spendius wrote:JJ-
Someone else complained about my typing on the same point.I can't see what the problem is I'm afraid.Maybe two people have a similar eyesight difficulty.I have tried comparing one of your posts with an old one of mine I am no longer familiar with and I find no difficulty with the reading of either. Is it a space after a stop you want. Like that.
What you suggest is actually done in Decline of the West which I happen to have here.
How about an article dug up on a archeology excercise. Does that have a meaning before it is found? Or does the finding of it give it its meaning?
Have you tackled Meaning of Numbers in Spengler?
I haven't seen published or freehand texts run words into each other. I've never seen it before and it looks and feels jerky. At U.N.E.S.C.O.I might find some confusions. Finding something must be 'something' I suppose, or it wouldn't be found. I don't think I would be able to say I found anything until I specified the framework of my search (e.g, an archeolgical dig).
If we consider an object before it is found, then we presume to place a silent witness by the hidden object, who observes it with the same eye as we would if it was found. So that's a bit of a cheat.