What was the leading cause of death for law enforcement last year?

Immunity only lasts for six months though. I'm not terribly eager to play Russian roulette even once. Playing Russian roulette twice a year doesn't sound very fun to me.

Where did you learn that natural immunity lasts only six months?

I also read that in one of the many articles on the subject. I don't think they tried to distinguish between the origin of the immunity. I'm supposing that one or more booster shots extent the time.

It is interesting that the two extremes are represented on this thread. Glennn is denying science, Bobsal is exaggerating risk far beyond the science.

It is also interesting that they are both relying on incorrect mathematics (both are using a form of the base rate fallacy).

This is an incorrect statement. Immunity doesn't "last for six months". The booster is exactly that... a booster.

Wow Bobsal!

This cartoon is comparing vaccine mandates with slavery. That's a new lev of extreme (at least they stayed away from Auschwitz).

Seriously Bobsal, these cartoons suck.

I've provided you with actual scientific studies--many of them. So long as you deny their existence and their findings, you are always going to believe that those who don't share in your denial are denying science. The science says that natural immunity is superior to the experimental injections.

You should consider the impression you're making on others. You are accusing me of denying the science after I provided the scientific studies that prove that natural immunity is superior to the experimental injection of denying science. You have yet to produce anything to show that the experimental injection is superior to natural immunity. Nothing . . .

If you think that that was comparing slavery to vaccine mandates, there's no point in even explaining it to you. Your reading comprehension might need checked into.

He doesn't debate or discuss anything, he looks for something he can get effusive about with fake moral outrage.

I've given up arguing with him and about six others. I can't believe they've let nonono have two sock accounts and that gangasnake is back as a sock.

The thing they have in common is they're both desperate for attention.

It really is quite sad.

____________________________________________________________________________________________________

Then it's settled. Those who follow the science understand that natural immunity is superior to the experimental injection. Those who don't follow the science will place their faith in the one convoluted study that was used by the CDC to justify giving immune individuals an unnecessary experimental injection.

Immunity to all the coronaviruses has always been fleeting. That is why people can catch the same cold every year.

Plus, they are studying the immunity provided by the vaccines, and it drops off after six months.

Why would we need boosters at six months if immunity continues past that point?

I've provided a link to the studies that disprove the idea that natural immunity is not good enough.

Dear Dr. Walensky and Ms. Cashman,

Thank you for your response on September 17, 2021 to the petition filed on behalf of the Informed Consent Action Network1 (“Petitioner”), dated July 6, 2021. A copy of the petition, and the addendum, are appended as Appendix A (the “Petition”).2

A copy of your response is
appended as Appendix B.

While your response is appreciated, it does not address any of the over 50 studies cited in the Petition which reflect that those previously infected with COVID-19 (the “naturally immune”) have superior protection from becoming infected with and transmitting SARS-CoV-2 than those vaccinated for COVID-19 (the “vaccine immune”).

Critically:

1. Your response does not contest any of the studies cited and data which collectively reviewed hundreds of thousands of naturally immune versus vaccine immune individuals and found that the rate of infection among the naturally immune (“reinfections”) is far lower than the rate among the vaccinated (“breakthrough cases”). (Infra § I.)

2. Your response does not contest that, despite a world-wide hunt, there has never been a single documented case of reinfection resulting in further transmission, while, in contrast, there are numerous documented cases of breakthrough cases resulting in further transmission. (Infra § II.)

3. Your response does not contest any of the studies and data cited which reflect that, consistent with the foregoing real-word data, the naturally immune have more robust and durable T cell and B cell immunity. (Infra § III.)

These three facts alone should suffice to lift restrictions on those naturally immune at least to the same extent as those vaccine immune.

https://www.icandecide.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/10/Reply-to-CDC-Re-Natural-Immunity-v-Vaccine-Immunity.pdf

Why do you suppose the "experts" are ignoring 50 studies that contradict their one study?

The problem with natural immunity is, you have to play Russian roulette to get it.



I have no idea. I am unfamiliar with both the people and the studies.

The studies are at the link in the post above yours.

Here is an excerpt:

The unrebutted data reflects that reinfection is rare and occurs at a small fraction of the rate of breakthrough cases. UK’s official government COVID-19 data shows a probable reinfection rate of 0.025% through August 19, 2021 during Delta.11 In contrast, this same data shows, through September 2, 2021, a vaccine breakthrough rate for Delta infections of 23%.12 This is in line with Dr. Walensky’s statement that, “A modest percentage of people who are fully vaccinated will still get COVID-19 if they are exposed to the virus that causes it.”13 11

https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/1012240/Weekly_Flu_an
d_COVID-19_report_w33.pdf at 17-18.
12https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/1014926/Technical_Briefi
ng_22_21_09_02.pdf at 21. Meanwhile, the CDC – which is only reporting breakthrough cases which lead to hospitalization
and death and whose “surveillance relies on passive and voluntary reporting” and acknowledges that “data are not complete or
representative” and “are an undercount of all SARS-CoV-2 infections among fully vaccinated persons – has reported 14,115
breakthrough cases; https://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/COVID-19/health-departments/breakthrough-cases.html. Notably,
Louisiana alone had counted 14,650 breakthrough infections as of August 25, 2021,
https://www.politico.com/news/2021/08/25/cdc-pandemic-limited-data-breakthroughs-506823.
13 https://www.nytimes.com/article/covid-breakthrough-delta-variant.html.

My only complaint about natural immunity is that you have to play Russian roulette in order to acquire it.

That could really only be said for older and/or fatter folks. Young healthy people getting covid isn't very threatening at all.