1
   

better off without religion?

 
 
Amigo
 
  1  
Reply Tue 9 Aug, 2005 03:58 pm
Pythgoras 500 B.C
0 Replies
 
Frank Apisa
 
  1  
Reply Tue 9 Aug, 2005 04:02 pm
thethinkfactory wrote:
As far as the earth being flat - it has been a LONG time since we did.

I know Aristotle knew it was round (the shadow on the moon they knew was caused by the earth and that shadow suggest a circular shape - even though later we discovered that wasn't exactly right either - it is flat on either end so the proper terming is a oblate spheroid).


The fact that Aristotle "knew" it was round...would have very little effect on what Amigo was trying to say...and which John challenged. Artistotle knew lots of stuff that the common folk did not...and most of them would have rejected had they heard it offered.

In any case, the presumption that Aristotle (or Ptolemy, or whomever) actually thought the world was round based on lunar eclipses...is probably over-stated.


Quote:
However, Thales reasoned that the earth was a disk floating on water. SO it seems sometime between the 800's b.c.e and 300's b.c.e. th western world figured out that the world was not flat or disk shaped.


My guess is that there were significant numbers of humans who thought the earth was flat LONG AFTER the dates you are offering. My guess is a majority probably considered the earth as flat well into the dark ages.
0 Replies
 
Amigo
 
  1  
Reply Tue 9 Aug, 2005 04:05 pm
If iv'e learned one thing here at A2K it's that logic,reason and fact are no match for denial. There its partners.
0 Replies
 
Abdullah ha
 
  1  
Reply Tue 9 Aug, 2005 04:56 pm
how can people say that they don't have a relegion........... give me one good reason that makes a person belief that GOD doesnt excist!!
0 Replies
 
Amigo
 
  1  
Reply Tue 9 Aug, 2005 05:01 pm
If god could be proven or disproven we wouldn't be here.I don't know if god excist. Neither does anyone else.
0 Replies
 
Frank Apisa
 
  1  
Reply Tue 9 Aug, 2005 05:34 pm
Amigo wrote:
If god could be proven or disproven we wouldn't be here.I don't know if god excist. Neither does anyone else.


I do not know if there is a God...or if there are no gods. And it is my guess that neither does anyone else.
0 Replies
 
Ray
 
  1  
Reply Tue 9 Aug, 2005 05:59 pm
Wait, not all people believed the world was flat.
0 Replies
 
Frank Apisa
 
  1  
Reply Tue 9 Aug, 2005 06:01 pm
Ray wrote:
Wait, not all people believed the world was flat.


Stop the presses....we have a news flash!
0 Replies
 
Amigo
 
  1  
Reply Tue 9 Aug, 2005 06:53 pm
The point is at one point the people that believed the earth was flat out numbered the people who didn't and were persecuted for it. What else Do or don't we believe in that is yet to be proven.
0 Replies
 
thethinkfactory
 
  1  
Reply Tue 9 Aug, 2005 07:43 pm
Good points Frank and Amigo - Your both right - I get caught up in my discipline at times and foget the power of denial.

Thanks for the realization.

What about this:

Could it be that religion and the worship of God are different? Worship of God is not bad - but religion is?

It just seems like the true worship of God is a humbling experience wheras religion tends to be engaging in another power brokering that humans love to engage in - and worship ourselves and what we can do.

TTF

TTF
0 Replies
 
Amigo
 
  1  
Reply Tue 9 Aug, 2005 07:58 pm
A relationship with god.That he may help me see the truth instead of what I want to see.That we can be the best he knows we can be and in that way we serve god and man and heaven and hell dissapear. But Who knows
0 Replies
 
Ray
 
  1  
Reply Wed 10 Aug, 2005 12:52 am
umm... define religion? Rolling Eyes

Quote:
Stop the presses....we have a news flash!


What presses? j/k I know I should've read the previous posts...
0 Replies
 
John Jones
 
  1  
Reply Wed 10 Aug, 2005 12:56 am
Frank Apisa wrote:
John Jones wrote:

If someone thought the earth was flat we should say who thought it. Besides, a model is only as good as the evidence. In years to come we will not say that the earth is a three dimensional spheroid but a multidimensional bollock.


