Matter vs anti – matter (2)

Reply Mon 15 Aug, 2022 04:32 pm
Piggy’s thread “matter vs anti - matter” has been forced stopped by “abnormal” users. Smart researchers should be AWARE the research there is far not yet completed.
There are three of my threads have been forced stopped or destroyed by “abnormal” users or abusers. It’s unfair for normal users.
Piggy has wasted much time to play games with or combat with those “abnormal” users or abusers. Normal scientific research has been disturbed again and again.
It’s a shame in the history of science.
Next go on with normal scientific research.
  • Topic Stats
  • Top Replies
  • Link to this Topic
Type: Discussion • Score: 0 • Views: 420 • Replies: 4
No top replies

Reply Mon 15 Aug, 2022 04:47 pm
Model of neutrino, touchy and feely

Those “Lord of creature” and the First Order are powers in this cosmos. They have their firm “position / stance”. Then, they can form “poles” in society.
Such eternal weaker / “loser” as the pig is not powerful enough to establish firm “position / stance”. Then, he can’t form a “pole” in society.
When the pig encounters those “Lord of creature”, he has to bow to them and say “hello”; when the pig encounters the First Order, he has to bow to them and say “hi”. When the pig is fishing and drinking beer by the riverside of Shapu village while thinking about physics and cosmos, he get back the “fairy feeling of himself”.
That’s oscillation in different external environments.

Actually there is the same phenomenon in nature. Take a look at these spiral springs again:
Left – handed is left – handed; right – handed is right handed. They have their firm “position / stance”, unless they are destroyed.
But if you twist a smooth steel circle without spiral chilarity, it can oscillate between left – handed, non spiral chilarity and right – handed.

In piggy’s physics model, charge or say the electrical polarization is directly reflected by the spiral chilarity of the spherical electromagnetic wave. The fact is that the electrical polarization of proton, electron, etc, is very firm.
In piggy’s physics model, such spherical electric wave without spiral chilarity can exist. It can serve as the model of neutrino.
So, in such model, neutrino should be able to oscillate in different external electrical environments and demonstrate electrical polarization between +, neutral and - . Then, people can consider anti – neutrino actually is neutrino itself, because +, neutral and – are just different states of that thing itself; also people can consider anti – neutrino is not neutrino itself, because different states have different inherent PROPERTY / chirality.

But that model above can’t explain why neutrino can travel near the speed of light. (Some new research in experiment even alleged neutrino travels in the speed of light.)

Actually, there is something else in piggy’s physics model can serve as the model of neutrino too: “the released photon without spiral chilarity” (relevant materials for reference: the unit charge model ahead in the thread "matter vs anti - matter" as well as relevant chapters in the physics thread). Then, in such model, anti – neutrino actually is neutrino itself.

Piggy has been “touchy and feely” over this hard problem for a few years. Not yet can make a decision / choice. 呵呵
Please don’t “sure enough” the issue of neutrino can overthrow Einstein’s theory. 呵呵
Perhaps it’s just a problem troubling that so called what “standard” MODEL, not nature.
Have a lovely day, guys.

Liqiang Chen
Aug 16, 2022
0 Replies
Reply Thu 18 Aug, 2022 05:06 pm
I'm a poor wayfaring stranger
I’m travelling through this world of woe
Yet there’s no sickness, not toil, nor danger
In that bright land to which I go
I’m going there to see my Father
I’m going there no more to roam
I’m only going over Jordan
I’m only going over home
I know dark clouds will gather ‘round me,
I know my way is rough and steep
But golden fields lie just before me
Where God’s redeemed shall ever sleep
I’m going there to see my mother
And all my loved ones who’ve gone on
I’m going there no more to roam
I’m only going over Jordan
I’m only going over home

The development of history is the course of leaving those stumbling stones behind one by one.
The biggest stumbling stone in history of the cosmos would be the First Order. Piggy “sure enough”.
0 Replies
Reply Thu 18 Aug, 2022 05:12 pm
Photon vs anti – photon, touchy and feely

As piggy said in the physics thread, Once upon a time we have a primary discussion about the mechanism of the absorption / emission of photon by atom in PHF. (piggy means something besides the quantum mechanism of energy levels, the focus is where’s the photon gone after it’s absorbed by atom).
The “standard” answer from that “authentic” rabbit Dandan was “it’s gone” “just gone”. Piggy’s humble opinion is that such “standard” empty answer can only be brought to university to fool the students. They have to unconditionally accept the “standard” constraint anyway.

A vivid analogy is where do you deposit / take out your money? Into / from the air? It’s the bank. The “bank” is the emphasis here. (The “amount of money” is the emphasis of QM.)

Because the electron is in outskirt of the atom, piggy’s humble opinion is the photon is deposited in electron after it’s absorbed by atom. In piggy’s physics model, this event is easy to understand: it’s just like a drop of rain fallen into the pool.

Then, when the photon is emitted by the atom, actually it’s from the electron.
So, under such a mechanism, we can expect the released photon retain the spiral chirality of the electron.

Assume a photon is emitted by an anti – atom, we can expect the released photon retain the spiral chirality of the positron.

In this sense, anti – photon is not the photon itself.

In piggy’s physics model, there could be a neutral case: “the released photon without spiral chilarity”.

As piggy said in the chapter “model of neutrino”, “the released photon without spiral chilarity” can serve as the model of neutrino.

According to the principle illustrated above, we can expect the mechanism of the emission of photon by atom can’t generate neutrino. The significant thing is that it’s fact. Coincidence again? Nowadays they “authentic” / “standard” theory just can’t do that.

Liqiang Chen
Aug 19, 2022
0 Replies
Reply Thu 18 Aug, 2022 05:15 pm
To prevent the attacking of that extremist stalker, piggy has to put on a steel helmet. It’s a shame in the history of science.
0 Replies

Related Topics

How can we be sure? - Discussion by Raishu-tensho
Proof of nonexistence of free will - Discussion by litewave
morals and ethics, how are they different? - Question by existential potential
Destroy My Belief System, Please! - Discussion by Thomas
Star Wars in Philosophy. - Discussion by Logicus
Existence of Everything. - Discussion by Logicus
Is it better to be feared or loved? - Discussion by Black King
  1. Forums
  2. » Matter vs anti – matter (2)
Copyright © 2022 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.06 seconds on 10/04/2022 at 08:49:36