If you start a thread about the difference between science and pseudoscience you can't complain when someone posts about correct science.
In science there are correct answers. They are found by studying real brains and analyzing actual chemical compounds.
I agree with your premise but I disagree with your conclusions.
You say love is chemical and I say it is not only chemical but it is also organic which encompasses our DNA and many other systems.
You name three chemicals and say, they are love.
That is science applied incorrectly.
The ancient Greeks had hundreds of words for love.
Charitable love, love of society, worldly love, paternal, maternal, erotic, reverence for the dead...
You are saying these are three chemicals and I disagree with your scientific conclusions?
Have you ever felt love in your gut?
Well your gut has many trillions of bacteria living there, more bacteria than there are stars in the universe.
A human can discern the difference between a multitude of different emotions. Just like a dog's nose is millions of times more sensitive than a human's sense of smell. It can sense thousands of chemicals.
Each human emotion is a soup of chemicals combining into various molecules throughout our bodies and being detected by a myriad of senses.
These senses can register emotions like, trust, fear, hypocrisy, violence, doubt, scepticism, sarcasm, mistrust, admiration, adoration, appreciation of beauty, amusement, anger, anxiety, awe, awkwardness, boredom, calmness, confusion, craving, disgust, empathic pain, entrancement, excitement, fear, horror, interest, joy, nostalgia, relief, hunger...
Are they all three chemicals? Because many of these emotions are within the realm of our sense of love.
There are millions of bodily reactions, nervous system triggers and impulses in the brain. Glucose, adrenalin, a plethora of vitamins, minerals and chemical interactions with our DNA that are, for the most part, still far beyond our scientific understanding.
I just wonder what your motives are to try and use science to relegate love to three chemicals? Regardless, your conclusions are inaccurate and erroneous.
It is like amalgamating rape with love. Oh, it's all dopamine anyway... (cynical)
Your premise is science but your conclusions are crude and inaccurate.