Well, John....Amigo wrote:

Quote:
We use to worship the sun we thought the world was flat.


And you responded,

Quote:
We never thought the earth was flat.


It sounds to me as though you understood to whom Amigo was referring...and in fact, agreed with his use of "we."

I rather suspect Amigo was saying that humans at one time thought the earth was flat.

It is apparent to me that you are arguing that humans never thought the earth was flat...and you seem to be basing that on the fact that you saw some pictures somewhere which showed something.

You also asserted that the notion that humans at one point thought the earth was flat was "...a myth put out by an american journalist at the turn of the century, promoting a science magazine."

Your thesis is absurd...and considering the argument you presented here, you really should not be giving advice on how arguments ought to be sustained.


The flat earth idea was popularised by an american journalist who said that religion was stupid because it always claimed the earth was flat, which was never true.
Scientists like to rubbish the opposition. We fall for it.

The earth is flat at any point you walk on it, except at hills and tumuli. This is borne out by observation. Science places observation on a pedestal.
0 Replies
 
Frank Apisa
 
  1  
Reply Wed 10 Aug, 2005 03:30 am
thethinkfactory wrote:
Good points Frank and Amigo - Your both right - I get caught up in my discipline at times and foget the power of denial.

Thanks for the realization.

What about this:

Could it be that religion and the worship of God are different? Worship of God is not bad - but religion is?

It just seems like the true worship of God is a humbling experience wheras religion tends to be engaging in another power brokering that humans love to engage in - and worship ourselves and what we can do.

TTF

TTF


Would you see anything edifying in the "true worship" of Zeus? How about the "true worship" of Santa Claus?

If we want truth....how about: I do not know if there is a God; I do not know if there are no gods; I do not see enough unambiguous evidence upon which to base a meaningful guess in either direction?
0 Replies
 
Frank Apisa
 
  1  
Reply Wed 10 Aug, 2005 03:34 am
John Jones wrote:
The flat earth idea was popularised by an american journalist who said that religion was stupid because it always claimed the earth was flat, which was never true.


That is an absurd contention on your part, John.

I defy you to prove that...

a) it was never true that people thought the earth was flat...or...

b) that this notion is merely an idea popularized by an American journalist.


Quote:
Scientists like to rubbish the opposition. We fall for it.


You really are way out there!


Quote:
The earth is flat at any point you walk on it, except at hills and tumuli. This is borne out by observation. Science places observation on a pedestal.


Way out there!
0 Replies
 
John Jones
 
  1  
Reply Wed 10 Aug, 2005 06:38 am
Frank Apisa wrote:
John Jones wrote:
The flat earth idea was popularised by an american journalist who said that religion was stupid because it always claimed the earth was flat, which was never true.


That is an absurd contention on your part, John.

I defy you to prove that...

a) it was never true that people thought the earth was flat...or...

b) that this notion is merely an idea popularized by an American journalist.


Quote:
Scientists like to rubbish the opposition. We fall for it.


You really are way out there!


Quote:
The earth is flat at any point you walk on it, except at hills and tumuli. This is borne out by observation. Science places observation on a pedestal.


Way out there!


You will have to indicate a moment in history when religion thought that the earth was flat. The medieval church certainly didn't. How far back do you want to go?

Making claims that no-one has experienced the voice or presence of God is a bit ...

How will you cope when they say that the the earth is not a 3 dimensional sphere but a multidimensional string? A fact is true only according to a particular model. So even if people thought the earth was flat, they expressed a true fact.
0 Replies
 
Frank Apisa
 
  1  
Reply Wed 10 Aug, 2005 01:36 pm
John Jones wrote:
Frank Apisa wrote:
John Jones wrote:
The flat earth idea was popularised by an american journalist who said that religion was stupid because it always claimed the earth was flat, which was never true.


That is an absurd contention on your part, John.

I defy you to prove that...

a) it was never true that people thought the earth was flat...or...

b) that this notion is merely an idea popularized by an American journalist.


