0
   

What the f--- is with the French????

 
 
dyslexia
 
  1  
Reply Tue 1 Apr, 2003 09:52 pm
but is it indicative of France, is it an isolated incident like painting swastikas on jewish synagogues in the US, like burning crosses in the south, it is a valid question but i would prefer more far reaching information before judging an entire nation. this seems more like "snapshot" views than comprehensive analysis.
0 Replies
 
timberlandko
 
  1  
Reply Tue 1 Apr, 2003 10:04 pm
Yeah, Dyslexia, a "Snapshot" sorta like those streaming in from the "Embedded Reporters". "The Big Picture" is often very different from the flashy tidbits trotted out to dazzle the crowd.
0 Replies
 
blatham
 
  1  
Reply Tue 1 Apr, 2003 10:05 pm
dys

Of course, that is the case. Pollsters are quite aware of how seemingly subtle changes in questions asked in a poll can change results dramatically.

ci

Be at peace, old friend. The French don't want dead soldiers, they just also don't want this adminstration playing god or Napoleon, and neither do I.

But, even if it were accurate, the last thing Max (or the two chaps whose name is on that piece) might spend any time doing is wondering WHY such anger and disdain has erupted. Certainly nothing to do with failings of the administration, or of America's role in the world. All the evil and misperception lies elsewhere.
0 Replies
 
nimh
 
  1  
Reply Wed 2 Apr, 2003 06:17 am
Tartarin wrote:
It still strikes me as indicative that most French hate Bush but still say they like Americans, whereas most Americans don't even know Chirac's name and say they hate the French.


Just wanted to see this repeated ... that's the thing, even about this topic itself, innit?<nods>
0 Replies
 
dyslexia
 
  1  
Reply Wed 2 Apr, 2003 07:27 am
nimh i would venture a guess that most americans do not know who Blair is either.
0 Replies
 
dlowan
 
  1  
Reply Wed 2 Apr, 2003 07:45 am
really? You're kidding!
0 Replies
 
dlowan
 
  1  
Reply Wed 2 Apr, 2003 07:59 am
Fascinating how quickly bonds between nations are loosed, no? - or can appear so. Here we have nonsensical, yammering hate-talk from both sides of the Atlantic, it seems, and back and forth across the English Channel. Still, the emptiest vessels make the loudest noise. Nonetheless, the thing becomes more real in people's minds as they read about such incidents as Maxsdadeo uses - never mind the reality of countless Allied gravesites, tended lovingly all over France - interestingly, I have a friend just back from there speaking with some emotion of this very loving care, because he, like me, has family buried there from both wars.

1 in 3 french people back Saddam? Hmmmm - can it be that some of them are affected by the hateful, insulting words being spoken in the US and returning them with hateful interest - or are taking up their human task of grumbling and bitching? Is this nonsense to echo back and forth and create a real problem where only disagreement existed before?

That will help things no end, I am sure.
0 Replies
 
au1929
 
  1  
Reply Wed 2 Apr, 2003 08:06 am
dyslexia

Quote:
nimh i would venture a guess that most Americans do not know who Blair is either.


Nah. He has been in the headlines and on the 6:00 o'clock news. And we know that almost all Americans at least get that far in the seeking of knowledge. Embarrassed Embarrassed
0 Replies
 
dyslexia
 
  1  
Reply Wed 2 Apr, 2003 08:20 am
Au i do disagree, i believe that if i walked down my street, a very middle class neighborhood and asked each resident to name the head of state for Canada, Mexico, GB, France, far less than 50 % would get the correct answers.
0 Replies
 
Tartarin
 
  1  
Reply Wed 2 Apr, 2003 08:31 am
Last Friday (3/28) Jeffrey Nunberg did a piece on Fresh Air which is available on audio and worth a listen: http://freshair.npr.org/day_fa.jhtml;jsessionid=YO3FQG1XJ5QPBLA5AINCF4A?todayDate=archive

He talks about the choices in how we pronounce foreign place names as cultural choices -- the Eye-Wrack people on one side of the issue, the i-rookh and i-Rock on the other. Remember (I do!!) how those who pronounced Guatemala and El Salvador correctly were thought to be commies? Listen to Nunberg!

Naming things (and people) correctly implies respect...
0 Replies
 
blatham
 
  1  
Reply Wed 2 Apr, 2003 08:44 am
dys

I think that is likely to be true. It seems less the case here in Canada, though there's no question the average Canadian is far less aware of the world outside North America than their European or even Brit counterparts. Physical isolation explains this in part, but it doesn't explain the difference between our two countries. There seems pretty evidently to be a cultural isolation at work too. My daughter attended grades 11 and 12 in California and was quite shocked at the difference.

In my perfect world, adults wouldn't shoot bazookas at the UN, and kids would all spend 6 months before majority volunteering in some distant country.
0 Replies
 
Tartarin
 
  1  
Reply Wed 2 Apr, 2003 09:01 am
"...kids would all spend 6 months before majority volunteering in some distant country..."

That was part of the expectation in my family and the schools I went to. Volunteering -- and spending time in a foreign educational institution. Foreign languages were a must. Thems was the good ol' days.

I have a friend who sent his kids to Canadian schools and universities.
0 Replies
 
Tartarin
 
  1  
Reply Wed 2 Apr, 2003 09:02 am
I should add that, living as Texas as I do, it's an article of faith that Mexican schools are better than ours...
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

THE BRITISH THREAD II - Discussion by jespah
FOLLOWING THE EUROPEAN UNION - Discussion by Mapleleaf
The United Kingdom's bye bye to Europe - Discussion by Walter Hinteler
Sinti and Roma: History repeating - Discussion by Walter Hinteler
[B]THE RED ROSE COUNTY[/B] - Discussion by Mathos
Leaving today for Europe - Discussion by cicerone imposter
So you think you know Europe? - Discussion by nimh
 
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.2 seconds on 12/22/2024 at 06:03:44