the form of photons or particles. The light ray is a wave but the energy transmits matter in the form of photons. Thus, it can also be assumed that any other particle, for example a moving electron, can be a wave of matter. The existence of matter waves was confirmed in 1927. Also in 1927 the uncertainty principle was formulated, stating that it is impossible to measure the position and momentum of a particle with unlimited accuracy. The issues considered are related to the problem of wave-particle duality.
Wave-particle duality, the property of matter, for example electrons, in that in some conditions the wave character is manifested, and in others corpuscular character. Wave properties are revealed by diffraction and interference phenomena. Classical physics could not explain, for example, the photoelectric phenomenon, the adoption of the concept of a discrete radiation structure enabled solving this difficulty. Electron diffraction has shown that molecules have wave properties in addition to their corpuscular properties. Current theory assumes that all molecules have both wave and corpuscular character. This fact has been checked not only for elementary particles but also for composite particles such as atoms. Recognition of the dual nature of matter is the basis of modern physics.
So far, considered duality remains a mystery, this is my explanation of this enigma. The problem of wave-particle duality is in fact a problem of trichotomy, where the third state are fields. At the explanation of this problem it is possible to invoke phenomenon of three states of concentration of the matter, the solid state, liquid and gas. This phenomenon determines the model for the problem of trichotomy in the microworld. Three states of concentration of the matter it is possible to implement by the fourth state which is the vacuum. Contractual condensation of the vacuum gives the highest state of concentration, gas. The further condensation gives the liquid state of concentration, still further the solid state of concentration. So the vacuum condenses into fields, fields condense into waves, waves condense into particles - I will correct this model accordingly in a moment. The formation of particles directly from the fields corresponds to gas resublimation. These considerations make for the conclusion that the base for three states of the microworld is the vacuum. So particles, waves and fields are just a condensed form of vacuum (space). On the ground of STM (see paragraph 1) we can reach explanation where particles, waves and fields can be brought to the space.
The vacuum or space itself is in three states, the firstfruits of particle, wave and field matter. First we have the firstfruits of particle matter, the square microgrid, which is what the particles are made of. Later we have the firstfruits of wave matter - asymmetric microgrid, waves are made of it. Then the firstfruits of field matter, straight parallel lines, from which the fields are composed. It can be said that these firstfruits of fields are themselves a field, and the vacuum (space) itself is a field.
So it appears that matter is simply of a threefold nature, because the space from which it arises has a threefold nature. There are three microgrids, a particle microgrid, a wave microgrid, and a field microgrid.
Vacuum (space) has a threefold nature depending on the degree of rarefaction. The most compact is the square microgrid, corresponding to solid bodies. The asymmetric microgrid, corresponding to fluids, is more rarefied. The most rarefied is the linear microgrid corresponding to gases. The fourth hypothetical state of space is nothingness, a higher vacuum without any structures, or maybe with some very rarefied and very simple structures. This means that in a certain case the space would be truly empty, as it seems in the ordinary way of perceiving it.
In the original model, I assumed that vacuum condenses into fields, fields condense into waves, and waves condense into particles. In the current model, I assume that the vacuum (space) itself is in the appropriate four states and is itself subject to internal condensation through subsequent states corresponding to vacuum, fields, waves and particles. The basis and state corresponding to vacuum is nothingness.
It is worth noting that both my TOE and the solution to the wave-particle duality puzzle are both based on the concept of nothingness. This provides a certain unified synthesis of theoretical concepts. We derive everything from the concept of nothingness, it condenses into space and this into matter (TOE), and is condensed in the structural order of space itself, which is in four states, corresponding to the four states of matter (wave-particle duality).
Jasper10
 
  0  
Thu 30 May, 2024 07:19 am
@pragmatical45,
Its easy to answer how light in classical physics can be a wave.

Light particles are influenced by push/pull electromagnetic forces.

Everything vibrates in the cosmos.
0 Replies
 
Jasper10
 
  0  
Sat 1 Jun, 2024 12:17 am
@pragmatical45,
There is one big problem with your new perspectives though pragmatical45

What primary energy source initiated the single Big Bang that you claim happened? Claiming that magic caused it from nothing is not scientific my friend.

You are therefore describing a fairytale science that is based upon many mathematical assumptions to get it to work.

You are wasting your time with such pursuits,

You need to strengthen your philosophy and then you may be able to understand an alternative sound science to fairytale science.

Its clear that your philosophy is very weak.
izzythepush
 
  1  
Tue 11 Jun, 2024 11:38 am
@Jasper10,
You've shut down two threads already with your inane nonsense.

All you do is attack an insult other beliefs which is ironic considering all you have is vague nonsense which you're incapable of articulating further.

It's like you want to be kicked off again.
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

New Propulsion, the "EM Drive" - Question by TomTomBinks
The Science Thread - Discussion by Wilso
Why do people deny evolution? - Question by JimmyJ
Are we alone in the universe? - Discussion by Jpsy
Fake Science Journals - Discussion by rosborne979
Controvertial "Proof" of Multiverse! - Discussion by littlek
 
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.04 seconds on 10/13/2024 at 05:53:05