Quote:
Scientists like to rubbish the opposition. We fall for it.


You really are way out there!


Quote:
The earth is flat at any point you walk on it, except at hills and tumuli. This is borne out by observation. Science places observation on a pedestal.


Way out there!


You will have to indicate a moment in history when religion thought that the earth was flat. The medieval church certainly didn't. How far back do you want to go?



You have asserted that people never thought the earth was flat....and that the notion was simply an invention of an American journalist.


I repeat was I said earlier:


I defy you to prove that...

a) it was never true that people thought the earth was flat...or...

b) that this notion is merely an idea popularized by an American journalist.



Quote:
Making claims that no-one has experienced the voice or presence of God is a bit ...


What the hell is this sentence fragment supposed to mean????


Quote:
How will you cope when they say that the the earth is not a 3 dimensional sphere but a multidimensional string? A fact is true only according to a particular model. So even if people thought the earth was flat, they expressed a true fact.


I really wouldn't give a rat's ass. I am not saying the earth is round, oval, spheroid, or anything else.

What I am doing is challenging some really dumb-assed statements you have made.

And I notice that you are dodging the challenge.
0 Replies
 
John Jones
 
  1  
Reply Wed 10 Aug, 2005 02:56 pm
Frank Apisa wrote:
John Jones wrote:
Frank Apisa wrote:
John Jones wrote:
I am not saying the earth is round, oval, spheroid, or anything else.

What I am doing is challenging some really dumb-assed statements you have made.

And I notice that you are dodging the challenge.


The flat earth idea was popularised by an american journalist who said that religion was stupid because it always claimed the earth was flat, which was never true. So religion never thought the earth was flat, unless you simply like to think that it did think that, which is dishonest.

We never thought the earth was flat. I am quite entitled to say that. Different models of the earth present different earths in each case, The earth you speak of, the round earth, was NEVER thought of as flat. I have already said that, but you ignored it. Oh yes, and read this again: So religion never thought the earth was flat, unless you simply like to think that it did think that, which is dishonest.

So that puts a rocket up sciences arse and all its believers, of which you count yourself as one.
0 Replies
 
SuperScott
 
  1  
Reply Wed 10 Aug, 2005 06:57 pm
John Jones wrote:
Frank Apisa wrote:
John Jones wrote:
Frank Apisa wrote:
John Jones wrote:
I am not saying the earth is round, oval, spheroid, or anything else.

What I am doing is challenging some really dumb-assed statements you have made.

And I notice that you are dodging the challenge.


The flat earth idea was popularised by an american journalist who said that religion was stupid because it always claimed the earth was flat, which was never true. So religion never thought the earth was flat, unless you simply like to think that it did think that, which is dishonest.

We never thought the earth was flat. I am quite entitled to say that. Different models of the earth present different earths in each case, The earth you speak of, the round earth, was NEVER thought of as flat. I have already said that, but you ignored it. Oh yes, and read this again: So religion never thought the earth was flat, unless you simply like to think that it did think that, which is dishonest.

So that puts a rocket up sciences arse and all its believers, of which you count yourself as one.



John Jones, could you perhaps give us evidence of this American journalist. Also, religion is an idea, it doesn't think for its self. Could you please be more specific.

I am pretty sure that some people throughout the course of history had the idea that the earth was flat. Some even thought if they sailed out too far they would fall off. I don't understand how you can make the claim that nobody EVER thought the earth was flat.
0 Replies
 
BumbleBeeBoogie
 
  1  
Reply Wed 10 Aug, 2005 07:11 pm
BBB
bm
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

How can we be sure? - Discussion by Raishu-tensho
Proof of nonexistence of free will - Discussion by litewave
Destroy My Belief System, Please! - Discussion by Thomas
Star Wars in Philosophy. - Discussion by Logicus
Existence of Everything. - Discussion by Logicus
Is it better to be feared or loved? - Discussion by Black King
Paradigm shifts - Question by Cyracuz
 
Copyright © 2025 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.03 seconds on 05/01/2025 at 12:40:26